logo
Merz vs von der Leyen: Germany's power couple under summer strain

Merz vs von der Leyen: Germany's power couple under summer strain

Euractiv5 days ago
BERLIN – At about half past nine on Brussels' big-budget-reveal day in July, a late‑night missive landed in the inboxes of Berlin's political correspondents.
In exactly 100 words, the German government's chief spokesperson, Stefan Kornelius, laid into the €2 trillion proposal for the EU's next seven-year financial framework (MFF) spending plan, which European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen had unveiled earlier that day.
The plan to increase the long-term budget by nearly two‑thirds was 'not sellable" in times of budget consolidation, he wrote, adding that Germany would also "not support" burdening businesses with a proposed EU-wide corporate levy. In sum: Berlin "won't be able to accept the Commission's proposal."
Afterwards, even some of Friedrich Merz's allies were surprised by the harsh language that his team directed at the plans of von der Leyen, a German Christian Democrat, just like the chancellor.
It was the clearest indication in recent weeks that Merz is annoyed with what he sees as Brussels' tone-deafness, particularly on deregulation and competitiveness, as conversations with more than half a dozen officials briefed on the matter suggest.
It also highlighted that conflicts of interest between the power couple atop the Commission and the largest EU member state are starting to come to the fore.
Meet the conservative German trio that could rule Europe
The EU's likely next leadership trio believe they are keeping Europe from sliding far-right – it won't be so easy.
A trusting trio?
Regarding the MFF, one senior German government official grouched that von der Leyen should have known that an increase in the budget and a new corporate levy were non‑starters in Berlin, suggesting that her maximalist bid had provoked a due reaction.
Notably, several sources said that von der Leyen had not shared the controversial parts of the proposal with Berlin in advance, perhaps knowing they would be rejected.
That casts a shadow on what has been portrayed as close coordination between Merz and the Commission president. By one account, the two leaders had been in touch most weekends for the last two years, despite von der Leyen's closeness to ex-Chancellor Angela Merkel, a key Merz rival.
Ahead of the German elections in February, Merz vowed repeatedly to restore Berlin's leadership in Europe and clear obstacles to economic growth that he blamed on Brussels.
His mission should have been aided by the German centre-right axis that also comprises Manfred Weber, the Bavarian head of the European Parliament's biggest group, the EPP.
And in the run-up to February's election, both sides played along.
When von der Leyen needed Merz's backing to secure the EPP's lead candidacy in the 2024 European elections, she began echoing his mantra: less micro‑rulemaking, more grand direction.
On the campaign trail in Germany, she smiled along, in turn, when Merz committed her to an EPP paper on cutting bureaucracy, which targeted some of her first-term policies.
As Europe's conservatives rally around Merz, von der Leyen left in the cold
The EPP's messaging is clear that the CDU will return in the driver's seat, if Merz becomes Germany's chancellor.
Venting in Valencia
