
Investors brace for oil price spike, rush to havens after US bombs Iran nuclear sites
The reaction in
Middle East stock markets
, which trade on Sunday, suggested investors were assuming a benign outcome, even as Iran intensified its missile attacks on Israel in response to the sudden, deep US involvement in the conflict.
US President Donald Trump called the attack "a spectacular military success" in a televised address to the nation and said Iran's "key nuclear enrichment facilities have been completely and totally obliterated". He said the US military could go after other targets in Iran if the country did not agree to peace.
Iran said it reserves all options to defend itself, and warned of "everlasting consequences". Speaking in Istanbul, Iran's Foreign Minister Abbas Araqchi said Tehran was weighing its options for retaliation and would consider diplomacy only after carrying out its response.
Investors said they expected US involvement would cause a stock market selloff and a possible bid for the dollar and other safe-haven assets when major markets reopen, but also said much uncertainty remained.
"I think the markets are going to be initially alarmed, and I think oil will open higher," said Mark Spindel, chief investment officer at Potomac River Capital.
"We don't have any damage assessment and that will take some time. Even though (Trump) has described this as 'done', we're engaged," Spindel said.
"I think the uncertainty is going to blanket the markets, as now Americans everywhere are going to be exposed. It's going to raise uncertainty and volatility, particularly in oil," he added.
One indicator of how markets will react in the coming week was the price of ether, the second-largest cryptocurrency and a gauge of retail investor sentiment.
Ether was down 8.5 per cent on Sunday, taking losses since the first Israeli strikes on Iran on June 13 to 13 per cent.
Most Gulf stock markets, however, seemed unconcerned by the early morning attacks, with the main indexes in Qatar, Saudi Arabia and Kuwait up slightly or flat. Israel's Tel Aviv main index was at an all-time high.
Oil prices, inflation
A key concern for markets centers around the potential impact of Middle East developments on oil prices and thus on inflation. Rising inflation could dampen consumer confidence and lessen the chance of near-term interest rate cuts.
Saul Kavonic, a senior energy analyst at equity research firm MST Marquee in Sydney, said Iran could respond by targeting American interests in the Middle East, including Gulf oil infrastructure in places such as Iraq or harassing ship passages through the Strait of Hormuz.
The Strait of Hormuz lies between Oman and Iran and is the primary export route for oil producers such as Saudi Arabia, the United Arab Emirates, Iraq and Kuwait.
"Much depends on how Iran responds in the coming hours and days, but this could set us on a path towards $100 oil if Iran respond as they have previously threatened to," Kavonic said.
While global benchmark Brent crude futures have risen as much as 18 per cent since June 10, hitting a near five-month high of $79.04 on Thursday, the S&P 500 has been little changed, following an initial drop when Israel launched its attacks on Iran on June 13.
Jamie Cox, managing partner at Harris Financial Group, said oil prices would likely spike before leveling off in a few days as the attacks could lead Iran to seek a peace deal with Israel and the United States.
"With this demonstration of force and total annihilation of its nuclear capabilities, they've lost all of their leverage and will likely hit the escape button to a peace deal," Cox said.
Economists warn that a dramatic rise in oil prices could damage a global economy already strained by Trump's tariffs.
Still, any pullback in equities might be fleeting, history suggests. During past eruptions of Middle East tensions, including the 2003 Iraq invasion and the 2019 attacks on Saudi oil facilities, stocks initially languished but soon recovered to trade higher in the months ahead.
On average, the S&P 500 slipped 0.3 per cent in the three weeks following the start of conflict, but was 2.3 per cent higher on average two months following the conflict, according to data from Wedbush Securities and CapIQ Pro.
Dollar woes
An escalation in the conflict could have mixed implications for the US dollar, which has tumbled this year amid worries over diminished US exceptionalism.
In the event of US direct engagement in the Iran-Israel war, the dollar could initially benefit from a safety bid, analysts said.
"Do we see a flight to safety? That would signal yields going lower and the dollar getting stronger," said Steve Sosnick, chief market strategist at IBKR in Greenwich, Connecticut. "It's hard to imagine stocks not reacting negatively and the question is how much."
Jack McIntyre, portfolio manager for global fixed income at Brandywine Global Investment Management in Philadelphia, said it was uncertain whether US Treasuries would rally after the US attack, largely due to the market's hypersensitivity to inflation.
