Punjab Congress' Bajwa questions intent: ‘Sacrilege Bill handed minutes before debate; CM wants to bulldoze it through House'
Bjawa questioned the government's intent, saying, 'This is not how serious legislative business is conducted, especially on issues that strike at the very heart of Punjab's socio-religious fabric.'
Highlighting parliamentary conventions, Bajwa pointed out that opposition parties are normally given at least 48 hours to study and understand a Bill before it is brought to the House for discussion. He accused Chief Minister Bhagwant Mann of riding roughshod over democratic procedures and showing complete disregard for legislative norms.
'It appears that Bhagwant Mann wants to bulldoze his decisions without any meaningful debate or scrutiny. This only proves that he has little regard for democratic conventions and is more interested in pleasing his political master, Arvind Kejriwal, than serving the people of Punjab,' said Bajwa.
The Congress leader called it deeply unfortunate that such a grave and emotional issue as sacrilege is being reduced to a political stunt by the AAP government. He warned that such behaviour not only erodes the dignity of the Assembly but also diminishes public trust in the government's commitment to justice.
Consulted leading legal experts to draft the Bill: Mann
Chief Minister Mann said that sacrilege was an emotive and critical issue that concerned every Punjabi. He emphasized that the matter has grave repercussions not only in the present but also for future generations. He said that stringent punishment for this unpardonable offence is the need of the hour to serve as a deterrent to criminals.
The Chief Minister reiterated that Punjab is a sacred land of great Gurus, saints, and seers who have shown the path of mutual love and tolerance. However, he lamented that certain anti-Punjab forces have been attempting to destroy the state's social fabric by orchestrating sacrilegious acts of holy granths since 2016. He reaffirmed the state government's firm commitment to ensuring exemplary punishment for the perpetrators of such incidents.
Mann added that the government had consulted leading legal experts to draft robust legislation that prevents offenders from evading severe consequences—including sternest punishment for such heinous crimes. Reaffirming his government's dedication to justice, he asserted that every individual involved in these sacrilegious acts, whether directly or indirectly, would face exemplary punishment. He said it is the solemn duty of the state government to ensure that these dreaded criminals are held accountable for their actions.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Hindustan Times
4 minutes ago
- Hindustan Times
Teacher's death: Haryana suspends mobile internet, SMS in Bhiwani, Charkhi Dadri
A day after the Haryana Police probe into the recent death of a 19-year-old playschool teacher ruled out foul play and indicated she had died by suicide, the state government on Tuesday suspended mobile internet services, bulk SMS and dongle services in Bhiwani and Charkhi Dadri districts in view of the tension and public outrage as the family rejected the findings and refused to cremate the body. The state home department order said the step was being taken to stop the spread of misinformation on social media platforms and to check the mobilisation of demonstrators. The state home department order said the step was being taken to stop the spread of misinformation on social media platforms and to check the mobilisation of demonstrators who could cause loss of life and damage to property by indulging in violence. On Monday evening after the police made the findings based on the autopsy report, the Bhiwani district administration representatives held talks with a committee formed by villagers to hold discussions on behalf of the victim's family and they agreed to cremate the woman's body on Tuesday. The woman's father expressed satisfaction with police findings but he took a U-turn on Tuesday and accused the committee of mounting pressure on him to conduct the last rites of his daughter, who was found dead in a field near a canal at Singhani village on August 13. Talking to reporters at his house, he said: 'We are not happy with the autopsy report and police findings. I urge people to join the fight for justice for my daughter.' Security stepped up Soon, a large number of people gathered at Dhani Laxman village and attended a panchayat. The villagers announced they would continue their fight and asked the state government to ensure justice to the woman's family. Villagers in Charkhi Dadri district expressed solidarity with the woman's family and planned to hold a dharna. Villagers from nearby areas were prevented from reaching Dhani Laxman village as police were deployed on connecting roads. Additional police force were requisitioned from Panipat district. Opposition parties, including the Congress, have demanded a CBI investigation into the death. Though the teacher's body was found on August 13, she had been missing since August 11 after leaving school, purportedly to enquire about admission at a nearby nursing college. A murder case was registered by the police on the complaint of the woman's family. Suicide note found: Police On Monday, the emergence of a suicide note turned the investigation on its head. A police officer, however, said that the note was found on the same day the body was discovered and the woman's family knew about it all along. Bhiwani superintendent of police Sumit Kumar said the suicide note was found near the body in a bag, which also had her Aadhaar and other documents. 