Oregon high school girls REFUSE to stand with trans athlete on podium — Martina Navratilova reacts
Reese Eckard (Sherwood High School) and Alexa Anderson (Tigard High School) stepped down from the podium after a transgender athlete placed fifth. Anderson had placed third, while Eckard took fourth.
Tennis legend and outspoken advocate for women's sports, Martina Navratilova, responded strongly to the incident on X (formerly Twitter).
"Women and girls are punished no matter what they do in this misogynistic world…" Navratilova wrote.
She added, "Feminists never asked for this. At least not the great majority of us… never."
Navratilova responded to the growing debate on X (formerly Twitter), emphasising that women are being unfairly targeted for protesting rules they didn't create.
"Stop blaming women for this. Women do not make the rules," she replied to a social media user's post.
"Majority of women are against it too. Women get punished no matter what they do."
Addressing the consequences faced by athletes who refuse to compete under current regulations, Navratilova added: "Because not competing can get you banned from the sport. The rules must change, and those are made by men mostly."
In a broader critique of gender dynamics in sport and society, Navratilova continued in another reply to a user's comment: "The world is misogynistic, the world is patriarchal, and most of the rules are made by men. And all of the danger comes from men."
Navratilova has repeatedly criticised Democratic lawmakers for not acting to protect women's sports. Earlier this year, she condemned Democrats for blocking the Protection of Women and Girls in Sports Act.
"I hate that the Democrats totally failed women and girls on this very clear issue of women's sports being for females only," she said.
Calling for stronger action, she urged: "Grow a spine."
Navratilova referenced President Donald Trump's "No Men in Women's Sports" executive order, which was signed in February. She lamented that Democrats failed to support similar efforts.
She questioned Democratic priorities, asking: "What are the Dems willing to give up for men who identify as trans? Abortion… the Constitution… rule of law… That's just for starters…"
The incident and Navratilova's comments reignite an ongoing national debate around transgender participation in women's sports—a debate that continues to divide public figures, lawmakers, and athletic communities across the US.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
News18
23 minutes ago
- News18
Bihar SIR row: Electoral rolls cant remain static, bound for revision, says SC
New Delhi, Aug 13 (PTI) The Supreme Court on Wednesday said electoral rolls cannot 'remain static" and were bound to be revised as it disagreed with the submission that special intensive revision (SIR) of voter list in poll-bound Bihar had no basis in law and ought to be quashed. A bench of Justices Surya Kant and Joymalya Bagchi was informed by NGO Association of Democratic Reforms that the exercise should not be allowed to be carried out pan-India. Aside from the NGO, leaders of opposition parties including Rashtriya Janata Dal (RJD) and the Congress have challenged the electoral roll revision drive of the Election Commission of India (ECI) in Bihar. Senior advocate Gopal Sankaranarayanan, appearing for the NGO, said the ECI notification on SIR ought to be set aside for want of legal basis and never being contemplated in law. He, therefore, contended it couldn't be allowed to go on. The ECI can never conduct such an exercise since inception and it is being done for the first time in history and if allowed to happen only God knows where it will end, he added. 'By that logic special intensive revision can never be done. One-time exercise which is done is only for the original electoral roll. To our mind, the electoral roll can never be static," the bench noted. 'There is bound to be revision," the top court said, 'otherwise, how will the poll panel delete the names of those who are dead, migrated or shifted to other constituencies?" The bench went on to tell Sankaranarayanan that the ECI had residual power to conduct such an exercise as it deemed fit. It referred to Section 21(3) of the Representation of the Peoples Act (RP Act), which says 'the Election Commission may at any time, for reasons to be recorded, direct a special revision of the electoral roll for any constituency or part of a constituency in such manner as it may think fit." Justice Bagchi further asked Sankaranarayanan, 'When the primary legislation says 'in such manner as deemed fit' but the subordinate legislation does not… will it not give a residual discretion to ECI to dovetail the procedure not completely in ignorance of rules but some more additives than what the rules prescribe to deal with the peculiar requirement of a special revision?" Sankaranarayanan submitted that the provision only allowed revision of the electoral roll for 'any constituency" or 'for part of a constituency" and the ECI couldn't wipeout the rolls of an entire state for fresh inclusion. 'Actually, it is a battle between a constitutional right and a constitutional power," Justice Bagchi said. The residuary power of the ECI flows from Article 324 of the Constitution and the RP Act mentions both summary revision and special revision and the ECI in the instant case has only added the word 'intensive", that all, the judge noted. Advocate Prashant Bhushan, also appearing for the NGO, alleged the ECI played 'mischief" and removed the search feature from the draft roll and the list of 65 lakh people whose names were deleted for being dead, migrated or shifted to other constituencies. 