The EPP congress in spring had already foreshadowed that Merz would be a demanding partner for von der Leyen and her Commission, however.
In his address in Valencia, Merz offered scant praise for their record. Instead, he blamed Brussels for 'annoying people with fixed bottle caps," promised to revisit green rules that are part of von der Leyen's first-term legacy, and railed against tougher safety tests for private vehicles.
Delegates shouted 'Bravo!' – but the Commission president looked less pleased.
While she spared some applause, her arms remained otherwise crossed in her lap, with her lips pressed together. The body language suggested she was 'about to explode," one EPP official remarked, though some others did not share the impression.
'Von der Leyen doesn't like it when people get hung up on small things like the bottle caps,' the official said.
Brussels bureaucracy...
Judging by the communication in the office, Merz and his administration appear to have seen their worst fears about the EU institutions confirmed.
Officials in Berlin are annoyed that the Merz camp is forced to publicly fight what they regard as an incessant flow of misguided policies, which – not least – make for bad publicity.
Early rumours about the controversial budget plans were seen as so detached from reality – and the fiscal constraints of most European countries – that some officials initially didn't believe them.
But Merz also bristled at recent reports that the Commission was weighing rules to require newly purchased rental and company cars to be fully electric from 2030.
'The proposals (…) completely ignore the needs that we currently have in Europe,' he thundered two weeks ago. 'These proposals aren't right.'
Days earlier, a letter from Merz to von der Leyen had surfaced expressing 'great concern' about the EU's Deforestation Regulation, which would impose new reporting duties, even on products from tightly regulated German forests.
Exemptions for 'zero‑risk countries' like Germany would be 'an important contribution to dismantling bureaucracy," Merz urged.
Unlike other leaders, he was notably pleased about the outcome of tariff negotiations with the US, amounting to a 15% surcharge on EU exports. But that came only after he vocally criticised that the Commission's negotiation goals were "way too complicated" and broad in the beginning.
...or Merz's madness?
Brussels officials, for their part, view much of this as a Merz problem.
There appeared to be a wider consensus among EU officials that the German government was belatedly discovering that the bloc is more complicated to handle than it imagined and not easily bent to Berlin's will, one well‑placed official said.
Being in government was a reality check for Merz's entire agenda, the EPP official suggested.
Still, both sides distinguish Merz's personal relationship with von der Leyen – described as respectful and aligned on policy goals – from his quarrel with the broader Commission machinery.
That may well be spin. Either way, amid the growing divide between the Commission and Berlin on key policy fronts, the personal relationship between the chancellor and the president could prove largely irrelevant.
The coming two years, Merz said a day after the budget presentation, "will be a tough battle'.
(mm)
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Europe's wind farm army
Europe's wind farm army

