logo
One small thing you can do to save food from the trash

One small thing you can do to save food from the trash

CNN25-06-2025
Sophia Kokolakis doesn't always know what she's having for dinner, even after she's been to the store. A large paper bag brimming with food rides shotgun on the way home, but she has no clue what's inside.
The Toronto resident ordered the bag on Too Good To Go, an app where grocery stores and restaurants can list their excess, soon-to-be-trashed food for pickup at discounted rates. For $8.99, Kokolakis said she got three burrito wraps, a Thanksgiving stuffing dish and three containers of imitation crab salad.
As more people aim to cut down on weekly food spending, markdown apps are an increasingly popular way to score cheap meals destined for garbage bins. Part of the appeal? App developers say they might offer a meaningful solution to the world's major food waste problem.
The United States wasted 73.9 million tons of unsold or uneaten food, or nearly one-third of the country's total food supply, in 2023, according to data from ReFED, a nonprofit focused on food system reform. Retailers and restaurants accounted for about 17.2 million tons of that waste.
The most widely used markdown apps include Too Good To Go, with about 120 million users, and Flashfood, with more than 1.5 million users, which both partner with businesses in dozens of major cities throughout the US and Canada.
Before the end of each day, Clifford Simpson, the owner of the Atlanta restaurant Soul Good Fine Food, takes stock of how many dishes he has sold and lists a handful of 'surprise bags' for $5.99 each on Too Good To Go.
Users stake their claim on Simpson's bags without knowing what they'll get. The app only guarantees an $18 value, with combinations of wings, fried fish, black-eyed peas, ribs, grits and more listed as possibilities.
'Before (using) the app, we would just throw out tons of food every day. It cost us a lot of money,' Simpson said. 'Now we got more new customers coming in, maybe they haven't heard of us before, and they come back another day.'
Partnering businesses pay a membership fee and give a percentage of each sale to the app in exchange for their listing service, according to a Too Good To Go spokesperson.
'It saves a lot of waste and at least covers my cost of food and labor. I'm not making money on it, but I'm also not losing money,' said Atlanta-based Pizza Jeans owner and Too Good To Go partner Jeremy Gatto.
If a customer isn't happy with their purchase, they can write a review in the app for other users to see.
Flashfood functions similarly, but it only partners with food stores and grocers. Participating businesses list their items on the app at a discount two to three days before the 'best-by' date, according to Flashfood spokesperson Esther Cohn.
While eating day-old food doesn't appeal to everyone, most markdown apps' policies require partnering businesses to follow local food safety regulations, said Patrick Guzzle, vice president of food safety for the National Restaurant Association.
Most state health departments follow the US Food and Drug Administration Food Code model, which requires that vendors throw out cooked food after seven days to prevent the overgrowth of dangerous, invisible pathogens like listeria, salmonella and E. coli, Guzzle said.
Both Flashfood and Too Good To Go allow users to report spoiled food for refunds and remove businesses that violate their policies.
On the other hand, there are limited state regulations against wasting food that is perfectly good to eat, Guzzle noted. Liquid separation, discoloration and loss of shape, for example, are all common reasons businesses may opt to throw things out to protect their brand reputation, he said.
'There's a lot of differences between food quality and food safety. … Many people don't know the difference,' Guzzle explained. 'The food code, all of that's built around those pathogens. … 'Freshness' on the other hand, is a food quality concern.'
After the Covid-19 pandemic drove up food insecurity and damaged food supply chains, more vendors started to take notice of just how much food was going to waste, said Jeffrey Clark, the National Restaurant Association's director of business engagement, in an email.
'Many consumers began demanding more action from the companies they patronize, and the restaurant industry is starting to respond,' Clark said. As markdown apps become available in more cities across the US, ReFED estimates the technology could potentially save up to 881,000 tons of food waste per year, based on annual reports from the apps.
Still, a general lack of awareness about these apps among food vendors and customers alike, as well as an overly cautious food culture, have posed a challenge to expansion efforts, said Jackie Suggitt, vice president of business initiatives and community engagement for ReFED.
Stephanie Smith, who lives outside of Wilmington, North Carolina, said she loves the concept of food markdown apps like Too Good To Go. But even with a population of more than 100,000 people, there aren't enough businesses listing food on the app for her to use it consistently.
'I've used it twice at a local bakery, I went and picked up a box of pastries that they had,' Smith said. 'But I'm hoping that a lot more businesses will pick up on it.'
In the bustling city of Toronto, where Kokolakis lives, demand can be so high that there aren't enough offerings for everyone who wants them. Many surprise bags sell out within mere minutes, she said.
'The demand is there,' Cohn said of Flashfoods in an emailed statement. 'Our job is to get more items on the platform that people can purchase and allow them to shop at more places. We ultimately want to be available everywhere groceries are sold today.'
A big driver for awareness about these apps has come from user testimonials posted on social media platforms. However, some showcase less than glamorous surprise bags and excessive loads of bagels, for example, that may be impractical for a regular Tuesday night dinner.
'One of the biggest unknowns is we don't know how much of that food is still not going to waste,' Suggitt said. 'We assume they're eating it. We hope they're eating it. But I think a big question still is, how much are they eating versus how much is still ending up in the garbage?'
Still, Kokolakis said by reading online reviews and using the apps mindfully, she can still limit her purchases to foods she will actually eat.
'It's such a cool way to help out,' Kokolakis said. 'You feel good about your purchase, and you get to try something new.'
Sign up for CNN's Life, But Greener newsletter. Our limited newsletter series guides you on how to minimize your personal role in the climate crisis — and reduce your eco-anxiety.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Sugar Creek motel rooms are being turned into $1,000/month apartments
Sugar Creek motel rooms are being turned into $1,000/month apartments

