
Shop-bought health tests not fit for purpose, warn experts – as they present ‘significant risk' for wrong diagnosis
The kits are readily available from supermarkets for checking health factors like high cholesterol, vitamin deficiencies, fertility and prostate problems.
1
But experts warn 'evidence for their benefit is lacking'.
A study by the University of Birmingham found many cannot back up claims about their accuracy.
Testing found many have confusing or unreadable instructions, and customers often do not know what to do with their results.
Scientists said they should go through more stringent quality checks and be regulated like medical products.
Professor Jon Deeks said: 'Current regulations are not adequately protecting consumers.
'For matters of our health, it is important that the evidence upon which health decisions are made is available and can be scrutinised.'
Kits cost as little as £1.89
There is a booming market for the tests, which mostly work like Covid lateral flow tests, and the UK industry is set to be worth half a billion pounds by 2030.
Researchers bought 30 of the kits from shops around Birmingham, costing between £1.89 and £39.99, and evaluated them.
They found at least 18 had 'high risk' problems that might lead to a wrong result or decision.
Eleven had equipment quality issues, 10 did not have a proper sampling process and 15 had issues with the instructions or advice on what to do with the results.
Those with problems included tests for menopause hormones, kidney function, vitamin D and thyroid function.
In one example, Prof Deeks said the self-tests for prostate-specific antigen (PSA) levels, a marker of prostate health, were fixed at a certain concentration level.
However, 'if you're age 70 you need to have your PSA done at a very different level to when you're 20', he said.
False results could put strain on the NHS
Dr Clare Davenport said: 'A good test should be clear about who and when to use it.
'It should be easy to use and easy to interpret.
'We expect it to be accurate and we expect it to be evidence-based if it's going to be sold to the general public, with clear advice of what to do with next steps.
'Unfortunately, what we found is that actually many tests gave unclear or missing guidance.
'On one side, if you get a false positive result that might lead to unnecessary extra testing, unnecessary treatments or just anxiety to patients.
'And on the other side, you may have a false negative and you get this false reassurance, which can lead to missed or delayed diagnosis and delayed treatment with obviously worse outcomes for patients.
'All of this can have an impact on health care demand.
'The wrong test or result can then lead to unnecessary or additional appointments, investigations and treatments and a higher burden on the NHS.'
Dr Bernie Croal, president of the Royal College of Pathologists, said: 'There are significant risks to patients when poor quality tests are carried out inappropriately.'
However, the team said that in the future, home tests could have great potential for patient care.
The Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency (MHRA), which regulates medical products, said it would look at the findings.
It issued its own warning about the kits in June and said they must not be taken as real medical advice.
The MHRA said: 'Self-tests can provide helpful insights, but they're not a substitute for medical advice or a diagnosis.
'If you're unsure about a result, or have symptoms you're worried about, speak to a GP, pharmacist or other healthcare professional before making any decisions.'
The research was published in the British Medical Journal.
Body checks you can do now
Check your semen: It should be a white-grey colour. Red in semen or yellow-green should be assessed
Check your testicles: Roll each of them between your finger and thumb to gently feel their surfaces to look for swellling, hardness or lumps.
Check your breasts: Both men and women should be aware of the signs of breast cancer, which are lumps, inverted nipples, fluid oozing from the nipple, a sore or rash around the nipple, hard, red skin, swellings or lumps in the armpit.
Check your peeing habits: Going more often, straining to go, having a weak flow or feeling like you've not emptied? These could be signs of a prostate problem.
Check your blood pressure: You can check your blood pressure at home using an automated digital device, at the GP or pharmacy.
Check your heart: Your heart rate should be somewhere between 60 and 100 bpm. You can count using a clock and pressing lightly on the inside of your wrist.
Check down the loo: Look for signs of blood in stool or if you've had a persistent change in frequency or type of stool (e.g. diarrhoea or more difficulty). Pain when going should also be checked out.
Check your cholesterol: The best way to check your cholesterol levels is by visiting your pharmacist or GP but you can also check it at home with tests including Bupa's Be.Healthy at Home.
Check your nails: Ridges, dents, brittleness and clubbing of the nails can all indicate an underlying health issue.
Check your hair: Hair loss is seen in both men and women from middle age, but iron deficiency can also cause it.
Check your BMI: Your body mass index (BMI) is a simple way to check whether you're a healthy weight. Use an online calculator such as that on the NHS.
Check for lumps and bumps: Changes to the skin, including around the genitals, moles and marks must be checked.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Daily Mail
24 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Child is rushed to hospital 'after falling from height' in Dagenham
A five-year old boy has been rushed to hospital after 'falling from a height' in Dagenham this afternoon. Paramedics rushed to the scene near Dagenham Headway Tube station in east London at 2.31pm. The child is understood to have fallen from a height and was taken to a major trauma centre following the incident.


The Sun
24 minutes ago
- The Sun
Boy, 5, rushed to hospital after plunging from a height as air ambulance responds & cops close street
A FIVE-year-old boy has fallen from a height and been rushed to a major trauma centre. Paramedics raced to the scene, nearby Dagenham Headway Tube station, in east London, at around 2.30pm today. Church Elm Lane was cordoned off from Tasty kebab shop to Church Elm Lane Health Centre. Emergency services, including an air ambulance, arrived to transport the youngster to a major trauma centre. It is understood the boy's injuries are not life threatening. The Met Police confirmed there have been no arrests. A spokesperson for the force said: "Police were called at 14:32hrs on Monday, 4 August to reports of a child who had fallen from height in Church Elm Lane, Dagenham Officers, the London Ambulance Service and the London Air Ambulance attended. "A five-year-old boy was taken to hospital for treatment. His injuries are not life threatening. There have been no arrests." A London Ambulance Service spokesperson added: "We were called at 2.31pm today to reports of a person fallen from height on Church Elm Lane, Dagenham. "We sent resources to the scene, including an ambulance crew, an incident response officer and a paramedic in a fast response car. "We also dispatched London's Air Ambulance. "Our first paramedic arrived in less than five minutes. We treated a child at the scene and took them to a major trauma centre by road." 1


The Guardian
an hour ago
- The Guardian
I found it agonising to quit smoking. So why are people ignoring the new treatments on offer?
If there was a five-minute nuclear warning, I'd run straight to my local shop and buy a pack of cigarettes. Even now, after all these years. I stopped more than a decade ago – note that I say 'stopped' rather than 'gave up' because the latter implies a sacrifice, and I have been brainwashed (OK, hypnotised) not to use the term. But you are never really a non-smoker. You are just a smoker who is currently not smoking. In your soul, you are forever one of the people who leave the table after eating to go and have a conversation outside, even if you physically stay put these days. So, as someone who found it difficult to quit, it's baffling to hear that although two stop-smoking medications have been available in the UK since 2024, only 0.2% of those attempting to give up have used them, according to an analysis of NHS data on smoking in England. Cytisine (which also goes by cytisinicline) is a plant-based product that has been used in eastern Europe since the 70s and may appeal to those who prefer a natural option over a synthetic drug. It mimics the effects of nicotine, and tricks your brain into thinking you've had a cigarette. Varenicline – withdrawn in 2021 over concerns about impurities, but now reformulated and rereleased – can apparently reduce the urge to smoke, make you enjoy it less when you do and ease withdrawal symptoms. I tried everything when it came to my struggle with Silk Cut. Patches, gum, lozenges – I carried on smoking while I wore, chewed and sucked them all. I read the world-famous success story The Easy Way to Stop Smoking by Allen Carr (no, not that one). I attended the NHS in-person sessions, three times, to no effect. I was a triple failure, and oddly proud of it for a reason I still don't quite understand. I had neurolinguistic programming, where the man shook my hand as he greeted me, asking, 'And how long was it that you smoked for?' 'Oh, I still smoke now. I just had one outside,' I volunteered cheerfully. He tutted and told me that for some clients, talking about smoking in the past tense like that was all it took. I scoffed at those weaklings as I walked to my train afterwards – in a cloud of smoke, obviously. The closest I came to victory back then was a hypnotist recommended by a friend, with the caveat that he sounded so much like Cliff Richard it was hard to take him seriously. She didn't mention that he worked out of an extremely insalubrious portable cabin at the back of a building site. As I knocked on the tin-can door (while simultaneously putting out yet another last ever cigarette), I reasoned that if he murdered me, I would technically have given up smoking, therefore this would have been a success. Reader, he did not murder me. In gentle, dulcet tones, he told me I felt sleepy, while I felt embarrassed for him because I definitely wasn't hypnotised. When he 'brought me round' he asked me how long I thought I'd 'been under'. I'd been thinking about what to have for dinner the whole time, so stifled a giggle as I told him: about 10 minutes. He replied that it had been two hours. The next morning, it occurred to me that I hadn't even thought about smoking, let alone done it. Thrilled, I sent another friend, who had the same experience. However, a year later, almost to the day, we both started smoking again. I went back for a do-over but it didn't work. In the end, I probably spent about as much on trying to stop smoking as I had on cigarettes, and the thing that finally worked was free: boring old willpower. It was agony. Personally, I would have bitten the doctor's hand off if they could have given me a treatment that worked. And while of course no treatment is 100% effective, as I found out, stopping smoking is hard and gruelling. The more options people have, and the more visible and accessible these options are, the better. Do you have an opinion on the issues raised in this article? If you would like to submit a response of up to 300 words by email to be considered for publication in our letters section, please click here.