logo
I've studied tsunamis for 25 years - here are the warning signs one is coming

I've studied tsunamis for 25 years - here are the warning signs one is coming

Metro31-07-2025
One of the most powerful earthquakes ever recorded triggered huge tsunami waves across the Pacific Ocean.
Some as high as four metres were observed after the 8.8-magnitude tremor struck off the city of Petropavlovsk, on Russia's remote Kamchatka Peninsula on Wednesday.
Safety alerts have been downgraded but still remain in parts of Japan, the Pacific and over 3,000 miles (5,000 kilometres) away in Chile.
Professor David Tappin, a marine geologist at the British Geological Survey, woke up to over 50 emails from global tsunami warning systems after the quake.
The expert, who has studied tsunamis for over 25 years, explained to Metro how tsunamis form from the seabed and how they travel so far across the globe.
Tsunami's are caused by large scale disturbances on the seafloor.
Most commonly, and in the case of yesterday's tsunami warnings, it is earthquakes that trigger the massive waves.
'Earthquakes are the most hazardous tsunami mechanism,' Prof Tappin explained.
Violent earthquakes occur due to a build-up of pressure between the tectonic plates that make up the Earth's crust.
The crust 'plunges down into the mantle'
Prof Tappin laid out what happened yesterday: 'Off Kamchatka, the Pacific plate is moving westwards towards Russia and it's plunging down into the mantle
'Due to the pressure, there was a massive movement yesterday evening that caused an earthquake.'
The tsunami expert said that when the seabed moves during an earthquake, that same movement happens to the ocean above.
So, for example, if the sea bed ruptured by 10 meters, then the waves generated on the sea surface would be 10 metres high.
Prof Tappin said: 'The sea surface reflects that vertical movement of the sea bed.
'So during an earthquake, the sea surface collapses and that generates a tsunami.'
One of the most infamous warning signs of a deadly tsunami is when the tide pulls away from the shoreline.
Beachgoers may be tempted to investigate, or pick up dead fish, but in reality a massive tsunami wave could be just minutes away.
But the tide does not always recede before the giant waves strike, as Prof Tappin explained.
When the tectonic plates move, the seabed either moves up or down.
When there is 'downward movement' that is when a 'trough' can be created in the sea.
'As the trough approaches the coastline, that's what causes the wave to recede,' Prof Tappin said.
But the opposite can also happen, where the seabed moves upwards due to the build-up of pressure, triggering a 'positive wave'.
This leads to an initial, particularly high, wave that hits the coastline.
To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video
It took just hours for tsunami waves as high as 4 metres to strike Japan after the earthquake off Kamchatka.
Yet tsunami waves then smashed into the coastlines of North and South America hours later, with many coastal communities told to stay cautious over the next 24 hours.
However as these devastating waves travel over the ocean, they are hardly noticeable.
Prof Tappin explains that is because the distance between each wave, called the wavelength, is actually hundreds of kilometres before they reach the coast.
At this stage, the ocean is nearly two miles in depth and there is hardly any friction stopping the waves' movement.
This lack of friction is why the tsunami that hit the US overnight were still powerful.
The Galapagos Islands and parts of the US saw 4ft waves, as tall as those faced by many in Japan.
Those waves, which appear 'benign' in the deep ocean, only become tall and frightening when it gets close to land.
Prof Tappin said: 'When it approaches the opposite shore, the water depths approach and there is a frictional effects which leads to the build up of the tsunami.
'The wavelength reduces but the height of the wave increases.'
The world's first tsunami warning system was set up in 1946 after a devastating disaster that year.
Headquartered in Honolulu, Prof Tappin explained how it works: 'It is composed of around 100 seismometers, which measure earthquakes.
'They are working 24/7, and if there is an earthquake larger than magnitude seven, then the warning centre identifies this.'
All eyes then turn to tide gauges, which measure the height of an ocean, based around the Pacific
'If there is an abnormality in the wave height after a magnitude seven quake then the warning bell rings.
'The center will then send out a warning to local organizations who are responsible for deciding when and how to evacuate people.'
After the Kamchatka Peninsula earthquake, warnings or alerts about tsunami waves were issued in more than a dozen countries, including in Russia, Japan, Taiwan, the Philippines, Mexico and California. More Trending
The difference a warning system can make can be huge.
The tsunami in Japan in 2011 saw 15 metre waves, but because of the pacific warning system only 18,000 people died.
Whereas in the Indian Ocean tsunami in 2004 there was no warning system and 230,000 people lost their lives.
After 2004 a warning system was also established for the Indian Ocean and Mediterranean.
Get in touch with our news team by emailing us at webnews@metro.co.uk.
For more stories like this, check our news page.
MORE: Tsunami warnings still in place after 8.8 magnitude Russian earthquake
MORE: This country will be underwater by 2050 — and people are entering a bleak competition to escape
MORE: Whales eerily become beached hours before earthquake – do they predict them?
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

