logo
Investor Julia Koch looking to buy minority stake in New York Giants, source says

Investor Julia Koch looking to buy minority stake in New York Giants, source says

CNBC21-05-2025

Investor Julia Koch is looking into buying a limited partnership in the NFL's New York Giants, a person familiar with the matter confirmed to CNBC.
About a year ago, Koch bought a 15% stake in BSE Global, the parent company of the NBA's Brooklyn Nets, WNBA's New York Liberty, and Barclays Center. That stake had a $6 billion valuation, according to a person familiar with the terms of the sale.
Koch and her family are interested in additional investments in teams, especially in the New York market, according to a person familiar with Koch's thinking.
The people familiar asked to remain unnamed because they are not authorized to speak to the public on these matters.
Koch and her family have a net worth of $74 billion, according to Forbes.
Both the New York Giants and a representative for Julia Koch declined to comment to CNBC on the matter.
Others have been mentioned as possible investors in the Giants, including the team's former quarterback Eli Manning, who told CNBC he'd be interested in investing in the team. It has also been reported that former Milwaukee Bucks owner Marc Lasry and former Giants great Michael Strahan were interested in buying a piece of the Giants.
In CNBC's NFL team valuations published in September, the Giants were valued at $7.85 billion, fourth highest among the league's 32 teams.
Two people familiar with the matter told CNBC that the situation around investment in the Giants remains very fluid, with different individuals and groups speaking with each other about forming a limited partnership to buy a stake. The stake is likely to be less than 10%, according to another person familiar with the matter.
There has been a spate of limited partner sales of NFL teams over the past several months. In December, an 8% stake in the Philadelphia Eagles went for $8.3 billion. Also in December, Ares Management and Joe Tsai, owner of BSE Global, bought minority stakes in the Miami Dolphins, Hard Rock Stadium, the Miami Grand Prix F1 race and about half the Miami Open tennis tournament. That stake has a valuation of $8.1 billion, according to a person familiar with the sale. On Tuesday, the NFL approved the sale of 6.2% of the San Francisco 49ers at an $8.6 billion valuation, according to a person familiar with that sale.
One reason for the high valuations, according to a sports banker who also asked to remain unnamed in order to speak freely, is that NFL owners in August voted to allow private equity firms to invest in the teams, something MLB, NBA and NHL had all previously approved. NFL Commissioner Roger Goodell told CNBC's Scott Wapner on Monday that the league will likely allow more private equity firms to buy into the NFL.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Wilmer Alejandro Flores Player Props: June 5, Giants vs. Padres
Wilmer Alejandro Flores Player Props: June 5, Giants vs. Padres

USA Today

time31 minutes ago

  • USA Today

Wilmer Alejandro Flores Player Props: June 5, Giants vs. Padres

Wilmer Alejandro Flores Player Props: June 5, Giants vs. Padres Wilmer Alejandro Flores was hitless in his most recent game (0 for 3), but will take another crack at it when the San Francisco Giants square off versus Dylan Cease and the San Diego Padres on Thursday at 3:45 p.m. ET on NBCS-BA and SDPA. Find odds, stats, and more below to make your Wilmer Alejandro Flores player prop bets. Wilmer Flores leads the Giants with 47 runs batted in (while hitting 10 home runs). Wilmer Flores' home runs rank 42nd in MLB and he ranks sixth in RBI in MLB. Watch tonight's Giants game on Fubo! Wilmer Alejandro Flores Prop Bets and Odds Hits Prop: 0.5 hits (Over odds: -161) 0.5 hits (Over odds: -161) Home Runs Prop: 0.5 home runs (Over odds: +800) 0.5 home runs (Over odds: +800) RBI Prop: 0.5 RBI (Over odds: +225) 0.5 RBI (Over odds: +225) Runs Prop: 0.5 runs (Over odds: +180) 0.5 runs (Over odds: +180) Total Bases Prop: 0.5 total bases (Over odds: -167) How to Watch San Francisco Giants vs. San Diego Padres Matchup: San Francisco Giants vs. San Diego Padres San Francisco Giants vs. San Diego Padres Time: 3:45 p.m. ET 3:45 p.m. ET Date: Thursday, June 5, 2025 Thursday, June 5, 2025 TV Channel: NBCS-BA and SDPA NBCS-BA and SDPA Live Stream: Fubo (Watch now! - Regional restrictions may apply) Wilmer Alejandro Flores vs. Dylan Cease Over his career against Dylan Cease, Wilmer Alejandro Flores is 0 for 1. Against Dylan Cease last year, Wilmer Alejandro Flores was 0 for 1. Wilmer Alejandro Flores prop bet insights In 62.3% of his games this season (38 of 61), Wilmer Alejandro Flores has recorded a hit, and in 13 of those games (21.3%) he's recorded at least two hits. He has hit a home run in eight games this season (61 opportunities, 13.1%), going deep in 4.1% of his chances at the plate. In 32.8% of his games this season (20 of 61), Wilmer Alejandro Flores has scored at least one run, and in three of those games (4.9%) he recorded more than one run scored. He has plated at least one run 27 times this season in 61 tries (44.3%), including driving in multiple runs in 14.8% of games (nine times) and producing three or more of his team's runs on four occasions. Wilmer Alejandro Flores has been set down on strikes in 32 of 61 games this year, with multiple strikeouts in eight of them. MLB odds courtesy of BetMGM Sportsbook. Odds updated Thursday at 12:12 p.m. ET. For a full list of sports betting odds, access USA TODAY Sports Betting Scores Odds Hub. Wilmer Alejandro Flores stats against the Padres Padres starter: Dylan Cease

