$50 bill credits included in Mass. Gov. Healey's plan to reduce energy bills
WATCH: Mass. Gov. Healey announces plan to lower energy bills, prevent future price hikes
Much of the savings is long-term, but immediate relief is planned in the form of $50 credits on April electric bills for residential customers of Eversource, National Grid and Unitil, Gov. Maura Healey announced Monday.
To pay for that one-time relief, the state will redirect about $125 million collected from Alternative Compliance Payments (ACP), which retail electricity suppliers can pay to help fulfill their requirements to use a certain amount of renewable or alternative energy sources. ACP funds normally promote clean energy projects or technology that reduces demand.
The redirection of clean energy funds for electric bill relief builds on a previous move to reduce March and April natural gas bills by about 10 percent.
Healey's plan also calls for the Department of Public Utilities to examine new 'potential regulations' on competitive electric suppliers. Watchdogs -- including Healey herself when she was attorney general -- have accused those third-party companies of predatory tactics, but industry leaders argue they can help customers save money and legislative efforts to prohibit them from selling power to residents stalled in the House.
Altogether, Healey's office estimated the constellation of actions, including elimination of the Solar Renewable Energy Certificate I and II program, expanded auto-enrollment in discount rates, and the arrival of power from the New England Clean Energy Connect program could save about $5.8 billion over a five-year span.
Healey said she also plans to file an 'energy affordability and independence bill' at some point in the coming weeks, echoing a pledge she first made to business leaders two weeks ago.
The governor held the energy costs press conference at Community Teamworks in Lowell.
This is a developing story. Check back for updates as more information becomes available.
Download the FREE Boston 25 News app for breaking news alerts.
Follow Boston 25 News on Facebook and Twitter. | Watch Boston 25 News NOW
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Boston Globe
9 hours ago
- Boston Globe
Rising unemployment darkens jobless benefits fund forecast
That's an earlier dropoff than in a Get Starting Point A guide through the most important stories of the morning, delivered Monday through Friday. Enter Email Sign Up Officials continue to project taxes on businesses used to fund unemployment benefits will increase every year until 2028, when they will reach the highest possible level. In addition to rate adjustments, the state can borrow money to replenish the unemployment fund and keep benefits paid. During the COVID-19 pandemic, Massachusetts took out federal advances, then issued bonds to spread repayment costs over multiple years. Advertisement The new report forecasts that Massachusetts will pay hundreds of millions of dollars more in unemployment benefits across 2026, 2027, and 2028 than previously estimated. Its calculations are built on an assumption that unemployment will hover around 4.5 percent in the next five years, up from the roughly 3.7 percent rate baked into the prior quarterly report. Advertisement Tufts University Center for State Policy Analysis executive director Evan Horowitz criticized prior state projections as relying on an overly optimistic unemployment forecast. He said Monday that he's 'glad we've finally acknowledged the obvious reality that unemployment isn't going to be low forever.' 'Now lawmakers need to face the equally obvious fact that our system is broken,' he said. 'In a few years, we're likely to see an unholy mix of high headline tax rates and even higher benefit costs, leading to large and persistent shortfalls. That's bad.' Employers pay different amounts based on how many of their former workers collect unemployment benefits and how much they have set aside to cover unemployment costs. Right now, those contributions are assessed at what the state calls 'Schedule D,' the middlemost rung. An employer can expect to pay between $124.50 and $1,897.50 per employee per year under Schedule D, according to Many business groups have been pushing the Legislature to overhaul the unemployment system, arguing that the state offers some of the most generous benefits in the country and that the costs on employers hamstring competitiveness. In January, the Healey administration pledged to convene business, labor, and other leaders and chart a path toward major reforms. The talks have not yet produced any major changes to eligibility or benefit levels. Advertisement The administration has made other changes to overhaul UI technology and pilot extended call center hours, promoting those as making the system more efficient for users. Jay Ash, a former housing and economic development secretary to former governor Charlie Baker who now leads the Massachusetts Competitive Partnership, warned last week that the state's 'UI system is broken.' 'We consistently rank at or near the bottom on cost, and it is just another reason that MA has an anti-competitive reputation,' he wrote in a LinkedIn post. 'The Administration and the Legislature are pledging to examine the system closely — here's hoping they do so and make reforms that make it easier to afford to hire our residents.' Ash pointed to CNBC's latest In addition to benefits, businesses are also paying an additional charge to pay back pandemic-era borrowing the state undertook to replenish the trust fund. The employer-funded account will be on the hook for an additional $203 million per year to repay the federal government for a Baker administration accounting error that used federal funding to pay benefits the state should have covered. The first payment is due by Dec. 1 under A coalition of influential organizations called the Massachusetts Opportunity Alliance Advertisement Lawmakers have in the past intervened to freeze looming unemployment tax rate increases. They tend to take up economic development-related legislation in the second year of the two-year cycle, when all 200 legislative seats are up for reelection. Healey plans to seek reelection in 2026, and has so far drawn two Republican challengers.
