We could withdraw from the von der Leyen coalition: Renew chief Valérie Hayer
We put it to Hayer that the EPP has not sided with the far right in the great majority of votes over the past year. "But when you look at the most important files in the European Parliament, they decided consciously to make a deal with the far right. I can give you lots of examples," Hayer responds. "Nothing can be achieved with the far right, because the far right just wants to undermine Europe," she adds.
We ask Hayer how France is going to deal with its huge public debt, while at the same time increase its defence spending by €3.5 billion in 2026. Is it not a contradiction to spend more money while also making austerity cuts? "We have to push for more investment at the national but also at the European level," Hayer responds. "We are under threat with disinformation, cyberattacks and so on. And President Macron had also a very pro-European stance when he decided and announced this increase in defence spending. So I think we don't have any other choice."
On the subject of public spending, the EU Commission has now made its proposal for the next big seven-year EU budget, and it represents an increase on the current 2021-2027 budget, which Hayer helped to negotiate. "We want to have a strong competitiveness fund to support our industries," Hayer says. "We also want to have a 'European preference' with local content [in strategic investments]. And a key demand from our group is that we want a strong commitment vis-a-vis the rule of law, especially with the smart conditionality, which means no euros going to autocrats and governments who don't respect our common rules. But on the ground, mayors and NGOs should still benefit from [EU] money."
Hayer also talks about US President Donald Trump and his stated intent to impose 30 percent tariffs on EU imports on August 1. "First of all, nobody has any interest in this trade war. Nobody. Neither the EU, nor the US," she answers. "Now, the unity of Europe is absolutely key. Of course we should support the Commission strategy and leave the political space for negotiation. But if on the 1st of August we don't have enough in the negotiations, let's not be shy. We are a power. We have a huge market that is interesting for US companies, and we should have these countermeasures to convey the message to Donald Trump that we will not be fooled."
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Euronews
an hour ago
- Euronews
Fact check: Aree France's working conditions are among Europe's worst?
French social media users have been reacting to claims made recently on live TV by economist Jean-Claude Delgènes, who said that France has "completely fallen behind in terms of working conditions". "In a study carried out at the end of 2021 and published in 2022 (...) France is in 36th position, right at the bottom with Albania, in terms of working conditions," Delgènes told Public Sénat, the official TV channel of the upper house of the French Parliament. His statements have prompted a flood of reactions on social media. It comes as the issue of precarious working conditions comes to the fore in France. Over the past two and a half months, five young workers and trainees aged between 15 and 19 have been killed in workplace accidents, raising questions about the country's labour conditions. We took a closer look at the data to verify the claims made by Delgènes. France trails most European counterparts The claims are based on a 2021 study by Eurofound, a Dublin-based agency that conducts research into living and working conditions in European countries. Its most recent survey into European working conditions, known as EWCS, dates from 2021. Updated fieldwork from 2024 is expected to be made public later this year. The research looks at working conditions in 36 European countries, including all 27 European Union member states. It includes a 'job quality index', which combines data points on aspects such as health, safety, work satisfaction and more to measure the degree to which workers are strained in the workplace. The results suggest that more workers in France are exposed to 'extremely strained' or 'highly strained' conditions than in most other countries. Only in Serbia, Montenegro, Slovakia and Poland do more workers have 'extremely strained' or 'highly strained' conditions, according to the findings. France not in 36th position 'with Albania' When we also consider those who cited 'moderately strained' conditions, France ranks penultimately, with only Slovakia scoring worse, and Albania faring slightly better. The research therefore does not place France "right at the bottom, with Albania in terms of working conditions" as Delgènes asserts. When we look only at workers citing "extremely strained", or the most severe conditions, France ranks 30th, above other EU member states such as Croatia and Cyprus as well as the United Kingdom. Concerns over health and safety The data, however, does place France behind most of its European counterparts when it comes to labour conditions. Data provided by Eurostat, the EU's statistical office, confirms the trend. According to the latest estimates, only Malta ranks worse than France in terms of the incidence of fatal accidents recorded in the workplace. These concerns have been augmented recently with the tragic deaths of five young workers in their place of work in the space of just two and a half months. According to estimates, two people die in the workplace in France every day. The French government is examining a proposal to sanction employers responsible for workplace issues, such as through fines and criminal prosecutions, according to a document recently seen by French media, including Le Monde.
LeMonde
4 hours ago
- LeMonde
Iran says it will not halt nuclear enrichment ahead of European talks
Iran has no plans to abandon its nuclear program including uranium enrichment despite the "severe" damage caused by US strikes to its facilities, the country's foreign minister said ahead of renewed talks with European powers. Iran is scheduled to meet Britain, France and Germany in Istanbul on Friday, July 25, to discuss its nuclear program, with Tehran accusing European powers of scuppering a landmark 2015 nuclear deal. The meeting will be the first since Iran's 12-day war with Israel last month, during which the United States carried out strikes against Tehran's nuclear facilities. For now, enrichment "is stopped because, yes, damages are serious and severe," Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi told Fox News' "Special Report with Bret Baier" on Monday, July 21. "But obviously we cannot give up enrichment because it is an achievement of our own scientists," he continued, calling it a source of "national pride". US President Donald Trump responded to the comments on his platform Truth Social, saying Washington would carry out strikes again "if necessary". The 2015 agreement, reached between Iran and UN Security Council permanent members Britain, China, France, Russia and the United States, plus Germany, imposed curbs on Iran's nuclear program in exchange for sanctions relief. However, it unravelled in 2018 when the United States, during Trump's first term, unilaterally withdrew and reimposed sweeping sanctions. 'Iran holds the European parties responsible for negligence' Though Europe pledged continued support, a mechanism intended to offset US sanctions never effectively materialized, forcing many Western firms to exit Iran and deepening its economic crisis. "Iran holds the European parties responsible for negligence in implementing the agreement," said foreign ministry spokesman Esmaeil Baqaei ahead of Friday's talks in Istanbul on the deal's future. Iran will also host a trilateral meeting Tuesday with Chinese and Russian representatives to discuss the nuclear issue and potential sanctions. The Chinese foreign ministry said Beijing would "continue to play a constructive role in pushing relevant sides to restart dialogue and negotiations, and reach a solution that takes in account the legitimate concerns of all parties". In recent weeks, the three European powers have threatened to reimpose international sanctions on Tehran, accusing it of breaching its nuclear commitments.