‘I'm Treating Guys Who Would Never Be Caught Dead in a Casino'
‘I'm Treating Guys Who Would Never Be Caught Dead in a Casino'

Yahoo

time35 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

‘I'm Treating Guys Who Would Never Be Caught Dead in a Casino'

Gambling has swallowed American sports culture whole. Until early 2018, sports betting was illegal under federal law; today, it's legal in 39 states and Washington, D.C. (and easy enough to access through backdoor channels even in the states where it isn't). During NFL games, gambling commercials air more often than ads for beer. Commentators analyze not just whether a team can win, but if they might win by at least the number of points by which they're favored on betting apps. Nearly half of men younger than 50 now have an account with an online sports book, and Americans spent about $150 billion on sports wagers last year. I regularly get ads on my phone offering me a complimentary $200 in sports bets, as long as I gamble $5 first. As betting has overrun American sports, other forms of gambling are also on the rise. According to industry data, American casinos are more popular now than at any point on record. The age of their average patron had been crawling upward for years, but since sports betting was legalized at the federal level, it has plummeted by nearly a decade, to approximately 42. Some signs point to gambling problems increasing, too. No centralized entity tracks gambling addiction, but if its scale comes even close to matching the new scale of sports betting, the United States is unequipped to deal with it. In its power to ruin and even end lives, gambling addiction is remarkably similar to drug dependency. Imaging studies show that pathological gamblers and people with substance addictions share patterns of brain activity. They are more likely to experience liver disease, heart disease, and sleep deprivation, whether it originates in the anxiety of concealing a gambling addiction or because someone is up wagering on contests, such as cricket and table tennis, that happen in faraway time zones. The best national survey available, which dates to well before the rise of sports betting, found that 2 million to 4 million Americans will experience a gambling disorder at some point in their life; one in six people with a gambling disorder attempts suicide. Even if their death certificate says differently, 'I've had several patients who died because of the emotional pain from their gambling disorder,' Timothy Fong, a psychiatrist specializing in addiction treatment and a co-director of UCLA's gambling-studies program, told me. Fong, like the other researchers I spoke with, said that rapid forms of gambling, especially those that allow you to place multiple bets at one time, tend to be especially addictive. For decades, sports betting mostly involved wagers on who'd win a match, by how much, and total points scored—outcomes resolved over the course of hours. Now apps offer endless in-game bets decided in seconds. Last year, I watched the Super Bowl with a friend who bet on the national anthem lasting less than 90.5 seconds—the smart money, according to the analysts. He lost when Reba McEntire belted the song's last words twice. The ability to place one bet after another encourages a hallmark behavior of problem gamblers—when deep in the red, instead of walking away, they bet bigger. 'Viewing sports gambling as a way to make money is likely to end badly,' Joshua Grubbs, a gambling researcher at the University of New Mexico, told me. 'Gamblers that think that gambling is a way toward economic success or financial payouts almost always have far more problem-gambling symptoms.' And some apps actively blur the already hazy line between betting and other financial activities. For instance, the financial platform Robinhood, where millions of people trade meme stocks and manage their retirement accounts, began offering online sports 'events contracts' (a type of investment whose payout depends on traders' correctly predicting the outcome of a specified event) during March Madness this year through a partnership with the financial exchange Kalshi. (A Robinhood spokesperson told me this 'emergent asset class' differs significantly from sports betting because users, not the house, set the prices, and can more easily exit their positions. But the experience of 'investing' in an events contract is virtually indistinguishable from betting.) Financial markets have recently started offering services like this even in states where sports betting is illegal. State gambling regulators have called foul, but the federal government has so far made no move to stop the companies. As the courts sort out whether any of this is legal, Robinhood decided to let customers trade on the Indy 500 and the French Open. Several recent trends suggest that problem gambling might be on the rise in the U.S. Calls to state gambling helplines have increased. (This might be partly explained by advocacy groups marketing their helplines more aggressively than ever; gambling companies also tack the numbers onto their ubiquitous ads.) Fong said that he was recently invited to speak to a consortium of family lawyers, whose divorce clients have started asking, 'How do I protect my children from the damage of their father's gambling?' Researchers and counselors are especially worried about single young men who play in fantasy sports leagues, bet on sports, day trade, and consider gambling a good way to make money. Gamblers Anonymous is rolling out groups for young people. 