BBC accused of 'spurious' defence over Gaza documentary axe
Welcome to Media Watch. This week we look at the BBC's decision to axe a documentary on Gaza's health service as well as a Sky News reporter being accused of 'parroting propaganda' in his questioning of the Israeli ambassador to the UK.
BBC's 'spurious' defence after axing documentary
THE BBC has come under fire for 'censoring' the accounts of medics and aid workers in Gaza after axing a documentary about Israel's brutal bombardment.
Gaza: Doctors Under Attack explored the destruction of the health service in Gaza and was reportedly ready to be broadcast in February.
We told how the documentary was shelved last month following the controversy around How To Survive A Warzone, which featured the son of a Hamas official.
The production firm behind Gaza: Doctors Under Attack, Basement Films, said at the time that the BBC had postponed airing its film until after a review into How To Survive A Warzone is complete.
However, despite the fact that this review remains ongoing, the BBC has now officially scrapped plans to show the documentary after concluding that it "risked creating a perception of partiality" over the corporation's coverage of Israel and Gaza.
READ MORE: Ex-Unionist party leader backs Scottish independence referendum
Tom Chivers, who works for the Media Reform Coalition, said the BBC's excuse for shelving the documentary was 'spurious', adding it had 'abandoned any pretence' that it gives 'equal regard' to the lives of Palestinians.
He told The National: 'This is only the latest failure by the BBC to provide accurate, impartial and independent reporting on Israel's siege in Gaza and the appalling humanitarian crisis it has created.
'By censoring these accounts from medics and aid workers in Gaza, the BBC has abandoned any pretence that it gives equal regard to the lives and experiences of Palestinians.
'The BBC's excuse for refusing to broadcast the documentary rests on a completely made-up phrase. A 'perception of bias' has no basis whatsoever in the BBC's editorial guidelines.
'If this 'perception' test was applied to other topic of reporting, it would be impossible for the BBC to broadcast any news at all.
'This spurious, unjustifiable defence proves that the BBC is completely cowed by, and overly sensitive to, the objections of Israeli officials and those who wish to ignore or silence any reporting on the atrocities taking place in Gaza.'
The BBC said it was transferring ownership of the film material to Basement Films, and that the documentary had "not undergone the BBC's final pre-broadcast sign-off processes", as some reports had suggested.
Basement Films said it was 'relieved' that the BBC has released the film back to the company 'so that we can release it to the world'.
The company said the BBC had confirmed the film had been approved for broadcast and gave out six different release dates before eventually dropping it.
A Basement Films statement said: 'We would like to thank all the BBC people who worked on this film, those who approved it, those who praised and lauded it, and the scores of BBC staff members; on air editors, correspondents, producers, managers, technical staff and freelancers who told us to keep fighting and gave us sound advice, wrote group letters to their bosses, and asked us to keep fighting to have the film released as approved.
'Although the BBC are now taking their names off this film, it will remain theirs, and we hope it serves to open up the debate on how the nation's broadcaster covers what is happening in Gaza, and that people feel free to speak up and speak out, rather than stay silent or leave, and at some point get the journalistic leadership they deserve.
'But most of all we would like to thank the doctors and contributors and survivors, and to apologise for not believing them when they said the BBC would never run a film like this. It turned out they were right.'
Sky News reporter slated for Israeli ambassador interview
Elsewhere, Sky News reporter Wilfred Frost has been criticised for an interview he carried out with Israeli ambassador to the UK, Tzipi Hotovely.
Frost challenged Hotovely about Gazan children dying amid Israel's assault on the enclave.
Tzipi Hotovely: "We are not there to kill anyone, rather than the terrorists, but in the end of the day its Hamas that is creating this horrible architecture of children & people as human shields"
Wilfred Frost: "I think there's no doubt about that & I'm not questioning that" pic.twitter.com/8xF8nGB4il — Saul Staniforth (@SaulStaniforth) June 23, 2025
But he has been slated for suggesting he was 'not questioning' a statement by Hotovely that Hamas is to blame for using 'children and people as human shields'.
Appearing on Sky News on Monday, Hotovely said: "We are not there to kill anyone, rather than the terrorists, but in the end of the day it's Hamas that is creating this horrible architecture of children and people as human shields.'
