There was a deal to fix this Alabama community's raw sewage crisis. Trump tore it up over DEI
They used to barbecue on the back porch looking out at the woods on their land until a couple of years back when the contaminated wastewater seeping out from a leaky old pipe got simply unbearable. Willie, 71, ripped out the sinking porch as branches began falling off a towering old hickory tree which is now completely dead and at risk of toppling.
'We have water and electricity now, it's just the waste, the raw fluids on the ground. But the little money that me and my wife get is just to take care of our bills, we can't afford no septic system,' said Willie, a retired janitor with a weak heart and mobility issues. 'This might be the richest country in the world, but we're the little people.'
Related: 'A dog cemetery would not be treated like this': the fight to preserve Black burial grounds in the US
Here in Alabama's Lowndes county, a majority-Black county with high levels of poverty and a deep civil rights history, an estimated 60% to 80% of households in rural parts do not have a functioning sanitation system. Authorities have known about the raw sewage crisis for decades, which to some extent affects all 67 counties in Alabama.
In 2025, in the richest, most powerful country in the world, many people are still forced to depend on PVC pipes to funnel parasite-infested wastewater from the bathroom and kitchen into hand-dug trenches, fields or wooded areas metres from where they sleep, play and grow vegetables.
It's unclear when or whether the Perryman family will ever get to experience life without the stench of raw sewage after a landmark 2023 civil rights settlement mandating the state to resolve the crisis was terminated by the Trump administration, dismissing it as an 'illegal' diversity, equity and inclusion (DEI) agreement. As a result, the state is no longer required to resolve this sanitation crisis – or conduct public health campaigns. It could also restart enforcing sanitation laws that threaten residents without a functioning sewage system with fines and jail time – which the justice department settlement strictly forbade.
The decision is part of Donald Trump's broader assault on all programs, policies and research that seek to tackle systemic and structural inequalities in American life by claiming that they are discriminatory, 'woke' and wasteful.
Ripping up the Lowndes county legal settlement puts the onus back on Alabama lawmakers to remedy the sewage crisis, but it's unclear whether this longstanding public health crisis will be a priority without a federal mandate or funds.
'The money's been taken away so that means we've got to wait another one year, two years … We keep hoping for some help, but we're not getting any younger,' said Thelma Perryman, 74, a retired farmhand who has never lived in a house with a functioning sanitation system.
Charlie King, chair of the Lowndes county commission, said he had been left speechless by the cruelty of the decision: 'Losing the funding will have a devastating effect on the people of the county, who are struggling and don't have no ways to help themselves. This administration is just not concerned about the poor people, whether they are white or Black, poor people, period. They don't have a heart for them.'
Lowndes county is a sprawling, mostly rural area between Selma and Montgomery, where almost three-quarters of the 9,000 or so inhabitants are Black and nearly a third live below the poverty line.
The county is part of what's known as the Alabama Black belt – named for the dark, fertile soil prized for producing cotton during the enslavement and Jim Crow eras, which became synonymous with the brutal trade and treatment of African people by European settler plantation owners.
The scale of the injustices perpetrated was in part why by the mid-1960s Lowndes county had become a major organising hub for the civil rights movement. Stokely Carmichael led the Student Nonviolent Coordinating Committee (Sncc) in organising voter-registration drives and political education classes, later launching the Lowndes County Freedom Organization, the independent Black political party that first adopted the Black Panther as its logo.
The county earned the grim nickname Bloody Lowndes due to the violent white backlash against the students and other Black organisers pushing the US to live up to its promised ideals of equity, rights, liberty, opportunity and democracy for all.
Residents here have struggled with raw sewage and other wastewater problems for generations due to a mix of structural poverty, the waterlogged clay soil that was ideal for growing cotton but makes standard septic tank systems ineffective, and environmental racism by state authorities.
Six decades after Martin Luther King Jr led voting rights marchers through Lowndes county en route from Selma to Montgomery, many of the residents living without basic sanitation are descendants of enslaved cotton pickers – and also have connections to the civil rights struggle.
Nationwide, 20% to 25% of households are not connected to a public sewer, and instead depend on individual septic systems to treat and disperse toilet, bath and other waste water. Private underground septic systems are mostly found in rural areas where municipal systems are unaffordable or impractical, with particularly high concentrations in New England and the deep south. In many places, the climate crisis is adding pressure to septic systems of all kinds due to sea level rise, salt intrusion and increasingly intense rainfall.