'I'm treating guys who would never be caught dead in a casino,' James Whelan, a clinical psychologist who runs treatment clinics for gambling addiction in Tennessee, told me. [Read: How casinos enable gambling addicts] These imperfect proxy measures, along with incomplete data trickling out of a few states, are the best indicators that researchers have about the extent of gambling addiction. Experts are also unsure how long any increase in problem gambling might last: Some studies suggest that the prevalence of gambling problems tends to equalize after a spike, but those findings are usually limited to physical casinos and remain debated within the field. According to researchers I spoke with, no study has established the prevalence of gambling addiction in the U.S. since sports betting became widespread. Federal agencies dedicated to alcoholism and substance abuse allocate billions of research dollars to American universities every year. Yet for decades, the federal government—the largest funder of American research—has earmarked zero dollars for research on gambling activity or addiction specifically, despite collecting millions annually from gambling taxes. (The Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration, which collects national data on behavioral health and funds research into it, declined to comment.) Gambling-addiction treatment is '50 years behind where we are with drugs or alcohol or any other substance,' Michael Sciandra, the executive director of the Nebraska Council on Problem Gambling, told me. Doctors and therapists, even those who specialize in treating addiction, rarely screen for issues with gambling, he said. Among the handful of dedicated gambling-addiction treatment providers around the country, many deploy cognitive behavioral therapy, which studies suggest can at least temporarily improve patients' quality of life and reduce the severity of their gambling problem. But discrepancies in treatment approaches and tiny trial sizes make it difficult to say exactly how many patients the therapy helps. Two medications used to treat alcoholism and opioid addiction have also been found to reduce the severity of gambling addiction across a handful of small clinical trials. But the evidence needed for FDA approval would require large and expensive clinical trials that no one seems eager to fund, Marc Potenza, the director of Yale's Center of Excellence in Gambling Research, told me. Because the federal government doesn't fund gambling-addiction treatment, each state decides what resources to make available. A Tennessee caller to the national helpline 1-800-GAMBLER might be put through to their state's helpline and then connected to the network of government-subsidized clinics Whelan runs across the state. But in states with bare-bones offerings, workers typically refer callers to peer-support groups such as Gamblers Anonymous, or to online resources on budgeting, says Cole Wogoman, a director at the National Council on Problem Gambling, which runs the helpline. Studies have found that each of these strategies is less effective than therapy. [Charles Fain Lehman: Legalizing sports gambling was a huge mistake] Texas could be an example of how unprepared the U.S. is to deal with any increase in problem gamblers. The state's gambling laws are among the strictest in the country, and yet it still sends the second-highest number of callers (behind California) to 1-800-GAMBLER. This November, Texans might vote on a constitutional amendment to allow sports betting. The state of more than 30 million has no funding for gambling treatment and only three certified gambling counselors, according to Carol Ann Maner, who is one of them. The state's official hub for gambling help, which Maner leads, was founded just this spring. Once they find the money, Maner and her colleagues plan to finally set up the state's own helpline. But first, they need to recruit and train more therapists for a job that, thanks to a lack of state and federal funding, might require turning away uninsured clients. That's a daunting task. Finding the apps Texans can use to get around gambling restrictions is easy. Article originally published at The Atlantic

