Paramedics are less likely to identify a stroke in women than men. Closing this gap could save lives
The main emergency treatment for ischaemic strokes is a 'clot-busting' process called intravenous thrombolysis. But this only works if administered quickly – ideally within an hour of arriving to hospital, and no later than 4.5 hours after symptoms begin. The faster treatment is given, the better the person's chance of survival and recovery.
However, not everyone gets an equal chance of receiving this treatment quickly. Notably, research has shown ambulance staff are significantly less likely to correctly identify a stroke in women compared to men.
In a recent study, we modelled the potential health gains and cost savings of closing this gap. And they're substantial.
The sex gap in stroke diagnosis
In Australia, about three-quarters of people who experience stroke arrive at hospital by ambulance. If paramedics suspect a stroke, they can take patients directly to a hospital which specialises in stroke care, and alert the hospital team so scans and treatment can start immediately.
Research has shown women aged under 70 are 11% less likely than men to have their stroke recognised by paramedics before they arrive at the hospital.
While younger men and women experience stroke at a similar rate, the symptoms they present with may be different, with 'typical' symptoms more common in men and 'atypical' symptoms more common in women.
Research has shown women and men are equally likely to present with movement and speech problems when having a stroke. However, women are more likely to show vague symptoms, such as general weakness, changes in alertness, or confusion.
These 'atypical' symptoms can be overlooked, leaving women more vulnerable to misdiagnosis, delayed treatment, and preventable harm.
What we did
In our study, published recently in the Medical Journal of Australia (MJA), we used ambulance and hospital data from a 2022 MJA study in New South Wales. This is the study we mentioned above that showed paramedics correctly identified stroke more often in men than women under 70.
From this dataset, we identified more than 5,500 women under 70 who had an ischaemic stroke between 2005 and 2018. Using this group, we built a model to compare two scenarios:
the status quo, where women's strokes are identified at the current rate of accuracy; and
an improved scenario, where women's strokes are identified at the same rate as men's.
We then projected patients' health over time, including their level of impairment, risk of another stroke, and immediate and long-term survival.
Closing the diagnosis gap would save lives and money
When women's stroke diagnosis rate was improved to match men's, each woman gained an average of 0.14 extra years of life (roughly 51 days) and 0.08 extra quality-adjusted life years (QALYs), meaning an additional 29 days in full health.
Scenario two also meant A$2,984 in health-care costs would be saved per woman.
Scaled to the national level based on the number of women under 70 hospitalised with ischaemic stroke each year, closing this gap would mean 252 extra years of life, 144 extra QALYs, and $5.4 million in cost savings annually.
Some limitations
We didn't have sex-specific data for every aspect of the model, which is in itself a telling sign of the lack of recognition of sex as an important factor in understanding disease. Because of this, we used combined data from both men and women in some parts of our model, which may have affected the results.
Further, the NSW data we used for rates of treatment with intravenous thrombolysis were higher than the national average, so our national figures may be slightly over-estimated.
Beyond stroke – why all this matters
The disparity we found is one example of a broader, systemic issue in women's health: sex-based differences in diagnosis and treatment that favour men.
Too often, women's symptoms are misinterpreted or dismissed because they don't match a 'typical' pattern. This can lead to delays, missed opportunities for early treatment, and worse outcomes for women.
In stroke, faster and more accurate diagnosis means people are less likely to die or require long-term care, and more likely to recover better and get back to their daily lives sooner.
So what can we do to close the diagnosis gap?
Investing in better training for paramedics and other emergency responders, so they can recognise a wider range of stroke presentations, could pay off many times over. Public awareness campaigns that highlight atypical stroke symptoms could also help.
Technologies such as mobile stroke units and telemedicine support may be part of the solution, but they must be implemented with attention to sex-specific needs.
This article is republished from The Conversation. It was written by: Lei Si, Western Sydney University; Laura Emily Downey, George Institute for Global Health, and Thomas Gadsden, George Institute for Global Health
Read more:
World's 'oldest baby': what a 30-year-old embryo tells us about the future of fertility
Condoms, PrEP and vaccines: how the UK is expanding STI prevention
Menopause and brain fog: why lifestyle medicine could make a difference
The authors do not work for, consult, own shares in or receive funding from any company or organisation that would benefit from this article, and have disclosed no relevant affiliations beyond their academic appointment.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Trump administration tiptoes into testing prior authorization in traditional Medicare
Traditional Medicare plan holders have typically not had to wait for prior authorization before receiving medical treatment. Until now. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) recently announced a new program to test prior authorization requirements for certain services in six states starting Jan. 1. The states — New Jersey, Ohio, Oklahoma, Texas, Arizona, and Washington — will apply prior authorization evaluations to more than a dozen services. CMS says the pilot program is intended to root out 'fraud, waste, and abuse,' but as Medicare Advantage members know well, prior authorization can lead to frustrating delays in care. How it works CMS will contract with private companies to deploy 'enhanced technologies, including artificial intelligence (AI)' to conduct the authorization reviews. It won't apply to in-patient or emergency services or treatments 'that would pose a substantial risk to patients if significantly delayed,' according to a CMS press release. Specific services that will require prior authorization are skin and tissue substitutes, electrical nerve stimulator implants, and knee arthroscopy. There is genuine concern about the costs of some of these items and services. A recent New York Times article highlighted pricey medical products, including paper-thin bandages made of dried bits of placenta, for Medicare patients. The Biden administration had approved a plan to limit Medicare's coverage of the bandages, known as skin substitutes, which were reportedly being sold for roughly $10,000 per square inch. An updated Medicare policy proposes setting a significantly lower payment rate. The new prior authorization program 'is focused on reducing wasteful spending, which is an important goal for Medicare,' Jeffrey Marr, a health economist at the Brown University School of Public Health, told Yahoo Finance. 'I expect that the use of prior authorization in this model is likely to reduce the overall level of Medicare spending,' he said. 'Selecting potentially low-value services is a critical part of setting up a well-functioning prior authorization system.' The key question for CMS to address is whether prior authorization can work in traditional Medicare in a way that does not deny or discourage high-value care that improves beneficiaries' health, Marr said. One red flag: 'The companies that will make the prior authorization decisions will be paid a percentage of the savings that they generate for Medicare. This creates an incentive for participants to deny a high share of services,' he said. Sign up for the Mind Your Money weekly newsletter By subscribing, you are agreeing to Yahoo's Terms and Privacy Policy Prior authorizations are part of the Medicare landscape How often do prior authorizations pop up for seniors with Medicare and Medicare Advantage plans? In traditional Medicare, services that often require prior authorization include certain outpatient hospital services, non-emergency ambulance transport, and durable medical equipment. For 2023, under 400,000 prior authorization reviews for traditional Medicare beneficiaries were submitted to CMS, according to KFF data. Medicare Advantage plans, which are offered by private insurers, are a different story. Almost all Medicare Advantage enrollees — 99% according to KFF research — must receive prior authorization for some services. These are typically higher-cost services, such as inpatient hospital stays, skilled nursing facility stays, chemotherapy, and other drugs. That common practice, combined with AI used to scan these requests, is a thorny issue. 'Prior authorization processes and requirements, including the use of artificial intelligence to review requests, may result in administrative hassles for providers, delays for patients in receiving necessary care, and in some instances, denials of medically necessary services, such as post-acute care,' according to Jeannie Fuglesten Biniek, co-author of the KFF report. To allay that fear, CMS noted in the announcement: 'While technology will support the review process, final decisions that a request for one of the selected services does not meet Medicare coverage requirements will be made by licensed clinicians, not machines.' The prior authorization program will not alter Medicare coverage or payment rules, for now, but other services may be added later. There has been pushback. More than a dozen members of Congress sent a letter on Aug. 7 to CMS administrator Dr. Memet Oz to urge him to 'put patients and providers first by cancelling' the model and requested more details about how the program will be implemented. 'The use of prior authorization in Medicare Advantage shows us that, in practice, [this proposal] will likely limit beneficiaries' access to care, increase burden on our already overburdened healthcare workforce, and create perverse incentives to put profit over patients,' the lawmakers wrote.A pivot in MA authorization In an odd juxtaposition, a week prior to trumpeting this new Medicare pre-authorization model, the administration announced that it had a non-binding commitment from insurance plans to reduce prior authorization in Medicare Advantage. In late June, the Department of Health and Human Services announced an initiative coordinated with companies including Aetna, Blue Cross Blue Shield, Humana, and UnitedHealthcare, to streamline prior authorization processes for patients covered by Medicare Advantage. Under the initiative, electronic prior authorization requests would become standardized by 2027. 'Pitting patients and their doctors against massive companies was not good for anyone,' US Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy, Jr. said in a statement. 'We are actively working with industry to make it easier to get prior authorization for common services such as diagnostic imaging, physical therapy, and outpatient surgery.' Oz added: 'These commitments represent a step in the right direction toward restoring trust, easing burdens on providers, and helping patients receive timely, evidence-based care.' Kerry Hannon is a Senior Columnist at Yahoo Finance. She is a career and retirement strategist and the author of 14 books, including the forthcoming "Retirement Bites: A Gen X Guide to Securing Your Financial Future," "In Control at 50+: How to Succeed in the New World of Work," and "Never Too Old to Get Rich." Follow her on Bluesky. Sign up for the Mind Your Money newsletter
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Trump administration tiptoes into testing prior authorization in traditional Medicare
Traditional Medicare plan holders have typically not had to wait for prior authorization before receiving medical treatment. Until now. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) recently announced a new program to test prior authorization requirements for certain services in six states starting Jan. 1. The states — New Jersey, Ohio, Oklahoma, Texas, Arizona, and Washington — will apply prior authorization evaluations to more than a dozen services. CMS says the pilot program is intended to root out 'fraud, waste, and abuse,' but as Medicare Advantage members know well, prior authorization can lead to frustrating delays in care. How it works CMS will contract with private companies to deploy 'enhanced technologies, including artificial intelligence (AI)' to conduct the authorization reviews. It won't apply to in-patient or emergency services or treatments 'that would pose a substantial risk to patients if significantly delayed,' according to a CMS press release. Specific services that will require prior authorization are skin and tissue substitutes, electrical nerve stimulator implants, and knee arthroscopy. There is genuine concern about the costs of some of these items and services. A recent New York Times article highlighted pricey medical products, including paper-thin bandages made of dried bits of placenta, for Medicare patients. The Biden administration had approved a plan to limit Medicare's coverage of the bandages, known as skin substitutes, which were reportedly being sold for roughly $10,000 per square inch. An updated Medicare policy proposes setting a significantly lower payment rate. The new prior authorization program 'is focused on reducing wasteful spending, which is an important goal for Medicare,' Jeffrey Marr, a health economist at the Brown University School of Public Health, told Yahoo Finance. 'I expect that the use of prior authorization in this model is likely to reduce the overall level of Medicare spending,' he said. 'Selecting potentially low-value services is a critical part of setting up a well-functioning prior authorization system.' The key question for CMS to address is whether prior authorization can work in traditional Medicare in a way that does not deny or discourage high-value care that improves beneficiaries' health, Marr said. One red flag: 'The companies that will make the prior authorization decisions will be paid a percentage of the savings that they generate for Medicare. This creates an incentive for participants to deny a high share of services,' he said. Sign up for the Mind Your Money weekly newsletter By subscribing, you are agreeing to Yahoo's Terms and Privacy Policy Prior authorizations are part of the Medicare landscape How often do prior authorizations pop up for seniors with Medicare and Medicare Advantage plans? In traditional Medicare, services that often require prior authorization include certain outpatient hospital services, non-emergency ambulance transport, and durable medical equipment. For 2023, under 400,000 prior authorization reviews for traditional Medicare beneficiaries were submitted to CMS, according to KFF data. Medicare Advantage plans, which are offered by private insurers, are a different story. Almost all Medicare Advantage enrollees — 99% according to KFF research — must receive prior authorization for some services. These are typically higher-cost services, such as inpatient hospital stays, skilled nursing facility stays, chemotherapy, and other drugs. That common practice, combined with AI used to scan these requests, is a thorny issue. 'Prior authorization processes and requirements, including the use of artificial intelligence to review requests, may result in administrative hassles for providers, delays for patients in receiving necessary care, and in some instances, denials of medically necessary services, such as post-acute care,' according to Jeannie Fuglesten Biniek, co-author of the KFF report. To allay that fear, CMS noted in the announcement: 'While technology will support the review process, final decisions that a request for one of the selected services does not meet Medicare coverage requirements will be made by licensed clinicians, not machines.' The prior authorization program will not alter Medicare coverage or payment rules, for now, but other services may be added later. There has been pushback. More than a dozen members of Congress sent a letter on Aug. 7 to CMS administrator Dr. Memet Oz to urge him to 'put patients and providers first by cancelling' the model and requested more details about how the program will be implemented. 'The use of prior authorization in Medicare Advantage shows us that, in practice, [this proposal] will likely limit beneficiaries' access to care, increase burden on our already overburdened healthcare workforce, and create perverse incentives to put profit over patients,' the lawmakers wrote.A pivot in MA authorization In an odd juxtaposition, a week prior to trumpeting this new Medicare pre-authorization model, the administration announced that it had a non-binding commitment from insurance plans to reduce prior authorization in Medicare Advantage. In late June, the Department of Health and Human Services announced an initiative coordinated with companies including Aetna, Blue Cross Blue Shield, Humana, and UnitedHealthcare, to streamline prior authorization processes for patients covered by Medicare Advantage. Under the initiative, electronic prior authorization requests would become standardized by 2027. 'Pitting patients and their doctors against massive companies was not good for anyone,' US Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy, Jr. said in a statement. 'We are actively working with industry to make it easier to get prior authorization for common services such as diagnostic imaging, physical therapy, and outpatient surgery.' Oz added: 'These commitments represent a step in the right direction toward restoring trust, easing burdens on providers, and helping patients receive timely, evidence-based care.' Kerry Hannon is a Senior Columnist at Yahoo Finance. She is a career and retirement strategist and the author of 14 books, including the forthcoming "Retirement Bites: A Gen X Guide to Securing Your Financial Future," "In Control at 50+: How to Succeed in the New World of Work," and "Never Too Old to Get Rich." Follow her on Bluesky. Sign up for the Mind Your Money newsletter Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Trump administration tiptoes into testing prior authorization in traditional Medicare
Traditional Medicare plan holders have typically not had to wait for prior authorization before receiving medical treatment. Until now. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) recently announced a new program to test prior authorization requirements for certain services in six states starting Jan. 1. The states — New Jersey, Ohio, Oklahoma, Texas, Arizona, and Washington — will apply prior authorization evaluations to more than a dozen services. CMS says the pilot program is intended to root out 'fraud, waste, and abuse,' but as Medicare Advantage members know well, prior authorization can lead to frustrating delays in care. How it works CMS will contract with private companies to deploy 'enhanced technologies, including artificial intelligence (AI)' to conduct the authorization reviews. It won't apply to in-patient or emergency services or treatments 'that would pose a substantial risk to patients if significantly delayed,' according to a CMS press release. Specific services that will require prior authorization are skin and tissue substitutes, electrical nerve stimulator implants, and knee arthroscopy. There is genuine concern about the costs of some of these items and services. A recent New York Times article highlighted pricey medical products, including paper-thin bandages made of dried bits of placenta, for Medicare patients. The Biden administration had approved a plan to limit Medicare's coverage of the bandages, known as skin substitutes, which were reportedly being sold for roughly $10,000 per square inch. An updated Medicare policy proposes setting a significantly lower payment rate. The new prior authorization program 'is focused on reducing wasteful spending, which is an important goal for Medicare,' Jeffrey Marr, a health economist at the Brown University School of Public Health, told Yahoo Finance. 'I expect that the use of prior authorization in this model is likely to reduce the overall level of Medicare spending,' he said. 'Selecting potentially low-value services is a critical part of setting up a well-functioning prior authorization system.' The key question for CMS to address is whether prior authorization can work in traditional Medicare in a way that does not deny or discourage high-value care that improves beneficiaries' health, Marr said. One red flag: 'The companies that will make the prior authorization decisions will be paid a percentage of the savings that they generate for Medicare. This creates an incentive for participants to deny a high share of services,' he said. Sign up for the Mind Your Money weekly newsletter By subscribing, you are agreeing to Yahoo's Terms and Privacy Policy Prior authorizations are part of the Medicare landscape How often do prior authorizations pop up for seniors with Medicare and Medicare Advantage plans? In traditional Medicare, services that often require prior authorization include certain outpatient hospital services, non-emergency ambulance transport, and durable medical equipment. For 2023, under 400,000 prior authorization reviews for traditional Medicare beneficiaries were submitted to CMS, according to KFF data. Medicare Advantage plans, which are offered by private insurers, are a different story. Almost all Medicare Advantage enrollees — 99% according to KFF research — must receive prior authorization for some services. These are typically higher-cost services, such as inpatient hospital stays, skilled nursing facility stays, chemotherapy, and other drugs. That common practice, combined with AI used to scan these requests, is a thorny issue. 'Prior authorization processes and requirements, including the use of artificial intelligence to review requests, may result in administrative hassles for providers, delays for patients in receiving necessary care, and in some instances, denials of medically necessary services, such as post-acute care,' according to Jeannie Fuglesten Biniek, co-author of the KFF report. To allay that fear, CMS noted in the announcement: 'While technology will support the review process, final decisions that a request for one of the selected services does not meet Medicare coverage requirements will be made by licensed clinicians, not machines.' The prior authorization program will not alter Medicare coverage or payment rules, for now, but other services may be added later. There has been pushback. More than a dozen members of Congress sent a letter on Aug. 7 to CMS administrator Dr. Memet Oz to urge him to 'put patients and providers first by cancelling' the model and requested more details about how the program will be implemented. 'The use of prior authorization in Medicare Advantage shows us that, in practice, [this proposal] will likely limit beneficiaries' access to care, increase burden on our already overburdened healthcare workforce, and create perverse incentives to put profit over patients,' the lawmakers wrote.A pivot in MA authorization In an odd juxtaposition, a week prior to trumpeting this new Medicare pre-authorization model, the administration announced that it had a non-binding commitment from insurance plans to reduce prior authorization in Medicare Advantage. In late June, the Department of Health and Human Services announced an initiative coordinated with companies including Aetna, Blue Cross Blue Shield, Humana, and UnitedHealthcare, to streamline prior authorization processes for patients covered by Medicare Advantage. Under the initiative, electronic prior authorization requests would become standardized by 2027. 'Pitting patients and their doctors against massive companies was not good for anyone,' US Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy, Jr. said in a statement. 'We are actively working with industry to make it easier to get prior authorization for common services such as diagnostic imaging, physical therapy, and outpatient surgery.' Oz added: 'These commitments represent a step in the right direction toward restoring trust, easing burdens on providers, and helping patients receive timely, evidence-based care.' Kerry Hannon is a Senior Columnist at Yahoo Finance. She is a career and retirement strategist and the author of 14 books, including the forthcoming "Retirement Bites: A Gen X Guide to Securing Your Financial Future," "In Control at 50+: How to Succeed in the New World of Work," and "Never Too Old to Get Rich." Follow her on Bluesky. Sign up for the Mind Your Money newsletter Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