READ MORE: UK not selectively applying international law, Labour minister insists
Frost replied with: 'I think there's no doubt about that and I'm not questioning that"
Also in the interview, Frost said 'we can both agree resoundingly about that' when Hotovely said 'they need to blame Hamas for creating this reality for the Palestinians'.
On the exchange, Chivers told The National: 'It's not the job of reporters to demure to government officials and repeat their propaganda, their job is to challenge them and report the truth.'
TV producer Richard Sanders described the interview as 'appalling'.
He said on Twitter/X: 'This is absolutely appalling and Sky should retract.
'There is not a scrap of evidence Hamas uses civilians as human shields. There is a mass of evidence that Israel does precisely this.
'We dealt with this issue at length in our Al Jazeera Investigative Unit film GAZA. This lie continues to be the principal justification for the slaughter of civilians in Gaza.'
On social media, Frost was accused of 'parroting propaganda', while one user said it was an example of 'why people are losing faith in traditional media'.
Sky News has been approached for comment.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Mirror
an hour ago
- Daily Mirror
Petrol price fear for Brit motorists as fuel could spike at pump in coming days
Oil prices have soared due to the conflict in the Middle East and Brits are being warned that they could be hit at the pump as the cost of petrol could also spike Brits are being warned to top up your tanks now as petrol prices could soar in the coming days due to the conflict in the Middle East. Iran has launched a missile attack today on a US military base in Qatar, retaliating for the American bombing of its nuclear sites. And oil prices had already soared to their highest point since January following the US attack over the weekend. The threat of US involvement in the conflict between Israel and Iran led the latter to warn of severe consequences and after the missile strikes Iran's parliament voted on Sunday to close the Strait of Hormuz - a crucial maritime route as around a fifth of the world 's oil supply passes through it. For the go-ahead to be given, Iran's Supreme National Security Council would still need to approve the decision but even just the possibility of the closure led to oil prices to surge. And this has a knock on effect for Brits at the pump. Now a latest post by Trump on Truth Social is claiming a "ceasefire" in the war between Israel and Iran has been agreed, but it is unclear at this stage how that will pan out. Looking at the impact on oil of conflict in the Middle East, Jorge Leon, head of geopolitical analysis at energy intelligence firm Rystad and ex-Opec official, commented: "An oil price jump is expected. In an extreme scenario where Iran responds with direct strikes or targets regional oil infrastructure, oil prices will surge sharply." While Susannah Streeter, head of money and markets at Hargreaves Lansdown, agreed that a continued Middle East conflict is likely to lead to price hikes. 'Prices at the pumps are set to track higher in response,' she said. 'Although they don't mirror crude prices, due to other factors to consider, such as refining capacity and demand for other oil uses, petrol prices do tend to follow a similar curve upwards. 'Fresh financial pain in terms of rising prices at the pumps could still be to come, if Iran moves to limit the flow of tankers through the key Strait of Hormuz off Iran.' She added: "If the Strait is closed there are fears it will lead to an oil price shock, and another big inflation problem, given how fuel costs are included in the basket of goods which are tracked." Meanwhile, RAC head of policy Simon Williams has also said that the price of fuel could go up further. 'The average price of a litre of petrol has increased by 1.5p to 133.5p in the last week, while diesel has gone up by 2p to 140p," he said. 'Although the cost of a barrel of oil jumped by $5 to $74 straight after Israel's 13 June attack on Iran, so far it hasn't climbed much higher. It's now trading around $77 - $12 a barrel, more expensive than it has been for the last three months, which is not yet enough to cause a major hike at the pumps. 'As retailer margins have been high for some time, the oil price rise has squeezed these to fairer levels for drivers. If, however, retailers are set on maintaining margins of around 12p a litre, we may well see the average price of fuel go up further. 'It's also important to note that the oil price is a long way off the $137.72 seen in the early days of the Ukraine war in spring 2022 which led to average prices reaching record highs in the summer of 191.5p for petrol and 199p for diesel."