Jim Cramer Says 'Under Pressure Are The Two Words We Hear Every Morning.' He Thinks That's Why Europe's Doing Better—But Not Everyone Agrees
Jim Cramer Says 'Under Pressure Are The Two Words We Hear Every Morning.' He Thinks That's Why Europe's Doing Better—But Not Everyone Agrees

Yahoo

time37 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Jim Cramer Says 'Under Pressure Are The Two Words We Hear Every Morning.' He Thinks That's Why Europe's Doing Better—But Not Everyone Agrees

CNBC's Jim Cramer sparked debate on Monday when he posted on X that the phrase 'under pressure' has become the morning routine in U.S. markets. 'No wonder Europe [is] doing better than we are,' he wrote. The following day, he doubled down, posting: 'I do not know when the market will NOT be under pressure in the morning. I think as long as Europe's markets are viewed as safer than ours it could be a constant.'Don't Miss:Invest where it hurts — and help millions heal:. Cramer's post drew plenty of pushback. One person wrote, 'Europe is absolutely not doing better than we are,' while another said, 'Short EU, Long USA.' One analyst offered a more nuanced take: 'EU is actually not doing better than the US economically or in tech/productivity, but they do now have lower government debt and higher quality of life.' Others took a more skeptical or sarcastic tone. 'Europe looks to be like a giant California. Which is falling apart,' one user replied. Another joked, 'Jim, we're about to crash. Need you to be bullish.' But the question of Europe outperforming isn't just about opinions online. Trending: Maximize saving for your retirement and cut down on taxes: . According to a recent Bloomberg report, eight of the world's 10 best-performing stock markets are in Europe. Germany's DAX Index is up more than 30% in dollar terms. Markets in countries like Poland, Slovenia, Hungary and Greece are also seeing double-digit growth. The pan-European Stoxx 600 Index is beating the S&P 500 by a record 18 percentage points this year. Bloomberg reports that the strong performance is being driven by Germany's massive infrastructure and defense spending plans, a stronger euro, and solid corporate earnings. 'Europe is back on the map,' head of investment strategy for RBC Wealth Management Frederique Carrier told Bloomberg. 'We are getting more questions about Europe now over the last two months than we did over the last 10 years.' UBS Group AG analysts estimate that $1.4 trillion could shift from U.S. assets into European equities over the next five expanded in a CNBC column on June 1 on why he thinks the U.S. market keeps getting dragged down. 'We keep getting thrown off, and the lack of predictability is driving investors elsewhere,' he said. He argued that while Europe may not be surging economically, its relative stability makes it attractive. 'Do we really think the economies in Europe are doing that well? Is Italy on fire? Spain soaring? No. But what they do have is consistency, even if it is the consistency of mediocrity. We, on the other hand, have no stability whatsoever because of the incredible, mind-boggling power of the White House.' Cramer pointed to what he calls a 'Trump discount' weighing on sectors like tech, retail, pharmaceuticals, and banking. 'We sit here, agog, as Europe goes higher when we have companies in our stock indexes that are doing much, much better than any of theirs. But it doesn't matter because ours can be taken away with a stroke of President Donald Trump's pen — and don't we know it.' Read Next: Can you guess how many retire with a $5,000,000 nest egg? .UNLOCKED: 5 NEW TRADES EVERY WEEK. Click now to get top trade ideas daily, plus unlimited access to cutting-edge tools and strategies to gain an edge in the markets. Get the latest stock analysis from Benzinga? APPLE (AAPL): Free Stock Analysis Report TESLA (TSLA): Free Stock Analysis Report This article Jim Cramer Says 'Under Pressure Are The Two Words We Hear Every Morning.' He Thinks That's Why Europe's Doing Better—But Not Everyone Agrees originally appeared on © 2025 Benzinga does not provide investment advice. All rights reserved. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store