logo
We're backing Scotland with billions in investment, says Reeves ahead of visit

We're backing Scotland with billions in investment, says Reeves ahead of visit

Rachel Reeves said Labour is 'seizing the huge potential and opportunities that Scotland has to offer' in defence and energy.
She will visit RAF Lossiemouth in Moray and the St Fergus gas plant in Aberdeenshire on Friday, exactly a week after she toured the Rolls-Royce factory near Glasgow Airport.
The Chancellor will meet 200 Boeing staff at the military site where three new E-7 Wedgetail aircraft are being made.
The UK Government said its plans to increase defence spending to 2.6% will raise Britain's GDP by around 0.3%, while adding 26,100 jobs to the Scottish economy.
It also pointed to its £200 million investment for Aberdeenshire's Acorn carbon capture project, which could create 15,000 new jobs while safeguarding 18,000 more. A final investment decision for the project is yet to be made.
Ms Reeves said: 'We're seizing the huge potential and opportunities that Scotland has on offer.
'Whether it's in defence to keep the UK safe, or clean energy to power all corners of the country, this Government is backing Scotland with billions of pounds of investment to grow the economy and create jobs.'
The Chancellor will visit RAF Lossiemouth on Friday (Danny Lawson/PA)
Scottish Secretary Ian Murray said the Government is investing in defence to 'ensure Britain's security and deter our adversaries and drive economic growth'.
He added: 'This investment is a massive jobs opportunity for Scotland – this 'defence dividend' is good news for Scotland, where it will help create skilled jobs, drive economic growth, and help tackle the critical skills gaps facing the country in sectors such as nuclear, construction, maritime and project management.'
Maria Laine, Boeing's UK president, said: 'Boeing has a long-standing presence in Scotland including at RAF Lossiemouth, the home to the UK's P-8 Poseidon fleet and where the E-7 Wedgetail will be based when it enters service.
'As a key partner of the UK Armed Forces, Boeing welcomes the defence spending increase and has seen first-hand how defence infrastructure investments, such as the £100 million Atlantic Building and new E-7 facilities at RAF Lossiemouth, can deliver for local jobs, suppliers and UK national security.'
Scottish Secretary Ian Murray said Scotland is receiving a 'defence dividend' from the UK Government (Gareth Fuller/PA)
Michelle Ferguson, director of CBI Scotland, added: 'Scotland's energy and defence sectors are vital to our economy, driving investment and supporting thousands of skilled jobs.
'The Chancellor's announcement of £200 million for the Acorn energy project is very encouraging, but businesses are eager for final approval to unlock its full potential and secure North Sea jobs.
'Increased defence spending will further boost Scotland's skilled workforce and create growth opportunities across key supply-chain.
'Close collaboration between the Scottish and UK governments will be essential to fully realise these benefits, driving forward national security and Scotland's transition to a resilient, low-carbon economy.'
Aberdeen & Grampian Chamber of Commerce urged the Chancellor to drop the energy profits levy (EPL), the so-called 'windfall tax' on oil and gas companies, which has a headline rate of 78%.
Chief executive Russell Borthwick said: 'If we stick to course on the accelerated decline of the North Sea, then we'll only have a few short years and not prosperous decades of future oil and gas from our own waters.
'Instead, we'll import more, pay more and suffer further consequences of jobs and businesses lost, just at the time we need them to support the energy transition.
'We know the Chancellor needs to find growth from somewhere within the UK economy. With oil and gas, there's no need to start from scratch or build out a nascent industry.
'Simply by removing the confiscatory EPL, letting investment flow into projects and stimulating activity in a sector which has been hammered by policy for too long, we can unlock significant growth in the UK economy.'
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Korean equity surge risks stuttering without stronger reform push: Raychaudhuri
Korean equity surge risks stuttering without stronger reform push: Raychaudhuri