Business Wire
15 hours ago
- Business Wire
Glancy Prongay & Murray LLP, a Leading Securities Fraud Law Firm Encourages Charter Communications, Inc. (CHTR) Investors To Inquire About Securities Fraud Class Action
LOS ANGELES--(BUSINESS WIRE)-- Glancy Prongay & Murray LLP, a leading national shareholder rights law firm, announces that a securities fraud class action lawsuit has been filed on behalf of investors who purchased or otherwise acquired Charter Communications, Inc. ('Charter' or the 'Company') (NASDAQ: CHTR) common stock between , inclusive (the 'Class Period'). Charter investors have until October 14, 2025 to file a lead plaintiff motion. What Happened? On July 25, 2025, Charter released its second quarter 2025 financial results, reporting that total internet customers had declined by 117,000, compared to about 100,000 in the second quarter of 2024, when adjusted to remove the prior year's impact of Affordable Connectivity Program ("ACP") related disconnected. The Company's total video customers also decreased by 80,000. On this news, Charter's stock price fell $70.25, or 18.5%, to close at $309.75 per share on July 25, 2025, thereby injuring investors. What Is The Lawsuit About? The complaint filed in this class action alleges that throughout the Class Period, Defendants made materially false and/or misleading statements, as well as failed to disclose material adverse facts about the Company's business, operations, and prospects. Specifically, Defendants failed to disclose to investors that: (1) the impact of the ACP end was a material event the Company was unable to manage or promptly move beyond; (2) the ACP end was actually having a sustaining impact on Internet customer declines and revenue; (3) neither was the Company executing broader operations in a way that would compensate for, or overcome the impact, of the ACP ending; (4) the Internet customer declines and broader failure of Charter's execution strategy created much greater risks on business plans and earnings growth than reported; (5) accordingly, the Company had no reasonable basis to state the Company was successfully executing operations, managing causes of Internet customer declines, or provide overly optimistic statements about the long term trajectory of the Company and EBITDA growth; and (6) as a result, Defendants' positive statements about the Company's business, operations, and prospects were materially misleading and/or lacked a reasonable basis at all relevant times. If you purchased or otherwise acquired Charter common stock during the Class Period, you may move the Court no later than October 14, 2025 to request appointment as lead plaintiff in this putative class action lawsuit. Contact Us To Participate or Learn More: If you wish to learn more about this action, or if you have any questions concerning this announcement or your rights or interests with respect to these matters, please contact us: Charles Linehan, Esq., Glancy Prongay & Murray LLP, 1925 Century Park East, Suite 2100, Los Angeles California 90067 Email: shareholders@ Telephone: 310-201-9150, Toll-Free: 888-773-9224 Visit our website at Follow us for updates on LinkedIn, Twitter, or Facebook. If you inquire by email, please include your mailing address, telephone number and number of shares purchased. To be a member of the Class you need not take any action at this time; you may retain counsel of your choice or take no action and remain an absent member of the Class. This press release may be considered Attorney Advertising in some jurisdictions under the applicable law and ethical rules.
