
When Jayalalithaa walked out of the National Development Council meeting
On December 27, 2012, the Chief Ministers of various States and Union Territories and Union Ministers had assembled at the Vigyan Bhavan in New Delhi for the 57th meeting of the National Development Council (NDC). Representing Tamil Nadu was Jayalalithaa, who was elected to the office the previous year. State Finance Minister O. Panneerselvam, Chief Secretary Debendranath Sarangi, and senior officials had accompanied her to the meeting convened to finalise the draft of the 12th Five Year Plan.
The NDC, presided over by Prime Minister Manmohan Singh, was a forum for decision-making and deliberations on matters of development. After Singh delivered his opening remarks, the Chief Ministers were called one by one to address the gathering, each allotted a time slot of 10 minutes.
Bell rang
When Jayalalithaa's turn came, she began addressing the meeting. After 10 minutes, a bell was rung to signal that her time was over. As the bell sounded, Jayalalithaa, who had not yet completed her speech, became upset. She walked out of the hall with the Tamil Nadu delegation.
Quoting sources, The Hindu reported that Jayalalithaa had only reached the 10th page of a 28-page speech when the bell was rung. The Prime Minister, who was conducting the proceedings, then called the next speaker: Andhra Pradesh Finance Minister Anam Ramnarayan Reddy.
Speaking to journalists outside the venue, Jayalalithaa accused the Centre of stifling the voice of the Chief Ministers. 'The voice of the Chief Ministers has been stifled. They were not allowed to speak freely. At the very beginning, we were told that only 10 minutes would be allotted to each Chief Minister and after that a bell would ring. This is unheard of. This has never been the practice before... If this is the way they are going to treat the Chief Ministers, the Centre could stop calling such conferences and stop inviting us. We have got enough work back home,' The Hindu quoted her as saying.
Jayalalithaa said she had attended many such conferences, including the earlier NDC meetings and the Chief Ministers' conferences, where no such practice had been adopted. 'This is an utter humiliation of a Chief Minister who has come all the way to Delhi to present the views of the State government, in the interest of the welfare of the people of Tamil Nadu and in the national interest,' she said.
She also alleged that the Congress-led United Progressive Alliance government (of which the DMK was a constituent) was discriminatory. 'Those who supported the Centre were allowed to speak for 30 or 35 minutes and even more. At the last conference that I attended, the Assam Chief Minister was allowed to speak for more than 35 minutes. It is impossible to convey the views of the State government in such a short period as 10 minutes. This is not democracy. The NDC meeting had turned out to be an exercise in humiliation,' Jayalalithaa said.
Manmohan's 'gesture'
The Centre swiftly rejected her allegations, denying any discrimination between the Congress- and non-Congress-ruled States. Union Minister of State for Parliamentary Affairs Rajiv Shukla said, 'The Prime Minister showed a gesture by giving an opportunity to her to speak first, immediately after his speech, though her turn was to come much later.'
He said that with a long list of speakers — including 35 Chief Ministers, the Deputy Chairman of the Planning Commission, the Finance Minister, and the Agriculture Minister — the time limit had to be enforced uniformly. 'The same arrangement was made for the Chief Ministers of the Congress- and non-Congress-ruled States. The buzzer was pressed even for the Congress Chief Ministers. So where was the discrimination? The leaders should not make political capital out of such events,' Mr. Shukla said.
According to him, the NDC meeting should be used by the Chief Ministers to achieve something for the people of their States instead of 'making an issue out of a non-issue'.
Mixed response
Her walkout received a mixed response in political circles. While BJP Chief Ministers Narendra Modi (Gujarat and now the Prime Minister) and Shivraj Singh Chouhan (Madhya Pradesh and now Union Minister for Agriculture) supported Jayalalithaa's action, Maharashtra Chief Minister Prithviraj Chavan (Congress) welcomed the system of limiting the speech of the Chief Ministers to 10 minutes, saying all the States were being treated equally. Mr. Modi had said sarcastically, 'The less they hear, the better it is for them [the Centre],' The Hindu reported.
Meanwhile, DMK president M. Karunanidhi criticised Jayalalithaa's reaction, calling it an 'exaggeration'. He said, 'The Chief Minister's speech (in text form) appeared in newspapers. It would have taken more than an hour, had she read out the entire speech.' In a letter to his party members, Karunanidhi questioned the practicality of allowing all Chief Ministers to read out their full speech. 'Therefore, it is an exaggeration to say that Tamil Nadu was insulted. It is not a genuine allegation,' he said, adding that even in the State Assemblies, a bell would be rung to remind members of the time limit.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Time of India
15 minutes ago
- Time of India
Donald Trump asks US Supreme Court to allow mass federal layoffs
Donald Trump's administration asked the U.S. Supreme Court on Monday to halt a judicial order blocking mass job cuts and the restructuring of agencies, part of the Republican president's campaign to downsize and reshape the federal government. The Justice Department's request came after San Francisco-based U.S. District Judge Susan Illston blocked large-scale federal layoffs , known as " reductions in force ," in a May 22 ruling siding with a group of unions, non-profit groups and local governments that challenged the administration. The case involves the U.S. Departments of Agriculture, Commerce, Health and Human Services, State, Treasury and Veterans Affairs, among others. Controlling the personnel of federal agencies "lies at the heartland" of the president's executive branch authority, the Justice Department said in the filing. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Dermatologista recomenda: simples truque elimina o fungo facilmente Acabe com o Fungo Undo "The Constitution does not erect a presumption against presidential control of agency staffing, and the president does not need special permission from Congress to exercise core Article II powers," the filing said, referring to the constitution's section delineating presidential authority. The Supreme Court requested a response by the plaintiffs in the case to the administration's filing by June 9. Live Events Trump directed federal agencies in February to "promptly undertake preparations to initiate large-scale reductions in force" as part of his administration's restructuring plans. Illston wrote in her ruling that Trump had exceeded his authority in ordering the downsizing. "As history demonstrates, the president may broadly restructure federal agencies only when authorized by Congress," Illston wrote. Illston on May 9 had initially blocked about 20 agencies from making mass layoffs for two weeks and ordered the reinstatement of workers who had lost their jobs. She continued most of that relief in her May 22 ruling. The San Francisco-based 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in a 2-1 ruling on May 30 denied the Trump administration 's request to halt the judge's ruling. The 9th Circuit said the administration had not shown that it would suffer an irreparable injury if the judge's order remained in place and that the plaintiffs were likely to prevail in their lawsuit. "The executive order at issue here far exceeds the president's supervisory powers under the Constitution," the 9th Circuit wrote, calling the administration's actions "an unprecedented attempted restructuring of the federal government and its operations." Trump's administration has sought relief from the Supreme Court in a growing number of cases following rulings by lower courts impeding various policies since he returned to office in January.


