ACT Welcomes Draft Plan To End Infrastructure Whiplash
"This plan is a game-changing step toward getting the best-value infrastructure projects built, at the right price and on time," says ACT Leader David Seymour.
"A fundamental problem with our approach to infrastructure planning has been a political cycle shorter than the project cycle. When decision-makers change, infrastructure priorities are jerked around by political whiplash, leading to costly stops and starts on major initiatives like Auckland rail projects, roading, schools, and hospitals.
"The plan, once finalised, will deliver exactly what ACT has campaigned on: long-term infrastructure planning and prioritisation, smarter funding and financing, efficient delivery of critical projects, and better maintenance of assets.
"Instead of going back to the drawing board every time there's a change of political guard, future governments will be able to draw from an established pipeline of planned and costed projects.
"New Zealand ranks in the top 10% of OECD nations for infrastructure spending but the bottom 10% for outcomes. The infrastructure industry has been denied the certainty needed to bring in the investment, equipment, and talent they need to get the big stuff built efficiently.
"This plan aligns with ACT's coalition commitment of regional deals between central and local government to ensure funding certainty. Meanwhile, Simon Court has advanced the refresh of the Public-Private Partnership policy and introduced a new strategic leasing policy so that once projects are identified the private sector can play its part in finance and delivery.
"Simon's work to replace the Resource Management Act with a less bureaucratic system based on property rights also feeds in to make development faster and more affordable. Without ditching the RMA, projects will continue to be held up for years of arguments about effects that we already know how to manage well.
"Crucially, the Infrastructure Minister is seeking cross-party engagement on the Plan. I hope all parties will engage in good faith, because cross-party agreement means certainty for industry, which in turn means more projects get built on time and New Zealand becomes a richer, more industrious, more prosperous place to live."
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Scoop
5 hours ago
- Scoop
ACT Welcomes Game-changing Building Consent Reforms
ACT Housing, Building and Construction spokesman and Licensed Building Practitioner Cameron Luxton is celebrating moves to end joint and several liability and to allow for mergers of Building Consent Authorities. 'Tradies have been railing for years against cost and delays caused by badly incentivised councils. The joint and several liability system leaves councils and ratepayers on the hook for other people's defective work. Under these conditions, it's a miracle when a council signs off on anything. 'ACT has campaigned to fix this madness, and now we're getting there. Moving to proportionate liability, where each party is responsible for their own work, will cut the risk-averse red tape that turns small projects into headaches. "Of course, this leaves the question of what local councils will actually be left liable for, and how far the councils' liabilities will extend in practice if they remain liable for inspections. I look forward to seeing how the legislation handles this. "ACT also welcomes moves to allow mergers of Building Consent Authorities. We've repeatedly highlighted the madness of having 66 different BCAs, each with their own interpretation of the Building Code, meaning a builder's paperwork can be rejected in one district but accepted in the next. "Some councils have maintained positive relationships with builders while others have struggled to keep up, and home builders have had issues with poorly skilled council staff assessing consents. Consolidation will allow poorly performing councils to adopt best practice from their neighbours, and pooling resources will help to ensure a more consistent level of professionalism in processing consents. 'Whether you're building, buying, or renovating, these reforms are good news. Both owners and buyers have a stake in clearing the consenting quagmire. If we want a property-owning democracy, we need a system that's faster, fairer, and less costly. These changes move us closer to that vision, and ACT is proud to see our advocacy reflected in this overhaul. 'With ACT in Government, we're tackling big challenges with positive sum thinking. It would be easy to say the solution to expensive housing is to finger-point and to whack homeowners and investers with new taxes. Instead, we're getting bureaucracy out of the way so Kiwis can build more homes and create the conditions for prosperity.'
NZ Herald
13 hours ago
- NZ Herald
David Seymour, Winston Peters distance themselves from Christopher Luxon's Benjamin Netanyahu ‘lost the plot' remarks
Act's David Seymour and New Zealand First's Winston Peters have distanced themselves from comments Prime Minister Christopher Luxon made last week when he said Israeli leader Benjamin Netanyahu had 'lost the plot'. Seymour, Luxon's Deputy Prime Minister, told the Herald it's 'better just to keep your thoughts to yourself' when
Scoop
a day ago
- Scoop
Council Must Back Down On Cape Palliser Road Closure Plan
ACT Local Government spokesperson Cameron Luxton is calling on South Wairarapa District Council to ditch its plan to shut off public access to Cape Palliser. Luxton has written a letter to Mayor Martin Connelly urging the Council to withdraw its proposed bylaw, and is encouraging New Zealanders to make a submission to the council before submissions close tomorrow. The bylaw would close an unformed legal road that provides essential access to public land, sparking strong opposition from locals and regular visitors, especially hunters, fishers, trampers, surfers and ratepayers who use the route regularly. 'At the Ngawi public meeting, someone asked whether the Council had actually got legal advice before launching this process,' says Luxton. 'The answer was no. That's staggering, and it tells you everything about how poorly thought through this proposal is. "In his response to my letter, the Mayor doesn't address concerns over the legality of the closure. Instead, he argues that visitors to the cape can make do with 'alternative public routes'. Those familiar with the area make the point that this would mean traipsing for hours o'er hill and dale or across less safe rocky, tidal areas. "The Council's process has completely missed the mark. They've done the bare minimum in order to claim they've consulted with the public, when it's obvious the plan from the outset was to shut us out of land we have legal rights to access. They need to pull the plug and start treating the community with some respect.' Submissions on the proposal close tomorrow, and Luxton is urging everyone who values public access to speak up before it's too late. 'If you reckon this is a stitch-up, and most people do, then get your submission in," says Mr Luxton. "You don't have to live in South Wairarapa. Anyone who wants to visit this stunning piece of coastline has an interest in protecting public access. And if we let one council get away with locking us out of our coastline, others will follow suit. It takes five minutes to tell the Council they've got this one badly wrong.' Links to letters:
