Marvel wants out of Blake Lively and Justin Baldoni's explosive legal battle over Deadpool's Nicepool
Finally, it is now official that Marvel has zero interest in being the third wheel in Blake Lively and Justin Baldoni's spiralling legal drama. The comic book empire is slamming the emergency brakes, pleading with a federal court to yank it out of the messy subpoena war over Deadpool and Wolverine's 'Nicepool' character.
The drama around It Ends With Us
Let's rewind. Blake and Justin, who co-starred in It Ends with Us, are no longer playing nice. Instead, they are locked in a bitter courtroom clash, throwing metaphorical popcorn-worthy punches. And somehow, Marvel's fictional feminist, Nicepool, got dragged into the battlefield.
In a recent letter submitted to Judge Lewis J. Liman (yep, this is all very real), Marvel said, hard pass. They asked the court to quash the subpoena issued by Baldoni's production company, Wayfarer Parties, demanding confidential documents about Nicepool's creation and any ties to Baldoni. Not only that, Marvel also begged the court for a protective order to block anyone from spilling their classified creative tea.
What is the concern of Marvel behind all this
An insider close to Marvel explained that the company is concerned the subpoena will lead to the unauthorised release of sensitive information that has nothing to do with the actual legal beef. Instead of diving deep into the Nicepool archives, they want the whole subpoena situation frozen until Ryan Reynolds' motion to dismiss as a counterclaim defendant is resolved.
Wait, it gets juicier.
Baldoni's legal squad fired back with some serious side-eye. They said that Marvel's counsel bailed during a negotiation call, dodging any real conversation about confidentiality concerns. The rep claimed Marvel's lawyer just wanted to know what the Wayfarer team 'really' needed—despite the subpoena already listing documents on the Nicepool character and anything connected to Baldoni.
Why is Nicepool even relevant? Because in Deadpool and Wolverine, Ryan Reynolds (aka Blake's husband) plays the flamboyant, self-proclaimed feminist Nicepool who showers Ladypool (played by Blake) with compliments, calling her 'gorgeous.' Baldoni claims this was not just cinema, it was a coded, public dig at him.
So now, Marvel, who just wants to make superhero blockbusters in peace, is caught in a celebrity warzone over alleged onscreen shade.
Someone pass the popcorn, because this is not your average Hollywood lawsuit—it is a cinematic crossover no one asked for
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
11 hours ago
- Time of India
Thunderbolts lost millions despite rave reviews, what's next for Marvel?
Thunderbolts premiered to strong enthusiasm—a whopping 88 per cent critic score on Rotten Tomatoes and a 93 per cent audience rating. Disney CEO Bob Iger even heralded it as 'the first and best' result of Marvel's new film strategy. But six weeks in, its $371 million global box office haul places it among the MCU's lowest earners. With a production and marketing outlay reaching $275 million, analysts say it would need about $425 million just to break even. Critical acclaim, financial crash Shawn Robbins, director of analytics at Fandango, suggests Marvel has entered a 'new era' where blockbuster success cannot be assumed. Indeed, while pre‑pandemic MCU films largely topped $500 million, only 6 of 13 movies have crossed that mark since 2020. Still, Marvel's vast ecosystem—including Disney+, theme parks, and merch—helps cushion losses. Standalone films are fading, but the big guns still fire Michael Bock from Exhibitor Relations notes that 'lower‑tier comic book movies aren't cinematic slam dunks anymore,' pointing to Thunderbolts' rapid decline at the box office. In response, Marvel is scaling back stand‑alone origin films and doubling down on tentpole events and crossover extravaganzas, think Fantastic Four: First Steps, Avengers: Doomsday (Dec 2026), Spider‑Man 4, and Avengers: Secret Wars (Dec 2027). These are seen as safer bets with built‑in fanbases. Quality over quantity: The creative course correction After Marvel fatigue set in—sparked by an overload of interconnected films and TV series—Kevin Feige admitted the studio had overstuffed its release schedule . The misfires of The Marvels and Quantumania forced introspection. Now, Marvel is pulling back, emphasising fewer, bigger, and more polished projects. Thunderbolts was viewed more like a narrative bridge than a standalone hit, What's Marvel's next move? Marvel has signalled that it will prioritise proven franchises like Avengers and Spider‑Man. Lesser-known characters may only get spotlight time in team‑ups rather than their own blockbusters . With rising production costs and tighter budgets, the MCU's strategy appears to be about smart storytelling over sheer volume.