'This happened just a day after Congress leader Rahul Gandhi did a press conference pointing out over lakh people as fake voters," he added, arguing an ordinary person was denied the right to search their name on the draft roll whether dead or alive or migrated to another place. Justice Kant said he was unaware of any such press conference but when it comes to the Registration of Electors Rule of 1960, Section 10 mandates the election commission to publish a copy of the draft roll at the office in the constituency. 'They have to publish the draft roll at the office in the constituency. That's a minimum threshold under the law. However, we would have liked it if it was published on the website for wider publicity," Justice Bagchi said. Senior advocate Rakesh Dwivedi, appearing for the ECI, said the petitioners claimed the rural population of Bihar was not tech savvy and now they were talking about the inability of the same people in searching online. During the hearing, the bench also told senior advocate Abhishek Singhvi, appearing for petitioners, that the 11 documents required to be submitted by an elector for Bihar's SIR as opposed to seven documents in summary revision conducted previously showed the exercise was 'voter friendly". It said despite petitioners' arguments that non-acceptance of Aadhaar was exclusionary, it appeared the large number of documents was 'actually inclusionary". 'The number of documents in summary revision conducted earlier in the state was seven and in SIR it is 11, which shows it is voter friendly. We understand your arguments that non-acceptance of Aadhaar is exclusionary but a high number of documents is actually inclusionary," the bench said. The hearing will continue on Thursday. On August 12, the top court said inclusion and exclusion of citizens or non-citizens from the electoral rolls was within the remit of the Election Commission and backed its stand to not accept Aadhaar and voter cards as conclusive proof of citizenship in the SIR of voters' list in Bihar. PTI MNL MNL AMK AMK (This story has not been edited by News18 staff and is published from a syndicated news agency feed - PTI) view comments First Published: August 13, 2025, 19:15 IST News agency-feeds Bihar SIR row: Electoral rolls cant remain static, bound for revision, says SC Disclaimer: Comments reflect users' views, not News18's. Please keep discussions respectful and constructive. Abusive, defamatory, or illegal comments will be removed. News18 may disable any comment at its discretion. By posting, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy.
News18
41 minutes ago
- News18
US News: Democrats Walk Out Over GOP's New Texas Voting Map Texas Redistricting Crisis
In a dramatic escalation of political tensions, Texas Democrats have staged a walkout in protest against a controversial new voting map introduced by the GOP. The redrawn districts are being labeled by critics as a calculated move to consolidate Republican power and weaken minority and Democratic voter influence. The GOP insists the map complies with legal and constitutional requirements, but Democrats argue it dilutes voter representation and undermines fair elections.
Time of India
43 minutes ago
- Time of India
How the right shaped the debate over the Sydney Sweeney ads
To hear Vice President JD Vance tell it, the Democratic Party has a serious Sydney Sweeney problem. 'Did you learn nothing from the November 2024 election?' Vance asked of the Democrats during a podcast interview last week. 'The lesson they've apparently taken is, 'We're going to attack people as Nazis for thinking Sydney Sweeney is beautiful.'' His comments joined a chorus of Republican and right-wing voices who argued that a new American Eagle ad campaign with Sweeney, one of Hollywood's top young stars, had stoked left-wing outrage over its slogan: 'Sydney Sweeney has great jeans.' They claimed that progressives were up in arms over the intentional double-entendre with the word 'genes,' suggesting it was winking at eugenics or white supremacy. In reality, most progressives weren't worked up much at all. Criticism of the ad campaign had come almost entirely from a smattering of accounts with relatively few followers, according to an analysis of social media data by The New York Times. Conversation about the ad did not escalate online or in traditional media until days later, after right-leaning influencers, broadcasters and politicians began criticizing what they described as a wave of progressive outrage. In fact, by the time right-wing users were in an uproar, only a few thousand posts on social platform X mentioned Sweeney, according to data by Tweet Binder, a social media analytics company. Fewer than 10% of those expressed clear criticism of the actress or ad, according to the analysis by the Times, which used artificial intelligence to help flag posts for review. Overall, there were three times as many posts supportive of the campaign and Sweeney on X as there were posts critical of them in the days after the campaign began, the analysis by the Times showed. The boiling social media frenzy over the American Eagle campaign has been driven, at least in part, by the public's seemingly insatiable interest in Sweeney. But it also shows how, on today's internet, a controversy can sometimes be described as widespread when it isn't. Instead, people pushing an agenda can cherry-pick from the tens of millions of posts and videos uploaded to social media every day to make their case. The political right has become particularly adept at this tactic, cognizant of the way that tapping into hot-button cultural issues can stoke popular anger not just against progressive ideas but against the Democratic Party itself. In the case of the American Eagle ads, the one-sided discourse also appears to have provoked an actual debate: Left-leaning criticism of the campaign rose considerably after the topic gained traction on the right. 