'The handwriting matches (with that of the woman),' the SP said over the phone. He said there was proof she bought insecticide. 'We found through video surveillance that she had gone to an insecticide shop. There is a record in the register of the seller that the woman had taken this quantity of insecticide and paid a particular amount for the same to the seller,' the officer said. 'The next part of the investigation was whether the insecticide was consumed or not. We sent the viscera report to the forensic sciences laboratory along with other samples. There were numerous samples given by the coroner to us,' the SP said, adding 'In the viscera sample, the presence of insecticide has been confirmed in the body.' 'So, there is self-purchase, there is a suicide note, there is poison in the body,' he said. According to the police, Manisha wrote in the suicide note, 'Mummy, papa you did a lot for me, but you were upset with me. I was not wrong. Also I did nothing wrong. I want to fulfil my parents' dream. I wanted to be a nursing officer. I don't want to be a financial burden. I am sorry if I have hurt you.' Two autopsies, one of which was done at Post Graduate Institute of Medical Sciences, Rohtak, also unravelled the mystery behind the lacerations on the face, earlier claimed to be a slit mark. The PGIMS confirmed she was not raped and also there was no cut on her throat. 'In the first post-mortem report, the doctor mentioned that these wounds are lacerated wounds with a gnawing effect. Gnawing is when any scavenger eats the body. The doctor has very clearly mentioned that these are the scavenging animal bites, and he has used the word gnawing effect. A portion of the neck was missing. Eyes were not there, face skin was not there. However, no vital organ below the neck is missing,' the SP said. Earlier, the woman's family accused the police of delaying the registration of a complaint in the matter. The woman's father alleged that the Loharu police had initially refused to lodge a report on August 11, suggesting that his daughter might have run away or gone on a trip and would return in a few days. It was only the following day that the complaint was registered. Haryana chief minister Nayab Singh Saini on Friday ordered the transfer of the then SP and suspension of five police officials from the district in connection with the death. Sumit Kumar assumed the charge of SP two days ago.
Hans India
5 minutes ago
- Hans India
Will work to make Rahul Gandhi next PM: Tejashwi Yadav at Voter Adhikar Yatra
Patna: Rashtriya Janata Dal (RJD) leader Tejashwi Yadav on Tuesday made a strong pitch in support of his 'bade bhai (elder brother)' and Congress MP Rahul Gandhi, during the ongoing Voter Adhikar Yatra and declared that the Mahagathbandhan (RJD-Cong-Left alliance in Bihar) will work towards making him the next Prime Minister. Tejashwi's poll pitch for Rahul Gandhi came at their roadshow in Nawada district. Addressing the gathering of supporters, he said, 'Whenever the next Lok Sabha elections are held, we will dislodge the NDA government from power and will work to make Rahul Gandhi the Prime Minister.' The war cry by the RJD leader and also the unarguable face of Mahagathbandhan in the Bihar elections, was greeted with loud cheering and applause from the crowd. Tejashwi and Rahul, having launched 'Voter Adhikar Yatra' from Bihar's Sasaram, are set to tour 1300 km in the state to win public support ahead of the Assembly elections. The bonhomie between the two leaders is also apparent, with Tejashwi in the driver's seat while the Congress MP gives him company. In one of the viral pictures from the rally, Tejashwi was seen driving a jeep while Rahul was waving to the crowd from the 'passenger' seat. While batting for Rahul Gandhi as the next Prime Minister, Tejashwi also blasted the Centre as well as the Nitish government for 'tampering' with the electoral rolls and 'abandoning' the people of Bihar. He said that many names have been struck off the Bihar electoral rolls, and many people who voted in the Lok Sabha elections have been declared dead in the current draft electoral list. 'BJP is snatching the rights of people to vote in upcoming elections, in connivance with the Election Commission,' Tejashwi said and credited Rahul for 'exposing' the corruption and voter fraud in Bihar's electoral process. Slamming the Nitish administration, he said the Chief Minister is in an "unconscious state" and unable to lead the state, and therefore it is time to throw out this 'inefficient and ineffective' government. He said that the Bihar government has no plan or framework for people's welfare, and it is just aping policies proposed by him and the grand alliance. 'Mahagathbandhan promised people of Bihar -- free electricity, enhanced pension, formation of youth commission. They copied our promises and started it just ahead of the elections to fool and cheat you,' he stated. He added that it is the INDIA bloc that will shape the future of Bihar as it has the 'vision and mission' for the state and also has a 'pool of young leadership' to steer the state.
&w=3840&q=100)
Business Standard
5 minutes ago
- Business Standard
SC starts hearing on Presidential Reference on timeline for assent to bills
The Supreme Court on Tuesday commenced hearing on the Presidential Reference, which raised constitutional questions on whether the court can impose timelines for Governors and the President to deal with bills passed by state assemblies. A five-judge constitution bench headed by Chief Justice BR Gavai allowed state governments of Kerala and Tamil Nadu to question the maintainability of the Presidential Reference. "We will hear preliminary objections for half an hour. Thereafter, we will start hearing submissions from the Attorney General," CJI Gavai said at the outset. The bench -- also comprising Justices Surya Kant, Vikram Nath, P S Narasimha and A S Chandurkar -- said that after hearing preliminary objections, the court will hear arguments on the Presidential Reference itself, starting with the submission of Attorney General R Venkataramani. Senior advocate KK Venugopal, appearing for Kerala government, opposed the Presidential Reference and said the issue is covered by a series of judgments. Citing several Supreme Court verdicts, he said the Governor's powers under Article 200 has been interpreted by the apex court time and again, and it is for the first time in the Tamil Nadu (State vs Governor) case, a deadline has been fixed for assent of bills passed by the Assembly. Meanwhile, the Centre, in its written submission, has said that imposing fixed timelines on Governors and the President to act on bills passed by a state Assembly would amount to one organ of the government assuming powers not vested in it by the Constitution, and lead to "constitutional disorder". The apex court imposing fixed timelines would dissolve the delicate equilibrium that the Constitution has established and negate the rule of law, it stated. On July 29, the top court had fixed a time schedule for hearing the Presidential Reference and proposed to start the hearing from August 19. The top court had said that the Centre and the states supporting the Presidential Reference will be heard on August 19, 20, 21 and 26, while those opposing it will be heard on August 28 and September 2, 3 and 9. The bench said rejoinder submissions, if any, will be heard on September 10. On July 22, the top court observed that the issues raised in the Presidential Reference will affect the "entire country". In May, President Droupadi Murmu exercised powers under Article 143(1) to know from the top court whether timelines could be imposed by judicial orders for exercise of discretion by the President while dealing with the bills passed by state assemblies. The President's decision came in light of the April 8 verdict of the apex court, on powers of the Governor in dealing with bills passed by the Tamil Nadu government. The verdict, for the first time, prescribed that the President should decide on the bills reserved for her consideration by the Governor within three months from the date on which such reference is received. In a five-page reference, President Murmu posed 14 questions to the Supreme Court and sought to know its opinion on powers of Governor and President under Articles 200 and 201 in dealing with bills passed by the state legislature. The verdict has set a timeline for all Governors to act on the bills passed by the state assemblies and ruled that the Governor does not possess any discretion in exercise of functions under Article 200 of the Constitution in respect to any bill presented to them and must mandatorily abide by the advice tendered by the council of ministers. It had said that state governments can directly approach the Supreme Court if the President withholds assent on a bill sent by a Governor for consideration.