Time of India
16 hours ago
- Time of India
Wolverine back? Hugh Jackman's stunt double seen on set; Avengers: Doomsday rumors grow
Hugh Jackman Speculation regarding Hugh Jackman's comeback as Wolverine in 'Avengers: Doomsday' has hit new levels following a recent photo post by his veteran stunt double, Daniel Stevens. According to a report in Comicbookmovie, Stevens posted on social media that he is working at London's Pinewood Studios, which is the verified location of filming for the next Marvel blockbuster. The news has renewed speculations regarding Jackman's future within the Marvel Cinematic Universe (MCU). Earlier this week, Jackman also shared a video on Instagram that fans suspect could be him preparing for a character, again sparking rumors about his return as the legendary mutant. Although the video did not explicitly state anything, the timing of the upload, together with Stevens' check-in location, has piqued the interest of fans and insiders. Familiar faces and fan favorites join epic ensemble Daniel Stevens, a stunt veteran, has been directly linked with Jackman's interpretation of Logan in numerous films. Still, he has doubled for other top heroes such as Chris Pratt's Star-Lord, Robert Downey Jr.'s Iron Man, and Chris Hemsworth's Thor. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Pensia Pilon 3 NN Pensia Facultativă NN Vezi oferta Undo All three actors are already set to show up in 'Avengers: Doomsday,' leaving it open whether Stevens is doubling for any of them rather than Jackman. Nevertheless, the timing has sparked rumors that Jackman may be getting back into the costume after last year's successful Deadpool & Wolverine cameo. During a recent interview, Jackman was questioned about his future and responded cryptically, "I really can't say much, except when you say 'appear,' it's more like dominate and destroy every other character. I'm kidding." He continued, "I really have nothing to add, and if I did, I would find a really cool way to not say it, but I actually have nothing to add. " 'Avengers: Doomsday' is being directed by Joe and Anthony Russo and written by Stephen McFeely, who had worked with the duo before on 'Captain America: The Winter Soldier' and 'Avengers: Endgame.' The movie stars a diverse lineup of returning and new actors, including Chris Hemsworth, Anthony Mackie, Tom Hiddleston, Paul Rudd, Letitia Wright, Sebastian Stan, and Robert Downey Jr. The film will also be the Avengers franchise debut of Wyatt Russell, Simu Liu, Florence Pugh, David Harbour, and Hannah John-Kamen. Cast members of the 'X-Men' and Fantastic Four franchises have been confirmed as well, including Patrick Stewart, Ian McKellen, Rebecca Romijn, Pedro Pascal, Vanessa Kirby, and Channing Tatum, who appears in Deadpool & Wolverine. 'Avengers: Doomsday' will release in theaters on December 18, 2026, with 'Avengers: Secret Wars' on December 17, 2027.
Indian Express
19 hours ago
- Indian Express
Blake Lively fights to keep Taylor Swift's private texts away from Justin Baldoni; files motion to block access
Justin Baldoni's $400 million countersuit against Blake Lively may have been tossed aside, but the legal war is still raging on. On Friday, Gossip Girl star filed a motion in a New York court, seeking 'protective orders' in an attempt to protect her communication with popstar Taylor Swift. Earlier, it was reported that Swift had been approached by Lively's team to delete the text exchanges between them. Now, according to the court filing, Lively's attorneys urged the judge to block Baldoni's lawyers from obtaining those messages, saying they have nothing to do with the ongoing case. This comes hours after Baldoni's lawyer, Bryan Freedman, called Lively's victory false, alleging the court has asked them to amend and refile the lawsuit. Also read: Blake Lively opens up on emotional turmoil caused by Justin Baldoni's lawsuit, reacts to dismissal: 'I've felt the pain' Baldoni's lawyers had earlier subpoenaed Taylor Swift and her legal team, citing her involvement in the movie It Ends With Us, alleging creative interference. However, last month, they unexpectedly dropped the charge after the singer's attorney objected to what they called an 'unwarranted fishing expedition.' Lively's side now wants Swift excluded from the dispute altogether. According to the letter obtained by PEOPLE, Baldoni's Wayfarer Parties 'have pursued these communications at the same time they have refused to produce to Ms. Lively the documents they publicly claimed to have received as part of a deal to withdraw their subpoenas to Ms. Swift and her counsel.' When dropping the subpoena earlier, Freedman said, they got 'excatly what they were looking for'. However, later, Lively's side published an email from Swift's attorney, Doug Baldridge, disputing the statement. 'No documents are being produced and no deposition is being scheduled.' Baldoni suffered a major legal setback Monday when Judge Lewis Liman dismissed his defamation and extortion suit against his co-star, her publicist, and The New York Times. The same suit also referenced Swift discussing how Ryan Reynolds and the singer's presence during a dinner invitation pressured Baldoni into making changes to a particular rooftop scene in the movie. Lively later allegedly called the two of them 'dragons,' referring to popular Game of Thrones characters. In the recent court filing, Lively's attorney Esra Hudson said, 'Good cause exists for this request because it has been a tactic' of Wayfarer Parties to stir tabloid attention without any legitimate legal basis. Meanwhile, Lively's harassment and retaliation suit against Baldoni and others involved in production remains intact. The Hollywood A-lister has filed additional charges alleging that Baldoni and his publicists orchestrated a smear campaign against her. 'The only allegations in this action that were ever remotely relevant to Ms. Swift were in the Wayfarer Parties' now-dismissed complaint,' Hudson said, according to Variety. 'Ms. Swift is not mentioned a single time in Ms. Lively's amended complaint.' Also read: Blake Lively 'threatening' Taylor Swift with 'private texts' if singer doesn't support her, claims Justin Baldoni in new court filing A spokesperson of Lively told the outlet, 'the ongoing attempts to once again try and use the world's biggest star as a PR tactic in this matter reflects a public unraveling of epic proportions, and serves only to distract from the fact that Justin Baldoni's lawsuits against Ms. Lively, Ryan Reynolds, their publicist, and the New York Times have been entirely dismissed.' The development comes a day after it was reported that Lively's team is preparing to subpoena Swift's ex-manager, Scooter Braun, and his K-pop wing HYBE.
