Ministers face £5bn Nuked Blood bill as they refuse to reveal evidence
Ministers have uncovered government plans to conduct radiation experiments on troops, but refused to give details to Parliament.
It comes days after the Defence Secretary told MPs he was 'deeply uncomfortable' about a super-injunction that prevented him discussing a £7bn data leak about Afghan troops and translators.
Now the Mirror can reveal that his department is again hiding potentially expensive errors behind the cloak of a 'ministerial review' - with final costs estimated at a further £5bn.
Tory grandee Sir John Hayes said: "Given that the ministers will have discovered a great deal in this review, it's important they inform Parliament of it at the earliest opportunity to maintain good faith, and I will be raising this in the House as a matter of urgency."
The inquiry was ordered last year after a BBC documentary showcased our investigation of the Nuked Blood Scandal, a Cold War programme of mass blood and urine testing on servicemen conducted in Australia and the Pacific for more than a decade.
The results are missing from medical files, effectively denying them war pensions, compensation, and the right medical treatment. MoD officials have repeatedly told Parliament and the courts that blood testing never took place.
Veterans Minister Al Carns has been asked several times by MPs of all parties to reveal his findings from the 10-month review of Ministry of Defence archives, but has rejected the calls, saying he is hunting for evidence of an official policy of blood-testing. 'I will update the house when I am in a position to share the findings of the exercise that is looking at concerns raised with me about some nuclear test veterans' medical records,' he told the Commons.
His staff have examined 43,000 files, amounting to more than a million pages. They include a 1957 request from Charles Adams, the scientific director of the Atomic Weapons Research Establishment that blood counts should be done on troops even if others 'thought it unnecessary'.
A second AWRE letter examined by his team says blood tests are needed 'from the medico-legal aspect' for all troops and civilians before they leave the UK because 'we wish to exclude people with existing pathological conditions... we wish to be able to demonstrate that this has been done in any case in which a claim for damage is made'.
The review is also thought to have uncovered a 1958 operational order from Bomber Command stating that 'all personnel who go to Christmas Island should have the following blood examinations made and the results recorded in [their file]'.
READ MORE: Video of Labour's broken promises to nuke veterans gets 3 million views as pressure grows
It is not known whether these documents have been personally shown or briefed to the minister, but his officials are known to have examined the files between January and July. The MoD is facing a lawsuit from veterans and widows about non-production of the medical records, estimated to top £5bn.
Alan Owen of campaign group LABRATS said: 'The data leak which has caused so much outrage was blamed on the previous government, but this happened entirely on Labour 's watch.
'They set up the review, they've been briefed on the findings, and they've refused repeated requests from Parliament to reveal what they know. They don't even have the excuse of a super-injunction to hide behind - this is the government's own doing.'
A spokesman for the MoD said: 'The Minister for Veterans and People has commissioned officials to look seriously into unresolved questions regarding medical records as a priority, and this is now underway.
"This work will be comprehensive, and it will enable us to better understand what information the department holds in relation to the medical testing of service personnel who took part in the UK nuclear weapons tests, ensuring that we can be assured that relevant information has been looked at thoroughly.'
The spokesman was unable to confirm whether the minister had personally reviewed the files seen by his team.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
BBC News
2 hours ago
- BBC News
India says no foreign pressure to stop conflict with Pakistan
India's defence ministry has rejected US President Donald Trump's claim of ending its conflict with Pakistan in May, saying the country had not responded to pressure from Singh was speaking at the opening of a parliamentary debate on the 22 April attack in Pahalgam, in Indian-administered Kashmir, which claimed the lives of 26 tourists. India blamed Pakistan for the attack - which it denied - and launched a series of strikes, named "Operation Sindoor", on its neighbour, leading to four days of intense military action from both has frequently claimed that the ceasefire between the two nuclear-armed neighbours was brokered by the US - which India has denied. On Monday, Singh reiterated that it was "completely incorrect and baseless to say that the military action was stopped because of pressure"."India halted its operation because all the political and military objectives studied before and during the conflict had been fully achieved," he told the Lok Sabha, the lower house of also claimed the decision was taken after a request from Pakistan's Director General of Military Operations (DGMO), who "pleaded for relief"."It was only after this that the Indian Armed Forces decided to pause operations," he added. Islamabad has not commented on Singh's claims. The escalation in May was the worst military confrontation between India and Pakistan in decades, with dozens of people killed in the four-day fighting, before Trump announced a ceasefire between said the purpose of India's military action was "to destroy the terror nurseries raised by Pakistan over the years".He said over 100 "terrorists, their trainers, handlers and associates" were killed in coordinated strikes on nine "terror infrastructure targets" in Pakistan and Pakistan-administered-Kashmir in an operation that lasted 22 minutes."The objective was to provide justice to the families who lost their loved ones in the Pahalgam terror attack," he the proceedings, opposition leaders questioned the government about Islamabad's claim that it shot down five Indian fighter jets and a drone during the denied this and said India's defence systems had intercepted all incoming projectiles and missiles, adding that no Indian military establishment suffered any also said the Indian armed forces could resume military action if there was any further "misadventure" from the Pakistan side. Earlier in the day, the Indian army said that it had killed "three terrorists" in a gun battle in Indian-administered TV channels claimed the three were suspected to be behind the April attack - but officials have not confirmed investigators have previously said all three militants involved in the deadly attack were Pakistani nationals from the UN-proscribed militant group Lashkar-e-TaibaFollow BBC News India on Instagram, YouTube, X and Facebook.
