Crystal Palace ultras to launch furious protest march against Uefa after Eagles booted out of Europa League
The Eagles are appealing against Uefa's decision to demote Oliver Glasner's side to the Conference League next season for breaching multi-club ownership rules.
5
5
American businessman John Textor owns a stake in Palace and is also the majority owner of French club Lyon, who also qualified for the Europa League next season.
The rules of European football 's governing body state clubs owned, to a certain threshold of influence, by the same person or entity cannot compete in the same European competition.
Uefa 's rules set a deadline of March 1 2025 to show proof of multi-club ownership restructuring - a deadline which Palace missed.
Nottingham Forest, who finished seventh in the Premier League last season, could replace FA Cup winners Palace in the Europa League next term.
And now raging Palace fans have planned a protest to start from Norwood Clocktower to Selhurst Park on Tuesday night at 7:30pm.
The ultras said even hinted at unfair treatment from Uefa, who they claim are often influenced by other clubs with more "prestige and money".
A statement from the Holmesdale Fanatics read: "Uefa's decision to demote Crystal Palace to the Conference League is a terrible injustice for both our club and the game of football as a whole.
"A team has won the oldest cup competition in the world and, with it, its first piece of silverware in the club's history.
"A dream not unique to Palace fans but one shared by supporters of clubs across the country.
"To then have the deserved prize of Europa League football unjustifiably taken away is emblematic of a European football governing body disconnected from the true values that makes the sport adored by fans everywhere.
"It is indicative of why so many fans have fallen out with the modern game.
"We call this protest not just for Palace's position in the Europa League to be reinstated, but with all football fans in mind.
"Many clubs could be the next to be ruled against for lacking the historical prestige and financial resources to influence Uefa for their own gain."
The X post was captioned with: "Time to act. Please share widely."
It will take for around 12 minutes for the marchers to get from the meet-up point to Selhurst Park.
5
A timeline - why Palace have been demoted
March 1: Uefa's deadline passes for clubs in multi-club groups to change their ownership structure.
At that point, Crystal Palace were 12th in the Premier League and in the FA Cup fifth round.
April 30: It is revealed Evangelos Marinakis has removed himself from control of Nottingham Forest, putting his shares into a blind trust when it looked like Forest would qualify for the Champions League alongside Olympiakos, also owned by the Greek billionaire.
May 17: Palace win the FA Cup by beating Manchester City 1-0 and qualify for the Europa League.
On the same day, Lyon qualify for the Europa League on the final day of the Ligue 1 season. But Lyon face the prospect of Uefa sanctions for over spending rules.
May 25: Forest fail to qualify for the Champions League on the final day of the Premier League season but reach the Conference League instead, so Marinakis takes back control of the club.
June 3: Uefa meet with Palace executives in Switzerland to discuss whether the Eagles are able to play in Europe next season.
John Textor and Steve Parish attend the meeting to fight Palace's case.
June 9: It is revealed Forest have written to Uefa warning that Palace could be in breach of Uefa's multi-club ownership rules.
June 25: It is announced that Lyon have been relegated from Ligue 1 after failing to convince authorities they have resolved their financial difficulties.
July 9: Lyon's appeal is upheld, meaning they are reinstated to Ligue 1 and their spot in the Europa League is confirmed.
July 11: Palace's demotion to the Conference League is announced by Uefa, with the Eagles saying they will appeal the decision.
As FA Cup winners, Palace won a spot in the Europa League for the 2025/26 campaign after beating Manchester City 1-0 at Wembley eight weeks ago.
But that was brought into question with Lyon finishing sixth in Ligue 1 and earning their own Europa League spot.
Palace stand to lose £3.9m up front in prize money and can win a maximum £18.4m from the Conference League, compared to a minimum £9.1m and potential £33.5m from a successful Europa League campaign.
Textor - who Palace argue did not have overall control of the club - sold his 43 per cent stake to New York Jets owner Woody Johnson - albeit after the March 1 deadline.
He then resigned from his leadership roles at Lyon when they were relegated to Ligue 2 after failing to convince authorities they have resolved their financial difficulties.
This appeared to pave the way for Palace's Europa League participation.
But, there was further uncertainty on Wednesday when Lyon won their appeal against their relegation and were reinstated to Ligue 1 - meaning they are able to take up their Europa League spot.
5
5
Palace argued Textor does not hold any decisive influence at the club, but the Premier League side's defence was not accepted.
Club chief Steve Parish slammed 'ludicrous' Uefa for permitting 'the biggest injustice in the history of football'.
Parish said on Friday that Johnson had passed the Premier League's owners' and directors' test and that everyone at Palace feel they have been made an example of by Uefa.
Uefa rejects any claim that Palace have been harshly treated. It regards the case as a clear breach of the regulations, saying on Friday it had reached that conclusion after an 'assessment of the documentation submitted' by Lyon and Palace.
Forest's place has not yet been confirmed, with Uefa 's Club Financial Control Body waiting until the outcome of the Court of Arbitration for Sport appeal.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Mail
33 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Rachel Reeves 'limping' from one event to the next, head of the Institute for Fiscal Studies warns in brutal assessment of Labour's economic record
Rachel Reeves is 'limping' from one event to the next, the new head of the Institute for Fiscal Studies has warned in a stark assessment of Labour's economic record. Helen Miller said while Labour came into office on the promise of 'mission-driven government' and 'long-term thinking', reality proved different. Fears about small downgrades to Britain's growth prospects meant that the Budgets and statements were dominated by concerns about the parlous state of the public finances and if tax hikes or spending cuts would be needed, she said. 'We continue to limp from fiscal event to fiscal event, obsessed with whether run-of-the-mill revisions to the economic and fiscal outlook have reduced the fiscal headroom and whether tax or spend takeaways will follow,' said Ms Miller. 'We need to break out of this cycle.' The remarks add to the increasingly negative perceptions of Labour's handling of the economy after a year in power, with business leaders and economists unsettled by the direction being taken by Ms Reeves – and bond markets also becoming anxious. Ms Miller made the comments as she steps up from deputy to replace Paul Johnson as director of the IFS, a respected financial think-tank. Economists and businessmen continue to wonder whether Ms Reeves will have to put up taxes in her autumn Budget after Labour's U-turns on welfare and winter fuel payments. Growth also looks to be deteriorating, and defence spending must be increased as per new Nato rules and the Prime Minister's pledge. These shortcomings may open a financial black hole. Ms Miller said it was 'safe to assume the Chancellor will stick to her fiscal rules' on bringing down debt and borrowing. She added: 'But that alone doesn't automatically equate to sustainable public finances.' Last week the Office for Budget Responsibility (OBR) warned Britain was effectively living beyond its means, saying it 'cannot afford the array of promises that it has made to the public'. Ms Miller said: 'There are lots of reasons that demands for government spending could run far ahead of tax revenues. However much this – or any future – Government is willing to tax and spend, it won't be enough. We need better designed policies. 'And we desperately need economic growth. While that wouldn't eliminate the need for trade-offs it would make them more palatable.' Ms Miller also echoed the OBR's warning that the abandonment of planned spending cuts was leaving the UK's finances more vulnerable. She said: 'Politicians need to level with voters about the scale of the challenges and to make the case for bold reforms. 'Lessons must be learned from the recent disability benefits U-turn, and learned quickly, so that reform efforts in other areas land more successfully.'
The Independent
40 minutes ago
- The Independent
UK ‘long overdue' a conversation about NHS funding, says Javid
Former chancellor Sir Sajid Javid has said that the UK is 'long overdue' a 'serious conversation with taxpayers about how we continue funding' the NHS, as he introduced a report that backs a shift towards a social insurance model. Sir Sajid, also a former health secretary, said the country 'cannot afford' to 'bury our heads in the sand' when it comes to how the UK pays for healthcare. His comments are part of the foreword for the PolicyExchange's report The NHS – A Suitable Case For Treatment. The centre-right thinktank suggests that 'better quality healthcare' could be delivered 'by moving from our present entirely socialised model to a hybrid model with a significant social insurance component'. They also advocate changes such as removing free prescriptions for over-60s, but the report says that 'under no circumstances' should the UK try to replicate the US model of healthcare. Introducing the paper, Sir Sajid described the NHS as 'one of our country's most treasured and beloved national institutions'. 'We've come to a crossroads. A serious conversation with taxpayers about how we continue funding their favourite national institution is long overdue,' he said. He said that the UK is left with the options of putting more money into healthcare through tax rises or 'reforming' the system. 'What we cannot afford to do is to bury our heads in the sand,' he added. 'The responsible politician, the one who is concerned with the national interest, must look at every option for reform,' Sir Sajid said. The PolicyExchange report says that 'under no circumstances should the UK consider moving towards the US model', but that other countries 'with some sort of insurance-based model do much better' such as France, Germany and Singapore. 'We believe that better quality healthcare with universal coverage and improved long-term funding sustainability could be secured by moving from our present entirely socialised model to a hybrid model with a significant social insurance component,' the report says. Alongside a shift towards a 'social-insurance based system of financing healthcare', the thinktank made a number of recommendations for reforms that could be made within the existing NHS model. Among the changes the PolicyExchange suggest are a £20 charge for visiting a GP, with low-income groups exempt. They also say that people over 60 should no longer be universally eligible for free prescriptions, and the exemption should be determined by your income. They also advocate charges for 'more luxurious hospital accommodation', which they say could raise £700million. PolicyExchange advocate a system where universal healthcare coverage is available, and a basic model can be supplemented by other policies. The Government would regulate insurers and healthcare providers, and they say the system should still be called the NHS, with the main change being the way it is financed.
Telegraph
44 minutes ago
- Telegraph
The Government needs to realise the economic illiteracy of tax raids
SIR – The childish binary politics of 'bosses bad, workers good' playing out under our Government cannot continue ('Tax raid looms for middle classes', report, July 14). Of course, the Government needs to generate income. Reducing the tax rate increases the tax take, as has been demonstrated in the past. Encouraging wealthy people to stay in the country – and indeed move here – means higher spending in stores, restaurants and on leisure activities, which immediately translates into higher VAT revenues. People in business understand that you don't make money by saving money. Money is made by generating growth. Shimon Cohen London N2 SIR – Rachel Reeves, the Chancellor, is reportedly considering increasing taxation for higher earners, but not 'working people'. This infers that higher earners do not work for their remuneration. Many are in management positions and shoulder the responsibility of ensuring that there is work for the 'working people' to do. Valerie Mourilyan Wisborough Green, West Sussex SIR – When will Rachel Reeves and this Government learn that the more you tax, the lower your receipts? The expectations of returns on business investments have become lower than the risks involved. Economic growth is jeopardised, major companies and wealthy people are moving abroad and more people are on the dole. Liz Truss had the right ideas – but they fell apart because they were needlessly rushed and, above all, undermined at home, sparking a negative international response. Derek Morton Stockport, Cheshire SIR – The middle-income group of hard-working people are more likely to be able to afford electric vehicles, solar panels and heat pumps. The impending raid on their finances, in addition to other penalties levied in the past year, show just how incompetent and disconnected this Government is. Chris Benn Grantham, Lincolnshire SIR – I wonder if the Chancellor watches Antiques Roadshow. On Sunday night, Andy McConnell was presented with a small, elegant jug made of white opaque glass, produced in south Staffordshire. He could date it precisely because we learnt to imitate ceramics in this way in 1740; when excise duty was imposed on British manufactured glass in 1745, white opaque glass was not included. However, in 1777, excise duty was added, causing manufacture to stop immediately. Some fundamental and inescapable laws of economics applied then as now. John Brady Haddenham, Buckinghamshire