There has been progress in Lowndes county, but those in the rural unincorporated areas are lagging way behind, despite initiatives by non-profits with federal, state and private funding that have been difficult to track. Hundreds of homes still have either no sanitation system to deal with human waste or a failing septic system that is easily overwhelmed by rain and even toilet paper, pushing raw sewage back into the sink or bathtub.
Alabama began prosecuting poor, mostly Black residents for noncompliance with sanitation regulations more than two decades ago, even though most families had built their homes before the standards came into force – while others had ended up with unsuitable systems through earlier government programs. At least one woman is known to have been jailed, while many others were cited, fined or mired in court struggles.
Despite mounting evidence of a serious public health crisis and criticism from the UN, it took a civil rights lawsuit brought by a local environmental justice group in 2017 to finally force authorities to do the right thing.
A landmark settlement in 2023 during the Biden administration mandated the state government to stop criminalizing residents unable to afford septic systems and instead work on remedying the indignity.
The settlement was reached after an 18-month justice department investigation found that the Alabama department of public health (ADPH) had systematically failed to tackle the raw sewage – a public health crisis exposing mostly Black, but also low-income white, families, to health hazards such as hookworm, a gastrointestinal parasite most commonly found in parts of sub-Saharan Africa and south-east Asia. Instead, authorities threatened residents with fines, jail time and losing their homes.
It was a historic civil rights victory for environmental justice, and a signal that the Biden administration was willing to take at least some steps to tackle some of the US's deep-seated structural inequalities that have led to people of color, Native Americans and low-income communities being disproportionately exposed to a multitude of environmental harms including raw sewage, lead-contaminated water and toxic air.
In August 2023, the ADPH received $5m from the American Rescue Plan Act (Arpa), Biden's Covid-19 stimulus package, to address sewage problems across the so-called Black belt. Of this, $1.5m was allocated by the state to Lowndes county.
Since then, hundreds of low-income households, including the Perryman family, have finally made it on to a waitlist for a custom-made septic system that would be paid for entirely or partly by federal funds, depending on their economic circumstances. The couple is considered a priority case due to the critical state of seepage, as well as their age and ailing health.
After years of setbacks, the Lowndes County Unincorporated Wastewater Program (LCUWP), a non-profit created by the county commissioners to oversee the assessment and rollout of septic systems, began the task of building trust in a community that has been badly and repeatedly let down.
In April, Trump's justice department tore up the settlement, claiming it violated the president's Ending Radical and Wasteful Government DEI Programs and Preferencing executive order, which bans federal agencies from pursuing programs or initiatives related to DEI including those dealing with environmental justice.
'Trump says he wants to make America great again, but it was never great for Black people, for the minorities. It's a sad reflection of past times that people in this day and age are still fighting for such basic rights,' said Stephanie Wallace, a community outreach worker with the Center for Rural Enterprise and Environmental Justice (Creej), which launched the civil rights lawsuit that led to the historic settlement. 'Raw sewage on the ground is not DEI.'
The justice department declined to comment.
The Lowndes county decision is part of Trump's broader assault on civil rights and anti-poverty and anti-racism efforts championed by some of his predecessors.
Trump's 2026 budget, signed into law last week, will also have devastating impact on the Black belt communities, where 28% rely on Medicaid, compared with 23% statewide. Hunger rates are also likely to rise given that one in four Alabamians receive Snap benefits, which Trump's new budget also slashes. The state will have to come up with an additional $120m – a 30% increase – to continue providing food assistance for more than 700,000 people, half of whom are children.
Trump won Alabama with 65% of the votes in 2024, but 68% of Lowndes county voted for Kamala Harris.
Alabama's Black belt counties are among the poorest in the US, and in Lowndes county the median income is just $35,000 a year – 57% below the national average, according to the US census. Installing a new septic system is beyond the means of most of those who desperately need one.
The heavy, nonabsorbent clay soil synonymous with the region makes it extremely difficult to install and operate conventional septic tanks, which cost between $10,000 and $15,000, instead requiring custom-engineered systems that can be as expensive as $50,000.
So far, the LCUWP has installed only three septic systems due to the complex soil, poor housing conditions and bureaucratic obstacles – including a cumbersome funding mechanism that requires the non-profit to secure bank credit to pay for everything upfront, and then submit receipts to the state for reimbursement from the Arpa fund. Another 20 are ready to be fitted over the summer.
Clara Hope*, who asked to remain anonymous, is a 68-year-old retired factory worker and widow who lives on a quiet, picturesque country road in the house that she and her husband built 40 years ago, back when they used an outhouse and hauled water.
No matter how hard they worked, the couple could never afford to install a septic system and raise their children, so instead a straight pipe discharges into a cordoned-off field out back of the bungalow, which is lush and green thanks to the seeping sewage fertilizing it.
Hope, who has bronchitis, diabetes and mobility issues, keeps her home clean and tidy but there is a distinct odour – which she can no longer smell on account of being what she calls 'nose blind' after a lifetime of living with raw sewage. But Hope is among the lucky ones who will benefit from the remaining Arpa funds. Her first-ever septic system, which cost $40,000 to engineer, is almost ready to be installed.
'I just felt everything was defeated when Trump canceled the program, like it was going to fall through again and I would be without a septic tank probably until I died. I do feel sorry for those who won't get one but I'm just so happy that finally I'm gonna be able to get mine so the place will be cleaner, and the scent will go,' said Hope.
The remaining Arpa funds will cover another 40 to 50 new septic systems, but there are now almost 150 households on the tier-one priority list who have been deemed poor enough by the ADPH to qualify for a fully funded system – with hundreds more who need help but would be asked to pay a share.
In February, the ADPH allocated another $1.5m to Lowndes county, which came from the state budget and which groups such as the LCUWP can bid for, but this is still not enough.
'There's a lot of mistrust among the community that has grown from past betrayals, and we know there are still people with needs who have not yet applied for septic systems. I personally felt disappointed and discouraged by the decision to cancel the settlement, as we have to let people down again,' said Carmelita Arnold, who runs the LCUWP and whose role now includes chasing other potential funding so the project doesn't collapse.
Arnold is worried that the state could lose interest, now that the federal government no longer cares. 'We had more support when the DoJ was backing it. And now that they're not, it's like almost going back to what it was before,' she said.
According to an ADPH spokesperson, 'the termination of the DoJ agreement has not changed any of the ADPH work in Lowndes county'. The department does not know how many households in Alabama are currently without a reliable septic system.
Yet, in April, following the termination of the justice department settlement, a spokesperson said that under state law the installation of sanitation systems was outside the agency's authority or responsibility, but it would continue the work 'until appropriated funding expires'. After that, the ADPH will only provide support and technical assistance to 'other organizations that may choose to engage in this work'.
It's unclear whether the ADPH will restart enforcement of sanitation laws that could result in criminal charges, fines, jail time and potential property loss for poor residents.
About 30 miles (50km) south-east from Hope is an idyllic cul-de-sac where four generations of the McPherson family live on 33 acres (13 hectares) in five homes with no septic tanks – or garbage collection.
Rattlesnakes, horseflies, mosquitoes and all sorts of other biting insects live in the prairie and surrounding woods where the sewage empties out. But the worst thing, according to Christopher McPherson, 54, is when the straight pipe gets backed up and they have to locate the blockage and flush it out: 'If you don't watch yourself, everything will shoot down with force and get all over you. If that happens, I take the water hose, some soap and bleach, and just make sure it don't get in your mouth.'
Related: Amid attacks on DEI, a US nonprofit offers reparations, education and healing: 'We're looking to fill the gap'
It's a beautiful spot, peaceful and sparkling green, but there's an unpleasant whiff that intensifies as the piercing sun heats the raw sewage seeping out of the pipe.
According to McPherson, who runs his own small handyman business, the family has been trying to secure help for at least 30 years, but something always goes wrong: the money runs out, or the project disappears. Three of the five homes were recently assessed and approved by the LCUWP, but there are many people in similar dire straits ahead of them – and Trump killing the settlement could mean a long wait until new donors come on board.
'It's wild to me that people don't think about the poverty side of America, because a lot of people here can barely make ends meet; some are living in tents out in the woods, begging for money so they can eat,' said McPherson. 'We have our own home, so I think we got it pretty good, but sewage is a basic thing everybody needs. Trump says he's trying to make America great again, but he's just making it hard for us. He's not really doing anything to help regular people.'
In a region where setbacks and resistance are the norm, Elis Bandy, 79, a lifelong Lowndes county resident and the LCUWP's in-house septic system expert, is disappointed but not surprised by the latest blow.
