logo
Edinburgh school catchment and moving Gaelic unit under review at council debate

Edinburgh school catchment and moving Gaelic unit under review at council debate

Edinburgh Live29-04-2025

Our community members are treated to special offers, promotions and adverts from us and our partners. You can check out at any time. More info
Plans for the future of Gaelic education in Edinburgh are to be discussed this week.
The Education, Children and Families committee will meet on Thursday as the number of applications for places at the city's only Gaelic primary school doubles in a year, and plans for a standalone secondary school stalled.
Gaelic education for secondary school pupils is currently available at James Gillespie's High School - which is also seeing a rise in the number of pupils enrolled.
A number of options, including exploring a catchment change, introduction of timetabling efficiencies, internal reconfiguration of existing accommodation or, if possible, additional accommodation, have all been highlighted in the meeting agenda.
Plans to offer an annex unit at Liberton High School were previously ruled out and it was decided there was no budget in the capital programme to deliver a Gaelic Medium Education (GME) secondary school.
Parents previously criticised plans for the provision at the new Liberton High School due to its location from the primary school and a more central site being required. Councillors agreed and a statutory consultation was paused.
The main report states: "Engagement with the GME community on all aspects of GME education has continued through the Edinburgh Gaelic Collaborative Forum and in line with the specific action on demand for GME in the Gaelic Language Plan.
"However, in relation to the provision of new GME primary and secondary schools, there remains no fundamental change to the update provided in 2022. Monitoring of the primary and secondary school rolls continues, and demand is currently able to be accommodated in existing provision or by introducing the rising rolls options highlighted above.
"There remains no specific capital budget allocated to the provision of GME infrastructure and therefore no detailed project work can progress. The situation with potential site availability for a new GME secondary school remains as has been reported to Committee in 2022.
"Following the request by Committee on 3 September 2024 to report the potential of the Police Headquarters at Fettes as a site, direct communication with the Scottish Government and Police Scotland has reconfirmed this site would not be available to the Council for the provision of a GME secondary school."
In terms of next steps, the monitoring of school rolls for GME and recruitment of school staff will continue and the council will engage with the Scottish Government, the Gaelic community in Edinburgh and other stakeholders to consider the best way forward.
Councillor Steve Burgess, Greens education spokesperson, said: "Greens strongly support the growth of Gaelic in the Capital, so we very much welcome any positive steps towards developing a robust strategy around the expansion of Gaelic Medium Education, which has now been stalled for years.
"But the challenge is how to grow Gaelic with only one primary school, that looks to be bursting at the seams, and no dedicated high school for Gaelic, whereas Glasgow has several Gaelic primary schools and a high school.
"The council needs to be working proactively with the Gaelic community in Edinburgh to rapidly produce a meaningful way forward for the growth of Gaelic in the Capital, and I would then hope and expect that the SNP Scottish Government would support this as they promised to in their last Holyrood election manifesto."

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Care reform Bill passed unanimously at Holyrood
Care reform Bill passed unanimously at Holyrood

Glasgow Times

timean hour ago

  • Glasgow Times

Care reform Bill passed unanimously at Holyrood

The Scottish Government proposed to shift accountability for providing social care to ministers and create local bodies that would be responsible for administering care. But serious opposition from political parties, local authorities and trade unions resulted in the plans being ripped out of the Bill despite around £30 million being spent on its development. The name of the Bill was eventually changed to the Care Reform (Scotland) Bill and it was passed with the support of 116 MSPs on Tuesday. Speaking about the failed proposals for the creation of a National Care Service, Scottish Tory health spokesman Dr Sandesh Gulhane said: 'Let's not pretend we've arrived at this moment by design. 'We're here because of yet another SNP policy that promised the world and delivered a fiasco. 'The now defunct National Care Service Bill was once hailed as the most significant reform to health and social care since the creation of the NHS. 'But, in reality, it was a half-baked plan dreamt up by ministers, clearly in an ivory tower that was dead in the water before the ink had dried on the first draft.' While Scottish Labour deputy leader Jackie Baillie said: 'The way we care for our most vulnerable is more important than party politics. 'That is why Scottish Labour committed to help the Scottish Government deliver such a service, but as I warned at the time, the devil would be in the detail.' The Scottish Government, Ms Baillie claimed, 'attempted a power grab'. 'Four years later, three first ministers later, three health secretaries later and £31 million later and what we have before us is a drastically reduced Bill with not a National Care Service in sight, and not a single extra penny of that money going directly to social care,' she added. Despite the changes, social care minister Maree Todd said the Government remained committed to the creation of a National Care Service. The remaining provisions will implement changes to the existing care system, the biggest of which has been dubbed 'Anne's Law'. The change will allow family and friends to be named as 'essential care supporters' and require care homes to facilitate visits from them in all but the most extreme circumstances. The proposals grew from a Scottish Parliament petition by Natasha Hamilton, who was unable to visit her mother Anne Duke in her care home during the pandemic, ultimately missing her death. Speaking in Holyrood on Tuesday, Ms Todd praised the work of campaigners for Anne's Law, some of whom were watching proceedings from the public gallery. 'I have been profoundly impacted by the conversations that I have had with them,' she said. 'The emotional harm and trauma that they and their loved ones and many others suffered from being unable to see one another for such long, isolating periods during the pandemic must be acknowledged to make sure that this never happens again.' As well as Anne's Law, the legislation will also give unpaid carers the right to take breaks.