Axios

time2 minutes ago

  • Axios

Sugar Creek motel rooms are being turned into $1,000/month apartments

Two budget motels in the West Sugar Creek area are being converted into studio apartments with rents starting at about $1,000 — a rarity in Charlotte. Why it matters: The conversions replace crime-linked motels with much-needed, organically affordable housing in northeast Charlotte, a roughly 20-minute drive to Uptown. The latest: This is Washington-based Sage Investment Group's first adaptive reuse conversion project in Charlotte. The Charlie Apartments is beginning leasing at the end of September. Construction began at the former Rodeway Inn and Speedway Inn in January and is expected to be completed by the end of the year. By the numbers: The floor plans range from 298 to 673 square feet and rent for $1,070 to $1,299, plus fees for pest control, cable and internet. Units under $1,000 a month are disappearing in America, declining by around 30% over the past decade, per a Harvard report. Between the lines: Converting motels into housing is a fast and relatively low-cost process, making it an attractive investment. The motels already come with amenities like pools and gyms. Yes, but: During a construction tour, Sage's team told Axios they often uncover unforeseen issues once they're inside the walls. It's also a significant effort to rework all the mechanical wiring. Typically, people are living in these hotels, providing another challenge. With the help of Crisis Assistance Ministry, Sage rehoused about 60 people who were living in the motels during the acquisition. The big picture: Charlotte is actively trying to revitalize the Sugar Creek and I-85 intersection, a high-crime area. The city even bought a motel itself to tear down and is partnering with a private developer to build affordable townhomes on the site. The Charlie Apartments will be a gated community with a full security camera system. The city's Corridors of Opportunity program provided $50,000 for local artists Jen Hill and Liz Haywood to paint murals on the property. Sage is gathering feedback on what the community wants to see. What's next: Sage is already eyeing two other properties for conversions in the Charlotte market — another in Sugar Creek and one off Tuckaseegee Road. Tour the construction. Sage is converting the old hotel lobby into a temporary leasing office. Later, it will become bike storage. This area between the two motels will become an amenity called "The Porch" with grilling stations, rocking chairs, dining tables and yard games. The second hotel was in poorer condition and required more structural repairs to address water damage and stabilize the building. It will open after the first building. The pool is being renovated and brought up to code. There will be another amenity space close by with a fireplace and seating. This is the entrance to the future clubhouse, with a fitness center, leasing office, coworking space and restrooms.

Mega-landlord settles with DOJ for Mass. price fixing claims
Mega-landlord settles with DOJ for Mass. price fixing claims

Axios

time2 minutes ago

  • Axios

Mega-landlord settles with DOJ for Mass. price fixing claims

The U.S. Department of Justice and the landlord Greystar Management Services reached a deal to settle their legal fight over claims that the company used an algorithmic software to fix rental prices. Why it matters: Greystar, the nation's largest landlord, runs apartment complexes across Massachusetts, including in Brighton, Revere and East Boston. The big picture: The price fixing allegations come as the state grapples with a worsening housing crisis, partly due to limited housing supply. Catch up quick: Six states and the DOJ sued the company behind the rent-setting software, Texas-based RealPage, last year, accusing the company of illegal price fixing and monopolization. Massachusetts and Illinois then joined an amended version of the lawsuit that named South Carolina-based Greystar and five other landlords. They accused the six landlords of colluding to raise rents across their properties, relying on RealPage's software. State of play: Greystar agreed in the settlement to stop using any "anticompetitive algorithm" that sets rental prices using competitors' sensitive pricing data, per the settlement. The company also agreed to stop sharing its own sensitive information with competitors, stop attending RealPage's meetings convening competing landlords, accept a court-appointed monitor and cooperate with part of the federal legal fight against RealPage. By the numbers: A White House report estimates that renters whose landlords used RealPage's algorithm paid an additional $70 a month on average in 2023. For Boston-area renters, the cost was $79 a month, per the analysis. The report happened independently of the multi-state lawsuit. That lawsuit didn't specify which Greystar properties used the algorithm. What they're saying: Greystar didn't admit any wrongdoing as part of the settlement. The company said in a statement that it "firmly believes that its use of RealPage's revenue management software complies with all applicable laws." "We entered into these settlements to make clear the government's interpretation of the law and to ensure we continue to do things the right way," the company wrote. Flashback: A 2022 ProPublica story revealed that RealPage worked with landlords to set rents nationwide in what legal experts said "may be artificially inflating rents and stifling competition." When the multi-state lawsuit began, RealPage refuted the allegations about its software with a six-page statement, saying landlords set their own prices and that RealPage "helps ensure that prospective residents have access to the best pricing available." One other landlord, Cortland, agreed to a settlement after being named in the amended lawsuit earlier this year.

