&w=3840&q=100)
Trump new tariffs: How India stacks up against rest of Asia
A customer holds hundred rupees Indian currency notes near a roadside currency exchange stall in New Delhi, India, May 24, 2024. File Image/Reuters
United States President Donald Trump has launched one of his most sweeping trade actions, formalised in an executive order just hours before the August 1 deadline Trump himself had set.
His new set of tariffs, aimed to 'rebalance' trade ties and reduce US deficits — are already prompting sharp responses from Asian governments and global markets.
The executive order, which uses the president's emergency trade powers, outlines tariff rates as high as 41 per cent on selected imports.
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
— including major economies like India, Japan, Taiwan, and South Korea — will see a surge in duties on products entering the US Goods from nations not covered in the directive will automatically face a 10 per cent tax.
Trump's latest order spells out rates ranging from 10 per cent to 50 per cent across 69 countries, making it one of the largest single tariff changes in decades.
The directive also imposes a 40 per cent tariff on goods rerouted through third countries to circumvent duties, sending a clear warning to companies relying on transshipment strategies.
This provision builds on an earlier tariff order issued in April, which had already rattled trade routes.
In explaining the move, Trump's order bluntly stated that some countries, 'despite having engaged in negotiations, have offered terms that, in my judgment, do not sufficiently address imbalances in our trading relationship or have failed to align sufficiently with the United States on economic and national-security matters.'
On the eve of the deadline, Trump reinforced the tone on social media, writing: 'THE AUGUST FIRST DEADLINE IS THE AUGUST FIRST DEADLINE — IT STANDS STRONG, AND WILL NOT BE EXTENDED. A BIG DAY FOR AMERICA!!!'
India's unresolved US trade fight
India finds itself squarely in the spotlight. Despite weeks of discussions, New Delhi and Washington were unable to secure a tariff-reducing agreement. As a result, Indian goods will now face a 25 per cent duty — a rate that has caused immediate economic ripples.
A senior US official, speaking to Reuters, summarised Washington's frustration: 'Our challenges with India, they've always been a pretty closed market… there are a host of other kind of geopolitical issues.'
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
The official also linked the trade impasse to broader foreign policy considerations, noting, 'You've seen the president express concern about, you know, membership in Brics, purchases of Russian oil and that kind of thing.'
A 3D-printed miniature model of US President Donald Trump, the Indian flag and the word 'Tariffs' are seen in this illustration taken July 23, 2025. File Image/Reuters
The tariffs have already shaken Indian markets. The rupee slipped, opposition parties voiced outrage, and business groups warned about pressure on export-oriented sectors.
Indian Commerce and Industry Minister Piyush Goel reassured Parliament that talks are still underway, saying the goal is to reach a trade pact by October-November this year.
He stated that 'the government gives great importance to protecting farmers, entrepreneurs, and medium and small enterprises, and will take all needed steps to safeguard its national interest.'
Yet US trade insiders caution that a breakthrough will not come quickly.
India's refusal to open its agricultural sector — long considered one of the most sensitive areas of its economy — remains a sticking point, as does its continued purchase of Russian oil.
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
Asia's responses — who gained, who lost
The tariff changes have reverberated across Asia, with outcomes ranging from relief to frustration.
Some nations secured reductions from earlier proposed rates, while others were saddled with some of the highest tariffs in the world.
US President Donald Trump holds a chart next to US Secretary of Commerce Howard Lutnick as Trump delivers remarks on tariffs in the Rose Garden at the White House in Washington, DC, US, April 2, 2025. File Image/Reuters
Japan negotiated one of the most significant rollbacks. Tariffs on Japanese goods will now sit at 15 per cent, down from the 25 per cent previously flagged, including critical relief for the auto sector.
Chief Cabinet Secretary Yoshimasa Hayashi called the shift a stabilising step, saying the lower tariffs 'will reduce uncertainty regarding U.S. trade policy and lower the risk of a downturn in our economy and the global economy,' according to NHK.
He pledged additional government financing support for small and medium-sized firms facing cost pressures.
Thailand also saw its rate lowered — now 19 per cent, compared to an earlier proposed 36 per cent. Finance Minister Pichai Chunhavajira posted on X that the tariff figure 'reflects the close friendship and partnership between Thailand and the United States.'
At the same time, he acknowledged the pain for exporters and farmers, promising 'comprehensive support measures,' including loans, subsidies, and tax breaks to help the economy adjust.
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
Malaysia benefitted from a cut too. Prime Minister Anwar Ibrahim noted that tariffs would fall from 25 per cent to 19 per cent, telling Parliament, 'Tomorrow's [Aug. 1] general tariff rate will ease and not burden our economy.'