Euractiv

time4 hours ago

  • Euractiv

Europe's wind farm army

Twelve nautical miles out to sea from the town of Łeba on Poland's coastline, the first of 76 new wind turbines are beginning to pierce the fog. The Baltic Power project will be one of the country's biggest offshore wind farms, generating enough electricity for 1.5 million homes. But its contribution to Europe's security goes beyond supplying power. The 120-metre towers are set to become sentinels, tirelessly scanning the brackish waters and leaden skies for hostile activity. In this new Cold War, where spying and sabotage threaten Europe's energy and communications infrastructure, and possibly even its territorial integrity, the potential of wind farms for military surveillance is lost on no one. As the Polish state secretary for EU affairs, Ignacy Niemczycki, told Euractiv on a windy boat ride out to the site: "We are looking at infrastructure differently than we were one year ago." Wake-up call When Finland and Sweden joined in 2023 and 2024, defence analysts dubbed the Baltic Sea 'Lake NATO', with members of the military alliance effectively encircling it. But after three years in which the strategically important waters have been plagued by drones, spy ships, aerial stand-offs and blatant sabotage of power and communication cables, the moniker is starting to ring hollow. There are only two strips of coastline on the Baltic that don't belong to NATO; both are Russian, and the area is becoming a geopolitical flashpoint. Now, more than three years after Russian tanks rolled across the border into Ukraine, the military alliance is looking to rally the serried ranks of offshore wind turbines, like the Baltic Power project, to Europe's defence. When the Nord Stream 2 gas pipelines were blown up in 2022, it came as a harsh 'wake-up call' to the European Union, says Julian Pawlak, a research associate at Hamburg military university (HSU). Western nations learned the hard way that they 'do not have a complete awareness of the Baltic Sea maritime domain'. The destruction last Christmas of the Estlink 2 undersea cable linking the Nordic electricity market to the Baltic power grid just before the latter cut ties with Russia was another rude awakening, and prompted NATO to set up a military operation in response. Making more off wind NATO has discussed dotting offshore energy infrastructure with surveillance tools for years. In the past, turning oil rigs into military bases has proven unfeasible for cost, security, and engineering reasons, Pawlak says. That's where wind turbines come in: They are tall, decentralised, and there are hundreds of them off the EU's Baltic coast. Already, wind turbines are equipped with bird sensors and transponders signalling their whereabouts to submarines, says Pawlak. Baltic Power – situated less than 200 kilometres from the Russian exclave of Kaliningrad – is equipping its new turbine towers with radars and sensors, following a security checklist drafted by Poland's defence ministry, Marcin Godek, the wind farm's operations and maintenance manager, explained in June. "There is a perfect symbiosis between offshore wind turbines and coastal protection," says Kristof Verlinden, a reserve Belgian coast guard who runs offshore wind farms at the firm, Parkwind. For Verlinden, they are also "sentinels or forward bases looking at the situation 50 kilometres or more from the coast". More eyes Wind farms' growing importance also brings greater risk of attack. 'The threats to offshore energy infrastructure are very real,' says Giles Dickson, CEO of lobby group Wind Europe. 'Assets are being attacked physically, not just cyberattacks," he added, pointing to several cable attacks in the Baltic Sea. The Swedish government recently halted 13 offshore wind farm projects in the Baltic Sea citing 'unacceptable consequences for Sweden's military defence' and interfering with the military. And turbines themselves have previously become the target of surveillance by the Kremlin. Baltic Power mapped potential threats in the region before beginning construction. They quickly fell victim to spoofing, where boats pretend to be someone or somewhere that they are not, and incidents of signals jamming meant plans needed to be overhauled, Godek said. Faced with this new reality, WindEurope has hired ex-military personnel to liaise with NATO. 'You cannot build an offshore wind farm in Belgium now if you do not commit to high levels of data sharing with the military and also commit to host their hardware if they ask you to do so,' said Dickson. Verlinden said Parkwind has the foundations for the coastguard to install multi-use sensors and detection systems. Employees go to the offshore turbines almost daily and report back any irregularities. In Belgium, Parkwind holds joint exercises "to train, verify and demonstrate our readiness towards security threats" with the coast guard, Verlinden said. "And we are ready to share our data such as AIS data, cable DAS, give access to our seaward looking cameras." But the prospect of a web of wind turbines sharing data among themselves, their operators and governments, also raises questions. Pawlak pointed to the need for lawmakers to clarify whether operators should have access to any information they collect. Close collaboration with the military would raise legal questions that are 'not completely clear', he said. Birdwatching Edward Zakrajsek, who handles the European market at radar firm DeTect, said wind turbines have a long history of watching the surrounding area. 'Birds were the first thing, but of course 10 or so years ago private drones hit the market and everyone can fly one now,' he says. Radars are already 'monitoring even individual birds with a 10-kilometre range 24 hours a day', Zakrajsek said, adding that "drones are about the size of a bird'. The more offshore wind farms that can be networked together, the better the surveillance data will be, and Zakrajsek said, 'the further out they are the better'. (rh, vc, jp)

Germany's Merz on the defensive at home over Israeli arms ban
Germany's Merz on the defensive at home over Israeli arms ban