MSPs unanimously approve scaled-back social care reforms
MSPs unanimously approve scaled-back social care reforms

STV News

time4 hours ago

  • STV News

MSPs unanimously approve scaled-back social care reforms

MSPs have voted to approve a set of scaled-back social care reforms after plans for a National Care Service were scrapped. The Care Reform (Scotland) Bill passed the third and final stage of Holyrood on Tuesday. The Scottish Government proposed to shift accountability for providing social care to ministers and create local bodies that would be responsible for administering care under the National Care Service. The plans faced opposition from political parties, local authorities and trade unions, resulting in them being removed from Bill despite around £30 million being spent on its development. The name of the Bill was eventually changed to the Care Reform (Scotland) Bill and it was passed with the support of 116 MSPs on Tuesday. Councillors debated a list of amendments on the bill at the Scottish Parliament. The Scottish Government says the bill will strengthen support for unpaid carers by establishing a legal right to breaks following £13m being allocated for up to 40,000 carers to take voluntary sector short breaks. It aims to improve access to independent advocacy and to create a national chief social work adviser role. Speaking about the failed proposals for the creation of a National Care Service, Scottish Tory health spokesman Dr Sandesh Gulhane said: 'Let's not pretend we've arrived at this moment by design. 'We're here because of yet another SNP policy that promised the world and delivered a fiasco. 'The now defunct National Care Service Bill was once hailed as the most significant reform to health and social care since the creation of the NHS. 'But, in reality, it was a half-baked plan dreamt up by ministers, clearly in an ivory tower that was dead in the water before the ink had dried on the first draft.' While Scottish Labour deputy leader Jackie Baillie said: 'The way we care for our most vulnerable is more important than party politics. 'That is why Scottish Labour committed to help the Scottish Government deliver such a service, but as I warned at the time, the devil would be in the detail.' The Scottish Government, Baillie claimed, 'attempted a power grab'. 'Four years later, three first ministers later, three health secretaries later and £31m later and what we have before us is a drastically reduced Bill with not a National Care Service in sight, and not a single extra penny of that money going directly to social care,' Despite the changes, social care minister Maree Todd said the Government remained committed to the creation of a National Care Service. She said: 'More than 200,000 people across Scotland access care each year. 'Anyone may need care during their lives, and that care should be high quality and delivered consistently across Scotland. 'That is why we have been so determined to bring forward much-needed reform, alongside the work we are already doing through the near £2.2bn total investment in social care and integration in 2025-26. 'Reform is not easy to deliver and it is being made more challenging by recent UK Government changes to Employer National Insurance Contributions and changes to migration. These will undoubtedly impact on care delivery. 'However, we have remained steadfast in our commitment to deliver the sustainable change to social care that people urgently need. 'This is a significant step that will strengthen the rights of people living in care homes, support unpaid carers and social workers and improve experiences for the many people who access social care across Scotland.' Get all the latest news from around the country Follow STV News Scan the QR code on your mobile device for all the latest news from around the country

Labour holds same contempt and arrogance towards Scotland as Tories
Labour holds same contempt and arrogance towards Scotland as Tories

The National

time4 hours ago

  • The National

Labour holds same contempt and arrogance towards Scotland as Tories

THE pattern is now clear and established. Keir Starmer's promised "reset" of the relationship between Westminster and Holyrood meant resetting it to the same old contempt and high-handed arrogance which we witnessed under the previous Conservative administration. When Chancellor Rachel Reeves announced that she was going to axe the universal winter fuel payment for pensioners, the Scottish Government was reportedly given a mere 40 minutes' notice despite the fact that control of the equivalent benefit in Scotland is devolved to Holyrood. Holyrood was given little notice of the swingeing benefits cuts which Labour announced in March, even though some of the benefits affected in England and Wales are devolved in Scotland and the benefits cuts will entail a reduction in the annual block grant which forms the backbone of the Scottish budget. This week, the Labour government announced a U-turn on its massively unpopular axing of the winter fuel payment. The UK Government has so far failed to inform the Scottish Government how much extra the Scottish Government will receive as a result of this U-turn. Yet again, there has been no consultation with the Scottish Government on a critical issue affecting thousands in Scotland. READ MORE: Labour MSP Davy Russell sworn in to Scottish Parliament after by-election win Speaking on BBC Scotland's Good Morning Scotland this morning, Governor General Ian Murray first tried to insist that Scottish pensioners will now receive less than their counterparts in England and Wales as a result of Labour's U-turn, a Unionist talking point which had been calmly debunked by Scottish Secretary for Social Justice Shirley-Anne Somerville on the same programme just minutes before. Murray then fell apart when asked how much extra funding the Scottish Government will get after Labour's winter fuel U-turn. He didn't know and ended up rambling on about NHS waiting lists as a distraction. If the Scottish Secretary, the man supposedly Scotland's voice in the UK Government cabinet, doesn't know what the financial implications of this U-turn are for the Scottish budget, then how exactly is the Scottish Government supposed to know? (Image: PA) In yet another instance of Scotland being marginalised and ignored by a Westminster government which continually assures us that it has Scotland's interests at heart, the SNP has pointed out that since taking office, this Labour government has committed £36 billion to energy projects in England since taking power last year but Scotland has scarcely registered at all, with the telling exception of the £3.4 billion electrical interconnection projects which will see two new high capacity electrical cables run from Scotland to England, one on the west coast and one on the east. This project is not about energy production, it is rather a means to facilitate the export of cheap Scottish energy to consumers in England. It's a project which some view as a form of colonialist resource extraction. As the BBC coyly put it in its report announcing the construction of the cables: "Although the link can carry electricity in both directions, the majority is expected to flow out of Scotland." That's like describing the British Museum as a benefit to Athens and the Parthenon. These are the only kinds of energy projects which the UK Government is willing to fund in Scotland. It's almost as though they expect Scotland to become independent and are determined to grab what they can before we go. (Image: PA) This week, Chancellor Rachel Reeves announced a £14.2 billion UK Government investment in the Sizewell C nuclear power station in Sussex. The nuclear plant is expected to take between nine and 12 years to build and cost around £20bn, according to initial estimates from 2020. However, in January, The Financial Times reported that the true cost of the reactor is expected to exceed £40 billion, and will not be ready until 2031 at the most optimistic date. When construction began on the Hinkley Point C nuclear plant in Somerset in 2017, it was expected to go on stream this year, but the project has been plagued by delays and cost overruns. The plant is now expected to be ready between 2029 to 2031 and is forecast to cost £41.6–47.9 billion rather than the original price tag of £18 billion when the project was commissioned. Meanwhile, the UK Government has still not spent any of the £200 million it promised to invest in Grangemouth, while GB Energy's budget has been repeatedly cut. The SNP opposes nuclear power in Scotland, and the party's energy spokesperson at Westminster Dave Doogan, accused the UK Government of pouring money into 'white elephants'. (Image: House of Commons) He said the Labour government was 'treating Scotland as an afterthought because of its prioritisation of English industries with a litany of investments made south of the Border over Scotland'. The SNP added: 'In total, since coming to office last year, the Labour Party has now committed £36bn to nuclear and carbon capture projects in England, whilst the Acorn Project has been forced to live with Labour's warm words, but not a penny of commitment.' Doogan said: 'Yet more billions has been committed to English nuclear projects, yet we have no investment in the Acorn Carbon Capture project, Grangemouth has been shut down and Westminster's fiscal regime has ruined North-East energy jobs – Scotland isn't just an afterthought, it's barely a thought at all. 'The evidence is clear that nuclear is extortionate, takes decades to build and the toxic waste is a risk to local communities – Scotland's future is in renewables, carbon capture and links to Europe, not more money for white elephants. 'It is absurd that energy rich Scotland is home to fuel poor Scots and that while energy bills go up, Scottish energy jobs are going down – that's directly as a consequence of Westminster policy and the further squandering of cash on expensive nuclear won't change that. 'Only the SNP firmly believe money from Scotland's natural resources should benefit Scotland's people – something that's an alien concept to Scottish Labour MPs who cheer on investment in England at the expense of Scottish industry.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store