Taiwan is now facing a 20 per cent temporary tariff. President Lai Ching-te said that if negotiations progress further, 'it can be expected that the tariff rate will be further reduced.'
He also flagged that future discussions with Washington will address supply chain cooperation and the controversial Section 232 tariffs that were imposed years ago on 'national security' grounds.
Cambodia, once facing one of the harshest penalties, became an unexpected winner. Its duty has been reduced dramatically from 49 per cent to 19 per cent.
Prime Minister Hun Manet called the outcome 'good news for the citizens and economy of Cambodia,' while also publicly thanking Trump for 'initiating and pushing for ceasefire between [the] Cambodian army and Thai army' after recent border clashes.
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
But not every Asian country escaped heavy hits.
Syria tops the list with a crushing 41 per cent tariff. Laos and Myanmar are each staring at 40 per cent duties, rates that could disrupt their fragile export sectors.
How India compares to the rest of Asia
Trump's executive order includes an extensive list of Asian nations and the duties they now face on exports to the US:
Afghanistan – 15 per cent
Bangladesh – 20 per cent
Brunei – 25 per cent
Cambodia – 19 per cent
Fiji – 15 per cent
India – 25 per cent
Indonesia – 19 per cent
Iraq – 35 per cent
Israel – 15 per cent
Japan – 15 per cent
Jordan – 15 per cent
Kazakhstan – 25 per cent
Laos – 40 per cent
Malaysia – 19 per cent
Myanmar (Burma) – 40 per cent
Pakistan – 19 per cent
Papua New Guinea – 15 per cent
Philippines – 19 per cent
South Korea – 15 per cent
Sri Lanka – 20 per cent
Syria – 41 per cent
Taiwan – 20 per cent
Thailand – 19 per cent
Turkey – 15 per cent
Vietnam – 20 per cent
Vanuatu – 15 per cent
The range shows how selectively Washington applied the policy — some countries, like Israel and South Korea, are at the low end with 15 per cent, while others like Syria and Myanmar sit at the top with 40-41 per cent.
How Asian markets reacted
Indian stocks slipped early on Friday: the Nifty 50 fell 0.35 per cent, and the BSE Sensex dropped 0.34 per cent.
Across Asia, tech companies bore the brunt of investor jitters. In Japan, Tokyo Electron saw a staggering 17 per cent plunge, with Lasertec (– 4.67 per cent), Advantest Corp (– 2.51 per cent) and SoftBank Group (– 2.07 per cent) also in the red.
South Korea's SK Hynix shed 5.12 per cent, and Samsung Electronics dropped 1.92 per cent.
Taiwan's TSMC slid 1.72 per cent, while Hon Hai Precision Industry (Foxconn) managed to gain 1.12 per cent, bucking the downward trend.
A stock broker reacts while monitoring the market on the electronic board displaying share prices during trading session at the Pakistan Stock Exchange, in Karachi, Pakistan. File Image/Reuters
Currency markets reflected the same uncertainty. The US dollar index inched up 0.11 per cent to 100.73, showing traders' cautious shift into the greenback.
The South Korean won dropped 0.53 per cent, dipping below 1,400 per dollar for the first time in nearly three months.
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
The Taiwanese dollar fell 0.35 per cent, and China's offshore yuan weakened by 0.11 per cent to 7.2083, approaching a two-month low.
Other Southeast Asian currencies also softened: the Thai baht lost 0.24 per cent, the Philippine peso fell 0.49 per cent, and the Malaysian ringgit dropped 0.42 per cent.
The Singapore dollar remained steady at 1.284, and the Japanese yen was flat at 150.75.
US data suggest these tariffs could ripple through consumer prices.
The US Commerce Department reported that prices for home furnishings and durable household equipment rose 1.3 per cent in June, the sharpest increase since March 2022.
Recreational goods and vehicles saw a 0.9 per cent rise — the highest since February 2024 — and clothing and footwear climbed 0.4 per cent.
China, India and future trade battles
While tariffs for most nations are now locked in, negotiations are ongoing for some of America's biggest trading partners.
China has until August 12 to finalise what officials describe as a 'durable' tariff agreement.
US Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent, speaking after trade talks in Stockholm, said that while progress has been made, the discussions 'still require President Trump's approval.' He noted that US negotiators 'pushed back quite a bit' on Chinese proposals.
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
India's situation is more uncertain. The 25 per cent tariff is now in place, and US officials have hinted that more concessions will be necessary for any reduction.
The gap between the two countries reflects both trade disputes and broader political concerns — including India's balancing act between Western partners and members of Brics, as well as its ongoing energy ties with Moscow.
Trump, for his part, struck a confident tone, hinting at undisclosed deals.
'We have made a few deals today that are excellent deals for the country,' he told reporters, though he did not name which countries were involved or when announcements would be made.