The woolly mammoth and a 30ft sea cow could all soon be back from the dead
The woolly mammoth and a 30ft sea cow could all soon be back from the dead

Metro

time3 days ago

  • Metro

The woolly mammoth and a 30ft sea cow could all soon be back from the dead

If all goes to plan, Ben Lamm's next Christmas card to his friends will be of him posing with a woolly mammoth and a dodo. Lamm, 43, is the billionaire entrepreneur who founded Colossal Biosciences, a genetic engineering company, in 2021. What the company hopes to do is certainly colossal – working to resurrect extinct species, a process called de-extinction. The idea, Lamm told Metro, came during a call about human-based biology with George Church, a biologist at Harvard Medical School. 'By the way, I'm working to bring back mammoths and other extinct species to reintroduce them back into the Arctic and regenerate the ecosystem. But I have to go now. Goodbye,' Lamm recalled of the call. 'I had just heard the greatest thing ever, and then the call was over. I stayed up all night reading articles and listening to interviews about all these things.' Scientists have long dreamed of reviving extinct species. But earlier this year, Colossal researchers helped bring the dire wolf, a giant, extinct species made famous by Game of Thrones, back from the dead. Kind of. Scientists salvaged DNA from the fossils of dire wolves and edited 20 of their genes into their closest living relatives, grey wolves. (Think Jurassic Park just without the maniacal computer-network engineer.) After creating embryos and implanting them in surrogates, three pups were born: Romulus, Remus, and Khaleesi. The pups, with their dense, pale coats, were the first successful case of de-extinction, Colossal said. SOUND ON. You're hearing the first howl of a dire wolf in over 10,000 years. Meet Romulus and Remus—the world's first de-extinct animals, born on October 1, dire wolf has been extinct for over 10,000 years. These two wolves were brought back from extinction using… — Colossal Biosciences® (@colossal) April 7, 2025 Now, Colossal wants to revive the woolly mammoth by giving elephants dense hair and thick fat, and reintroducing them to the Siberian tundra. Lamm said that his team are also 'exclusively focused' on two other extinct creatures: the Tasmanian tiger and the 12-foot-tall bird called Moa, though they haven't cracked how to insert edited genes into eggs yet. 'I'd personally love to bring back the Steller's sea cow,' Lamm said, referring to the extinct, 30-foot-long relative of the manatee, 'but there is nothing to gestate it in until we have artificial wombs working.' Inventing an undo button for extinction sounds like a sci-fi film, but Lamm's reasons for doing it are very much real. Many of the de-extinction candidates were eradicated by humans: The dodo was, well, as dead as a dodo by 1662 after people colonised Mauritius. The Tasmanian tiger was similarly wiped out after European settlers relentlessly hunted the striped marsupials in the 1800s, while the sea cow was wiped out by humans within 27 years of its discovery. Climate change threatens to make even more species vanish, and wildlife populations have already plummeted by 70%. 'Habitats around the planet are changing at a pace that is faster than evolution by natural selection can keep up,' explained Lamm. 'For many species, there is not enough time.' We're launching the Colossal Species Reintroduction Fund: $250K annually to help return missing and at-risk species to the wild. Rewilding restores ecosystems and helps prevent extinctions. This is one more step toward making extinction a thing of the past. — Colossal Biosciences® (@colossal) August 5, 2025 Is de-exctinction, with the power of pipettes and computers, possible? Experts told Metro they aren't so sure. For one, the dire wolves Colossal brought back can be better described as modified grey wolves, said Benjamin Tapon, a PhD student at Queen Mary's School of Biological and Behavioural Sciences. 'By any practical definition of a species, no animal that Colossal has genetically engineered so far is anywhere near the extinct animal they are trying to emulate,' he said. 'Colossal is doing the equivalent of rebuilding the Library of Alexandria by printing PDFs of a few books and adding them to the shelves of the local public library.' As much as dire wolves and grey wolves share 99.5% of their DNA code, Tapon said, people and bananas share 60% of genes. 'It's a bit like saying that Romeo and Juliet shares 99% of its words with 50 Shades of Grey, or a book in another language,' he added. Alex de Mendoza, a senior lecturer at Queen Mary's Centre for Epigenetics, said Game of Thrones and Colossal got a big thing wrong about the dire wolf – they probably weren't white. The wolves lived in arid conditions, not the tundra, de Mendoza said, so they were probably a red-ish brown, adding: 'The habitat they once roamed on is no longer here. 'Most species extinctions these days occur due to habitat loss. If we couldn't preserve their habitat while they were still alive, why should we bring them back?' Capon wonders whether developing the technology to resurrect long-dead creatures could make people less diligent at preventing extinction. 'If we bring them back, will they be zoo attractions?' he said. As controversial as de-extinction is, both Capon and de Mendoza understand where Lamm is coming from. Capon would love a pet dodo, 'just not enough to try to bring them back.' More Trending De Mendoza said he would de-extinct the Tasmanian tiger: 'It is so frustrating that this wonderful animal disappeared in the 1930s. 'I think there's still habitat for it to survive, as long as people don't kill it… That said, my hopes for seeing a Tasmanian tiger come back from extinction and not just a kangaroo with some stripes are rather low.' Lamm understands where his critics are coming from, too. Which animals Colossal hopes to de-extinct take into account whether they'd have a positive impact on the environment or help conservation efforts. 'If bringing back the species can also inspire the next generation,' he added, 'then that is just another bonus.' Get in touch with our news team by emailing us at webnews@ For more stories like this, check our news page. MORE: I went inside the Navy's secret battlespace barely anyone knows about MORE: I discovered the murky world of 'minor attracted people' – it's even more disturbing than you think MORE: Moment huge black bear is chased out of home by tiny Pomeranian dog