'Republicans are going to just keep hammering this because they know that they can find 13 teenagers on TikTok to say something crazy and then turn it into a two-week-long news story,' said Ryan Broderick, the author of Garbage Day, a newsletter about internet culture. American Eagle, which has been struggling financially in the face of inflation and sagging consumer spending, started the campaign with Sweeney on July 23. At the time, Jennifer Foyle, the company's president, described the campaign as a 'winning combo of ease, attitude and a little mischief.' In one spot, Sweeney, who promotes a number of other brands as well, zips up a pair of jeans while saying, in a voice-over, that 'genes are passed down from parents to offspring, often determining traits like hair color, personality and even eye color.' She adds, 'My jeans are blue.' Initial reactions were largely apolitical, though some progressives criticized the ad's sexual overtones while some on the right applauded a return to 'traditional advertising ' in what they viewed as a step away from more diverse representations. But on the fringes of sites including TikTok and X, some users began suggesting that the campaign had a more subtle and menacing message tied to eugenics: that blond, blue-eyed looks are somehow superior. 'She has good jeans like she has good GENES! hahahaha like in a nazi way!!' stated a July 25 post on X that drew more than 5 million views. The next day, a video on TikTok that also made a comparison to Nazism drew 3.5 million views. Those, however, appeared to be outliers: Nearly three-quarters of posts that were critical of Sweeney or the ad had fewer than 500 views, data show. Many pro-Trump users amplified the critical posts in reposts and reshares, driving even more attention to posts that would normally reach only a few thousand users. The tide began to shift on July 27, when large right-wing accounts such as Libs of TikTok began reposting critiques of the American Eagle campaign, mocking them as examples of 'triggered' liberals. 'Keep this up Democrats,' posted the account, which is run by a woman named Chaya Raichik and has 4.3 million followers on X. 'This is going to be great for you guys.' Raichik and another right-wing account shared a video from a left-wing TikTok user who had 70,000 followers on the platform. Their reposts were seen more than 4.4 million times on X, far eclipsing the reach of the original post. Then came the podcasters. Perhaps prompted by the viral success of posts that defended the American Eagle campaign while attacking left-wing viewpoints, popular podcast hosts including Charlie Kirk, Clay Travis and Michael Knowles jumped on the topic, devoting increasing amounts of airtime to what they described as evidence of a 'brain broken' Democratic culture. Elected Republicans soon followed. 'Now the crazy Left has come out against beautiful women,' Sen. Ted Cruz, R-Texas, posted on July 29. After reports emerged that Sweeney had registered as a Republican in Florida last year, President Donald Trump posted to Truth Social that Sweeney 'has the 'HOTTEST' ad out there' and praised the campaign for not being 'woke.' Absent from the evolving conversation, however, were any elected Democrats condemning the American Eagle spots. 'Has anyone on the left actually attacked the Sweeney ad?' asked a progressive podcaster, Brian Tyler Cohen, who has 600,000 followers on X and 4.6 million subscribers on YouTube, in a post last week as articles were circulating about the uproar. Travis, who has discussed the ads almost every day for the past week on his sports and politics podcast, 'OutKick,' as well as on his nationally syndicated radio show, acknowledged in an interview that elected Democrats had not criticized the ads. But he said the fact that they hadn't forcefully rebutted the complaints about the ads proved that the party was complicit in what he said was a 'woke' culture run amok. 'I haven't seen a single Democrat call out the absurdity,' he said. 'Their silence speaks volumes.' At least one elected Democrat, Rep. Eric Swalwell of California, did speak up to defend the ad. In a response to Cruz, Swalwell stated on X that 'attacking the Sydney Sweeney ad is dumb.' Yet his post drew only 60,000 views, compared with 1.2 million for Cruz's post on the ad. Sweeney has not publicly commented on the campaign, and American Eagle has also stayed largely out of the fray, save for an Instagram post late last week that said the campaign 'is and always was about the jeans.' At least in the short term, all the attention hasn't hurt the brand: American Eagle shares are up nearly 26% since the campaign began.
