logo
Australian Government weighing national road-user charge for EVs

Australian Government weighing national road-user charge for EVs

7NEWS7 days ago
The Australian Government has said there's 'no secret' it is looking at introducing a federal road-user charge, following a report in The Australian today that said federal treasurer Jim Chalmers is 'accelerating work' on such a charge.
Federal Treasury officials, as well as those from the Productivity Commission and the New South Wales and Victorian treasury departments, will reportedly attend a road-user charging forum in Sydney.
This will be hosted by Infrastructure Partnerships Australia, which is calling for a distance-based charge on drivers of electric vehicles (EVs), and will also be attended by Australian Automobile Association (AAA) managing director Michael Bradley.
With state-based road-user charges struck down in 2023 by the High Court of Australia, the federal government is working on a scheme of its own to help offset declining fuel excise revenue and thereby help maintain a source of revenue for road construction and maintenance.
CarExpert can save you thousands on a new car. Click here to get a great deal.
Infrastructure Partnerships Australia chief executive Adrian Dwyer argues such a charge would have little impact on EV adoption and that combustion-powered vehicles would still be subject to fuel excise.
'I wouldn't want to jump ahead of any sort of decision-making with that,' federal environment minister Murray Watt told ABC News Breakfast.
'It's no secret that we've said previously we'll work with the states and territories on this matter. There's obviously some reporting about that today in some of the newspapers.
'You'd be aware that there was a High Court decision which really raised this issue front and centre and ever since then, we've been working with the states and territories.
'But it's probably premature to say exactly what will occur.'
However, by charging EV owners through a separate scheme and maintaining the fuel excise that affects owners of combustion-powered vehicles, the Australian Government may disappoint those calling for a more holistic scheme like that in New Zealand.
The New Zealand government announced last week it plans to drop its fuel excise and make petrol-powered vehicles subject to a road-user charge based on distance travelled and vehicle weight, as diesel, electric and plug-in hybrid vehicles already are.
Dr Chalmers had already confirmed in June he was working with state and territory governments on 'the future of road-user charging', following remarks he made in February at a Business Council of Australia event about introducing a mileage-based charge for EV owners.
The Australian Government has already introduced a road-user charge, however, this is part of pilot program for heavy vehicles.
The National Heavy Vehicle Charging Pilot, of which Phase 3 was just completed, is designed to test different ways to charge heavy vehicles for their road usage based on their weight and the distance travelled instead of through registration or fuel excise.
State-based road user charges were struck down by a High Court ruling in 2023, when the Court found that under section 90 of the Constitution, only the Commonwealth can impose customs and excise duties.
This forced Victoria to shutter its scheme and refund all charges to owners of EVs and plug-in hybrids (PHEVs).
Victoria collected $3.9 million in EV and PHEV road user charges during the 2022/23 financial year alone.
The New South Wales and Western Australian state governments previously also pledged to roll out similar taxes around 2027, while South Australia promised to do the same but reversed course following a change in government.
Infrastructure Partnerships Australia says the federal government has the right to collect these charges, but it has 'limited practical capacity' to collect them as it doesn't handle driver licensing or vehicle registration.
Former Victorian treasurer Tim Pallas, who is also attending next week's forum, told The Australian that EVs are 'heavier and do more damage to the road network as a consequence than do internal combustion engine vehicles'.
'But there's an environmental plus to electric vehicles. So getting that balance right was key to us. The way we figured it, [a road-user charge] came in about half of the equivalent costs of fuel excise and that's not counting the incentives the state was putting into the ­vehicle purchase or registration for low-emissions vehicles.'
Mr Pallas said any federal road-user charge would need to work out how distance travelled is measured – Victoria's defunct scheme required intermittent photographs of odometer readings, for example – while also taking into account interstate travel to ensure revenue is distributed fairly.
'Even when electric vehicles didn't exist, fuel excise was a really inefficient way of charging for road use,' Mr Pallas told The Australian.
'With the share of electric ­vehicles expected to increase over time – which is a good thing – we need to update the current ­system,' former Liberal urban infrastructure minister Paul Fletcher, who is also attending the forum, told The Australian.
'The current arrangements are also unfair – particularly to those petrol and diesel car owners who drive longer distances, in our outer suburbs and in regional and remote Australia.
'If most Australians have no choice but to pay this particular tax – but some can avoid it by buying an expensive vehicle using the latest technology – then we have a problem with the design of the tax.'
Also attending the forum will be Michelle Jablko, chief executive of toll road operator Transurban, who has touted her company's experience in partnering with governments on real-world trials of road-user charging schemes in North America.
The Australian Electric Vehicle Association (AEVA) has called for a federal road-user charge to be implemented, but to cover all vehicles and to take into account a vehicle's mass.
'A universal, mass × distance road-user charge would serve the same role as fuel excise – a pay-by-use system which is proportional to the impact driving has on society and infrastructure. EV drivers don't have a problem with it – we just want to ensure the system is fair,' said AEVA president Dr Chris Jones in a statement.
He argued that by taking into account vehicle mass, such a charge 'would help drive sales of smaller, lighter vehicles regardless of fuel source'.
The Australian Automotive Dealer Association (AADA) has also previously called for an 'equitable national road-user charging system… [which] does not discourage the uptake of hybrids and EVs' and is done in a 'technology-neutral manner across all vehicles regardless of powertrain choice'.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Focus narrows on reducing regulation to boost productivity ahead of round table
Focus narrows on reducing regulation to boost productivity ahead of round table

ABC News

time2 hours ago

  • ABC News

Focus narrows on reducing regulation to boost productivity ahead of round table

Australia's productivity chief will assert that growth has not been a priority in policy making for years, citing the nation's growing tangle of regulation as evidence, in a speech ahead of Labor's economic reform round table this week. The warning coincides with a separate call from Australia's peak business bodies for red tape to be slashed by a quarter by the end of the decade, as Treasurer Jim Chalmers declared the government does "not want to settle for less" when it comes to productivity. Danielle Wood, chair of the Productivity Commission, will address the National Press Club on Monday, where she will argue there has been "less policy emphasis on growth and a declining reform appetite" across many wealthy nations in recent decades. "This manifests not just in less economic reform but in decisions by governments — federal, state and local — to pay less attention to growth trade-offs in pursuing other policy goals," she will say. "Nowhere is this more evident than in the growth of regulatory burden." Pointing to a significant increase in the number of words and conditional terms in acts and legislative instruments over the first two decades of the century, she will argue this "regulatory creep" is a symptom of the increasing demand for governments "to 'do something' every time an issue emerges". "When combined with Australians' tendency to look to government for answers — our 'Canberra fix' — we have ended up with a system that dampens growth." Business leaders, economists, unions and shadow treasurer Ted O'Brien will descend on Parliament House on Tuesday for a three-day meeting Mr Chalmers has billed as an opportunity to grapple with the big challenges facing the economy. Prime Minister Anthony Albanese will address the attendees at the beginning of proceedings on Tuesday, and later on Wednesday, he will host the attendees at the Lodge. But expectations that the forum will lead to significant reform in the short term have been tempered by the prime minister, who earlier this month talked down the prospect of tax changes emerging from the talks. The commission has released five reports in the lead up to the round table, culminating in what Ms Wood called a "to-do list" of recommendations that could "shift the dial" on growth. Among them are many aimed at improving government regulation, including things like employing digital tools to streamline approval processes. A leaked Treasury document prepared for cabinet, first reported by the ABC this week, featured a list of possible outcomes from the round table, including a pause to changes for the National Construction Code, measures to speed up housing approvals, and a national artificial intelligence plan to cut environmental red tape. It led the opposition to label the talks a "stitch up", a claim the government has dismissed, arguing it's not unusual that the department would have provided advice on some of the already received ideas ahead of time. Mr Chalmers and Mr Albanese both once again vowed they would not pre-empt any outcomes on Sunday, with the leader telling reporters in Perth that "the agenda is whatever people want to raise". He said ideas put forward will feed into the government's decision-making, including some that can be done immediately if adopted, others that will be implemented through federal budget processes, and some that tackle "the long-term challenges in the global economy, the impact on Australia, and how we deal with those issues". Ahead of the round table, 29 groups representing small, medium and large Australian businesses have launched a concerted campaign to cull red tape, warning that it needs to be easier to do business in Australia to attract investment. The alliance will also use the forum to call for reform of the approval process for planning and major projects, boosts for investment and innovation, and a process for "productive" tax reform that doesn't raise costs for consumers or businesses. Council of Small Business Organisations Australia chair Matthew Addison said the round table was an "opportunity to reset the economy in a way that supports business, not stifles it". "Our small businesses are buckling under the weight of excessive red tape, with regulatory burden and a patchwork of complex compliance obligations slowing growth," he said. Business Council of Australia chief executive Bran Black echoed that changes were needed to make it easier for businesses to operate, "so a cafe owner in Melbourne doesn't face 36 licences before they can pour a cup of coffee". He also pointed specifically to the need to cut red tape to make it faster to approve and build new homes, something the government has identified needs to happen to solve the housing crisis. Ms Wood will reference Productivity Commission research that found the time it takes to build houses and apartments has ballooned by 50 per cent over the past three decades. "It's not the time laying bricks that's blown out. It's the approvals processes: from planning, to heritage, to building approvals, environmental and traffic impact statements," she will say. "And these regulatory hairballs have found their way into almost every corner of our economy." According to Ms Wood, prioritising growth means there will be uncomfortable trade-offs, for example, heritage and density restrictions coming at the expense of more and cheaper housing, but that a "growth mindset means elevating growth and its benefits across all policy decisions". "It does not mean government should never intervene or pursue other conflicting goals, but the benefits of growth should not be traded away quietly or lightly," she will say. In an interview ahead of the round table, Mr Chalmers told the ABC that there was a lot of appetite in cabinet for cutting red tape and improving regulation where possible, and it would be a "really, really big focus" of the talks. "There are a number of reasons for our productivity challenge and we're going to chip away at trying to address it over time," he said. "We don't want to waste the next decade on productivity, the way our predecessors wasted the last, and that's what drives us." Andrew Bragg, the Coalition's shadow minister for productivity and deregulation, will also lay out the opposition's plan to increase productivity on Monday, arguing Australia has become "inefficient, bureaucratic and unproductive". "Many regulations are well intentioned, but we must now confront their cumulative effect," he will say, arguing it is costing the economy billions each year. Like Ms Wood, he will warn against the impulse of solving issues by simply announcing new laws or regulations. "More rules is always seen as good. The minister can announce the problem is solved. The caravan moves on. The dog barks," he will argue. "There is limited interest in how the new rules are enforced — unless there is a scandal." The Coalition's answer is deregulation, with a focus on "genuine enterprise with limited, rather than repressive, controls".

The week Chalmers can start to craft an economic legacy
The week Chalmers can start to craft an economic legacy

AU Financial Review

time3 hours ago

  • AU Financial Review

The week Chalmers can start to craft an economic legacy

The three-day Economic Reform Roundtable starting on Tuesday is Jim Chalmers' opportunity to make a fresh start on crafting an economic legacy to match the nation's great reforming treasurers. Before the 2022 election, Anthony Albanese promised Labor would seek to govern in the best reform traditions of the Hawke-Keating governments of the 1980s and 1990s. As treasurer, Paul Keating floated the Australian dollar, began winding down tariff protection, and reduced personal and company tax. As prime minister, he introduced the principle of enterprise bargaining into the industrial relations system.

‘Little prick to the ego': Poll shows most Aussies unaware of Labor's economic roundtable
‘Little prick to the ego': Poll shows most Aussies unaware of Labor's economic roundtable

Sky News AU

time5 hours ago

  • Sky News AU

‘Little prick to the ego': Poll shows most Aussies unaware of Labor's economic roundtable

Sky News host Paul Murray discusses how Australian politicians all think they are 'rockstars' and winners of popularity polls. 'Jim Chalmers and the week he is due to have at the economic reform roundtable, now remember when this was supposed to be about productivity, but productivity puts people to sleep but economic reform is a big general term… that also puts people to sleep,' Mr Murray said. 'You know what I love? I love when politicians and, basically all bar a few … they all think they're rockstars.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store