logo
Ministers Champagne, Anand in Mexico to strengthen countries' ties

Ministers Champagne, Anand in Mexico to strengthen countries' ties

CTV News2 days ago
Finance Minister Francois-Philippe Champagne and Foreign Affairs Minister Anita Anand were in Mexico for trade meeting.
OTTAWA - Finance Minister Francois-Philippe Champagne and Foreign Affairs Minister Anita Anand were in Mexico to strengthen the countries' relationship, days after the United States hit Canada with higher tariffs.
Champagne said during a virtual press conference from Mexico on Tuesday evening that it was a 'very successful trip' and that the mission was to 'get to know each other a bit better.'
The minister said the countries spoke about how to work together in areas like energy, auto and security.
'What we have agreed is to build a work plan between Canada and Mexico which focuses on a number of factors, for example resilient supply chains, port-to-port lines of trade, artificial intelligence and the digital economy, energy, security,' Anand said.
The ministers met with Mexican President Claudia Sheinbaum and other government officials. They are also set to meet with members of the business community while in Mexico.
'The bottom line is that we are building the momentum in the Mexico-Canada relationship and we're making sure that this relationship will stand the test of time and that it is a comprehensive, strategic relationship on the axis of the economy and geopolitical issues, including security,' Anand said.
Earlier in the day, Prime Minister Mark Carney said he would speak with U.S. President Donald Trump 'when it makes sense.'
'I haven't spoken to the president in recent days,' Carney said during a press conference in West Kelowna, B.C.
When asked Thursday about the prospects for a trade deal with Canada, Trump said that 'he's called' -- seemingly a reference to Carney.
The U.S. hit Canada on Friday with a 35 per cent tariff on goods not compliant with the Canada-United States-Mexico agreement on trade, known as CUSMA. Tariff rates for Canadian steel, aluminum and copper are at 50 per cent.
Carney said this means that 85 per cent of trade between the Canada and the U.S. remains tariff-free.
CUSMA is scheduled for a mandatory review next year.
During Tuesday's press conference to discuss supports for the softwood lumber industry -- a sector hit hard by American tariffs -- Carney pointed to Canada's large investment footprint in the U.S.
While other countries have included multibillion-dollar investment pledges in their trade deals with the U.S., Carney suggested that Canadian investment in the U.S. likely will decrease without a deal.
'We have 40 million people. We are the second-largest investor in the United States in the world,' he said.
'Without an agreement, there will be less by definition.'
While Trump has cited cross-border fentanyl trafficking to justify some of his tariffs, Carney said that drugs flowing from Canada to the U.S. amount to a 'rounding error' compared to other sources.
American border agents have seized about 34 kilograms of fentanyl at the Canadian border this fiscal year, compared to over 4,000 kilograms at the Mexican border, according to U.S. Customs and Border Protection data.
Canada is looking around for trade partners it can trust, Champagne said Tuesday as he and Anand met with Sheinbaum.
Anand and Champagne flew to Mexico on Monday to talk economic growth, trade and security with the Mexican president. Carney is expected to visit Mexico to meet with Sheinbaum soon.
In a media statement, Champagne said the visit was part of a broader strategy of diversifying Canada's trading relationships as the United States takes a protectionist, tariff-focused approach.
'As we strive to provide more certainty and diversify our export markets, forging closer partnerships like the one we enjoy with Mexico is how we chart a new way forward with partners we can trust,' he said.
While Canada is now under the increased U.S. tariff rate that took effect Aug. 1, Mexico received a 90-day reprieve from threatened higher U.S. levies.
Anand and Champagne dodged questions from reporters about how Mexico managed to get an extension while Canada didn't, with Anand stressing that the countries' economic relationships with the U.S. are different.
Ontario Premier Doug Ford last year called for a bilateral trade deal between Canada and the United States because he said Mexico was serving as a back door for Chinese auto parts and vehicles entering the North American market.
The automotive sector is one of the biggest drivers of trade between Canada and Mexico. Vehicles and auto parts account for 20 per cent of Canada's exports to Mexico and 37 per cent of Canadian imports from its southern partner, according to Economic Development Canada.
The auto sector has been a key target of Trump's tariffs. The North American automotive supply chain is spread between the three countries and Trump has said he wants to build up end-to-end auto manufacturing in the U.S.
Mexico is one of Canada's biggest trading partners for various commodities, including oil and gas, steel and aluminum.
Canada's imports from Mexico include tropical fruits, broadcast equipment and medical devices, according to Mexico's economy ministry.
Anand and Champagne were also scheduled to meet with Canadian and Mexican business leaders after their Tuesday press conference. A finance official said the meeting would include representatives from the banking, mining, aerospace, railway, pension, pharmaceutical and agri-food sectors.
By David Baxter.
With files from Catherine Morrison.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

FBI ousts more leaders, including ex-director who resisted Trump's demand for Jan. 6 agents' names
FBI ousts more leaders, including ex-director who resisted Trump's demand for Jan. 6 agents' names

CTV News

time6 minutes ago

  • CTV News

FBI ousts more leaders, including ex-director who resisted Trump's demand for Jan. 6 agents' names