Mariah Carey just had the best response to learning Katy Perry went to space
Mariah Carey just had the best response to learning Katy Perry went to space

Metro

time5 days ago

  • Metro

Mariah Carey just had the best response to learning Katy Perry went to space

Mariah Carey just learned that Katy Perry went to space – and it was frankly iconic. 'Would you fancy going to space?' Scott Mills asked the pop sensation and certifiable Queen of Christmas in an interview for BBC Radio 2. 'You know, like Katy Perry did?' A fairly innocuous question, seeing as everyone in the world was aware of the Dark Horse's controversial and heavily criticised all-female Blue Origin 10-minute space trip to the Kármán line – well, not everyone. 'Did she go to space?' asked Mariah, seemingly genuinely confused. 'Mmhmm,' Scott said with a nod. 'Not for long. I think it was…' 'Where did she go?' said Mariah looking around at the crew and seemingly absolutely baffled, perhaps assuming she went to the moon or to a space station. A crewmember informed her that she 'just went into orbit and back'. 'She's like floating in the…And this is true?' she said seeming more baffled than ever. Scott confirmed he had not made it up the news. 'Wow,' she said in a completely unenthused tone. 'Alright Katy,' she added, seeming completely unimpressed. 'I'm not mad at her, that's pretty amazing,' she added. The real question is of course, does Mariah see herself going to space one day? 'I think I've done enough,' she said with a laugh. Fair enough! To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video Jeff Bezos, founder of Amazon, was the billionaire tech oligarch behind the space flight Blue Origin, and his fiancée, Lauren Sánchez, was part of the crew. More Trending The other women on the flight included TV host and journalist Gayle King, NASA aerospace engineer Aisha Bowe, research scientist Amanda Nguyen and filmmaker Kerianne Flynn. Footage from inside the vessel showed the crew floating around before coming together for a cheer, yelling: 'Take up space!' Video footage showed Katy holding a flower and gazing into the camera while floating around the cabin. After landing on Earth, she held the daisy to the sky and then kissed the ground. Although it was heavily reported at the time, Mariah was Got a story? If you've got a celebrity story, video or pictures get in touch with the entertainment team by emailing us celebtips@ calling 020 3615 2145 or by visiting our Submit Stuff page – we'd love to hear from you. MORE: Kelly Clarkson's ex-husband Brandon Blackstock dies after secret cancer diagnosis aged 48 MORE: Elizabeth Hurley reveals blossoming bond with Billy Ray Cyrus' daughters after loved-up summer MORE: Diddy branded 'delusional' over plans to launch music comeback with stadium show

