GNU partners face off as DA challenges Employment Equity Act in court
Image: Jacques Naude / Independent Newspapers
The tension within South Africa's Government of National Unity (GNU) reached a boiling point this week as the Democratic Alliance (DA) initiated court proceedings against the Department of Employment and Labour's controversial Employment Equity Act amendments.
This legal action is seen as a manifestation of long-standing policy disagreements among coalition partners, which political analysts argue were never properly resolved when forming the GNU.
Unisa political studies lecturer Professor Dirk Kotze highlighted the absence of a comprehensive policy agreement when the coalition was formed.
'What is happening now is that each of them, when they emerge, it becomes a dispute or crisis like it was with the Expropriation Act, the Bela Act, and the National Health Insurance because there is no new legislation now,' said Kotze.
'It's symptomatic of the fact that they didn't negotiate the complete agreement on both policy matters in general or across the board, and that these issues now emerge one by one, and they have to actually deal with them piecemeal, instead of in a comprehensive way,' he said.
The Employment Equity Amendment Act, passed by Parliament in 2022, empowers the Minister of Employment and Labour to set sector-specific numerical targets aimed at achieving equity within the workplace.
In its constitutional challenge, the DA argues that Section 15A undermines fundamental principles of equality before the law.
After hearing arguments by the parties on Tuesday, the Pretoria High Court reserved judgment in the application. The DA insists the amendments on the Employment Equity Act are unconstitutional and violate the principle of equality before the law.
DA federal chairperson Helen Zille told the media earlier this week that the Employment Equity Amendment Act discriminated unfairly and unconstitutionally.
Video Player is loading.
Play Video
Play
Unmute
Current Time
0:00
/
Duration
-:-
Loaded :
0%
Stream Type LIVE
Seek to live, currently behind live
LIVE
Remaining Time
-
0:00
This is a modal window.
Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window.
Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque
Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps
Reset
restore all settings to the default values Done
Close Modal Dialog
End of dialog window.
Advertisement
Next
Stay
Close ✕
Ad Loading
'It is grossly unfair and gives totalitarian powers of social engineering to the Minister of Labour, who will be able to set rigid national targets for every economic sector, without any regard to the context of specific firms, and impose extremely heavy fines and the risk of criminal conviction for failure to meet them.
'This can no longer be classified as a target. It amounts to an enabling law for the minister to set rigid quotas, which have previously been found by our courts to be unconstitutional,' Zille said.
She warned that the draconian labour regime created by the Employment Equity Amendment Act is likely to drive away investment and increase unemployment.
'Companies and potential investors have repeatedly cited these social engineering laws as major barriers to investment and growth.'
Employment and Labour Minister Nomakhosazana Meth said the setting of numerical targets for equitable representation of suitably qualified individuals from designated groups at all occupational levels was done after consulting relevant sectors and with the advice of the Employment Equity Commission.
She said unlike rigid mandatory quotas, the Amendment Act introduces flexible employment equity targets and designated employers can set their annual numerical targets in their employment equity plans.
Meth also said employers can justify their failure to meet the targets on reasonable grounds.
'The DA's challenge seeks to disrupt efforts aimed at achieving equitable representation and maintaining the inherently unfair status quo.
'By opposing these amendments, the DA is actively sabotaging the transformation goals that have been pursued since the end of the apartheid era, effectively hindering progress towards equality and fairness in the workplace.
'This stance is not only anti-transformation, but also a step backward in the fight for equality and fairness in the workplace,' said Meth.
The ANC condemned the DA court challenge, saying it was a direct assault on the very foundation of South Africa's transformation journey.
'The DA's court challenge against section 15A of the EEAA, which introduces sector-specific numerical targets to correct racial imbalances in the workplace, reveals its enduring opposition to redress and equality,' spokesperson Mahlengi Bhengu-Motsiri said.
Kotze said it was difficult to predict what could transpire after the court action between the ANC and the DA.
However, he said should there be serious difference of opinion about policy matters, that can break up the GNU.
