With Butler Hospital strike, a vital R.I. resource is being put at risk
Sign up to get breaking news and interesting stories from Rhode Island in your inbox each weekday.
Enter Email
Sign Up
However,
Advertisement
From the beginning,
In recent meetings, the union has openly discussed 'setting a template' for statewide labor actions. They're framing this as a strategic escalation against hospital leaders, while also expanding their campaign to the government, board members, banks, and civic organizations.
Advertisement
Unlike SEIU, other unions have chosen not to strike and to continue negotiations, despite having a strike authorization, whereas SEIU decided on an indefinite strike. They are coordinating with political activists, using community events, and targeting our Board of Trustees with public pressure tactics aimed at intimidating rather than engaging.
In short, this is not a conventional
Let me be clear: we respect the right of workers to organize and advocate for better compensation, benefits, retirement, and working conditions. However, Butler Hospital is a behavioral health facility that serves some of the most vulnerable Rhode Islanders. It was never meant to be a stage for a political theater of escalation.
The damage being done is real: critical behavioral health programs across the state were already strained, and capacity at Butler is now being reduced out of necessity because of the union's action. A vital community resource is being put at risk — not because of its policies or finances, but because it was chosen as a beachhead for a broader conflict.
There's a moral price for that. And a practical one as well.
We must not allow the illusion of a righteous movement to obscure the deeper reality: when a strike becomes a symbolic crusade, it stops being about resolution and starts being about power. The people of Rhode Island deserve better. Our patients deserve better. And our health care workforce — union and non-union alike — deserves leadership that seeks solutions, not standoffs.
Advertisement
There is still a path forward. It begins with an honest consideration of Butler's actual circumstances — not those of other hospitals, not ideological ambitions, not long-term organizing goals. The future of health care in Rhode Island should be shaped through collaboration, not coercion.
We want the workers on strike to return to their positions.
We urge the union to end the strike and return to work, allowing our leaders to focus on the negotiations while the employees focus on the patients who need them. If this doesn't happen, we will continue to encourage more workers to cross the line to join those who have already courageously done so. Plus, we will be forced to explore further reductions.
Continuing the strike will only reduce access to behavioral health services across the state — at a time when our most vulnerable patients need these services more than ever.
This is not about winning a narrative. It's about doing the right thing. We encourage Butler employees to return to their positions to do what they do best — caring for patients.
Dr. Michael Wagner is the president and CEO of Care New England.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
CBS News
2 days ago
- CBS News
Miami health care workers rally in support of immigrants, speaking out against "big, beautiful bill" cuts
Immigration, health care and President Trump's "big, beautiful bill" were on the minds of Florida's Harare Workers' Union on Saturday, where they rallied at Miami's Jackson Memorial Hospital to speak out against the policies and cuts in the bill that they feel are unjust. Eighteen-year-old Elli said her father was deported years ago, and now she is worried that her mom will be next. "If my mom ever gets deported, my family will be devastated because I'm the eldest of the daughters taking care of my five siblings," Elli said. That's why she went to a rally at Jackson Memorial, where immigration was a key topic. Roxey Nelson of the Service Employees International Union (SEIU) said that immigrants are losing temporary protected status, or TPS, and that is trimming down staff in the health care sector. "I got a call that a nursing home that's like 100 beds, 80 or so workers," Nelson told CBS News Miami. "Thirty of them were laid off because of TPS." One of the main topics was the president's spending bill, which he called the "big, beautiful bill." Health care workers are also worried about the bill's cuts to Medicaid. According to the Florida Health Justice Project, Florida could lose about $4 billion annually in Medicaid funds. Union leaders are worried that it may impact services. Union leaders told CBS News Miami that Medicaid accounts for a noticeable chunk of Jackson Memorial's budget. "$325 million a year in Medicaid at Jackson," said Martha Baker of SEIU 1991. "They have about a $2 billion budget." "How are we gonna be coming to work every day thinking that we may be laid off?" asked Martha Wydra, an RN at University of Miami Hospital. CBS News Miami reached out to Jackson Memorial Hospital several times about this protest, but did not get a response. Meanwhile, the Florida Decides Healthcare organization is attempting to put Medicaid expansion on the next election ballot. "We have been collecting this whole year, and we are looking to complete the collection of petitions by December," said Mitch Emerson, the executive director of Florida Decides Healthcare. Florida Decides Healthcare cited a public opinion poll showing that 67 percent of likely voters support putting a Medicaid expansion on the ballot.