Euractiv

time4 hours ago

  • Euractiv

Germany's Merz on the defensive at home over Israeli arms ban

On Friday, Friedrich Merz's launched an embargo on exporting some arms to Israel. By Monday morning, it's already clear that many in his Christian Democratic Union (CDU) party hates him for it. By stopping the flow of weaponry that could be used in the bombardment on the Gaza Strip, the chancellor is effectively heralding a new era in the two countries' relationship. For a start, the development marks the first time that Berlin has effectively imposed sanctions on Israel over the current war. That's proven unpopular inside his party, since Merz's allies accuse him of abandoning Israel – making matters worse, they say he did not consult them first. And they have not been shy about making themselves heard. 'The CSU was not involved in the decision; we consider it to be questionable', Alexander Hoffmann, who leads the Bavarian sister group of the CDU in the parliament, told daily BILD . Other MPs took to social media and TV to make their displeasure known. Foreign policy deputy Roderick Kiesewetter called it a 'serious political and strategic mistake' in a social media post. I n the late 2000s, then-Chancellor Angela Merkel, a long-time rival for Merz, declared Israel as Germany's Staatsräson, making protection of the country a key national interest. By stopping the flow of arms, Germany was breaking 'a long-standing friendship and trust, while Staatsräson remains an empty, unbelievable shell', Kiesewetter said. 'This will not free a single hostage.' Matthias Hauer, a state secretary at the research ministry, said the move was a 'disastrous signal'. Meanwhile, a nother Christian Democrat MP , Carsten Müller, 'strongly condemned' the move online. On Saturday, Merz sent out his head of cabinet, Thorsten Frei, hoping to quell the discontent. 'There must be no doubt whatsoever that the basic principles of German policy towards Israel remain unchanged', he told dpa . Simultaneously, the chancellor's office sent out a three-page document, published by daily Welt , with additional explanations in hopes of heading off criticism. One reason cited for the move – avoiding 'social conflicts in Germany and Europe' – added fuel to the fire. 'We must not allow foreign policy decisions to be influenced by the anti-Semitic mob on our streets', said Dennis Radtke, an MEP who heads the workers' wing in the party. A Sunday emergency meeting of the party's foreign policy experts with Merz advisor Günter Sautter was quickly scheduled to quell the rebellion. Meanwhile, Merz himself took to the air waves to address both public and party at once. 'The principles of German policy towards Israel remain unchanged,' he told public broadcaster ARD in an interview . Berlin would 'continue to help [Israel] defend itself', Merz added. However, he added 'we cannot supply weapons to a conflict that is now trying to be resolved exclusively by military means'. Israel's plans to occupy the entire region could cause 'hundreds of thousands of civilian victims and require the evacuation of the entire city of Gaza', the German politician said. "Where should these people go?" (jp)

Trump, Putin peace talks in Alaska spark EU fears of a ‘one-sided' land swap
Trump, Putin peace talks in Alaska spark EU fears of a ‘one-sided' land swap

Euractiv

time14 hours ago

  • Euractiv

Trump, Putin peace talks in Alaska spark EU fears of a ‘one-sided' land swap

Top EU officials are pressing Washington to resist a 'one-sided' territorial swap with Russia in Ukraine peace talks, warning Donald Trump ahead of his summit with Vladimir Putin that any deal must start from the current frontlines and include security guarantees for Kyiv. 'The Russian position is framed as a territorial swap, but it appears as a rather one-sided swap', said a senior European Commission official on Sunday. Rather than land, 'security guarantees are of the utmost importance for Ukraine', the official added. In an overnight statement, several EU leaders urged the US to be wary of giving away too much land during an announced summit between Trump and Putin set to take place in Alaska on Friday. The Kremlin says Ukraine should withdraw entirely from eastern regions which it only partially occupies. 'There will be some swapping of territories', Trump said on Friday. The talks over a negotiated settlement for the war are set to go ahead without the inclusion of Ukrainian or EU leaders. The Commission official said any accord must include the 'most robust security guarantee' which would entail that there are "no limitations on [Ukraine's] armed forces and third countries support". Increasingly, there are signs that Washington is coming around. 'The US administration has been very involved and has shown interest in aligning positioning with Europe', the Commission official cautioned. The bloc's foreign ministers are due to convene by videoconference on Monday. 'Any deal between the U.S. and Russia must have Ukraine and the EU included', said the bloc's top diplomat, Kaja Kallas, in a statement sent to ministers on Sunday. 'A deal must not provide a springboard for further Russian aggression against Ukraine, the transatlantic alliance and Europe.' But it was the US which 'has the power to force Russia to negotiate seriously', she said. In an interview with Fox News, recorded on Friday, US Vice President JD Vance suggested a 'negotiated settlement' would be based on 'where the current line of contact between Russia and Ukraine is' – matching the EU line. (jp)

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store