The seal of The Federal Bureau of Investigation is seen on the Headquarters in Washington, Nov. 18, 2024. (AP Photo/Jose Luis Magana, File) WASHINGTON — The FBI is forcing out more senior officials, including a former acting director who resisted Trump administration demands to turn over the names of agents who participated in Jan. 6 Capitol riot investigations and the head of the bureau's Washington field office, according to people familiar with the matter and internal communications seen by The Associated Press. The basis for the ouster of Brian Driscoll, who led the bureau in the turbulent weeks that followed U.S. President Donald Trump's inauguration last January, were not immediately clear, but his final day is Friday, said the people, who were not authorized to discuss the personnel move by name and spoke to the AP on the condition of anonymity. 'I understand that you may have a lot of questions regarding why, for which I have no answers,' Driscoll wrote in a message to colleagues. 'No cause has been articulated at this time.' Another high-profile termination is Steven Jensen, who for months had led the Washington office, one of the bureau's largest and busiest. He confirmed in a message to colleagues on Thursday he had been told he was being fired effective Friday. 'I intend to meet this challenge like any other I have faced in this organization, with professionalism, integrity and dignity,' Jensen wrote in an email. Jensen did not say if he had been given a reason, but his appointment to the job in April was sharply criticized by some Trump supporters because he had overseen a domestic terrorism section after the 2021 riot at the U.S. Capitol. The FBI has characterized that attack, in which the Republican president's supporters stormed the Capitol in a bid to halt the certification of election results after he lost to Democrat Joe Biden, as an act of domestic terrorism. Spokespeople for the FBI declined to comment Thursday. A broader personnel purge The news about Driscoll and Jensen comes amid a much broader personnel purge that has unfolded over the last several months under the leadership of FBI Director Kash Patel and Deputy Director Dan Bongino. Numerous senior officials including top agents in charge of big-city field offices have been pushed out of their jobs, and some agents have been subjected to polygraph exams, moves that former officials say have roiled the workforce and contributed to angst. Driscoll, a veteran agent who worked international counterterrorism investigations in New York and had commanded the bureau's Hostage Rescue Team, had most recently served as acting director in charge of the Critical Incident Response Group, which deploys resources to crisis situations. Driscoll was named acting director in January to replace Christopher Wray and served in the position as Patel's nomination was pending. He made headlines after he and Rob Kissane, the then-deputy director, resisted Trump administration demands for a list of agents who participated in investigations into the Jan. 6 riot. Many within the FBI had seen that request as a precursor for mass firings, particularly in light of separate moves to fire members of special counsel Jack Smith's team that prosecuted Trump, reassign senior career Justice Department officials and force out prosecutors on Jan. 6 cases and top FBI executives. The Justice Department's request Emil Bove, the then-senior Justice Department official who made the request and was last week confirmed for a seat on a federal appeals court, wrote a memo at the time accusing the FBI's top leaders of 'insubordination' for resisting his requests 'to identify the core team' responsible for Jan. 6 investigations. He said the requests were meant to 'permit the Justice Department to conduct a review of those particular agents' conduct pursuant to Trump's executive order' on 'weaponization' in the Biden administration. Responding to Bove's request, the FBI ultimately provided personnel details about several thousand employees, identifying them by unique employee numbers rather than by names. In his farewell note, Driscoll told colleagues that it was 'the honor of my life to serve alongside each of you.' He wrote: 'Our collective sacrifice for those we serve is, and will always be, worth it. I regret nothing. You are my heroes and I remain in your debt.' Agents demoted, reassigned and pushed out The FBI has moved under Patel's watch to aggressively demote, reassign or push out agents seen as being out of favor with bureau leadership or the Trump administration. In April, for instance, the bureau reassigned several agents who were photographed kneeling during a racial justice protest in Washington that followed the 2020 death of George Floyd at the hands of Minneapolis police officers, two people familiar with the matter said Wednesday. Numerous special agents in charge of field offices have been told to retire, resign or accept reassignment. Another agent, Michael Feinberg, has said publicly that he was told to resign or accept a demotion amid scrutiny from leadership of his friendship with Peter Strzok, a lead agent on the FBI's Trump-Russia investigation who was fired by the Justice Department in 2018 following revelations that he had exchanged negative text messages about Trump with an FBI lawyer, Lisa Page. Eric Tucker, The Associated Press

Alberta no longer sure about big savings from auto insurance reforms
Alberta no longer sure about big savings from auto insurance reforms