The heartbreaking and worrying reason blue whales are going silent
The heartbreaking and worrying reason blue whales are going silent

Metro

time5 days ago

  • Metro

The heartbreaking and worrying reason blue whales are going silent

To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video The ocean is going silent. Blue whales, the gentle leviathans that swim in all but one of the world's oceans, are the singers of the underwater world. Their groans, whistles and clicks are famously so soothing that they count as white noise, and they may even have a pho-ne-tic alphabet. These haunting melodies aren't just for fun – these giants do so to socialise, get around and differentiate friend from foe. But researchers have revealed that blue whales are singing less and less as they're simply too hungry to do so. Scientists have used underwater hydrophones – an aquatic version of microphones – to monitor and record their vocalisations off the coast of Monterey Bay, California. The Monterey Bay Aquarium Research Institute found that the beats are singing 40% less than they once did six years ago. Over this period, the temperatures in the ocean have been cranked up by major heat waves, causing toxic algae to bloom that kill krill and anchovies. Both are the main diet of blue whales, the study said. John Ryan, a biological oceanographer at the institute, told the National Geographic: 'When you really break it down, it's like trying to sing while you're starving. 'They were spending all their time just trying to find food.' Humpback whales have a more diverse diet of krill, plankton and schooling fish, so their song frequency didn't change amid the heatwave. Over the six-year study, a pool of warm water officially dubbed 'the blob' drifted into the Bering Sea and Gulf of Alaska. The blob warmed the ocean by 2.5°C, far more than El Niño, a natural climate pattern linked to warmer conditions in the Pacific Ocean, could. The 2,000-mile-wide blob caused a record-breaking outbreak of toxic algae so severe that it shut down crab fisheries, starved seabirds and killed plankton. As krill vanished from the seas, the blue whales scattered and had to spend all their energy searching for food rather than singing. The scientist said this suggests the mammals not only ate less but also mated less, given they vocalise low-frequency D calls when they do. The researchers said that the blue whales' acoustics are a warning for what's to come as climate change cranks the planet's thermostat up. Sea surface temperatures broke records last year, with a quarter of the oceans experiencing once-rare marine heat waves. These warmer oceans cause rising sea levels, bleaching coral reefs and more intense hurricanes. Sea basins absorb 90% of the excess heat trapped in the atmosphere from greenhouse gases, which are emitted by burning fossil fuels. More Trending Dr Judith Brown, projects director at Blue Marine Foundation, which supports governments to protect marine areas, described whale song as a 'truly eerily beautiful sound'. 'We know that 90% of global fish stocks are overfished – a harsh reality that threatens marine ecosystems,' she told Metro. 'Blue whales rely on krill to survive, and fishing krill, a species from the bottom of the food chain, occurs annually around Antarctica. This year, more than 620,000 tonnes of krill were taken in just a few months. 'High fishing pressure likely results in limited krill availability for whales. So it's no surprise that whales struggling to find sufficient food may no longer 'sing'.' Get in touch with our news team by emailing us at webnews@ For more stories like this, check our news page. MORE: Tarantulas with giant penises discovered and we're scared stiff MORE: Millionaire trophy hunter gored to death by 1.3 tonne bull on African safari MORE: Danish zoo asks owners to donate unwanted animals to feed to predators

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store