Reuters

time39 minutes ago

  • Reuters

Korean equity surge risks stuttering without stronger reform push: Raychaudhuri

HONG KONG, August 4 (Reuters) - The Korean equity market, which went from being among the worst performers in Asia last year to the best regional performer in 2025, stumbled over the past week. The rally has fundamental support, but it could sputter if expected shareholder-friendly reforms don't materialize. The well-known 'Korea discount' afflicting the country's stocks has narrowed considerably this year. Korean equities typically trade at a sharp valuation discount to Asian stocks excluding Japan, with the exception of a brief period of AI-fuelled euphoria in 2023. But this discount fell from around 40% at the peak of political upheaval last year to under 30% in mid-July, thanks largely to expectations of shareholder-friendly reforms and greater clarity around the shape of the new government. However, Korean equities hit a hurdle in late July. The market corrected 4% in the last two trading days of the month after President Lee's government raised the peak corporate tax rate from 24% to 25% and the securities transaction tax from 0.15% to 0.20%. The announcement of a Korea-U.S. trade deal removed some uncertainties, but ambiguities about execution remain, and, overall, disappointment regarding the tax tweak overshadowed the trade truce relief. Korean equity performance in 2025 has been driven not just by political shifts but by several fundamental factors in a few large sectors. Financials, which constitute 13% of Korea's equity market, appreciated by 57% in the year through July 25, benefitting from investors' preference for high dividend yields and expectations of increased loan growth after a stream of rate cuts by the Bank of Korea. Meanwhile, industrials, representing 17% of Korea's market, have been lifted 54% over that period, thanks to the global defence and infrastructure spending boom. Technology, the country's largest sector at almost 30% of the market, has seen share prices rise by 45% in this time. The flagship technology stocks Samsung and SK Hynix are up 24% and 55%, respectively, as they continue to be propelled by AI optimism and the success of some specific new products, most notably Hynix's High Bandwidth Memory chip, an essential input to advanced AI servers and Nvidia's GPUs. Beyond these sector-specific catalysts, one of the most significant trends spurring investor enthusiasm for Korea this year has been the expectation of regulatory changes designed to protect minority shareholders. Korea's 'Value Up' program, initiated in February 2024 by the country's previous government led by former President Yoon Suk Yeol, began to tackle key issues plaguing Korean corporate governance, but many investors believe it did not go far enough. The unaddressed concerns include the prevalence of cross-holding structures that give founding families disproportionate control over companies and, relatedly, companies' reluctance to distribute excess cash to shareholders. Former President Yoon's declaration of martial law in December 2024 and his subsequent impeachment led to presidential elections in June 2025, and the formation of a seemingly stable government under President Lee Jae Myung. Soon after, on July 3, the National Assembly passed, opens new tab a corporate governance reform bill, which, among other things, requires company directors to act in the best interest of shareholders, limits large shareholders' voting rights when appointing audit committee members, mandates that hybrid virtual shareholder meetings must be held by publicly traded firms above a certain size, and raises the required proportion of independent directors on boards from one-quarter to one-third. Even before these measures were taken, corporate behaviour was already changing in anticipation of government pressure. Korean dividend payouts have been rising since 2022, and so have buybacks, according to FactSet. Indeed, buybacks in the first half of 2025 are higher than in all of 2024. These positive changes may have helped spur the rush of foreign capital flows into the country's equity market since April. Foreign institutions sold a net $28 billion of Korean equities from August 2024 to April 2025, and bought back a net $6 billion over the next three months. The currency has also been supportive of inflows. The Korean won has appreciated 7% against the U.S. dollar in 2025, second only to the Taiwanese dollar in the Asian leaderboard. Valuations remain attractive in Korea's market despite the sharp rally. Korean equities trade at a forward price-to-earnings multiple of 12.3x, far lower than its Asian peers that have similar earnings growth profiles. Of course, Korea's PE ratio is based on an 18% earnings growth forecast in 2026, the FactSet consensus expectation, and some investors may be sceptical about this figure. But such scepticism seems unjustified, as Korea's consensus EPS forecasts have been rising since March, a period marked by significant geopolitical and economic uncertainties that are, in many cases, now being resolved. Can the Korean rally regain its momentum? While the market's response to the U.S.-Korea trade deal may not have been overly positive, the outcome – a 15% tariff for many Korean goods versus the 25% rate feared – removes a massive risk, given that 15% of Korean companies' aggregate revenue comes directly from the U.S., according to FactSet. Investors, however, would be well-advised to keep an eye on the country's reform calendar, as several governance-enhancing reforms are still not finalized, most notably a tax amendment to incentivize higher dividend payouts. Moving forward, the fate of the Korean equity rally could depend, to a large extent, on what happens in government. (The views expressed here are those of Manishi Raychaudhuri, the founder and CEO of Emmer Capital Partners Ltd. and the former Head of Asia-Pacific Equity Research at BNP Paribas Securities). Enjoying this column? Check out Reuters Open Interest (ROI),, opens new tab your essential new source for global financial commentary. ROI delivers thought-provoking, data-driven analysis of everything from swap rates to soybeans. Markets are moving faster than ever. ROI,, opens new tab can help you keep up. Follow ROI on LinkedIn,, opens new tab and X., opens new tab ​