Daily Mail
9 hours ago
- Daily Mail
Nigel Farage vows Reform UK will scrap 'dystopian' online safety laws that puts a blocker on free speech
Reform has vowed to scrap the Online Safety Act because it creates a 'dystopian' world that suppresses freedom of speech. Nigel Farage 's intervention comes after it emerged that X blocked a powerful speech on grooming gangs by Tory minister Katie Lam in Parliament this year. Meanwhile, footage of arrests during asylum seeker hotel protests was also blocked 'due to local laws', according to the social media platform. Last week, the law changed to require websites to check users are over 18 before allowing them to access 'harmful' material such as pornography or suicide material. Failing to comply with the new rules could incur fines of up to £18million or 10 per cent of a firm's global turnover. Sir Keir Starmer today denied the legislation was censoring online content and said it was there to protect children. But at a Reform press conference today, Zia Yusuf, head of government efficiency for the party, said he would repeal the act, which he argued did nothing to protect children. He said the new powers were 'the sort of thing that I think [Chinese president] Xi Jinping himself would blush at the concept of', adding: 'So much of the act is massive overreach and plunges this country into a borderline dystopian state.' Arguing that the laws suppress freedom of speech, he said: 'We will repeal this Act as one of the first things a Reform government does.' Asked how he would protect children such as Molly Russell who took her own life after viewing footage promoting suicide, Mr Farage acknowledged he did not have the 'perfect answer'. He said his party had 'more access to some of the best tech brains, not just in the country but in the world' and would 'make a much better job of it'. Andy Burrows, chief executive of the Molly Rose Foundation, set up in Molly's memory, said scrapping the Act 'would not only put children at greater risk but is out of step with the mood of the public'. After a demonstration outside the Britannia Hotel in Leeds at the weekend, X users said the site blocked arrest footage. They were shown the message: 'Due to local laws, we are temporarily restricting access to this content until X estimates your age.'
Daily Mail
9 hours ago
- Daily Mail
Veterans hail temporary reprieve on Northern Ireland 'lawfare' as Labour legislation bid stalls
The campaign to protect SAS veterans from historical legal actions was boosted on Monday night by an apparent delay to Labour 's bid to axe the Legacy Act. Aided by this newspaper's Stop The SAS Betrayal campaign, nearly 200,000 members of the public have so far backed a bid to ensure soldiers are not exposed to a witch-hunt in the form of misconduct claims from the Troubles in Northern Ireland. Tory defence spokesman Mark Francois said the Government had been 'rocked' by the backlash and had postponed a Commons bid to scrap the Legacy Act, which provides protections to UK troops. He had expected Labour to present plans for alternative legislation before summer recess. But after a surge of public support for the Mail's campaign and a parliamentary debate, they were seemingly put on ice. The move may also be linked to a reported threat by Labour veterans minister Al Carns to resign over the issue. Just under 180,000 people have signed the parliamentary petition, boosted by former SAS reservist Sir David Davis, to support veterans. The battle to preserve their legal protections – deemed unlawful by a court in Northern Ireland – is expected to resume this autumn. Meanwhile, SAS veterans have stepped up plans to reenact an incident involving Special Forces soldiers and the IRA in 1992 which is the centre of a legal battle (pictured: the scene of the shoot out) On Monday night, Mr Francois said: 'While we have won this initial battle, with the help of the Mail and its readers, we haven't won the war. 'We still need to keep up the pressure on Labour MPs not to apply "two-tier justice".' Labour's intention to remove protections for UK troops included in the Legacy Act, which was introduced by the previous government's veterans minister Johnny Mercer, was included in its election manifesto. It made the vow after a successful legal challenge to the Act in Northern Ireland. A judge found the legislation was 'unlawful' as it undermined the UK's commitment to ensure a path to justice for those wronged by the state. Meanwhile, SAS veterans have stepped up plans to reenact an incident involving Special Forces soldiers and the IRA in 1992 which is the centre of a legal battle. As many as 12 SAS troops face possible murder charges following the deaths of four IRA men in County Tyrone in 1992. Former UK military commander in Northern Ireland Colonel Richard Kemp said: 'The British people don't want to see their soldiers thrown to the wolves over incidents they can scarcely recall several decades later. 'So no wonder so many people are backing the Mail's campaign.' A spokesman for the Ministry of Defence told the Mail on Monday night: 'The failed Legacy Act has been rejected by our domestic courts, exposing our brave veterans to no settled process or safeguards. 'Any incoming government would have had to fix the mess that was left, not least because it promised giving immunity to terrorists. 'This Government's commitment to our Operation Banner veterans is unshakeable. 'We will fix it by putting in place a fair and transparent system that gives survivors and families – including bereaved Armed Forces families – the ability to find answers and threats.'