'Trump is going to be a dictator, that's always been his goal, so this ain't nothing surprising to me,' said Bandy, a Methodist pastor. 'But as Dr King said, we still gotta fight for our rights because it's being violated every day.' *Name has been changed
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


WIRED
3 hours ago
- WIRED
You've Probably Heard of a California King Mattress. But What About an Alberta King?
There's more than one king size in the mattress world. Our sleep expert helps parse which one might fit your needs. All products featured on WIRED are independently selected by our editors. However, we may receive compensation from retailers and/or from purchases of products through these links. King-sized mattresses are the largest mattress size you can get, right? Surprise! It's not just the standard king anymore. With king mattress size options these days, you've got territories, states, and split surfaces all involved. If you weren't prepared for this pop quiz in mattress geography, worry not—I am. I'm a professional mattress tester of five years and, in this case, our expedition guide to walk you through it all. But if you need a full education in all things mattress, we have a guide on how to choose one. All Hail the King Standard king mattresses are 76 inches wide and 80 inches long. You get extra foot room, and for solo sleepers plenty of space to move around. It's also plenty of space for co-sleepers, and maybe a dog and/or child. Standard king mattresses may also go by another name, known as Eastern king. Kind of like New York City being 'The Big Apple' or Chicago being 'the Windy City,' both names refer to the same thing. California king mattresses are a bit longer than standard mattresses (not unlike the actual state of California). The width is shorter at 72 inches, but you have more length to work with at 84 inches. If you're tall, this could be a perfect match for you. However, co-sleepers may want to keep the shorter width in mind, especially if one person tends to be a restless sleeper who infringes on their partner's side of the bed. Split king mattresses take on a more Tetris-like approach to achieving their size, which happens to be the same as a standard king at 76 inches by 80 inches. Two twin XL mattresses are put side by side, and each is 38 inches wide but 80 inches long. The idea behind this power-coupling can commonly be seen with adjustable mattresses and adjustable frames, where a split down the middle allows for a range of mobility you can't get with other beds. If you're a couple looking for adjustable firmnesses for your respective sides, or the opportunity to move the top and bottom of the bed, it's likely you'll wind up with a split king mattress. $4,498 $4,098 (9% off) Saatva Wyoming king mattresses are where things start to expand in the realm. This bed measures 84 inches by 84 inches. Very symmetrical, also like the state of Wyoming. Wyoming king mattresses are considered more of a specialty mattress, so if this strikes your fancy, it most likely will require a custom order from a company that makes it, like Wyoming King. Not to worry, though, because as specialty king mattress sizes become more popular, the offerings are becoming more plentiful. For my above-6-feet-tall people, stand up! Or, rather, lie down, because this is exactly a size that gives you the space you felt other mattress sizes lack. Alberta king mattresses measure at 8 feet on both sides, or 96 inches long and 96 inches wide to be exact. No need to trek to Canada for an Alberta king mattress, as there are plenty of custom builders out there to get you situated. If you are above 6 feet fall, we are entering the mattress territory that you may find very accommodating. And of course, as is always the case with me, pun intended. Texas king mattresses really up the ante, and I'll spare you another state analogy. These beds are 98 inches long and 80 inches wide, so there are a lot of wide open spaces for sleepers. Like Wyoming kings, Texas king mattresses are plenty spacious—they easily fit three adults, or two and some kiddos. Or, maybe, one person with five Great Danes. Now that would be a party. Alaskan king mattresses are the newest king-size territory to be explored. Standard kings are spacious, but the more sleepers you add, the more cramped it will become. That really goes for any size mattress, but Alaskan kings are exempt from that statement. These beds are an astounding 108 inches long by 108 inches wide, or 9 feet for both. Even the tallest of sleepers have something to work with here, as well as families or people with many, many pets. Which Will You Crown? Please, please, please take the tape measure out and confirm that your bedroom is going to be able to fit your king mattress of choice. It's going to be awkward ordering an Alaskan king mattress and unboxing it only to find that it can't fully unfurl on the frame, much less between the walls. Speaking of bed frames, make sure yours is up to the task of supporting the extra weight and square footage of a king-size mattress! Also, where do you even get sheets for an Alberta king or Alaskan king mattress? Good news: Many of the mattress makers offering these custom sizes produce sheets that fit their products. With that said, enjoy spreading out and having extra sleep real estate to work with, especially if the kids, dogs, and partners are all crashing with you.
