logo
Delhi HC seeks ‘confidentiality' on CBI report on ‘cash-for-query scam' against Mahua Moitra

Delhi HC seeks ‘confidentiality' on CBI report on ‘cash-for-query scam' against Mahua Moitra

The Hindu2 days ago
The Delhi High Court on Monday (August 11, 2025) asked the CBI and all parties concerned to maintain 'confidentiality' on the agency's report before the Lokpal in connection with an alleged cash-for-query scam involving Lok Sabha MP Mahua Moitra.
Justice Sachin Datta gave the direction on Ms. Moitra's plea alleging that the media was alerted as soon as the CBI filed its report before the Lokpal.
'I'll make it clear saying that confidentiality be maintained. I'll dispose of the petition... There's no doubt that confidentiality has to be maintained. There is no dispute that everyone is bound to maintain confidentiality,' the judge said, adding that he will pass a detailed order.
Ms. Moitra's counsel claimed that soon after the CBI filed the report before Lokpal, the development was made public to the media.
The counsel said that though he was not asking for any takedown order, the provisions of the Lokpal and Lokayuktas Act as well as the authority's circular should be complied with.
Last month, the CBI submitted its report to the Lokpal in connection with the alleged cash-for-query scam case involving the Trinamool Congress leader and businessman Darshan Hiranandani.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Delhi High Court: Adults Have Right To Marry Without Family Interference
Delhi High Court: Adults Have Right To Marry Without Family Interference

India.com

time23 minutes ago

  • India.com

Delhi High Court: Adults Have Right To Marry Without Family Interference

New Delhi: The Delhi High Court has reaffirmed that the personal liberty of two consenting adults to marry and live together peacefully is protected under Article 21 of the Indian Constitution. In a recent ruling, the court emphasised that family opposition cannot override this autonomy. Justice Sanjeev Narula stated that the Supreme Court has consistently upheld this principle, directing law enforcement to protect couples from threats or coercion. In this case, the court ordered police protection for a young couple who feared harassment from the woman's family. The couple had solemnised their marriage on July 23, 2025, following Hindu rituals at an Arya Samaj trust in Delhi. They approached the court after the woman's parents allegedly tried to pressure her, despite her voluntary departure from her family home and her clear affirmation of the marriage during a police inquiry. That inquiry, initiated after a "missing" complaint, was later closed. To ensure their safety, the court instructed the local Station House Officer (SHO) to assign a beat officer, brief them on the court's directives, and provide the couple with emergency contact numbers. Any reported threats must be documented and addressed without delay. Justice Narula clarified that the court was not ruling on the veracity of the allegations but was solely focused on protecting the couple's fundamental rights to life, liberty, and dignity.

Akhilesh Yadav Sacks MLA Who Praised Yogi Adityanath For Justice In Husband's Murder
Akhilesh Yadav Sacks MLA Who Praised Yogi Adityanath For Justice In Husband's Murder

NDTV

timean hour ago

  • NDTV

Akhilesh Yadav Sacks MLA Who Praised Yogi Adityanath For Justice In Husband's Murder

Samajwadi Party (SP) MLA Pooja Pal was expelled from the party on Thursday, hours after she thanked Uttar Pradesh Chief Minister Yogi Adityanath for " delivering justice" in her husband's murder case and praised him for bringing in policies with zero tolerance against criminals. In an official statement in Hindi, SP chief Akhilesh Yadav said Ms Pooja, whose husband Raju Pal was shot dead by gangster Atiq Ahmed in 2005, was "immediately expelled" from the party due to her engagement in "anti-party activities and serious indiscipline which continued despite prior warnings and caused significant harm to the party". "She is no longer permitted to participate in any party programs and will not be invited to them in the future," the statement said. The development came hours after Ms Pooja thanked the Chief Minister for "listening to her when no one else did". Speaking in the Uttar Pradesh assembly during a 24-hour marathon discussion on 'Vision Document 2047', Ms Pooja said: "Everyone knows who murdered my husband (Raju). I want to thank the Chief Minister for bringing me justice and hearing me when nobody else did." She added: "The Chief Minister gave justice to many other women like me in Prayagraj by bringing in policies like zero tolerance that led to the killing of criminals like Atiq Ahmed. Today, the entire state looks at him with trust." Former Bahujan Samaj Party (BSP) MLA Raju Pal was shot dead on January 25, 2005, days after he married Ms Pooja. The murder, police said, was a result of political rivalry with gangster Atiq Ahmed's brother Ashraf, whom Raju had defeated in the 2004 bypoll to the Prayagraj West seat. In February 2023, Umesh Pal, a key witness in the murder case, was shot dead in Prayagraj's Sulem Saray area. Days later, Atiq and Ashraf - both of whom were arrested - were shot dead by three men when they were being taken for a medical check-up in Prayagraj. Atiq was shot in the head from behind, nearly at point-blank range. Ashraf, too, was shot dead, as the murder was captured on camera. This came days after Atiq's son Asad was killed in an alleged encounter in Jhansi. All three men were later arrested. "Mere pati ke hatyare Atiq Ahmed ko mukhya mantri ne mitti mein milaane ka kaam kiya (The Chief Minister buried my husband's murderer Atiq Ahmed)," Ms Pooja told the House. "I raised my voice when I saw that no one wanted to fight against criminals like Atiq Ahmed. When I started feeling exhausted with this fight, Chief Minister Yogi Adityanath gave me justice," she added. Raju had lost the election from the Prayagraj West seat to Atiq in 2002 but when the latter vacated it after being elected to the Lok Sabha, Raju defeated Ashraf in the bypoll. The Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) took over the probe into the murder case in 2016. In 2024, a CBI court convicted seven people - Ranjeet Pal, Abid, Farhan Ahmad, Israr Ahmad, Javed, Gulhasan, and Abdul Kavi - guilty in the case for criminal conspiracy and murder among other charges. Farhan was also held guilty under the Indian Arms Act. Meanwhile, a judicial commission formed to probe the gangsters' murders ruled out the possibility of a "pre-planned conspiracy" or "police negligence". The state government also informed the Supreme Court that it is "leaving no stone unturned to ensure a fair and impartial investigation" into the killings.

Delhi High Court: Adults have right to marry without family interference
Delhi High Court: Adults have right to marry without family interference

News18

timean hour ago

  • News18

Delhi High Court: Adults have right to marry without family interference

New Delhi [India], August 14 (ANI): The Delhi High Court has reaffirmed that the personal liberty of two consenting adults to marry and live together peacefully is protected under Article 21 of the Indian Constitution. In a recent ruling, the court emphasised that family opposition cannot override this Sanjeev Narula stated that the Supreme Court has consistently upheld this principle, directing law enforcement to protect couples from threats or coercion. In this case, the court ordered police protection for a young couple who feared harassment from the woman's couple had solemnised their marriage on July 23, 2025, following Hindu rituals at an Arya Samaj trust in Delhi. They approached the court after the woman's parents allegedly tried to pressure her, despite her voluntary departure from her family home and her clear affirmation of the marriage during a police inquiry. That inquiry, initiated after a 'missing" complaint, was later ensure their safety, the court instructed the local Station House Officer (SHO) to assign a beat officer, brief them on the court's directives, and provide the couple with emergency contact numbers. Any reported threats must be documented and addressed without Narula clarified that the court was not ruling on the veracity of the allegations but was solely focused on protecting the couple's fundamental rights to life, liberty, and dignity. (ANI)

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store