Boat Trader and YachtWorld owner has a chokehold on the US marine vessel market, an antitrust lawsuit alleges
Boat Trader and YachtWorld owner has a chokehold on the US marine vessel market, an antitrust lawsuit alleges

Business Insider

time3 minutes ago

  • Business Insider

Boat Trader and YachtWorld owner has a chokehold on the US marine vessel market, an antitrust lawsuit alleges

A Miami boat brokerage alleges yacht buyers are being boxed in and priced up. In a new lawsuit, it accuses the Miami-based owner behind some of the leading online platforms for buying and selling boats and yachts of holding an illegal monopoly in the US marine vessel market. The proposed class action antitrust lawsuit, filed in a Florida federal court late last week by the local boat brokerage, alleges that Boats Group has engaged in strong-arm tactics to choke competition and has used its market power to jack up prices on brokers and dealers. Boats Group, which operates the platforms Boat Trader, YachtWorld, and "has willfully maintained and expanded its monopoly power through exclusionary practices rather than competition on the merits," the lawsuit alleges. "This conduct has enabled Boats Group to preserve its monopoly power not through superior products or services, but through exclusionary tactics that suppress competition, reduce entry and innovation, and harm sellers and consumers," the lawsuit says. Representatives for Boats Group did not immediately respond to a request for comment on Monday from Business Insider. Permira, the global private equity firm that owns Boats Group, declined to comment. (Permira is not named as a defendant in the lawsuit). The lawsuit, filed by Brill Maritime Inc., which does business as Export Yacht Sales, seeks to "restore competitive conditions" in the boat market and recover damages for any US individuals or businesses allegedly harmed as a result of Boat Group's "anticompetitive conduct." The proposed class is estimated to be thousands of members, the lawsuit says. The lawsuit says that Boats Group publicly claims to control about 75% of the global market for online marine vessel listing and marketing services and that its share of the US market is believed to be similarly high. The company's website says its platforms attract more than 65 million annual visitors, "giving sellers unmatched exposure to serious boat buyers." Boats Group's subscription agreements with sellers, the lawsuit says, "contain exclusive dealing provisions that either prohibit or strongly discourage sellers, particularly brokers and dealers, from listing their inventory on competing platforms." Through subscriptions, boat sellers pay Boats Group to have their vessel inventory listed and marketed to a large swath of prospective buyers, the lawsuit says. Export Yacht Sales says in the lawsuit that it purchases these subscriptions with Boats Group and that it has been forced to pay "supracompetitive prices for essential marketing services, with effectively zero viable alternatives available." The Miami brokerage says in the lawsuit that its combined monthly cost of listing on Boat Trader and YachtWorld skyrocketed by more than 400% between 2014 and 2024, jumping from $1,004 to $5,128. The plaintiff was charged $2,900 a month by Boat Trader alone in 2025, the lawsuit adds. "Boats Group's exclusionary behavior has suppressed competition, harmed sellers and brokerages, and distorted the structure and dynamics of the online boat sales marketplace," the lawsuit says. As a result, the lawsuit says, consumers are met with fewer options and higher prices for their boating needs. "This dominance has enabled Boats Group's predatory conduct to persist over time, allowing it to impose supracompetitive prices for subscription-based listing and marketing services without losing significant business to rivals, restrict sellers' ability to switch to alternative services, and foreclose entry and expansion by rival platforms," the lawsuit alleges. Attorneys for Export Yacht Sales told Business Insider in a statement that the lawsuit "highlights the severe impact that Boats Group's anticompetitive conduct has had on this industry." "By monopolizing the market for online boat listing services, Boats Group has been able to impose steep and sustained price increases, forcing brokers to pay inflated subscription fees without viable alternatives," the lawyers said.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store