With inputs from agencies

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


India.com
17 minutes ago
- India.com
Meet T-14 Armata Tank, super powerful war weapon offered by Russia to India, its features are..., Trump to...
New Delhi: US President Donald Trump is not happy with India and Russia's friendship and is threatening both countries with tariffs. Amidst this, the two countries are discussing a crucial defence deal that might further enrage Trump. What has Russia offered to India? Russia has offered to sell the next-generation T-14 Armata tanks to India to replace its ageing T-72 tanks with new tanks. Russia's offer includes domestic manufacturing in India under the Make in India programme. Armata tanks are made by the Russian company Uralvagonzavod, and the T-14 Armata is its most advanced tank. Uralvagonzavod has offered to design and develop this tank according to India's needs for its Next Generation Battle Tank (NGMBT) programme. For this, the Russian company has shown interest in partnering with Indian defence companies. What is the crux of the proposal? The proposal includes possible collaboration with India's Combat Vehicle Research and Development Establishment (CVRDE) or other public sector defence units. The proposal is strategically prepared according to India's 'Make-I' procurement category, which aims to increase India's indigenous production. Under this plan, the Government of India provides up to 70% of the funding for developing prototypes, which emphasises domestic manufacturing and technology transfer. Will India buy the advanced T-14 Armata tank? Uralvagonzavod had signed a technology transfer agreement with India for T-90S tanks, which are now manufactured in India as T-90 Bhishma. India uses more than 83 per cent domestic technology in the T-90S tank, including complete localisation of the tank's engine. Russian officials have also expressed their intention to work with India for the local production of the T-14 Armata tank project. Company officials have suggested that the T-14 Armata would be an ideal successor to replace the Indian Army's huge but ageing fleet of T-72 tanks. Why is T-14 Armata considered one of the most advanced tanks in the world? The T-14 Armata is considered one of the most advanced tanks in the world. It has many remotely operated functions, an armoured capsule for the crew, a state-of-the-art digital control system and an active protection system (APS) called 'Afghanit'. This system is capable of destroying the enemy's anti-tank missiles on the way. Three operators can sit inside this tank and destroy the enemy's anti-tank missiles and RPGs in the air. It has a millimetre-wave radar, which provides 360-degree protection. Guided missiles can also be fired from this tank up to 8–10 kilometres. The maximum speed of this tank is 75 to 80 kilometres per hour, and its range is 500 kilometres. The weight of this tank is 55 tonnes, and its cost is around Rs 30 to 42 crore. If it is manufactured in India, its cost will be reduced by at least Rs 10 crore.


India.com
17 minutes ago
- India.com
No Consensus, Just Conflict: Operation Sindoor Debate Sinks Into Bitter Blame Game Between Govt And Opposition
New Delhi: The brief political unity witnessed in the aftermath of the Pahalgam terror attack and the subsequent military conflict with Pakistan seems to have unravelled following the surprise ceasefire announcement on May 10. This week's marathon three-day debate in Parliament on Operation Sindoor laid bare the widening gulf between the government and the Opposition. It reinforces the notion that in today's India, consensus is the exception, not the norm. The debate gave an opportunity to the leaders of both the government and the Opposition to show unity against terrorism coming from Pakistan. While many speakers across party lines called for a common stance, their speeches exposed deep divisions. The Opposition left no stone unturned to corner the lawmakers and pressed for answers on critical issues such as security and intelligence lapses preceding the Pahalgam attack, accountability for those failures, losses suffered by the Indian Air Force, and the true nature of US involvement. Notably, Prime Minister Narendra Modi chose not to respond in the Rajya Sabha, delegating the reply to Union Home Minister Amit Shah, which triggered an Opposition walkout. From the government's perspective, the needle moved favourably, for instance, Union Home Minister Amit Shah confirmed the elimination of the Pahalgam terrorists, and Prime Minister Modi asserted that "no global leader" had urged India to halt its military operation. Meanwhile, External Affairs Minister S Jaishankar put a full stop to speculations regarding New Delhi's differences with Washington, including issues of deportations, visas, and student concerns, aimed at closing talks around Trump's role in India-Pakistan ceasefire. However, the Opposition remained unsatisfied. Congress MP and Leader of Opposition Rahul Gandhi challenged the Prime Minister to publicly refute US President Donald Trump's claims of brokering the ceasefire, labeling the challenge 'political rhetoric.' While the PM skipped any mention of Trump and his repeated assertions of having brokered the ceasefire, Defence Minister Rajnath Singh sidestepped questions regarding the fighter jets lost on the first day of conflict, instead urging a results-focused perspective, saying, 'In any exam, the result matters. We should see whether a student is getting good marks and not focus on whether his pencil was broken or his pen was lost.' Congress's Nationalist Strategy In an uncharacteristic move, the Congress party adopted a nationalist stance to continue putting pressure on the