CBC

time7 minutes ago

  • CBC

Alberta no longer sure about big savings from auto insurance reforms

When Premier Danielle Smith announced a dramatic shift to a new auto insurance system that largely removes Albertans' rights to sue at-fault drivers for compensation, she and her ministers dangled the prospect of big discounts for motorists. "These better, faster services would be delivered at a savings of up to $400 per year on insurance premiums," she said at the November announcement. Standing behind a lectern that said "keeping Alberta affordable," Smith outlined major reforms to a system that has remained the second-most expensive among all Canadian provinces. The $400 figure, taken from an expert report on insurance reforms, has kept popping up in UCP government messages since then, including in a promotional video released in April. It repeated the claim alongside an image of a woman looking at her laptop and smiling wide, as the outline of a piggy bank appeared over her head. "It's better for your wallet, and if you're injured in an accident, it's better for your health," the voiceover actor stated. But in a government report released Aug.6 that's full of details on how auto insurance will work when the new system arrives in 2027, $400 in savings never gets mentioned. Nor do any claims or suggestions about how much, exactly, driver premiums will drop by, thanks to this big overhaul. An Alberta Finance official stated earlier this week that the initial $400 cost savings figure was devised using 2023 insurance data. Various pressures have since pushed up the cost of providing insurance, ranging from inflation to U.S. tariffs on steel and car parts, to Calgary's hail storms and the Jasper wildfire. The government will perform additional actuarial analysis to help better predict the pricing impact of the new model, the official said. Finance Minister Nate Horner offered a new explanation about the savings claim he and Smith made last fall. He pointed to the fact Alberta has capped this year's premium hikes for good drivers at 7.5 per cent this year, while the government estimate that private insurers lost money on auto coverage last year, to the tune of 19.6 per cent. The rate cap is now keeping rates "artificially low," the minister said Wednesday. "I would look at it this way, and this is where it's tough to communicate: they may already be seeing a $400 per premium savings due to the good driver rate cap," Horner told CBC News in an interview. In other words, without the rate cap insurers might have charged Albertans around $2,100 a year instead of the $1,703 average premiums they now pay, the minister is reasoning. Smith and Horner first floated the $400 savings last fall in conjunction with letting insurers hike rates this year by up to 7.5-per-cent rate and 7.5 per cent in 2026 as well — pending review — after past years of lower caps and rate freezes. Given how "fragile" the system is now thanks to cost woes, Horner said, he would not commit to keeping next year's hike at 7.5 per cent, saying it will depend on a statistical analysis. "I promised the Premier and Cabinet that I will bring something forward this fall for their consideration… I can't tell you what will come out of that." The insurance sector wants the rate cap lifted, and has begun making similar warnings that big savings will not materialize come 2027 through Alberta's insurance system redesign. Aaron Sutherland, a vice-president with the Insurance Bureau of Canada, not only highlighted the tariffs and climate disasters — he also cited the government's promises this new system will offer Canada's richest benefits for the injured and also preserve more ability to sue than other provinces with "no-fault" insurance systems. "When you take all of that in totality, it's very hard to see how this is going to deliver savings at this time, unless we see significant change in the direction that the government's charting," Sutherland said. While other provinces call insurance regimes without injured victims "no-fault," the Alberta government has branded its reforms "Care First." That's because insurance companies can more quickly determine what the compensation and health care a collision survivor is entitled to, rather than making them wade through a lawsuit or legal mediation. The United Conservative cabinet decided to move to this system to tackle what government says is the "single biggest reason" for rising insurance costs: litigation and bodily injury claims. A recent provincial review said the average claim cost rose from $91,000 in 2020 to $180,000 in 2024. Injury lawyers have pushed back hard at these assertions, and at the proposed reforms they warn would take away Albertans' rights to seek fair compensation. And they've been claiming since before these reforms were announced that moving to a no-fault system wouldn't offer the savings that government leaders had discussed. The reform "isn't going to produce any premium savings and it'll take away civil liberties. Now the insurance industry is telling the government the same thing," said Owen Lewis, a Grande Prairie lawyer and former president of the Alberta Civil Trial Lawyers Association. "They've been sold this lie that the only way to reduce premiums is to focus on what injured Albertans receive." Horner in November promised the new system wouldn't completely quash victims' ability to sue at-fault drivers like no-fault systems in provinces like Manitoba and British Columbia, but would offer "the biggest window of court access" of its peers. The province's new 23-page report on insurance reforms spells out the cases: an at-fault driver can be sued if they're convicted of murder or a Criminal Code driving offence like hit and run or driving with a suspended license; convicted of provincial offences of impaired driving or failing to stop for a peace officer; or if a victims's out-of-pocket expenses exceed their insurance policy. Distracted driving or ignoring a red light would no longer be grounds to sue in the new regime. Lewis said the government's limited range for legal claims would amount to around one per cent or less of client calls his firm currently receives. A provincial report last year forecast that moving to a no-fault system would axe 650 to 800 legal sector jobs in Alberta. Sutherland from the Insurance Bureau, meanwhile, argues that the province can chop more costs from the system and ease premiums by further limiting the right to sue. "They were clear they didn't want to see any tort [legal] access, but we tried to find a balance that we thought Albertans would appreciate," Horner said. But the minister also signalled no intention to further expand access, as lawyer groups want. "The larger the tort window, so to speak, the more expensive the system is." Whether any $400 in savings come in 2027 like the province used to say, or maybe the invisible current savings Horner has hinted at tied to rate caps, the government is promising that a system with a new way of handling injury claims outside the court system will be better at keeping prices more stable beyond 2027. "But Albertans should feel confident we're moving to a better system that will cost less than in the long term," Horner said. "It's just — we've kind of muddied the waters and it's harder to see."

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store