White House touts Columbia University deal, critics see dangerous precedent
Photo:
AFP
Columbia University's agreement to pay more than US$220 million to the US government to resolve federal probes was not capitulation but a means to restore vital public funding, the university's acting president said on Thursday.
But critics expressed concern about a harmful precedent in what they see as US President Donald Trump's push for greater control over elite US colleges.
Trump has targeted Columbia and other universities over
the pro-Palestinian student protest movement
that roiled college campuses last year.
Harvard University
is fighting the Trump administration
in court and critics have likened the Columbia deal to extortion.
Harvard University is fighting the Trump administration in court. (File photo)
Photo:
AFP/Maddie Meyer
Columbia faced the loss of billions of dollars in future federal funds and the potential revocation of the visa status of thousands of international students, said acting president Claire Shipman.
"This was not capitulation," Shipman told CNN, adding that the deal protected the university's "academic integrity."
Under the settlement, Columbia will pay US$200 million to the US Treasury and a further US$21 million to a fund to resolve alleged civil rights violations against Jewish employees following the October 7, 2023, Hamas attack on Israel, senior administration officials said.
In return, the university regained access to some US$1.7 billion in federal funding and grants, Shipman said.
The deal comes after the Trump administration in March penalized Columbia over how it handled last year's protests by cancelling US$400 million in federal funding.
It contended that Columbia's response to alleged anti-Semitism and harassment of Jewish and Israeli members of the university community was insufficient.
The school later acquiesced to a series of demands that included scrutiny of departments offering courses on the Middle East and other concessions that were widely condemned by US academics.
Wednesday's deal formalized many of those concessions in what Education Secretary Linda McMahon called an "incredible win" for the government.
"It is our hope this is going to be a template for other universities around the country," McMahon told cable network NewsNation.
"We're already seeing other universities taking these measures before investigation."
McMahon said Columbia agreed to discipline student offenders for severe disruptions of campus operations, bring viewpoint diversity to their Middle Eastern studies programs, eliminate race preferences from their hiring and admissions practices, and end DEI (diversity, equity and inclusion) programs.
Columbia law professor David Pozen called the agreement a "shakedown" and said it set a precedent for "pay-to-play" deals the Trump administration is seeking with other schools.
"The agreement gives legal form to an extortion scheme," Pozen said in a blog post, calling it the first time anti-Semitism and DEI have been invoked as the basis for a government-enforced restructuring of a private university.
Shipman said the agreement contained no provisions that "shall be construed as giving the United States authority to dictate faculty hiring, university hiring, admissions decisions, or the content of academic speech.
- CNN
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Scoop
39 minutes ago
- Scoop
The American People Are Inwardly Dead. Are All Western Peoples?
The post mortems on the re-election of Donald Trump after his disastrous first term, and an interregnum of relative normalcy under Joe Biden, continue on both sides of the Atlantic. Confining their examination to the political level, the pundits are missing the mark by a mile. Skimming along the surface like water bugs, journalists like Jake Tapper and Ezra Klein the USA, and Timothy Garton Ash in the UK are focusing on the failure of Democrats to replace an aging and declining President Biden, who had promised to only run for one term, with a younger, more vibrant candidate. Without addressing the spiritual, cultural and philosophical levels of our descent into national and global darkness, we cannot understand how we came to this pass, much less how to halt the slide into the abyss. In short, the most powerful nation on Earth twice elected a fascistic narcissist because this nation had first lost its soul, it's essential intactness a people. The question is, given America's cultural influence in the global society, how many other peoples have inwardly expired? Looking no deeper than political excrescence and no further back than Biden's last two years, Tapper, Klein and Ash are united in blaming Joe for not getting out of the race earlier. In the words of the Brit, 'Had Biden cleared the way for a Democratic primary in autumn 2023 the strongest candidate could have defeated Trump, and the entire world would have been spared the disaster now unfolding.' The commentariat on both sides of the pond are clinging to the wisdom-of-the-people illusion as what passed for democracy corrodes in real time. They echo the refrain, 'In 2023 77% of Americans thought Biden was too old to be president for another four years,' but the Democratic poobahs wouldn't listen. Timothy Garton Ash makes a statement sure to rile up 97% of Americans: 'This partly stems from the 237-year-old US constitutional device of rolling your prime minister and monarch into one.' It's a bit rich for people upholding the decrepit institution of monarchy to criticise the modern-day empire that replaced their empire for not ousting a decrepit leader, given that Americans fought a war of independence to free us from their monarchy, which was already decrepit in 1775. With regard to the present, when 'the people' are moribund, it matters little how decent the candidate is. The way things played out was no accident of history, or the result of Jill Biden and the 'politburo' (their word) around Joe concealing his decrepitude. Even now, with the benefit of double hindsight, there's widespread willful blindness. Journalists, academics and the commentariat should have seen after Trump's coup attempt that a growing darkness had engulfed America, and without a basic change in course authoritarianism was inevitable. Now, it's much harder to rid a nation of a tyrant than to prevent him from rising to power. In a column I wrote in June of 2022, 'Indict the Bastard,' I said that if Trump wasn't indicted and tried for his political crimes in time to keep him out of office, he and the servile Republican Party would steal the election, as they had tried to do with the January 6 2020 coup attempt. Though I've never underestimated the stupidity of the American people, I didn't think Trump would win cleanly over Biden or Harris. At the moment the Repubs are brazenly planning to steal both the midterm elections. They're ruthlessly gerrymandering districts in Texas, and will do so in every other state they can under the direction of their dictator, who said today 'we're entitled' to add more Republican seats to the House and Senate. Trump knows that if the Democrats win both Houses of Congress, the House will impeach him for a third time, and this time, if the Democrats control the Senate, he'll be convicted and removed from office. The governors of California and New York are saying they're going to fight fire with fire. Kathy Hochul, the governor of New York, called it a war yesterday. America is entering a gerrymandering civil war, but without a living, irate citizenry behind them, the Democrats are going to lose again. Deadness of the heart is the cultural and spiritual background that allowed the iniquity of Trumpism to emerge, just as it is the underlying reality that allows Netanyahu's campaign of starvation and genocide in Gaza to continue. Those who still have a beating chamber in their heart must face the virus of indifference if we are to rid ourselves of this global malignancy. The metaphysical momentum for our perilous predicament (and by 'our' I don't just mean Americans) has been building for a very long time. Here in California, the last best place on Earth, it's clear that man has reached the end of his long run, and no appeal to indigenous peoples or our indigenous past can meet the challenge we face as individuals and a species. Three or four of the nine core tipping points of the Earth's ecosystem have already been breached, and the rest are on the verge of being breached. The cornerstone nation-state has crumbled, as Israel's genocide in Gaza and Russia's WWI trench-warfare-plus-drones in Ukraine make a gut-wrenching mockery of the international/multilateral system. Radical change is imperative at all levels in a globalized world, but callow thinkers like Ezra Klein cling to a nationalistic framework and fantasise about 'abundance,' in an updated version of Reagan's trickle down economics of 40 years ago. Irrespective of the nationalistic mindset, that's an inherently false hope, since giving priority to material abundance ineluctably produces tremendous inequality. Why? Because it doesn't address human motivations of greed, power, comparison, competition and consumerism. Though the elites of media and academia have to think, speak and write within their prescribed lines and limits, those of us who aren't serving corporations or clicks can and must think more broadly, and especially, more deeply.
NZ Herald
2 hours ago
- NZ Herald
Trump's tariff moves suggest Indian and US co-operation over China can no-longer be counted on
Until that point, his Administration had been angling to reduce India's trade barriers but said nothing about its two years of buying Russian oil at a wartime discount. Before the shock of Trump's announcement in April of sweeping global tariffs, the world's two largest democracies seemed to be enjoying the friendship that its leaders had forged. At a meeting with Trump at the White House in February, India's Prime Minister, Narendra Modi, described India's intention to become one of the world's most advanced economies, with the US as a partner. 'In the language of America, it's 'Make India Great Again' — Miga,' he said. 'When America and India work together, this Maga plus Miga becomes a 'mega partnership for prosperity.'' Trump smiled. Left unmentioned but lingering just out of sight was China, the only country with a population to rival India's and an economy to stand in its way. China is also far and away America's most important economic competitor. Together, the US and India were seen as ready to use each other to try to restrain China's might. Total trade between the US and India was roughly US$130 billion last year. India's top exports to America include pharmaceuticals, auto parts, electrical goods, and gemstones. Modi's confidence in enlisting the US in its economic rise was well grounded. US administrations have been courting India as a geopolitical ally for more than a quarter of a century, since India announced its nuclear arsenal as a deterrent, it said, to China. And American dollars have poured into India as China's economy has matured and become more assertive. The Covid-19 pandemic and the war in Ukraine were the catalysts for a surge in investment. Multinational companies grew excited about doing business in India, to reduce the risk of exposure to China as it girds for a trade war with the US and possibly a real war with Taiwan. Manufacturing and professional services led the way. Wall Street followed, banking on the future growth of India, with its relatively young population and enviable political stability. But over the past week, Trump's escalating attacks on India have suddenly undermined this joint venture and sent reverberations throughout the business worlds of both countries. Today, an executive order by Trump said that India would face an extra 25% tariff starting on August 27 if it continued to buy oil from Russia. That levy on Indian goods imported into the US would come on top of a 25% tariff Trump announced last week, which is set to take effect tomorrow and on its own ranks as one of the highest rates in Asia. India's Foreign Ministry responded to Trump's executive order, reiterating that the country's motives for importing oil from Russia were tied to the energy needs of its 1.4 billion people. It was 'extremely unfortunate that the US should choose to impose additional tariffs on India for actions that several other countries are also taking in their own national interest,' the ministry's statement said. Indian officials had signalled over the weekend that they did not intend to stop buying Russian oil. With his tariff threats, Trump has thrown months of trade talks between both countries into question. Just a couple of weeks ago, negotiators and business leaders sounded upbeat. Even with some difficult details to be settled, the expectation was that India and the US mean too much to each other to let a global trade war tear them apart. US President Donald Trump with Prime Minister Narendra Modi of India during a meeting in the Oval Office of the White House in Washington, on February 13. With threats of tariffs up to 50%, Trump seems to be scrapping America's plan to turn India into a counterweight to China, declaring instead that it was a 'dead economy'. Photo / Eric Lee, The New York Times Modi was one of the first world leaders to visit Trump in Washington after he returned to the White House in January. The two men had long shared what was by all appearances a close relationship. As political leaders, both are regarded as strongmen. The US was earlier wary of Modi, who had been denied a visa to the US on the grounds that he played a role in the deadly anti-Muslim riots in 2002. But he was embraced when he became Prime Minister in 2014. Part of the calculation was based on security and the possible future of military alliances across Asia. Yet, India's attractive qualities as a partner in defence always hinged on the promise of its economy. Companies such as Apple have poured billions into India, which in 2023 eclipsed China in population, with eyes on India's domestic market and its capacity to export manufactured goods to the US and elsewhere. Those investments were supposed to be better than profitable; they were supposed to reduce or eliminate everyone's dependence on China to be the factory of the world. The 25% tariff alone, already much higher than those imposed on Asian competitors including Vietnam, Japan, and South Korea, would reduce the viability of such a trade. A 50% tariff would kill it. Yesterday, Trump took aim at two other industries that were explicitly being developed in India as an alternative to China. Pharmaceuticals, where India has world-beating advantages and sells more than US$10b a year to the US, is to face a special tariff that could eventually reach 250%, Trump said, to be announced 'within a week or so'. Eli Lilly, as one of many American corporations that have invested in India, for example, recently invested US$3b in an Indian factory. India makes nearly 40% of the generic drugs bought in the US. Trump's plan is to bring back manufacturing to the US, which is also the reason he has given for imposing another special tariff on semiconductors. Unfortunately for Indian and American companies, and some in East Asia too, everyone has been spending to make India competitive in this sector. Micron, based in Idaho, has taken advantage of Indian government subsidies to put US$2.5b into building chipmaking facilities in Modi's home state of Gujarat. High finance has also followed brick-and-mortar businesses. The Indian stock market has been on a bull run, finding enthusiastic new buyers among middle-class Indians. That made foreign investors eager for private deals. Stephen Schwarzman, chief executive of Blackstone, a New York investment firm, said this year that it was putting US$11b into Indian data centres to fuel the global artificial intelligence boom. A Mumbai-based investment professional, who was not authorised to speak publicly, said there was much more at stake in these investments than their dollar value. Bets like Blackstone's are about the future of business between India, China, and the US, he said, and bring expertise from one economy to another. India was benefitting from that. But now it looks like a vulnerability. The rupture of the relationship has generated huge uncertainty. Who wants to be responsible for making the next big bet? Some parts of the US-Indian equation look relatively secure. The trade in goods between the two countries has never been as important to their economic relationship as their trade in services and other people-to-people exchanges. Indians are just as present in American boardrooms as American-trained Indians are in Mumbai's corner offices. One aspect of this exchange, the proliferation of globally integrated, high-end offices in India — first in information technology and then across the professions — has remained a bright spot. Worth US$65b last year, it is more valuable than the total trade deficit in goods. China does not hold a candle to India's ability as a hub for office work other countries send its way. As frightening as the new tariffs are for many Indian factories, most American investors who have built stakes in India are not yet fleeing. They do, however, remember what happened in 2020, when India and China traded blows at their border and 24 soldiers were killed. Almost overnight, Chinese companies were forced to ditch their Indian investments at a loss. A war of words and tariffs is different, of course. However, Indian and American co-operation around China is no longer something that anyone can count on. This article originally appeared in The New York Times. Written by: Alex Travelli Photographs by: Saumya Khandelwal, Eric Lee ©2025 THE NEW YORK TIMES
RNZ News
2 hours ago
- RNZ News
US to ease human rights criticism of El Salvador, Israel and Russia, Washington Post says
By Kanishka Singh and Costas Pitas , Reuters Under Trump, the administration has increasingly moved away from the traditional promotion of democracy and human rights, largely seeing it as interference in another country's affairs. Photo: AFP / Pool / Christopher Furlong The Trump administration plans to scale back criticism of El Salvador, Israel and Russia over human rights, the Washington Post reports, citing drafts of the State Department's annual human rights report. The draft reports related to those countries were significantly shorter than the ones prepared by the administration of Democratic former President Joe Biden, who left office in January, following Republican Donald Trump's November 2024 election win. The State Department, which did not immediately respond to a request for comment, has not yet officially released this year's report, which covers last year's incidents. A senior State Department official in a briefing with reporters declined to provide specific details about the contents of the report but said it had been restructured in a way that "removes redundancies, increases report readability". The United States has traditionally viewed the promotion of human rights and democracy as well as press freedom as core foreign policy objectives, although critics have repeatedly pointed out the double standard Washington has had towards its allies. Under Trump, the administration has increasingly moved away from the traditional promotion of democracy and human rights, largely seeing it as interference in another country's affairs. Instead, Trump officials have interfered in other ways, repeatedly weighing in on European politics to denounce what they see as suppression of right-wing leaders, including in Romania, Germany and France, and accusing European authorities of censoring views such as criticism of immigration. On El Salvador, the draft State Department report states that it had "no credible reports of significant human rights abuses" in 2024, the Post said. The previous report published under the Biden administration said there were "significant human rights issues" there including credible reports of "degrading treatment or punishment by security forces" and "harsh and life-threatening prison conditions." The Trump administration has deported people to El Salvador with help from the government of President Nayib Bukele, whose country is receiving US$6 million from the US to house the migrants in a high-security mega-prison. The draft report makes no mention of corruption or threats to the independence of Israel's judiciary, the Post reported. The previous report mentioned isolated reports of government corruption and cited the criminal case of Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, who has been indicted on charges of bribery, fraud and breach of trust - all of which he denies. Previous references to Israeli surveillance of Palestinians and restrictions of their movements were also not addressed in the draft report, the newspaper said. The final report on Russia issued under the Biden State Department made several references to violence and harassment faced by LGBTQI+ people in Russia. The Washington Post said the draft report removed all references to LGBTQ+ individuals or crimes against them, and descriptions of government abuses that remained had been softened. The embassies of El Salvador, Israel and Russia in Washington did not immediately respond to separate emailed requests for comment. The Trump administration has moved to reshape the State Department's human rights bureau, which it said had become a platform for "left-wing activists to wage vendettas against 'anti-woke' leaders". Usually, the annual report is released around March or April each year but has been delayed this year. The State Department official said the report would be released "in the very near future." "The report is not meant to be every single human rights abuse that's happened in every single country. It's meant to be illustrative and a broad picture of what the conditions of human rights are on the ground in each country," the official said. - AFP
