
LinkedIn's 2025 Grad Guide: How To Get Hired Fast And Launch A Great Career
New grads discover how to make smart career choices that lead to long-term success and happiness.
As exciting as it was to walk across the stage and accept your hard-earned diploma, the reality soon sets in that you don't have a job. It's overwhelming to think about. When people ask you 'what do you want to do' – it's scary when you don't have an answer. You may have a degree with an applicable major such as engineering, marketing, computer science, or accounting, but in today's economy, getting hired is challenging.
Many new graduates are stumped because the job market is tough. As a career counselor who helps new grads land a position, I repeatedly hear, "I just want to get a job." Yet, this is the wrong way to launch your future. Having advised numerous students on career choices, which industries to enter, and where to find a good position, and helped them secure it, my perspective is different. I want to launch a career. That means the new graduate begins a job with a bright future in an industry that is growing.
When making these important career choices, there are four pillars on which to build your career foundation. They are your skills, strengths, interests, and available opportunities. Do some self-analysis, and ask yourself:
What are my interests?
What are my skills? My strengths?
What are my most important values?
Then add to that the most critical factor -- WHO is hiring now?
Nest, consider the employment and opportunity picture. Enter LinkedIn News's 2025 Grad's Guide created by the LinkedIn's data science team's analysis of the career paths of millions of professionals highlighting the first position that students secured after graduation. This key information identified the fastest-growing jobs, which industries have better options, and where 20-somethings are moving to that offer affordable living with plenty of job openings.
Fastest-growing jobs
Whatever your major, the road ahead will take several turns and pivots as you go through life. New jobs that don't even exist now will come on the horizon, and you may find yourself in a great role you never conceived of. You always want to be open-minded. As of today, LinkedIn's data identified 10 jobs it sees as having bright futures. These fastest-growing jobs include some tech roles, as well as others.
AI Engineer - no surprise there. And there will be a wide array of future jobs connected to the AI revolution – most of these job titles have not been created yet.
Law Clerk - for people seeking to start a legal career.
Data Center Technician – troubleshoots hardware and networking systems and maintains smooth operations.
Systems Engineer – designs, integrates, and manages complex IT systems.
Financial Planning & Analysis Specialist – also known as a Financial Analyst.
Business Development Representative – part of the sales team handling prospecting.
Administrative Analyst – focused on evaluating administrative processes, systems, procedures, and data analysis to make operational improvements.
Product Associate – support the development and launch of new or improved products.
Service Desk Specialist – IT support and help desk job
Clinician – Doctors, nurses, physician assistants, and other healthcare professionals.
Fastest-growing industries
With tech hiring declining, you may need to shift where you look. Broaden your net and consider these industries that will offer good opportunities now and in the future.
Best places to move to
The 20-somethings seem enamored with heading to the big cities they can't afford. Based on what they tell me, my unofficial survey shows that the popular cities to move to are New York (which tops the list), Denver, Los Angeles, San Francisco, San Diego, Seattle, and Boston. Denver is moderately expensive; the others have the highest living costs in the country.
LinkedIn's research showed that upon graduation, people are moving to these affordable cities that offer solid job opportunities to launch their careers. Another plus is that some are in states like Texas, Florida, and Tennessee, with no state income tax.
The fastest-growing cities where grads are moving to are:
- Tucson AZ
- Savannah GA
- Tallahassee FL
- Chattanooga TN
- Virginia Beach VA
- Tulsa OK
- Knoxville TN
- Dallas TX
- San Antonio TX
- Houston TX
Decision-making advice
Nothing is written in concrete, but mistakes can be disheartening and expensive. Too many people rush off with a dream, like students who move to LA, planning to get into the film industry, only to see that option never materialize. Dreams are important – they make life exciting and can push you forward to achieve your goal. However, having a backup plan, or even a Plan C, is a wise strategy too.
You want to avoid making expensive mistakes, such as moving somewhere new and not liking it, or investing a lot of time in a field you find unrewarding or very different from what you thought. To prevent some of this from happening, do your homework.
– Research and investigate the job duties to see if they align with the kind of work you'd enjoy. Use ChatGPT or Perplexity.ai , both are good resources for this kind of insightful career information.
– Talk to people who are doing the job. Target individuals fresh out of college with no more than 2-3 years of experience. They can provide you with actual inside information, giving you a realistic picture of what performing the job is like.
– Visit before you move. Stay awhile. Check to see if you or your friends, relatives, or classmates know anyone in the new town you can talk to. You want to get an accurate picture before you relocate. Be sure to check out some apartments during your visit. Location is paramount, so be close to work. Look at a few apartments for a realistic estimate of the monthly rent and utilities costs.
Priority #1 – get good experience
Salary should not be your driver -- getting good training and mentorship to learn as much as possible is a better objective. You want to work for a terrific employer under a great manager who will foster your professional development and guide you on the ins and outs of working within the company. Ideally, you want to be hired by an employer who will enhance and expand your skills, ensuring that you are not underutilized.
You can't put a price on happiness
Nothing will ruin your life more than working at a job you hate, one that is making you miserable.
There is one strategy that doesn't work and it is the old, outdated cliché, 'I just want to get a foot in the door no matter what the role is.' This approach will lead to significant frustration when it takes you a few years to gain enough internal experience and the opportunity to move into a better job may never materialize.