Economic Times
15 minutes ago
- Economic Times
Excellent meeting with Brazil's Vice Foreign Minister and India-Brazil Friendship Front President: Congress MP Shashi Tharoor
A delegation of Indian parliamentarians, led by Shashi Tharoor, engaged with Brazilian officials. Discussions centered on counter-terrorism cooperation following the Pahalgam attack. The delegation met with Vice Foreign Minister Maria Laura da Rocha and Senator Nelsinho Trad. They emphasized India's stance against terrorism. The visit is part of a broader diplomatic effort. Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads Congress MP Shashi Tharoor , who is leading an all-party delegation to Brazil, said that they had an "excellent meeting" with Brazil's Vice Foreign Minister Maria Laura da Rocha and that the atmosphere was warm and friendly. He said the Brazilian government showed a clear understanding of India's message regarding the fight against meeting Brazilian Vice Foreign Minister, he said, "Excellent meeting, Vice Foreign Minister and her team were very sympathetic, warm, I would even say, the atmosphere in the meeting was tremendously warm and friendly. And the main purpose for us was to ensure that our message was understood and there would be a feeling of the importance for solidarity in the struggle against terrorism and that's we got from them."The delegation, led by Shashi Tharoor, includes Members of Parliament from across the political spectrum, reflecting India's vibrant and inclusive democratic character. The delegation comprises Sarfaraz Ahmad, Ganti Harish Madhur, Shashank MTripathi, Bhubaneswar Kalita, Tejasvi Surya, and former Ambassador Taranjit Singh the meeting, the delegation thanked Brazil for its understanding of terrorism and shared views regarding the terrorist attack in Pahalgam. The two sides also explored avenues to enhance cooperation in counter-terrorism , multilateral diplomacy, and democratic values."A high-level All-Party Delegation led by Hon'ble MP Dr. @ShashiTharoor met Acting Foreign Minister of Brazil, Amb. Maria Laura da Rocha. They thanked Brazil for its understanding against terrorism, shared views on the Pahalgam attack, and discussed strengthening cooperation on anti-terrorist cooperation, multilateralism, and democratic values," the Indian Embassy in Brazil posted on delegation also held a meeting with India-Brazil Friendship Front President Nelsinho Trad. Shashi Tharoor said that he appreciates Trad's insightful understanding and strong endorsement of India's perspective on recent events. According to Tharoor, Trad said that they have an ally in him and his colleagues in Parliament in meeting India-Brazil Friendship Front (Federal Senate), headed by Senator Nelsinho Trad, Tharoor said, "A very positive meeting in which the Senator laid out very clearly his understanding of India's position. We had stressed that there can be no equivalence between terrorists and victims. We all want peace, but it cannot be at any price, and terrorism will have to pay its own price for what it does. And the Senator said that we have an ally in him and his colleagues in Parliament in Brazil, and we're very pleased to leave on this very positive note. He said when you leave this room, please consider you've had a successful visit. So, I take his words as mine.""Excellent & highly productive meeting with Senator Nelsinho Trad, President of the India-Brazil Friendship Front & President of the Senate Foreign Affairs Committee. Deeply appreciate his insightful understanding & strong endorsement of India's perspective on recent events. Such solidarity strengthens the bonds between our democracies," Tharoor posted on JMM MP Sarfaraz Ahmad says, "Wherever we have gone, we received a good response from the people in the government, diplomats.. Everyone in the world is against terrorism. We shared our experience, how we have suffered and how innocent lives have been lost in India. It was important to expose Pakistan. No one likes Pakistan because of its actions. It has been disturbing us since the beginning..."The delegation also met the Chief Advisor to Brazil's President, Celso Amorim. Sharing details regarding the meeting, Tharoor on X wrote, "Our day in Brasilia begins with a visit to the Presidential Palace, where we meet with my old friend the Diplomatic Advisor to the President, Ambassador Celso Amorim (Brazil's longest-serving Foreign Minister twice & Defence Minister once). A full &rewarding discussion followed."The visit to Brazil is part of India's larger global outreach following the Pahalgam terror attack , aimed at conveying India's zero-tolerance policy on terrorism. The delegation had earlier visited Panama, Guyana, and Colombia and will now travel to the United States to continue their diplomatic outreach.


Mint
16 minutes ago
- Mint
Shashi Tharoor shuts down Trump's India-Pak claim with a flourish: ‘No one needed to persuade us'
Shashi Tharoor shuts down Trump's India-Pak claim with a flourish: 'No one needed to persuade us' "We have enormous respect for the American presidency, and we will speak with that respect in mind. But broadly speaking, our understanding is a bit different... No one needed to persuade us to stop. We had already said to stop. If there was any persuasion by the American president or his senior officials, it would have been persuasion of the Pakistanis. They would have had to be persuaded. We don't need to be persuaded because we don't want war. We want to focus on development. That's the basic message," says Congress MP Shashi Tharoor, as the delegation he is leading will be in the US for its last leg of the visit. More details are being added.