The backwardness of this Labour Government's obsession with class
The backwardness of this Labour Government's obsession with class

Telegraph

time39 minutes ago

  • Telegraph

The backwardness of this Labour Government's obsession with class

SIR – The Civil Service is to restrict summer internships to students from 'lower socio-economic backgrounds' (report, August 2). I cannot quite see how this accords with the statement by Rachel Reeves, the Chancellor, that 'there should be no barriers to young people having the chance to decide on their own futures' ('Reeves: Defence shut out at job fairs', report, August 2). Geoffrey Budden Norton, Suffolk SIR – Pat McFadden, the Cabinet Office minister, has defended the change to Civil Service internships. This Labour Government should be encouraging the Civil Service simply to take on the most promising people, rather than constantly agonising over individuals' backgrounds. The latest move is nothing but discrimination. Avril Wright Ingoldisthorpe, Norfolk SIR – The Government's apparent definition of 'working-class' is odious. Anyone who is employed, draws a wage or receives a salary is a worker. It's time we stopped thinking in crude class terms. Nigel Carter Devizes, Wiltshire SIR – Would the children of train drivers – some of whom earn about £65,000 – really be considered working-class? Brian Hoffmann York SIR – The trouble with insisting that the Civil Service is and must remain a 'meritocracy' is that we encourage a cohort that considers itself rather superior. Instead of faithfully assisting the government of the day to implement the will of the people, some civil servants prefer to promote their own political views, often to the detriment of official policy. We should recruit broadly into the Civil Service, but quickly root out those who consider their personal idealism to be above their service to the country. Colonel Mark Rayner (retd) Eastbourne, East Sussex SIR – The reference in your Leading Article (August 2) to the Northcote-Trevelyan report – which suggested that the Civil Service attracted the 'unambitious', 'indolent' and 'incapable' – reminded me of a conversation I had at a social event last summer. One of the guests, who worked in the private sector, was complaining how much more taxing her job was than that of her friend, who worked for Transport for London (not part of the Civil Service, but public-sector). When I asked her why she didn't apply to work there, her friend said there were few vacancies. No one wants to leave because it's such a cushy number.

Business chiefs are demanding Rachel Reeves offers tax incentives to help a million young people into workplace
Business chiefs are demanding Rachel Reeves offers tax incentives to help a million young people into workplace

The Sun

time2 hours ago

  • The Sun

Business chiefs are demanding Rachel Reeves offers tax incentives to help a million young people into workplace

BUSINESS chiefs are demanding Rachel Reeves offers tax incentives to help a million young people into the workplace. More than 100 industry bosses, including Toyota and JCB, have written to the Chancellor demanding help to avoid youths ending up on the scrapheap. 2 Demands are being laid out for a Skills Tax Relief at the Budget with claims it could save £10 billion over five years in welfare savings. The calls come as the talent of one million NEETs – Not in Education, Employment or Training – is going to waste. Georgina Bristol, of the Jobs Foundation, said: 'We know that businesses are the best engine for providing that vital first step on the career ladder for young people. 'But businesses are facing too many additional costs, which is stopping them from fulfilling this vital role. 'We are not short of young people with ambition. We are short of clear routes into real work. A Skills Tax Relief could give business the tools to offer that hope.' Young people who were in this category before the pandemic stood at 10.7 per cent but this then hit a peak of 13.2 per cent – representing 987,000 not earning or even learning a skill. The joint letter from 125 business leaders wants Ms Reeves to bring in some form of tax incentive to enable funding in young people. Prominent signatories include chairman of JCB Lord Anthony Bamford, Labour Peer Lord Jon Mendelsohn and sports promoter Barry Hearn. The Jobs Foundation also highlights that that the number of apprenticeships has fallen by 40 per cent since 2016. The Chancellor last month told a House of Lords committee that getting young people back into work is where 'the biggest crisis exists'. Raising taxes will kill off growth, Reeves warned as she pledges to rip up business red tape 2

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store