logo
UK interest rates kept on hold with Bank alert to ‘highly unpredictable' world

UK interest rates kept on hold with Bank alert to ‘highly unpredictable' world

Leader Live19-06-2025
The Bank's Monetary Policy Committee (MPC) decided to keep rates unchanged at 4.25%.
In a split vote, with six members opting to hold and three preferring to cut, the MPC said a 'gradual and careful approach' to reducing borrowing costs continued to be the right course of action.
Bank governor Andrew Bailey said: 'Interest rates remain on a gradual downward path, although we've left them on hold today.
'The world is highly unpredictable.'
He added that there were 'signs of softening in the labour market' – referring to indicators including slower hiring and wage growth easing – which were being closely watched to see how far they feed into UK inflation.
The committee said it was alert to concerns about conflict in the Middle East, which has escalated in recent days with attacks between Israel and Iran.
In the minutes of the MPC's meeting, it noted that there had been 'rapid geopolitical developments', adding: 'Energy prices had risen owing to an escalation of the conflict in the Middle East.
'The committee would remain vigilant about these developments and their potential impact on the UK economy.'
It echoes similar remarks made by the US's central bank which also opted to keep interest rates on hold on Wednesday.
Global oil and natural gas prices have surged in recent weeks, which threatens to push up energy costs in the UK.
Furthermore, the MPC noted that Donald Trump's tariff policy was posing risks to global trade and continuing to create uncertainty.
But it said that deals struck between the US and other countries, including the UK, meant that the direct impact of the 'trade shock' on global growth could be smaller than it had forecast last month.
Meanwhile, the decision to keep rates on hold came as UK Consumer Price Index (CPI) inflation remained above the Bank's 2% target level, coming in at 3.4% last month.
The jobs market was also starting to cool, with the rate of unemployment ticking up and pay growth starting to ease.
The Bank said its network of agents had found that cost pressures from the beginning of April – including national insurance contributions rising – had put pressure on firms to recover them by raising prices.
As well as price hikes, it noted that businesses had been leaning on other actions to mitigate costs, including reducing their workforce, staff hours, salaries, and absorbing into profits.
The Monetary Policy Committee voted by a majority of 6-3 to keep interest rates at 4.25%
Find out more: https://t.co/rcGJUYFkWZ pic.twitter.com/VkO9vZyjgS
— Bank of England (@bankofengland) June 19, 2025
It also pointed to waning business sentiment amid weak growth in the UK economy, with demand not expected to recover until 2026.
Rachel Reeves said the Government respected the Bank's decision as she spoke at The Times CEO Summit.
Speaking in central London, the Chancellor said: 'We respect independent economic institutions, and the Bank has got an incredibly important but difficult job to do.
'We want them to set the monetary policy that is appropriate for meeting the inflation target, because we also saw in the last parliament a double-digit inflation which was so challenging for businesses, but also family finances, which also has a knock on impact on business.'
Ms Reeves, a former economist at the Bank, insisted the four interest rates cuts made under Labour were 'a world away from the previous parliament, when interest rates went up so sharply because of the poor economic mismanagement of prime ministers and chancellors'.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Oil markets seen bearish after Trump-Putin Alaska meeting
Oil markets seen bearish after Trump-Putin Alaska meeting

Reuters

time34 minutes ago

  • Reuters

Oil markets seen bearish after Trump-Putin Alaska meeting

LONDON, Aug 16 (Reuters) - Oil markets are set for a muted price reaction when they open on Sunday after U.S. President Donald Trump's and Russian leader Vladimir Putin's meeting in Alaska, at which Trump said a fully-fledged peace deal was the aim for Ukraine rather than a ceasefire. Trump said he had agreed with Putin that negotiators should go straight to a peace settlement - not via a ceasefire, as Ukraine and European allies, until now with U.S. support, have been demanding. Trump said he would hold off imposing tariffs on countries such as China for buying Russian oil following his talks with Putin. He has previously threatened sanctions on Moscow and secondary sanctions on countries such as China and India that buy Russian oil if no moves are made to end the Ukraine war. "This will mean Russian oil will continue to flow undisturbed and this should be bearish for oil prices," said ICIS analyst Ajay Parmar. "It is worth noting that we think the impact of this will be minimal though and prices will likely see only a small dip in the very near term as a result of this news." The oil market will wait for developments from a meeting in Washington on Monday between Trump and Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskiy. European leaders have also been invited to the meeting, a source familiar with the matter told Reuters. "Market participants will track comments from European leaders but for now Russian supply disruption risks will remain contained," said Giovanni Staunovo, analyst at UBS. Brent settled at $65.85 a barrel on Friday, and U.S. West Texas Intermediate at $62.80 - both down nearly $1 before the talks in Alaska. Traders are waiting for a deal, so until that emerges, crude prices are likely to be stuck in a narrow range, said Phil Flynn, a senior analyst with Price Futures Group. "What we do know is that the threat of immediate sanctions on Russia, or secondary sanctions on other countries is put on hold for now, which would be bearish," he said. After the imposition of Western sanctions, including a seaborne oil embargo and price caps on Russian oil, Russia has redirected flows to China and India.

Putin's charm offensive on Trump has succeeded
Putin's charm offensive on Trump has succeeded

Telegraph

time5 hours ago

  • Telegraph

Putin's charm offensive on Trump has succeeded

The Alaska summit has finished. Donald Trump afterwards described it as a 'ten out of ten' experience, declaring that 'great progress' was made towards peace in Ukraine. Vladimir Putin appreciated the camaraderie and Trump responded with hand pats and tender glances. The American allowed the Russian to dominate a press conference, which prevented the press from asking any questions. Putin, holding his sheaf of prepared notes, expertly performed a political somersault. During the current war he and his administration have scoffed at any idea that Russia is fighting Ukraine. For Putin, Ukrainian president Zelensky is merely an American puppet and America alone bears the responsibility for prolonging the current war. In Anchorage, though, Putin instead highlighted the military aid that the US transferred to Russia in the Second World War across the Bering Strait. It was a ploy to deflect attention from the Ukrainian question. In the week before the summit, president Trump had huffed and puffed like a strongman. He growled that if Putin rejected steps to a ceasefire, he would introduce 'severe' secondary economic sanctions that would punish any country that bought Russian oil and gas. If Trump had stuck to this standpoint in Alaska, Russia's economy would now be succumbing to crippling pressure of sanctions against countries which buy their oil and gas from Moscow. Russian finance minister Anton Siluanov would have to tell Putin that the 'special military operation' was no longer affordable. Currently the Russian cost of living index is high, but Russians have found it bearable. Any further heightening would spell danger for the Kremlin. But Donald suddenly lost his militancy when he met Vladimir at the airport and invited him to join him on the backseat of 'The Beast' – the armoured Cadillac that usually carries only the US president. In Anchorage, Trump appeared to fall, not for the first time, for Putin's charm. Putin learned his skills at a KGB training school where one of the textbooks – believe it or not – was Dale Carnegie's 'How to Make Friends and Influence People'. At the press conference, as his heralded super-deal to end the Ukraine war tumbled to the floor, Trump's morale appeared punctured. This is no surprise after weeks when he insisted that a speedy agreement on land swaps was available for a permanent peace. In a Fox TV interview immediately after the summit, however, he suggested that it is no longer his but rather Zelensky's task to negotiate such a deal. He did not say how Zelensky might do this without capitulating to Russian terms and ending his own presidency because Ukraine, for all its defects, is a democracy, and Ukrainians agree that national surrender should not be an option for their rulers. Putin's invasion has reinforced, not undermined, this resolve. As Zelensky has pointed out, Ukraine's sovereignty and its protection are a vital interest for all of Europe. Some commentators in the West still blame the United States for over-expanding Nato membership. They fail to understand that the ex-communist countries of Eastern Europe banged on Washington's door throughout the 1990s to allow them to join the alliance. They rightly assumed, from their experience at the USSR's hands, that Russia had not necessarily lost its imperial instincts. They needed to secure their defences in case there was a resurgence of Russian power. When the price of oil rose on world markets in the early 2000s, Russia's ambitions grew with its financial revenues. Estonia, Latvia and Lithuania are thankful that they made it into Nato before Putin could do to them what he has done to Ukraine. But as was shown in 2007 by the cyber-attack on Estonia's entire IT network, Russia continues to regard Baltic states as potential prey. Were Ukraine to drown in the current wave of Russian offensives it would not be long before moves were made against other countries along the Baltic littoral. Donald Trump has handed over to Zelensky the responsibility for dealing with Moscow. Earlier this year he and vice-president JD Vance were personally offensive to Zelensky at a live TV session in the White House when war leader Zelensky was even criticised for wearing military fatigues rather than a suit and tie. American supplies of war-fighting equipment have always been crucial in enabling the Ukrainians to defend themselves. But Trump has sometimes turned off the tap, and it now has to be kept open by the European powers which buy arms from the United States for transfer to Ukraine. The concern must be that the White House might decide to suspend even this arrangement. What, though, does Trump now expect of Zelensky? Will he demand agreement to so-called land swaps as the price for any kind of support from America? And will the American president continue circling in orbit around Planet Putin? The answer will not depend solely on Trump's preferences. As the first editions of Russian press told the summit story on Saturday morning, the Alaska talks were a victory for Putin. Without promising a ceasefire, Russia was beckoned back into the comity of the world's great powers. Until now Trump has received an easy ride from the conservative end of the American media spectrum. But Americans are patriots first and foremost – how long will they put up with the master of the deal, who has the pack of cards in his grasp, dealing with them so ineptly? Public opinion in the United States does not favour presidential losers – one of Trump's favourite words of abuse – when they permit the public humiliation of American power and prestige.

No deal on Ukraine at Trump-Putin Alaska summit
No deal on Ukraine at Trump-Putin Alaska summit

Reuters

time10 hours ago

  • Reuters

No deal on Ukraine at Trump-Putin Alaska summit

Follow on Apple or Spotify. Listen on the Reuters app. Read the episode transcript. A highly anticipated Alaska summit between U.S. President Donald Trump and Russian President Vladimir Putin yielded no agreement to resolve or pause Moscow's war in Ukraine, although both leaders described the talks as productive before heading home. Plus, Trump says there are no imminent plans to penalize China for buying Russian oil. Listen to On Assignment podcast here. Sign up for the Reuters Econ World newsletter here. Listen to the Reuters Econ World podcast here. Find the Recommended Read here. Visit the Thomson Reuters Privacy Statement for information on our privacy and data protection practices. You may also visit to opt out of targeted advertising. Further Reading 'No deal until there's a deal': Trump-Putin talks yield no breakthrough on Ukraine Trump says no imminent plans to penalize China for buying Russian oil Our Standards:The Thomson Reuters Trust Principles.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store