Boston Globe
21-07-2025
- Boston Globe
R.I., Mass., among states suing Trump administration over immigration status-based restrictions to safety net programs
The lawsuit, filed in US District Court in Providence, asks the court to halt the new federal rules and act quickly to ensure continued access to the social services programs. 'For the first time, millions of people are facing a new demand before they can access the Nation's most essential programs: 'show me your papers,'' the lawsuit states. 'This is not America, and it is not the law.' Get Rhode Map A weekday briefing from veteran Rhode Island reporters, focused on the things that matter most in the Ocean State. Enter Email Sign Up Rhode Island Attorney General Advertisement 'By changing the rules with no notice, agencies and organizations that receive federal funding for critical services must quickly pivot or risk shuttering,' Neronha said in a statement. 'For example, if access to mental health and substance use disorder services is lessened or eliminated, already overburdened hospitals across the country could become further overwhelmed. These federal funding streams are critically important to the health and well-being of all Rhode Islanders, as well as our health care system, and we will fight to ensure they remain uninterrupted.' Advertisement Attorneys general from every New England state except New Hampshire joined the lawsuit, along with Arizona, California, Colorado, Hawai'i, Illinois, Maryland, Michigan, Minnesota, Nevada, New Jersey, New Mexico, New York, Oregon, Wisconsin, Washington, and the District of Columbia. People in the country illegally are ineligible for federal public benefits such as food stamps, student loans and financial aid for higher education. However, they have been able to access community-level programs. And, for nearly 30 years and through five presidential administrations, according to the lawsuit, the federal government was consistent on the requirements of the Personal Responsibility and Work Opportunity Reconciliation Act, known as PRWORA. States needed to verify a person's lawful status before allowing them to access certain federal programs, such as Medicaid and Temporary Assistance for Needy Families. At the same time, the federal agencies told the states that PRWORA didn't require them to check someone's papers to allow them access to other community programs, such as food banks, Head Start, shelters, or rehabilitation clinics. Not anymore. On July 10, the US Departments of Health and Human Services, Education, Labor, and Justice changed the rules. The new rules restrict states from using federal funds to provide services to individuals who cannot verify immigration status. That means state safety net programs — soup kitchens, domestic violence shelters, Head Start, crisis counseling centers, senior nutrition programs, health centers in schools — must screen for immigration status. Under the new rules, undocumented immigrants will be prevented from Advertisement The Departments of Education and Labor placed education and workforce training programs within the statute's scope. The rules took effect with minimal notice and affect not only undocumented immigrants, but also, Neronha said, some lawful visa holders and even US citizens who lack access to formal documentation. The state programs are expected to comply immediately, but most providers can't implement major regulatory changes overnight, so they face losing federal funding. Neronha said these abrupt restrictions could impact the 'tens of millions' of dollars funding programs related to opioid treatment, homeless services, and mental health program in all public schools in Rhode Island, according to the state Department of Behavioral Healthcare, Developmental Disabilities & Hospitals. Funding changes to those community programs could lead to a health care crisis. The lawsuit argues that the federal government acted unlawfully by issuing these changes without following required procedures under the Administrative Procedure Act, and by misapplying PRWORA to entire programs rather than to individual benefits. The changes also violate the Constitution's Spending Clause by imposing new funding conditions on states without fair notice or consent. The coalition is asking the court to declare the new rules unlawful, halt their implementation through preliminary and permanent injunctions, vacate the rules and restore the long-standing agency practice, and prevent the federal government from using PRWORA as a pretext to dismantle core safety net programs in the future. Amanda Milkovits can be reached at
Boston Globe
11-07-2025
- Boston Globe
With Butler Hospital strike, a vital R.I. resource is being put at risk
Get Rhode Island News Alerts Sign up to get breaking news and interesting stories from Rhode Island in your inbox each weekday. Enter Email Sign Up However, Advertisement From the beginning, In recent meetings, the union has openly discussed 'setting a template' for statewide labor actions. They're framing this as a strategic escalation against hospital leaders, while also expanding their campaign to the government, board members, banks, and civic organizations. Advertisement Unlike SEIU, other unions have chosen not to strike and to continue negotiations, despite having a strike authorization, whereas SEIU decided on an indefinite strike. They are coordinating with political activists, using community events, and targeting our Board of Trustees with public pressure tactics aimed at intimidating rather than engaging. In short, this is not a conventional Let me be clear: we respect the right of workers to organize and advocate for better compensation, benefits, retirement, and working conditions. However, Butler Hospital is a behavioral health facility that serves some of the most vulnerable Rhode Islanders. It was never meant to be a stage for a political theater of escalation. The damage being done is real: critical behavioral health programs across the state were already strained, and capacity at Butler is now being reduced out of necessity because of the union's action. A vital community resource is being put at risk — not because of its policies or finances, but because it was chosen as a beachhead for a broader conflict. There's a moral price for that. And a practical one as well. We must not allow the illusion of a righteous movement to obscure the deeper reality: when a strike becomes a symbolic crusade, it stops being about resolution and starts being about power. The people of Rhode Island deserve better. Our patients deserve better. And our health care workforce — union and non-union alike — deserves leadership that seeks solutions, not standoffs. Advertisement There is still a path forward. It begins with an honest consideration of Butler's actual circumstances — not those of other hospitals, not ideological ambitions, not long-term organizing goals. The future of health care in Rhode Island should be shaped through collaboration, not coercion. We want the workers on strike to return to their positions. We urge the union to end the strike and return to work, allowing our leaders to focus on the negotiations while the employees focus on the patients who need them. If this doesn't happen, we will continue to encourage more workers to cross the line to join those who have already courageously done so. Plus, we will be forced to explore further reductions. Continuing the strike will only reduce access to behavioral health services across the state — at a time when our most vulnerable patients need these services more than ever. This is not about winning a narrative. It's about doing the right thing. We encourage Butler employees to return to their positions to do what they do best — caring for patients. Dr. Michael Wagner is the president and CEO of Care New England.