Yahoo
3 hours ago
- Yahoo
9 Things in Your Home You Need to Get Rid of ASAP This Month
"Hearst Magazines and Yahoo may earn commission or revenue on some items through these links." You might spend the most time getting organized around the new year and in the spring, but pros organizers say there's another period that's just as important: July. Between yard work, road trips, barbecues, water sports and kids' activities, your house has likely seen better days during this summer month. That's why we tapped professional organizers to find out the top things you should get rid of in your home this July. "I think July is the best month for a mid-year check-in and decluttering session," says Shaniece Jones, professional organizer and Founder of Closet Therapy. "It's the perfect time to restock summer essentials and let go of what's just taking up space. If it hasn't been used by now, it might be time to let it go." From ill-fitting swimwear and expired sunscreen to old school supplies and unwanted bikes taking up much-needed space in the garage, see suggestions from Jones and other professional organizers to keep your home in tip-top shape. Remember, anything that can be, should be donated. With all the outdoor activities on your schedule, from biking to swimming, chances are you have some unnecessary gear in your space. It's important to stay on top of it, especially if you have kids. "Get rid of bikes they've outgrown, pool toys collecting dust or swimwear that no longer fits," says Jones. Don't forget to get rid of defective beach umbrellas, too. And good news: Some things like camping gear and outdoor clothes can be donated. Just do a quick Google search first!Back-to-school season in August isn't the best time to tackle your kids' supplies, Jones says, as it's "highly intense and chaotic." This month, get a head start and declutter your kids' schoolwork from the past year. "Toss the old worksheets, reports and notebooks while things are a bit slow," she says. Tackle the mudroom as well, says Marissa Hagmeyer, NEAT Method co-founder and COO and author of the recently published book, The NEAT Method Organizing Recipe Book. "Set aside backpacks, lunchboxes and water bottles that are stained, broken or missing parts to be tossed or donated. The same goes for any other school supplies or gear that may need replacing before the school year." RELATED: Pro Organizers Want You to Throw Out Your Children's ArtworkWith vacation season underway, make packing a breeze by editing travel essentials. Take stock of everything from mini face moisturizers and toothpaste to makeup and body products. "Keep what you love and use," says Janelle Lam of Straighten Up by Janelle. But you can recycle what has expired, or donate what hasn't been used. RELATED: Thought You Had to Toss Your Empty Beauty Containers? There May Be Another Way"If you're using expired bug spray or sunscreen, they're not doing their job," says Hagmeyer. It's important to check dates on packaging, especially citronella stickers or bracelets. "Finish the summer off strong — sans sunburns — and clear space for products that actually work," she overlook your closet when you're decluttering. Are there pieces you didn't wear last summer? Is there an item you just don't love anymore? "If it didn't make it out of your closet last summer, there is a high chance it probably doesn't reflect your current style," Jones says. She recommends creating a Pinterest board just for your summer style. That way, you have a clear vision of what doesn't fit so you can easily declutter. Violetta Elezovic, founder of VS Organized Interiors, also suggests evaluating your summer wardrobe every year: "Go through your summer clothes and shoes that are worn out or no longer useful. In general, you can create more space in your wardrobe and keep a better eye on what you already have when things aren't so cluttered." And remember, many organizations will take gently worn summer clothing, including dresses and shorts. RELATED: Declutter Your Closet in Just a Day With These Hacks From Pro OrganizersWith outdoor entertaining, comes lots of food storage containers. You're bound to have some in your cabinet that you never reach for. "Summer leftovers, BBQs and picnics mean you're using food containers constantly," Lam says. "Take five minutes to match up lids, and toss any warped pieces." If you have too many, or they are just mismatched, check with local schools or senior center to see if they can be donated there. You can also try to find clever new uses for them, like storing crayons and pencils!Examine your beach towels to make sure they're in good shape. "If they are too thin or are ripped and frayed, it's time to let them go," says Nicole Gabai, founder of B. Organized! "Many donation centers will accept most textiles because they can sell the unusable items by the pound." You can also check with your local pet shelter, which can use them for clean up or keeping pets bottles always seem to accumulate out of nowhere, so it's worth taking stock of your collection in any cabinets and coolers. "Toss the ones that are moldy, smelly or rarely get used for whatever reason – broken zipper, item doesn't insulate well or water bottles that leak easily," says Gabai. RELATED: Not All Reusable Water Bottles Are Recyclable. Here's How to Tell If Yours pretty easy to access instruction manuals for appliances on reputable websites these days, whether you're trying to figure out a maintenance issue or learning how a specific feature works. Ashley Hines of Thee Tailored Life suggests making note of your appliances' model numbers before recycling paper manuals, though. "Most are unnecessary now that setup guides and troubleshooting tips are just a company website or YouTube search away," Hines says. You Might Also Like 67 Best Gifts for Women That'll Make Her Smile The Best Pillows for Every Type of Sleeper


Washington Post
3 hours ago
- Washington Post
My ex destroyed his relationship with our kids. Should I help fix it?
