Colombia rejects Guatemalan court's arrest warrants for top officials
Guatemalan Public Prosecutor Rafael Curruchiche on Monday accused Colombian Attorney General Luz Adriana Camargo and former Colombian Defence Minister Ivan Velasquez of corruption, influence peddling, obstruction of justice, and collusion during a United Nations-backed International Commission against Impunity in Guatemala (CICIG) investigation into bribes paid to Guatemalan officials by Brazilian construction giant Odebrecht.
Petro said on Tuesday that the targeting of Camargo and Velasquez was politically motivated and shows that the attorney general's office is 'subordinate to the mafia'.
'Narcotrafficking multinationals are trying to take over legal authorities and governments to carry out and whitewash their illicit business,' wrote Petro in a post on X.
In a statement released on Monday, Guatemala's government also said it 'emphatically rejects the arrest warrants'.
'These actions are carried out with a clear political objective, without grounding in the national and international legal system,' it said.
While announcing the warrants on Monday, Curruchiche alleged without providing evidence that Camargo and Velasquez abused their power while working at the CICIG on the Odebrecht case, a vast corruption scandal in which the construction firm admitted to bribing officials for public contracts in 10 Latin American countries.
On Tuesday, Curruchiche presented emails, purportedly between Odebrecht employees and Camargo, to reporters that he said prove Camargo and Velasquez are guilty, though Al Jazeera could not independently verify the validity of the emails.
Curruchiche's office first announced it was investigating Velasquez, who is currently Colombia's ambassador to the Holy See, in January 2023 when he was still minister of defence. From 2013 to 2019, Velasquez oversaw the CICIG, which uncovered several corruption networks in Guatemala.
Guatemala's prosecutor's office did not respond to a request for comment.
Both Camargo and Velasquez have denied the accusations.
'The corrupt Guatemalan Attorney General and her prosecutor Curruchiche – designated as corrupt and sanctioned by the US and the European Union – extend their persecution to me and Luz Adriana Camargo,' wrote Velasquez in an X post on Tuesday.
Colombia's attorney general also rejected the charges in a press conference in Bogota on Wednesday.
'I am comforted by the tranquility of my innocence in the crimes that have been attributed to me by political bias,' said Camargo.
Juanita Goebertus Estrada, director of the Americas Division at Human Rights Watch, told Al Jazeera that the accusations against the Colombian officials were unfounded.
'There is no evidence against Velasquez or Camargo of any credible participation in criminal activity,' she said, adding that the warrants were just the latest in a series of controversial moves by the office of Guatemala's Attorney General Maria Consuelo Porras, who has faced international criticism for resisting anti-corruption efforts.
'Consuelo Porras has a terrible record in human rights and democracy. She has constantly used criminal action as a weapon against those who have tried to fight against corruption in the country,' said Goebertus.
Curruchiche was criticised for interfering with elections after his office suspended then-candidate Bernardo Arevalo's party ahead of the presidential run-off in 2023. Arevalo went on to win the elections, assuming office in January 2024
Guatemala's government said the arrest warrants are part of a wider pattern of judicial overreach.
'These are part of a series of actions by the Public Prosecutor's Office, the Attorney General of the Republic and judges associated with corruption that have distorted the meaning of justice in Guatemala,' said the Guatemalan government in its statement on Monday.
Despite the arrest orders, it appears unlikely that actions against the two officials will be taken outside of Guatemala.
'Petro won't comply with the arrest warrants … and it is very likely that he will seek an injunction to any international notice by Interpol that seeks to do the same,' Sergio Guzman, director at Colombia Risk Analysis, a security think tank, told Al Jazeera.
However, Colombian opposition figures have embraced the arrest warrants as evidence of corruption in the Petro administration. Vicky Davila, the conservative frontrunner in next year's presidential elections, promised to comply with the order.
'On August 7 of next year, we will send them to Guatemala on a commercial flight, handcuffed, as befits extradited persons, to answer to the justice of that country for their alleged crimes,' wrote Davila in a post on X on Monday.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Al Jazeera
2 days ago
- Al Jazeera
Colombia's ex-President Alvaro Uribe sentenced to 12 years of house arrest
Former Colombian President Alvaro Uribe has been sentenced to 12 years of house arrest following his conviction for witness-tampering and bribery, according to local media reports. The sentencing hearing on Friday also resulted in Uribe, 73, receiving a fine of $578,000 and a ban from serving in public office for 100 months and 20 days — or just over eight years. He is now required to report to authorities in Rionegro, in his home province of Antioquia. Afterwards, Judge Sandra Liliana Heredia has ordered him to 'proceed immediately to his residence where he will comply with house arrest'. With his conviction on July 28, Uribe has become the first former Colombian president to be found guilty in a criminal trial. But Uribe's defence lawyers have already announced that they plan to appeal. The sentencing culminates a six-month trial and nearly 13 years of legal back-and-forth for the popular conservative leader, who is considered one of the defining forces in modern-day Colombian politics. His house arrest also comes less than a year before Colombia is set to hold presidential elections in May 2026. Allegations of human rights abuses The case centres around Uribe's role in Colombia's more than six-decade-long internal conflict, which has seen government forces, right-wing paramilitaries, left-wing rebel groups and drug-trafficking networks all fighting for control over parts of the country. During his tenure as president from 2002 to 2010, Uribe led a strong-armed offensive against left-wing rebels like the Revolutionary Armed Forces of Colombia (FARC), the largest such group at the time. But that approach earned him criticism for alleged human rights abuses, which he has denied. Under his presidency, the Colombian military faced increasing accusations that it was killing civilians in order to boost the number of enemy combatants it could report as dead. This practice, known as the 'false positives' scandal, has been implicated in the deaths of at least 2,000 people, with experts indicating that the number could be far higher. As many as 6,402 killings have been investigated. Critics have also questioned Uribe's ties to right-wing paramilitaries, another allegation the ex-president has rejected. But more than a decade ago, Uribe took action to silence one of his most prominent critics, leftist Senator Ivan Cepeda, sparking his current trial. Cepeda and others had drawn connections between Uribe's rise in politics in the 1990s and the creation of the paramilitary group Bloque Metro. A legal boomerang In 2012, Uribe filed a libel complaint against Cepeda with Colombia's Supreme Court, after the senator launched a probe into the ex-president's paramilitary contacts. But in 2018, the case took a surprising new direction: The Supreme Court dismissed the complaint against Cepeda, and the court system instead started to weigh charges against Uribe instead. Prosecutors accused Uribe of seeking to pressure paramilitary witnesses to change or suppress their testimony. While Uribe has admitted to sending lawyers to meet with former members of Colombia's paramilitaries, he has denied taking illegal actions. Two paramilitaries have testified that Uribe's lawyer Diego Cadena, who also faces criminal charges, offered them money to give favourable evidence. Their witness statements were also being used in a murder trial featuring Uribe's brother, Santiago Uribe. Uribe's conviction was announced after a 10-hour hearing in which Judge Heredia said there was ample evidence that the ex-president sought to change witness testimony. But that decision has sparked backlash from the United States, where the administration of President Donald Trump has shown willingness to place political pressure on countries like Brazil that pursue criminal cases against former right-wing leaders. On Monday, US Secretary of State Marco Rubio wrote on social media in defence of Uribe, repeating charges of judicial bias that have become commonplace under Trump. 'Former Colombian President Uribe's only crime has been to tirelessly fight and defend his homeland,' Rubio said. 'The weaponization of Colombia's judicial branch by radical judges has now set a worrisome precedent.' But Democrats in the US accused Trump of seeking to subvert the rule of law overseas for political gains. 'The Trump Admin is saying that foreign leaders shouldn't be subject to rule of law if they say nice things about Trump,' Representative Jim McGovern wrote in reply to Rubio's message. 'It is very wrong to support impunity for a strongman held accountable by courts in his own country. This statement is shameful, and you know it.'