Business Wire
21 hours ago
- Business Wire
CHTR INVESTOR NOTICE: Robbins Geller Rudman & Dowd LLP Announces That Charter Communications, Inc. Investors With Substantial Losses Have Opportunity to Lead Class Action Lawsuit
SAN DIEGO--(BUSINESS WIRE)--The law firm of Robbins Geller Rudman & Dowd LLP announces that purchasers or acquirers of Charter Communications, Inc. (NASDAQ: CHTR) securities, including purchasers of call options or sellers of put options between July 26, 2024 and July 24, 2025, both dates inclusive (the 'Class Period'), have until October 14, 2025 to seek appointment as lead plaintiff of the Charter Communications class action lawsuit. Captioned Sandoval v. Charter Communications, Inc., No. 25-cv-06747 (S.D.N.Y.), the Charter Communications class action lawsuit charges Charter Communications and certain of Charter Communications' top executives with violations of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. If you suffered substantial losses and wish to serve as lead plaintiff of the Charter Communications class action lawsuit, please provide your information here: CASE ALLEGATIONS: Charter Communications operates as a broadband connectivity and cable operator company serving residential and commercial customers. The Charter Communications class action lawsuit alleges that defendants throughout the Class Period made false and/or misleading statements and/or failed to disclose that: (i) the impact of the Federal Communications Commission's Affordable Connectivity Program ('ACP') end was a material event Charter Communications was unable to manage or promptly move beyond; (ii) the ACP end was actually having a sustaining impact on Internet customer declines and revenue; (iii) neither was Charter Communications executing broader operations in a way that would compensate for, or overcome the impact, of the ACP ending; (iv) the Internet customer declines and broader failure of Charter Communications' execution strategy created much greater risks on business plans and earnings growth than reported; and (v) accordingly, Charter Communications had no reasonable basis to state it was successfully executing operations, managing causes of Internet customer declines, or providing overly optimistic statements about the long term trajectory of Charter Communications and EBITDA growth. The Charter Communications class action lawsuit further alleges that on July 25, 2025, Charter Communications announced second quarter 2025 financial results, reporting EBITDA of $5.7 billion, which suggested 0.5% growth, and a decrease in Internet customers of 117,000, which included the impact of approximately 50,000 disconnects related to the end of the ACP in the second quarter of 2024. On this news, the price of Charter Communications' stock fell more than 18%, according to the complaint. THE LEAD PLAINTIFF PROCESS: The Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 permits any investor who purchased or acquired Charter Communications securities, including purchasers of call options or sellers of put options during the Class Period to seek appointment as lead plaintiff in the Charter Communications class action lawsuit. A lead plaintiff is generally the movant with the greatest financial interest in the relief sought by the putative class who is also typical and adequate of the putative class. A lead plaintiff acts on behalf of all other class members in directing the Charter Communications class action lawsuit. The lead plaintiff can select a law firm of its choice to litigate the Charter Communications class action lawsuit. An investor's ability to share in any potential future recovery is not dependent upon serving as lead plaintiff of the Charter Communications class action lawsuit. ABOUT ROBBINS GELLER: Robbins Geller Rudman & Dowd LLP is one of the world's leading law firms representing investors in securities fraud and shareholder litigation. Our Firm has been ranked #1 in the ISS Securities Class Action Services rankings for four out of the last five years for securing the most monetary relief for investors. In 2024, we recovered over $2.5 billion for investors in securities-related class action cases – more than the next five law firms combined, according to ISS. With 200 lawyers in 10 offices, Robbins Geller is one of the largest plaintiffs' firms in the world, and the Firm's attorneys have obtained many of the largest securities class action recoveries in history, including the largest ever – $7.2 billion – in In re Enron Corp. Sec. Litig. Please visit the following page for more information: Past results do not guarantee future outcomes. Services may be performed by attorneys in any of our offices.