Dear Meghan: I have two teen sons, 16 and 14. Two years ago, their father moved out after deciding to pursue a relationship with another woman; the boys stayed with me by mutual agreement between all four of us. The kids were devastated by their dad's decision, and the months following his departure were awful. When they had planned time with their dad, he often changed plans, arrived late to see them, left early, spent the whole time on his phone and just generally made them feel like they were not a priority. My older son, then the younger one, eventually cut their dad out of their lives except for occasional text messages. Right now, both kids aren't interested in a relationship with their dad, and he doesn't seem very interested in a relationship with them, either. Although he professes to want a relationship, he has not done anything to try to repair things between them, instead insisting the boys need to 'grow up,' 'accept the way things are' and 'stop being so angry.' For now, things between them are at an impasse. I am struggling with my role. I am trying to balance their growing autonomy and their right (I believe) to set boundaries with their dad with the worry that eventually they will be sad they missed this time together. I have suggested to their dad that he make the overtures necessary to fix things between them, but he is not interested in my perspective. Fair enough. In my opinion, it would be best if their dad would apologize, make an effort to reconnect with the kids and work on showing them how much he loves them. I encourage the kids to keep an open mind toward their dad, and I require that they keep the lines of communication open. I think he has to be able to contact them, in case he does wake up one day and decide to try to repair things. I'm unsure of what my job is here. Am I more in a role of listening and supporting them through their complicated feelings or of actively encouraging/pushing them to reconnect with their dad despite his recent shortcomings? He was a really great dad to the boys while they were growing up, and I think his abrupt 'about face' in this regard is part of what has made the kids so hurt and angry. — What Next? What Next?: Thanks for writing in. I sighed deeply reading this; I hate to see the unnecessary pain parents cause their children when they disappear from their lives. The boys' father first hurt them by leaving (rightly or wrongly), but the continuous pain of not showing up is where the real damage lies. Many children can move forward — even through something hard like a parent leaving for another adult — if both parents are committed to staying connected to the children. But when one parent checks out, it re-wounds the children and places extra pressure on the connected parent. Your children's father has taken absolutely no responsibility for his choices, decisions or the pain caused. And worst of all? He is doubling down on his immaturity by blaming his sons for the rift! He has given his sons absolutely no reason to trust him, so my question to you is: Why would you push your sons to discard the evidence and not trust their intuition? Of course, it is awful that your ex was once a present and loving father, and we hope that he can see the light one day. That day is not today. By encouraging your sons to 'keep the lines of communication open,' you are essentially saying: 'Hey guys, don't trust your instincts, push aside your feelings and stay vulnerable to someone who has hurt you. Badly.' Oof. You are confused about what your 'role' is here, but it's pretty clear. Your sons are now old enough to know their own minds. What they think and feel and experience is valid; your role is never to talk them out of that. Here's the good news and the bad news: You don't need to do a lot to fulfill your role. You actually put it perfectly: 'I am trying to balance their growing autonomy and their right (I believe) to set boundaries with their dad … .' Boom, that's it. You are worried about them missing time with their dad, but the bad news is that it isn't your problem to solve. The worse news is that you will have to watch your sons be hurt and disappointed by their father, and there may not be anything you can do about it. But by subtly or overtly pressuring your sons to stay open to their father, you are encouraging them to mistrust themselves. That's not fair. Children (even teens) are not meant to 'be better' than their parents; it is always the parents responsibility to show up for their children. If their father wants to be in connection with them, he knows how to find them. When you ask if you should just be listening and supportive, the answer is yes. If your sons ask, 'Should we talk to Dad if he reaches out?' your only responsibility is to use curiosity and thoughtfulness. 'I don't know buddy, what would need to happen for you to want to talk to him?' By asking thoughtful questions, you promote reflection and responsiveness rather than anger and reactivity in your sons. Is this frustrating for you? You bet it is! There are no easy answers or solutions here, so follow your children's lead. Good luck.