France 24
11 hours ago
- France 24
Can a French citizen's petition reverse the reintroduction of a banned pesticide?
The French National Assembly on July 8 adopted the divisive "Duplomb law", named after the conservative lawmaker Laurent Duplomb who proposed it. The draft law was presented in parliament as a bid to "reduce constraints" on French farmers, who have repeatedly expressed frustration over bureaucratic constraints on the agricultural sector, unfair foreign competition, and stringent regulations. But some farmers, environmentalists and medical experts have criticised many of the law's proposals – particularly one provision that proposes to reintroduce the insecticide acetamiprid, a chemical known to be toxic to pollinators such as bees and to ecosystems – which was banned in France in 2018. The contentious provisions spurred 23-year-old masters student Eleonore Pattery to launch a petition against the law on July 10, which brought the bill to the public's attention. The petition's author, who describes herself as "a future environmental health professional", called the new law a "scientific, ethical, environmental and public health aberration". "It represents a frontal attack on public health, biodiversity, the coherence of climate policies, food security, and common sense," she said. At the time of writing, the petition had collected more than 1.5 million signatures – higher than any other petition published on France's official National Assembly site so far. The reintroduction of acetamiprid – an insecticide that belongs to a class of synthetic chemicals similar to nicotine called neonicotinoids, often shortened to "neonics" – is the most divisive provision of the law. Neonics were developed in the 1980s to target the central nervous system of insects and disrupt nerve function. These insecticides are extremely effective against a wide range of pests like aphids and grubs, and have been used globally since the 1990s. In France, they are widely used by beetroot and hazelnut growers. However, they come with a list of caveats that harm biodiversity and human health, according to experts. Unlike contact pesticides that coat the surface of a plant, neonics are absorbed by the plant and distributed through its leaves, flowers, pollen, and nectar. While this makes them very effective against pests, they also cause impaired navigation, reduced learning, weakened colony health and death among bees. Various beekeeping organisations have urged citizens to fight against the law for this very reason and have branded the chemical "a bee killer". Scientists also say that neonicotinoids tend to remain inside the soil and hurt non-target species i.e., insects and animals that don't hurt crop yield but play an essential role in maintaining ecological balance. However, the invertebrates aren't the only ones at risk. A growing body of research shows that neonicotinoids impact human nervous systems too. Hundreds of doctors and researchers have signed an open letter published by French healthcare organisation Médecins du Monde that says the law fails to address the collapse of biodiversity and the impact on farmers' health. The letter specifically mentions three chemicals: acetamiprid, flupyradifurone and sulfoxaflor. 'The primary consequence of these dysfunctions is an increased risk for farmers of non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL), myeloma, prostate cancer, Parkinson's disease, and neurodevelopmental disorders, to take just a few examples, while the precautionary principle (and the European regulation) requires that no marketing authorisation be issued in the event of a risk to human health or biodiversity,' it says. The letter has been backed by The French League Against Cancer and the European Federation of Neurological Associations. 01:34 Environmentalists are also concerned by some of the other provisions of the law. The law claims it will promote the expansion of industrial agriculture by easing permits for large livestock facilities and water reservoirs. Critics say this move will harm smaller family-run operations and is likely to increase greenhouse gas emissions and environmental degradation. The Duplomb law will also implement several long-standing demands from France's largest farm union FNSEA, which has historically supported pesticide use. "We need to maintain our means of production, and I believe there's a lot of exaggeration in the comments being made," the head of FNSEA, Arnaud Rousseau, told franceinfo radio. Growers also argue that acetamiprid, allowed in other EU countries, is vital to fight yellows disease, which cut yields by 30% in 2020 and slashed sugar output. Can a citizen's petition change the law? The number of signatures on Pattery's petition continue to climb, and increasing pressure on the government to revisit the law. The French government has defended the bill, but has been obliged to acknowledge the outcry, amid the rapidly rising number of signatures. In France, petitions with over half a million signatures can prompt a parliamentary debate, but do not require a new vote. National Assembly chairwoman Yael Braun Privet said the government "had to listen to the people. We will hold a debate but this debate will not – it cannot – change the text that was just voted." Former Prime Minister Gabriel Attal has also said he would back a debate. Benjamin Morel, a constitutional expert and lecturer at the University of Paris-Panthéon-Assas agrees, saying that while the petition might lead to a debate, it will not ultimately lead to any change in the text of the law itself: "For the Duplomb law not to be enforced, a new bill would have to be introduced, or the president of the Republic would have to get involved." " Emmanuel Macron could request a new deliberation by Parliament, in accordance with Article 10 of the Constitution," Morel adds. But he believes that the result of the vote would be identical. For now, France's left – the four parties formerly allied under the banner of the New Popular Front – have promised to continue to battle to repeal the Duplomb law. "The fight has only just begun," warned Green Party MP Sandrine Rousseau on franceinfo radio on Monday.