Telegraph
2 hours ago
- Telegraph
BBC backs Martine Croxall after she corrected ‘pregnant people' script
The BBC has backed Martine Croxall after she replaced the term 'pregnant people' with 'women' in a news report. Insiders said the mood at the broadcaster has shifted in recent months and Croxall's on-air correction signals a move towards the use of more 'honest language'. The change has come from the top with support from Samir Shah, the BBC chairman, according to sources. The UK Supreme Court ruling in April is also said to have encouraged staff to speak up for women. Judges ruled that the term 'woman' in the 2010 Equality Act referred to biological sex, not acquired gender. Croxall won a new legion of fans, including JK Rowling, when she overruled the autocue during a BBC News report. In a story about heatwave-related deaths, the script said that 'pregnant people and those with pre-existing health conditions need to take precautions'. Croxall read the phrase 'pregnant people' then corrected it to 'women', accompanied by a subtle eye roll. A clip of the moment went viral on social media and was reposted on X by Rowling, who wrote: 'I have a new favourite BBC presenter.' Croxall is understood to have received no pushback from bosses about the language that she used. A BBC source said: 'This is very good news. Bosses are intensely relaxed, it seems – perhaps even pleased with what she did. It's down to the new chairman, in my opinion.' Another said that the Supreme Court ruling had brought 'clarity'. That is a marked change from February last year when Justin Webb was deemed to have broken impartiality rules by mentioning biological sex. During a report on Radio 4's Today programme about gender guidelines in international chess, Webb read out a reference to a transgender woman and added: 'In other words, male.' A listener complained and the BBC's editorial complaints unit agreed, saying Webb had given the impression 'of endorsing one viewpoint in a highly controversial area'. Tim Davie defended that ruling, telling MPs: 'It is an area of controversy – fact.'
South Wales Guardian
2 hours ago
- South Wales Guardian
Iran launches missiles at US base in Qatar in retaliation for American bombing
There were no US casualties, Donald Trump said as he dismissed the attack as a 'very weak response', adding that Washington was warned by Tehran in advance. 'Most importantly, they've gotten it all out of their 'system,' and there will, hopefully, be no further HATE,' the US president posted on Truth Social. Qatar condemned the attack on Al Udeid Air Base but said it intercepted the short and medium-range ballistic missiles. Iran said the volley matched the number of bombs dropped by the US on Iranian nuclear sites over the weekend, adding that it targeted the base because it was outside populated areas. Those comments, made immediately after the attack, suggested Tehran wanted to de-escalate with the US, something Mr Trump said after the strikes early on Sunday on Iran. He said Iran might be able to 'now proceed to Peace and Harmony' and he would encourage Israel to do the same. However, Israel's war on Iran continued, with the Israeli military expanding its campaign on Monday to target sites symbolic for the country's theocracy. Iran announced the attack on Qatar on state television as martial music played. A caption on screen called it 'a mighty and successful response' to 'America's aggression'. Meanwhile, a US military official said no American bases in Iraq were targeted but a malfunctioning Iranian missile aimed at Israel had triggered an alert in Iraq earlier in the day. It came after reports that Iraqis had said they were informed by US officials that missiles had been launched towards the the Ain al-Assad base housing US troops in western Iraq. Iran fired 19 missiles at the base in Qatar, and one impacted the facility but caused no casualties, a Qatari military officer said. Major General Shayeq Al Hajri told reporters that seven missiles were fired initially from Iran and all were intercepted over the water between the two countries by Qatari air defences. Iran then fired 12 more missiles and 11 were intercepted over Qatari territory, but one hit the US base, Maj Gen al Hajri said. It was not clear how much damage was caused by the missile. Mr Trump said 14 missiles were fired, 13 were brought down and one was 'set free' because it posed no threat. The Al Udeid base is home to the Combined Air Operations Centre, which provides command and control of air power across the region, as well as the 379th Air Expeditionary Wing, the largest such unit in the world. Just before the explosions, Iranian President Masoud Pezeshkian wrote on the social platform X: 'We neither initiated the war nor seeking it. But we will not leave invasion to the great Iran without answer.' The retaliation came a day after the US launched a surprise attack on Sunday morning on three of Iran's nuclear sites.