"This could lead to regime change (which) ultimately could have a much bigger impact on the global economy if Iran shifts towards a more friendly, open economic regime," said McIntyre.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Hindustan Times
11 minutes ago
- Hindustan Times
US spy chief Tulsi Gabbard says UK agreed to drop 'backdoor' mandate for Apple
U.S. Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard said on Monday the UK had agreed to drop its mandate for iPhone maker Apple to provide a "back door" that would have enabled access to the protected encrypted data of American citizens. Gabbard issued the statement on X, saying she had worked for months with Britain to arrive at a deal.(Bloomberg File Photo) Gabbard issued the statement on X, saying she had worked for months with Britain, along with President Donald Trump and Vice President JD Vance to arrive at a deal. U.S. lawmakers said in May that the UK's order to Apple to create a backdoor to its encrypted user data could be exploited by cybercriminals and authoritarian governments. Apple, which has said it would never build a so-called back door into its encrypted services or devices, had challenged the order at the UK's Investigatory Powers Tribunal (IPT). The iPhone maker withdrew its Advanced Data Protection feature for UK users in February following the UK order. Users of Apple's iPhones, Macs and other devices can enable the feature to ensure that only they — and not even Apple — can unlock data stored on its cloud.
&w=3840&q=100)

First Post
11 minutes ago
- First Post
President Trump's gain is America's loss: The high cost of Trumpian diplomacy
President Donald Trump seems to have gained a lot from his way of conducting American foreign policy from the very inception of his second term in office in January 2025. But has the US gained anything out of the Trumpian method of conducting diplomacy? What are Trump's private gains then? First of all, Trump's self-image and his belief that he can run the country's policy towards the rest of the world like an emperor towards his subjects are yet to rupture. No major power in the world appears equipped to confront him directly. Any country that has attempted to do so has remained ineffective. Many powerful countries rather have tried to massage his ego in very many ways. For example, President Vladimir Putin, despite his diplomatic victory in the Alaska summit, went to the extent of admitting that if Trump had been in power, there would not have been the Ukraine War! It was music to Trump's ears and made Trump forget his resolve to make Russia face 'severe consequences' if Putin did not sign on to a ceasefire agreement. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Second, despite Trump's now-on-then-off tariff policy that has not been based on sound economics but on flimsy grounds, countries around the world are struggling hard to somehow negotiate with him and conclude 'deals'. He imposed high tariffs on Mexico because that country did not do enough to stop illegal immigrants from entering US territory and failed to prevent fentanyl imports into the US. Similar was the argument on high tariffs on imports from Canada. He announced 50 per cent tariffs on Brazilian goods imported into the US, because he did not like the trial of former President Bolsonaro, accused of attempting a coup to stay in power! Trump threatened 25 per cent secondary sanctions on Indian goods because India bought oil from Russia. He did not extend secondary sanctions to European countries who also purchased Russian energy resources, though less in amount in comparison to Indian purchases. He refrained from imposing the same sanctions on China, which buys more Russian oil than India. Worse, he has not imposed any sanctions on Russia, accused of slow-peddling his efforts for a ceasefire agreement. Trump imposed high tariffs on Nato members of Europe, most of them also being members of the European Union, because these countries did not spend enough on defence and contributed more towards the alliance's budget. Similar was the logic to subject Japan and South Korea to high tariffs. He perceived the allies to be getting American protection at a cheaper rate while ripping off the US through trade. Do any of those reasons cited by President Trump for imposing high tariffs make sound economic sense? It is all politics. Third, Trump has so far triumphed, as he seems to be trying to garner as much revenue as possible to offset the budget deficit that will surely and greatly swell due to his pro-rich taxation policy. He hardly cares about its impact on middle-class consumers who supported him during the last election but cannot politically punish him anymore as he is no longer going to contest any election. Trump's tariff policy will sooner or later affect American companies that do import businesses. It will also adversely affect the countries that export goods to the US. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD In all these, President Trump may benefit, while others lose. When myriad countries are sending their officials and leaders to Washington to strike trade deals, President Trump looks royal, and his king-size appearance satisfies his ego as well. He is also lucky, as forecast by many economists about the dire consequences of his tariff policy on inflation and employment have not yet been demonstrated on the ground. While the current state of the US economy may deteriorate once the high import tariffs begin to bite more severely, Trump appears more focused on the present. His policies may backfire later, but he will have the authority to change course. The unfortunate aspect of Trump's policies is that the victims of his haphazard tariff announcements will not be compensated. And Trump may not lose much financially or otherwise. Fourth, besides his erratic tariff policy, President Trump has given a body blow to foreign assistance schemes to numerous countries by cutting off assistance completely or reducing it substantially. Foreign aid has been a flagship foreign policy tool of the United States for decades. US foreign aid on the surface looks like Santa Claus doling out freebies to various countries, but in reality, it buys the United States immediate strategic benefits and financial gains in the long run. It also consolidates American influence over decision-making in the recipient countries. President Trump may once again gain by saving money that may be of use to deal with the budget deficit and manage his pro-business taxation policy. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD The political and economic gain for the Trump presidency, however, has negative consequences for the United States. Some of the negative consequences are already discernible. One, the mistrust between the US and the NATO allies has widened a great deal. He succeeded in forcing the NATO allies to contribute more to the alliance by spending more on defence, but has failed to reinforce mutual trust among the allies. The same can be said about US-Japan and US-South Korean bilateral strategic alliances. Two, the Trump Administration spends much less on foreign assistance, but its consequences in terms of reduction of its soft power as well as political influence in numerous aid recipient countries will surely cost the United States very dearly. Three, the durability and intensity of the strategic partnership that the US has built in the last two decades with countries such as India, Vietnam, Indonesia, and many other countries has come under question. Future administrations will need to invest far more in renewing confidence with strategic partners, and yet there is no guarantee of success. Four, most American allies and strategic partners will almost certainly try to recalibrate their policies and de-risk their closer ties with the United States. It will take time, but their intention and the process have already begun. Trump's gain appears to be America's loss. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD The author is founding chairperson, Kalinga Institute of Indo-Pacific Studies, and editor, India Quarterly. The views expressed in the above piece are personal and solely those of the author. They do not necessarily reflect Firstpost's views.


Indian Express
11 minutes ago
- Indian Express
Apple to produce all new iPhone 17 models in India for first time: Report
Apple is reportedly set to produce all four models of the iPhone 17 in India, ahead of the expected launch of the flagship smartphone in India. In a boost to India's domestic manufacturing, the tech giant is also expanding iPhone 17 production across five factories, some of which are recently opened facilities, according to a report by Bloomberg. Tata Group's plant in Hosur, Tamil Nadu, and Foxconn's production facility close to the Bengaluru airport, both of which recently became operational, will join existing units in producing the iPhone 17, as per the report. This is the first time that Apple will produce and ship all new variations of an iPhone from India from the outset. The move comes as Apple looks to navigate the Trump administration's constantly shifting tariffs landscape by shifting the vast majority of the smartphone's production for the US market to India from China. Tata's new plant joining iPhone 17 production also points to the conglomerate's potential role as a key partner of Apple. Tata Group is currently the only Indian company assembling iPhone 17s in the country, as Taiwan-based Foxconn has so far been Apple's leading contractor here. In 2023, Tata bought Wistron Corp's Apple production plant located in Karnataka. It also owns a controlling stake in Pegatron's plant just outside of Chennai, Tamil Nadu. Tata-owned facilities are expected to contribute up to half of India's iPhone output over the next two years, as per the report. The value of iPhone exports from India has grown substantially. The Indian Express had earlier reported that India's share in US smartphone imports surged to nearly 36 per cent in the first five months of 2025, from about 11 per cent in 2024. China, which continues to dominate the product category, saw its share drop from 82 per cent to 49 per cent over the same period. In April, US President Donald Trump announced reciprocal tariffs on a number of countries, including India. Days later, the US exempted phones, computers and other electronic products from the reciprocal tariffs. More recently, Trump slapped 50 per cent tariffs on India partly as a response to India's purchases of Russian oil. However, Apple's iPhones have so far emerged unscathed under exemptions. Earlier this month, Apple CEO Tim Cook announced a fresh commitment to invest $100 billion in the United States, with a particular focus on deepening its manufacturing base in the country.