'The GNU is working very well for the DA. Their public support is increasing, so there is no reason for them to pull out.'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Citizen
3 hours ago
- The Citizen
Mandeni councillor allegedly demands R100k bribe for tender approval
Two Mandeni councillors are under fire after a leaked recording allegedly captured them demanding a R100 000 bribe for a municipal tender. The recording is said to feature the councillors negotiating the terms of the bribe with a local contractor, sparking widespread outrage and concern among residents and political leaders. Mandeni municipal speaker Phindile Sishi confirmed that the matter has been formally escalated to her office and is currently being addressed internally. 'The municipality reiterates its zero-tolerance stance on corruption and maladministration. We urge all staff and councillors to uphold the highest standards of integrity and professionalism in the execution of their duties,' said Sishi. The names of the councillors implicated in the scandal have not yet been released. Democratic Alliance (DA) councillor in Mandeni, Kuben Naicker, expressed outrage over what he described as 'disturbing and deeply concerning' conduct, reportedly involving an ANC ward councillor. 'Municipal institutions have been reduced to centres of political patronage, tender manipulation and extortion, while residents are left to suffer without access to basic services,' said Naicker. The DA is calling for a full forensic audit of all tenders awarded by the municipality over the past two years to uncover any further irregularities. Stay in the loop with The North Coast Courier on Facebook, X, Instagram & YouTube for the latest news. Mobile users can join our WhatsApp Broadcast Service here, or if you're on desktop, scan the QR code below.

IOL News
3 hours ago
- IOL News
What are tariffs and why is the US imposing them on South Africa?
South Africa is bracing for economic shock as a 30% tariff on all its exports to the United States takes effect on Friday. Image: AFP Despite President Cyril Ramaphosa and the Government of National Unity (GNU)'s best efforts to strike a deal, no agreement appears imminent. The Department of Trade and Industry further confirmed last week that it has not signed any substantive trade agreement with the Trump administration. "We have not signed any substantive agreement yet. The document signed was a precedent condition document," Ministerial spokesperson Kaamil Alli said. Trump has also cast doubt on his attendance at the upcoming G20 Summit in South Africa, citing what he described as 'very bad policies' in the country, indicative of the ongoing strained relations between the two countries. Video Player is loading. Play Video Play Unmute Current Time 0:00 / Duration -:- Loaded : 0% Stream Type LIVE Seek to live, currently behind live LIVE Remaining Time - 0:00 This is a modal window. Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window. Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps Reset restore all settings to the default values Done Close Modal Dialog End of dialog window. Advertisement Next Stay Close ✕ Ad loading With the looming tariff hogging the headlines and exporters and economists warning about severe economic implications for South Africa if a deal is not reached, IOL takes a closer look at what tariffs are and why countries impose them. What are tariffs? According to Clarissa Hahn, an economist from Oxford Economics, tariffs are taxes imposed by a government on goods and services imported from other countries. "Think of a tariff like an extra cost added to foreign products when they enter the country. They're usually a percentage of the price of the goods. The level of the tariff will affect the significance of its impacts," she said. Why do governments impose tariffs? According to Hahn, governments impose tariffs to: Raise government revenue – tariffs serve as a source of income for governments. Protect domestic industries and correct trade imbalances – tariffs shelter domestic industries from foreign competition and discourage consumption of imported goods. Political tool for negotiations – tariffs can be used to apply pressure on the foreign government they are imposed on , as part of a trade negotiation or a political tool . What impact do tariffs have on the economy imposing them? Tariffs can help domestic industries by reducing foreign competition and boosting demand for local products. However, if these industries rely on imported materials, higher costs may increase production expenses and consumer prices. What impact do tariffs have on the economies they are imposed on? "In the country where tariffs are imposed on targeted industries will face lower export demand. As their goods have become relatively more expensive in the importing country, it will lead to lower sales and lost market share, as consumers switch to relatively cheaper domestic goods." IOL News Get your news on the go, click here to join the IOL News WhatsApp channel


The Citizen
4 hours ago
- The Citizen
South Africa's road to political unity is long
Once a home for activists of all races, the ANC now faces an identity challenge as racial divisions in politics deepen. Does the ANC really need whites in its ranks? ANC Youth League president Collen Malatji sparked this controversial debate when he said he wants to see more racial diversity in the party. He made the remarks during a youth rally in the Eastern Cape at the weekend, where he expressed concern over the lack of white participation in the youth league. Malatji questioned why, decades after democracy, young white South Africans are still largely absent from the ANC's structures, especially considering the pivotal role played by figures like Joe Slovo, Denis Goldberg and other white comrades during the liberation struggle. 'We have to ask ourselves,' Malatji said, 'why white youth do not see the ANC as their home any more. Why did they join in the past, and what's pushing them away now?' His comments come at a time when South African politics remains racially polarised. While the ANC continues to dominate the black vote, it has seen declining support among other racial groups. Meanwhile, opposition parties like the DA and Freedom Front Plus (FF+) are struggling with their own identity challenges. The DA, in particular, appears unsure whether it is a black-led liberal party or a white-dominated opposition. As Malatji pointed out, the DA 'doesn't know whether it is a black or white party' – an identity crisis that speaks volumes about the broader racial tensions that still shape voter behaviour. ALSO READ: 'I don't see white people here': Malatji laments lack of diversity in the ANCYL The ANC, once celebrated as a nonracial movement, was a political home to South Africans of all races during the fight against apartheid. Leaders such as Slovo, Ruth First and Beyers Naudé symbolised the inclusive, values-driven vision of the ANC. Today, that image is fading. The ANC's inability to attract white youth is not just a numbers issue – it is a reflection of a deeper identity crisis and a drift away from its founding ethos. There are several reasons why white South Africans, particularly the youth, feel disconnected from the ANC today. First, race-based policies such as affirmative action and broad-based black economic empowerment, though aimed at redressing historic injustices, are often perceived by some as exclusionary or even hostile. This perception, whether fair or not, creates emotional and ideological distance. Second, the ANC's track record in governance has hurt its credibility. Years of corruption scandals, poor service delivery and internal factional battles have driven many away – regardless of race. For middle-class voters, both black and white, trust in the party's ability to lead effectively has eroded. ALSO READ: 'Extend that apology to black South Africans,' says ActionSA over Macpherson's hobo comment Malatji, however, believes the presence of white voices is essential – not only for symbolic reasons but also for restoring a sense of shared purpose. 'Bringing in white youth isn't about chasing votes,' he said. 'It's about restoring a vision of unity that was central to the liberation movement.' In other words, inclusivity strengthens the ANC's moral and political legitimacy. It reaffirms the principle that the party belongs to all South Africans, not just one group. Yet despite these intentions, the racial divide in voting remains deeply entrenched. Last year's general election showed that most South Africans still vote largely along racial lines. Black voters remain loyal to the ANC, EFF, Inkatha Freedom Party and lately uMkhonto weSizwe party, while the majority of white voters support the DA or FF+. Coloured and Indian voters are split across smaller parties, often guided by regional or economic concerns. This racialised voting pattern has been reinforced by South Africa's unequal society, where race still closely aligns with access to education, wealth and services. Political parties, whether intentionally or not, often speak past each other – targeting specific racial or cultural groups rather than building a shared national narrative. ALSO READ: Half a million white South Africans have left the country in 25 years So what would it take for the ANC – or any party – to truly bridge this divide? First, parties need to rebuild public trust through clean governance, transparency and delivery. Actions speak louder than speeches. Second, they must embrace inclusive language and stop relying on racial identity as a political tool. Third, they need to actively engage young people of all races – especially in schools, universities and communities – where future leadership is shaped. In the past, many whites, coloureds and Indians joined the ANC not just because it was a black-led movement, but because it stood for justice, democracy and human rights. Today, that moral clarity is harder to find. The ANC will need to rediscover and live out those founding values if it hopes to regain that kind of cross-racial support. Malatji's comments, while controversial to some, may be an important reminder that the struggle for a nonracial South Africa is far from over. Whether the ANC – or any other party – can build a truly inclusive future depends on whether they are willing to listen, reform and lead with integrity. The road to unity is long. But acknowledging the gap, as Malatji has done, is at least a start. NOW READ: Does Africa still need liberation parties?