government. This approach aimed to score political points by portraying the government as weak on defense. However, the tables turned with former Home Minister P. Chidambaram's suggestion that the Pahalgam attackers might have been "homegrown terrorists", rather than Pakistan-backed. This offered the government an opportunity to criticise the grand old party's inconsistent position. Rahul Gandhi's speech was notably combative, alongside his sister, Wayanad MP Priyanka Gandhi Vadra recalled the resignations of Vilasrao Deshmukh as Maharashtra Chief Minister and Shivraj Patil as Union Home Minister after the 2008 Mumbai terror attacks, to emphasise government accountability. Gandhi accused the Prime Minister of prioritising his image over the armed forces' freedom to operate, warning that 'the forces should be used with freedom and for the national interest' and urged a decisive military effort to 'defeat terrorism once and for all.' 'It is dangerous at this time for the Prime Minister to use the forces to protect his image. It is dangerous for the country. The forces should only be used in the national interest, and the forces should be used with freedom. If you want them to be used … then go all the way, fight properly and defeat them once and for all," he said. Historical Echoes In Debate The discussion frequently revisited historical parallels. The Congress party members highlighted Indira Gandhi's role in the creation of Bangladesh despite US pressure, contrasting it with the current ceasefire announcement influenced by the US. Meanwhile, the government drew attention to the Congress's perceived failings during critical moments, such as Partition, the wars of 1947–48 and 1965, the Indus Waters Treaty, and the 1962 war with China, to question the Opposition's credibility on national security. While the Congress remains burdened by its political legacy, this debate underscored the broader polarisation within Indian politics. Despite shared concerns over terrorism, the parties remain entrenched in mutual recriminations. With other INDIA bloc parties siding with the Congress in criticism of the government, the opposition front remains fragmented under intense BJP scrutiny.
&w=3840&q=100)

First Post
17 minutes ago
- First Post
Trump new tariff rates ‘pretty much set,' says US trade representative
Speaking on Sunday, US Trade Representative Jamieson Greer said the rates, set to take effect on August 7, are 'pretty much set,' defending the president's strategy as both economic and geopolitical. read more US Trade Representative Jamieson Greer gives a live TV interview about tariffs at the White House in Washington, DC, US. Reuters New US tariff rates are 'pretty much set' with no immediate possibility for discussion, Donald Trump's trade advisor said in remarks broadcast Sunday, justifying the president's politically motivated charges against Brazil. Trump, who has used tariffs as an instrument of American economic supremacy, has set tariff rates for dozens of economies, including the European Union, at 10 to 41 percent starting from August 7, his new hard deadline for the tariffs. In a pre-recorded interview broadcast Sunday on CBS's 'Face the Nation,' US Trade Representative Jamieson Greer said that tariff rates are unlikely to see changes in 'the coming days'. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD 'A lot of these are set rates pursuant to deals. Some of these deals are announced, some are not, others depend on the level of the trade deficit or surplus we may have with the country,' Greer said. 'These tariff rates are pretty much set.' Undoubtedly some trade ministers 'want to talk more and see how they can work in a different way with the United States,' he added. But 'we're seeing truly the contours of the president's tariff plan right now with these rates.' Last Thursday, the former real estate developer announced hiked tariff rates on dozens of US trade partners. They will kick in on August 7 instead of August 1, which had previously been touted as a hard deadline. Among the countries facing steep new levies is Brazil. South America's largest economy is being hit with 50 percent tariffs on exports to the United States – albeit with significant exemptions for key products such as aircraft and orange juice. Trump has openly admitted he is punishing Brazil for prosecuting his political ally Jair Bolsonaro, the ex-president accused of plotting a coup in a bid to cling to power. The US president has described the case as a 'witch hunt.' Greer said it was not unusual for Trump to use tariff tools for geopolitical purposes. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD 'The president has seen in Brazil, like he's seen in other countries, a misuse of law, a misuse of democracy,' Greer told CBS. 'It is normal to use these tools for geopolitical issues.' Trump was 'elected to assess the foreign affairs situation… and take appropriate action,' he added. Meanwhile White House economic advisor Kevin Hassett said that while talks are expected to continue over the next week with some US trade partners, he concurred with Greer's tariffs assessment in that the bulk of the rates 'are more or less locked in.' Asked by the host of NBC's Sunday talk show 'Meet the Press with Kristen Welker' if Trump could change tariff rates should financial markets react negatively, Hassett said: 'I would rule it out, because these are the final deals.' Legal challenges have been filed against some of Trump's tariffs arguing he overstepped his authority. An appeals court panel on Thursday appeared skeptical of the government's arguments, though the case may be ultimately decided at the Supreme Court. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD