
China having second thoughts on Trump's Nvidia chip deal
Citing people familiar with the matter, Bloomberg reported on Tuesday that Chinese authorities have sent notices to companies over the past few weeks, discouraging them from using the less-advanced semiconductors.
The report stated that Chinese officials are concerned that Nvidia chips may have location-tracking and remote shutdown capabilities. Nvidia has already denied this.
The Financial Times also reported on the same day that Beijing is demanding technology companies explain why they need to order H20 chips, but not Chinese ones.
The Information reported that the Cyberspace Administration of China (CAC) ordered companies, such as ByteDance, Alibaba, and Tencent, to suspend orders of Nvidia's H20 chips.
According to the report, the government is investigating any potential security risks stemming from H20, while encouraging Chinese companies to purchase chips from local manufacturers, such as Huawei Technologies and Cambricon.
Nvidia told the media in a statement that, as both the US and Chinese governments recognize, the H20 is not a military product or for government infrastructure.
'China has an ample supply of domestic chips to meet its needs. It won't and never has relied on American chips for government operations, just like the US government would not rely on chips from China,' said the company.
On July 15, Nvidia's Chief Executive Jensen Huang said the company would soon resume H20 chip sales in China.
On the same day, US Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick said the H20 is only Nvidia's 'fourth-best' AI chip, which is slower than the fastest chips American companies use.
He said the US wants to sell the Chinese enough AI chips that their developers 'get addicted to the American technology stack.' He said the United States' strategy is to stay one step ahead of what the Chinese can build.
At that time, some pundits in China described the H20 chips as an irresistible 'poison wine' that would slowly kill Chinese AI chip makers by taking away their customers. Some others criticised the US for 'dumping' the H20 to China.
Reuters reported on July 29 that Nvidia had placed orders for 300,000 H20 chipsets (worth about US$3.6 billion) with the Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company (TSMC) a week earlier.
On July 31, the CAC said it summoned US tech giant Nvidia over security risks related to its H20. It said some US lawmakers have called for advanced chips exported abroad to be equipped with 'tracking and positioning' functions.
'The US did not unconditionally relax its export controls for the H20 chips,' a writer with Mydrivers.com says in an article published on July 23. 'It still does not allow the export of the high-end Blackwell chips. It seems to be saying that, 'I give you a sweet, but this is the last one.''
The writer says that the Trump administration has not yet altered its strategy to counter China, but has instead employed an alternative approach. He says the US side must demonstrate sincerity if it wants to maintain dialogue with China, obtain Chinese rare earths, and push forward with Trump's visit to Beijing in September.
In an article, a Beijing-based financial columnist says that the US does not want to miss the opportunity to capitalize on the massive demand for AI chips in the country.
'The US government's lifting of the ban on the H20 isn't unconditional goodwill,' he says. 'Lutnick has explicitly stated that the US policy goal is to get Chinese developers addicted to American technology.'
He says Lutnick's comments bluntly revealed the United States' intention to profit from China, while controlling its technological development. He says Nvidia will reportedly sell the B20, B30, and B40 chips to China in September, fueling the already-drastic competition between Nvidia and Huawei Technologies in China.
'In Huawei's labs, engineers are now testing the performance of Ascend 910B chip clusters,' he says. 'This chip can reach 320 TFLOPs (trillion floating-point operations per second) using FT16 (16-bit floating-point numbers) in speed to match the H20, while its price is 40% lower.'
He says China will have more bargaining power in the global chip sector once its chips account for half of the Chinese AI computing market.
In a press briefing on Monday, United States President Donald Trump explained why he agreed to restart the export of the H20 chips to China.
He said that he had asked Nvidia for a 20% cut of the company's H20 chip sales to China, but ultimately, he agreed on only 15%. He stressed that the money will go to the US government, not himself. The same charge will also be applied to AMD, which sells MI308 to China.
Trump also said he would discuss with Nvidia's Huang if Nvidia could reduce the performance of its Blackwell system by 30 to 50% for the Chinese market.
'That would be an unenhanced version of the big one [the most advanced Blackwell chips,' he said in a press briefing. 'We still sometimes sell fighter jets to a country, and we'll give them 20% less than we have.'
In a February article, an IT columnist named Uncle Biao writes that Huawei planned to sell 100,000 Ascend 910C chips and 300,000 910B chips in 2025.
'Ascend 910C is a new generation AI chip, with its inference performance reaching 60% of Nvidia's H100,' he says. 'Besides, an inference service using DeepSeek R1/V3 and Ascend 910B has its performance reaching 80% of the A100.'
'Huawei uses its Ascend 910 series to break the Chinese market's dependence on Nvidia chips and become a significant competitor in the domestic market,' he says.
He adds that Huawei is also building an AI ecosystem with its software tools, including MindSpore, the Atlas computing platform, ModelArts AI development platform, algorithm libraries, and Compute Architecture for Neural Networks (CANN).
Huawei's CANN is a heterogeneous computing architecture for AI, aiming to break the monopoly of Nvidia's Compute Unified Device Architecture (CUDA). Key foundries (such as TSMC) and electronic design automation (EDA) software suppliers (such as Cadence, Synopsys, and Siemens) have already adopted the Nvidia CUDA-X and Blackwell platforms.
On August 5, Huawei announced the full open-source release of CANN. It said the software serves as a bridge between high-level AI training frameworks and Ascend chips.
Huawei's Rotating Chairman Xu Zhijun said that after seven years of development, CANN has achieved key breakthroughs in computing optimization, communication efficiency, and memory management. He said CANN can now provide computing power throughout the entire AI-model training and deployment process.
Read: China fears Nvidia chips could track, trace and shut down its AIs
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


AllAfrica
4 hours ago
- AllAfrica
Putin-Trump talks shift focus from ceasefire to peace deal
If you read the headlines in American and European newspapers, you would conclude that the Alaska Summit failed. It did not. Washington changed direction and abandoned its support for a ceasefire. Here is Trump's official statement: A great and very successful day in Alaska! The meeting with President Vladimir Putin of Russia went very well, as did a late-night phone call with [Ukrainian] President Zelensky of Ukraine, and various European Leaders, including the highly respected Secretary General of NATO. It was determined by all that the best way to end the horrific war between Russia and Ukraine is to go directly to a peace agreement, which would end the war, and not a mere ceasefire agreement, which often does not hold up. President Zelensky will be coming to DC, the Oval Office, on Monday (August 18) afternoon. If all works out, we will then schedule a meeting with President Putin. Potentially, millions of people's lives will be saved.' The summit's major outcome was that the push for a ceasefire agreement, a non-starter for the Russian side, has been taken off the table. This will come as a big shock for Zelensky and Europe, although Zelensky has already announced he will be in Washington on Monday to meet with Trump. The agenda is an actual peace agreement, not a ceasefire. We don't know anything about the terms Trump will suggest, but it will involve territorial adjustments. Trump will try and convince Zelensky to cooperate, but it is a good bet that he won't. Nor will his backers in Europe. Should the above prediction hold, Trump will have to figure out what to do next. He could go back to trying to squeeze the Russians with more sanctions or other punishments. But that would require yet another reversal and won't achieve anything. The foreign policy crowd has been betting that the Russian economy is so bad that the whole Russian enterprise might collapse if the West jacks up the pressure on Russia. A good result, in this estimation, would be for Russia to surrender or for Putin's government to collapse. Even under dire circumstances, after the fall of the Soviet Union and the collapse of the ruble, with massive unemployment, shut-down factories and crazy-high inflation, Boris Yeltsin, then president, found a way forward, and Russia did not have a civil war, and government institutions started to restore their authority. Yeltsin's administration lasted eight years and was replaced by a more conservative and authoritarian leader, Vladimir Putin. It is very hard to accurately read sentiment in Russia. Generally speaking, the Russians like order and certainty, and dislike war. If there was a hard sense in the Russian public, especially the top echelons of Russian society, that the Ukraine war was a disaster, then one would expect to see evidence that this was the case. When the Russian invasion of Afghanistan went sour, the Russian people, especially the nomenklatura, demanded that Russia's military involvement come to an end. After nearly ten years of war in Afghanistan, the Russian army began to pull out in May 1988, and all the Russian troops were gone by February 1989. Russians objected to the Afghan war mainly because of casualties. Russia suffered some 26,000 killed and 35,000 wounded, far less than the casualties in Ukraine. In the Chechen wars, on Russia's territory, the Russian army perhaps lost 15,000 troops, although official numbers are not available. Regarding Chechnya, research outfits such as the Jamestown Foundation argue that the Russian public supported a negotiated settlement and were against continuation of the fighting. In the end, the Russian army flattened the Chechen resistance and the Russian public remained mostly passive. One of the asymmetries of the Ukraine conflict is the political impact of Ukrainian drone and missile strikes on Russian territory. These attacks presumably are designed to answer Russia's relentless aerial strikes on Ukraine's critical infrastructure, on military targets and in limited cases on civilian targets. But the other side of the coin is the impact of Ukraine's drone and missile strikes in garnering public support for the Russian 'Special Military Operation' in Ukraine. Ukraine's attacks reinforce public opinion in favor of the SMO. It is noteworthy, as illustrated by a recent Gallup poll in Ukraine, that despite the Russian drone and missile strikes, public opinion in Ukraine is turning decisively against continuing the war without a political settlement. Young men and women, in large numbers, are leaving Ukraine to escape the war and military conscription. According to the London Telegraph, at least 650,000 Ukrainian men of fighting age have fled the country since the conflict with Russia escalated in 2022. This number does not include the thousands who are currently hiding from the authorities or paying bribes to stay out of the Ukrainian army. A Ukrainian soldier and a militia man help a fleeing family. Image: Emilio Morenatti / AAP Zelensky hews to a tough no-compromises line on any settlement with Russia. He rejects any territorial deal. So when he bargains with Washington, he likely will do two things: try and get his supporters here in Washington to back up his position on no territorial concessions; and attempt to refocus Trump on providing security guarantees for Ukraine, demanding a Russian withdrawal from Ukrainian territory. He will most certainly ask Trump for more weapons and money, and for heavy sanctions on Russia. It isn't clear after the summit with Putin how Trump will respond. As for security guarantees, despite some who support sending troops to Ukraine, the sad reality is that no European state, let alone the UK, France or Germany, is going to send even one soldier unless they go there as a backup to US forces. Trump has previously said no US boots on the ground in Ukraine, so any security guarantee would have to be virtual, not with troops, or limited to flyovers and satellite surveillance. It is unlikely Zelensky will like a virtual security guarantee, even one with flyovers. Of course, Trump could change his mind, but it would risk his presidency if the net result is US physical involvement in the Ukraine war. It is too bad we do not have a detailed readout on the actual conversation at Joint Base Elmendorf-Richardson. Trump's use of provocative symbols, F-35s and a flyover involving a B-2 stealth bomber, and the lack of the usual protocols (no honor guard and no national anthems), was hardly conducive to a diplomatic encounter of heads of state. Moreover, the use of a military base, explained as a 'security measure,' was inappropriate, but the Russians, anxious to state their case to Trump and intent on showing deep respect for the United States, accepted the venue and the conditions, even the escort of Putin's presidential aircraft by US fighter jets. The view from Putin's window. The bottom line is, at least for now, US policy has shifted. The US and Trump no longer support a ceasefire but want to settle the Ukraine war through negotiations. How long that will take, and even if it is possible, remains to be seen. Meanwhile, the war continues, and for the most part, Russia will continue pushing to take Pokrovsk and to expand the contact line further to the west. Ukraine, already stretched and now with uncertainties on military supplies, is facing a crisis. Stephen Bryen is a special correspondent to Asia Times and former US deputy undersecretary of defense for policy. This article, which originally appeared in his Substack newsletter Weapons and Strategy, is republished with permission.


South China Morning Post
10 hours ago
- South China Morning Post
China's top diplomat Wang Yi to visit India for first time in 3 years for border talks
Foreign Minister Wang Yi will visit India for the first time in three years to discuss the latest round of border talks, the Chinese foreign ministry has confirmed. During the trip from August 18 to 20, top diplomat Wang will serve as the 'special representative of the China-India boundary question' in the 24th round of border talks 'at the invitation of the Indian side', according to a Saturday statement from the ministry. This series of negotiations aims to address long-standing border disputes , which have seen a temporary de-escalation following years of tension. Wang is expected to meet top Indian officials including National Security Adviser Ajit Doval. The two last met in Beijing in December to review disengagement in eastern Ladakh along the disputed border, known as the Line of Actual Control, where an estimated 50,000–60,000 troops remain deployed on each side. 'We stand ready to work with India to act on the important common understandings reached between leaders of our two countries, maintain the momentum of high-level exchanges, cement political mutual trust, enhance practical cooperation, properly handle differences, and promote the sustained, sound and steady development of China-India ties ,' Chinese foreign ministry spokesman Lin Jian said on Thursday in response to speculation about a trip by Wang. 'China and India are both major developing countries and important members of the Global South,' he said. 'A cooperative pas de deux of the dragon and the elephant as partners helping each other succeed is the right choice for both sides.'


RTHK
11 hours ago
- RTHK
China tourism sees upgrade in hospitality sector
China tourism sees upgrade in hospitality sector Domestic tourism is on the rise with the hospitality sector having to adapt to changes in tourist experiences. File photo: Xinhua China's tourism boom is pushing upgrades in its hospitality sector, with shifting travel preferences and growing popularity of digital technologies spurring hotels to embrace cultural integration, artificial intelligence (AI) and international management. In the first half of 2025, domestic tourist trips hit 3.285 billion, up 20.6 percent from a year earlier, according to the Ministry of Culture and Tourism. Summer travel is set to accelerate, with an estimated over 2.5 billion trips, according to data from the China Tourism Academy. Hotel giants are feeling the heat. Jin Jiang Hotels, one of China's largest hotel groups, reported receiving more than 40.7 million guests in its Chinese hotels in July. In addition to the robust data, customers' hospitality demands are also changing. "Chinese travellers are no longer satisfied with just a bed for the night. They seek immersive, multifaceted experiences that turn hotels into hubs of exploration and engagement," said Qian Kang, vice president of Jin Jiang Hotels. Integrating hospitality services with culture, commerce, tourism, and sports has been identified as a major strategic opportunity for the hotel market in 2025, according to an industrial survey released earlier this year by hotel market observer HUAMEI Consulting Group. In Shanghai, Jin Jiang Radisson Hotels launched a culinary initiative, offering exclusive dining deals and immersive food tours. Jin Jiang Hotels China Region's AI voice system handles 70 percent of guest calls, resolving 86 percent of requests within 15 minutes, often coordinating with in-house robots for tasks like deliveries, according to Qian. (Xinhua)