Al Jazeera
6 days ago
- Al Jazeera
Colombia ex-President Alvaro Uribe found guilty in landmark bribery trial
Former Colombian President Alvaro Uribe has been found guilty of witness tampering and bribery in a landmark trial, becoming the country's first ex-president to ever be found guilty at trial. Judge Sandra Liliana Heredia ruled on Monday that there was enough evidence to determine that Uribe, 73, conspired with a lawyer to coax three former members of paramilitary groups who were in prison into changing testimony they had provided to Ivan Cepeda, a left-wing senator who had launched an investigation into Uribe's alleged ties to a paramilitary group in the 1990s. The case dates to 2012, when Uribe filed a libel suit against Cepeda with the Supreme Court. But in a twist, the high court dismissed the charges against Cepeda and began investigating Uribe in 2018. Uribe faces up to 12 years in prison, but a sentencing will be delivered in a separate hearing on Friday. He is expected to appeal the ruling. Uribe's critics have celebrated his trial as the deserved downfall of a man repeatedly accused of close relationships with violent right-wing paramilitaries, but never convicted of any crime. The former leader, 73, and his supporters say the process is a persecution and that he is innocent. Uribe and one of his lawyers, Jaime Granados, joined the hearing via videolink, while another lawyer, Jaime Lombana, appeared in person. 'This is not the end of this process, the appeal is next and we are going to demonstrate that this decision, which we respect, is wrong,' lawyer Juan Felipe Amaya, part of Uribe's legal team, told journalists at the court. Granados told the hearing that the presumption of Uribe's innocence should be maintained and asked for him to remain free during the remainder of the process. Both detractors and supporters gathered outside the court, with some Uribe backers sporting masks of his face. Even if the conviction is eventually upheld, Uribe may be allowed to serve his final sentence on house arrest because of his age. Uribe's trial triggered criticism from United States Secretary of State Marco Rubio. Uribe had a close relationship with the US during his two terms as president between 2002 and 2010, as right-wing governments in Latin America have often had. 'Uribe's only crime has been to tirelessly fight and defend his homeland. The weaponisation of Colombia's judicial branch by radical judges has now set a worrisome precedent,' Rubio said on X. Colombian President Gustavo Petro, a leftist, defended the ruling, writing on X that 'a strong justice system' will enable Colombia to emerge from violence. He added in another message that Rubio was interfering with Colombia's sovereignty. 'A decision against the ex-president could generate some kind of reprisal by the government of the United States,' Banco de Bogota said in a note on Monday, referring to a proposal by US Republican lawmaker Mario Diaz-Balart to cut non-military aid to Colombia next year, partly on concerns of due process violations in the Uribe case. Uribe, who was placed under house arrest for two months in 2020, is head of the powerful Democratic Centre party and was a senator for years both before and after his presidency. He has repeatedly emphasised that he extradited paramilitary leaders to the US. Colombia's truth commission says paramilitary groups, which demobilised under deals with Uribe's government, killed more than 205,000 people, nearly half of the 450,000 deaths recorded during the ongoing civil conflict. In recent decades, right-wing paramilitary groups across Latin America – backed by the US – along with the armed forces of allied governments, have been responsible not only for killings, but also for forced disappearances, sexual violence, mass displacement, and other grave human rights abuses.
Al Jazeera
7 days ago
- Al Jazeera
Colombia halts coal exports to Israel amid Gaza Genocide
Colombia halts coal exports to Israel amid Gaza genocide Quotable Video Duration 01 minutes 08 seconds 01:08 Video Duration 01 minutes 30 seconds 01:30 Video Duration 00 minutes 59 seconds 00:59 Video Duration 01 minutes 06 seconds 01:06 Video Duration 01 minutes 20 seconds 01:20 Video Duration 01 minutes 12 seconds 01:12 Video Duration 01 minutes 10 seconds 01:10