Being paid well is important, but money can't be the only driver. Consider these key factors that have a direct impact on your daily life.
- Would you like that company?
- Will you be excited to go to work there every day?
- Will the boss be a great manager?
- Can you get promoted?
Yes, there is much to consider to make a wise choice. Conducting thorough research, investigation, and digging beneath the surface will enable you to set yourself up for a successful and happy future.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Bloomberg
17 minutes ago
- Bloomberg
Stocks Hit Highest Since February on Jobs Surprise
Bloomberg Television brings you the latest news and analysis leading up to the final minutes and seconds before and after the closing bell on Wall Street. Today's guests are Bloomberg Television brings you the latest news and analysis leading up to the final minutes and seconds before and after the closing bell on Wall Street. Today's guests are Katie Nixon, Northern Trust, Betsey Stevenson, University of Michigan, Dan Dolev, Mizuho, Rashad Bilal & Troy Millings, Earn Your Leisure, Matthew Griffin, Bloomberg News, Barry Bannister, Stifel, Jess Menton, Bloomberg News, Ed Ludlow, Bloomberg News, Stacy Rasgon, Bernstein Research, Frances Katzen, Douglas Elliman, Brett Winton, Ark Invest, Tony Zaccario, Stretch Zone, Nicole Camarre, 43North. (Source: Bloomberg)


Washington Post
20 minutes ago
- Washington Post
Federal judge approves $2.8B settlement, paving way for US colleges to pay athletes millions
A federal judge signed off on arguably the biggest change in the history of college sports on Friday, clearing the way for schools to begin paying their athletes millions of dollars as soon as next month as the multibillion-dollar industry shreds the last vestiges of the amateur model that defined it for more than a century.


New York Times
27 minutes ago
- New York Times
Historic House v. NCAA settlement gets final approval, allowing schools to pay college athletes
By Ralph D. Russo, Stewart Mandel and Justin Williams A federal judge Friday granted final approval of the House v. NCAA settlement, a watershed agreement in college sports that permits schools to directly pay college athletes for the first time. The settlement, which resolves a trio of antitrust cases against the NCAA and its most powerful conferences, establishes a new 10-year revenue sharing model in college sports, with athletic departments able to distribute roughly $20.5 million in name, image and likeness (NIL) revenue to athletes over the 2025-26 season. Previously, athletes could earn NIL compensation only with outside parties, including school-affiliated donor collectives that have become instrumental in teams' recruiting. Advertisement The NCAA and the power conferences (ACC, Big 12, Big Ten, Pac-12 and SEC), as defendants in the settlement, also agree to pay nearly $2.8 billion in damages to Division I athletes who were not allowed to sign NIL deals, dating back to 2016. The damages will be paid out over 10 years, with most of the money expected to go to former power-conference football and men's basketball players. Universities can begin directly sharing revenue with college athletes starting July 1. Judge Claudia Wilken of the Northern District of California, who previously ruled against the NCAA in the O'Bannon and Alston cases, granted approval roughly a year after parties agreed to settlement terms and nearly two months after a final approval hearing on April 7, where Wilken heard testimony from more than a dozen objectors. Lawyers for both the plaintiffs and defendants noted that the number of objections and opt-outs in the settlement represent a tiny fraction of the nearly 400,000 athletes in the certified class. However, some of those objectors delayed approval, largely citing the settlement's new roster limits. These limits, which replace sport-by-sport scholarship limits, cap the maximum roster size per team while allowing for every roster spot to receive a scholarship. Schools can offer scholarship funds — partial or full — as they see fit, which creates more potential opportunities. But as schools preemptively prepared to comply with those new limits, they removed roster spots for thousands of walk-ons, particularly in football, and partial scholarship athletes in non-revenue sports. In late April, Wilken offered an ultimatum, instructing the settlement parties to revise the terms in a way that mitigated any lost roster spots as a result of schools preparing for the new roster limits, or she would deny the whole agreement. Settlement lawyers responded with an amendment that allows for voluntary 'grandfathering' of any athletes who lost roster spots as a result of the roster limits, a status that will follow those athletes through the remainder of their eligibility, whether they return to their original school or transfer elsewhere. Advertisement The initial House v. NCAA case — brought by plaintiffs Grant House, a former Arizona State swimmer, and Sedona Prince, then an Oregon women's basketball player — was filed in June 2020. It challenged NCAA policy at the time that prohibited athletes from being compensated for the commercial use of their NIL rights or from sharing in the revenue generated from NCAA and conference television contracts. The case was later consolidated with two similar suits, Carter v. NCAA and Hubbard v. NCAA. The cases had not gone to trial. The NCAA and Power 5 conferences, fearful a verdict might result in much higher damages, agreed to a settlement in May 2024. Wilken granted preliminary approval in October 2024. The NCAA's traditional amateurism model, in which athletes could not receive any compensation beyond a scholarship, began to crumble in 2014 when Wilken ruled against the NCAA in a suit brought by former UCLA star Ed O'Bannon, who objected to his image being used in an EA Sports video game without his permission. Wilken ruled for the plaintiffs, but after an appeals court struck part of her decision, the only tangible effect was that schools began offering cost-of-attendance stipends. The next major case, Alston v. NCAA, made it to the Supreme Court, where the justices ruled 9-0 against the NCAA. Often mischaracterized as a case about NIL, Alston's main impact was that it allowed schools to provide athletes $5,980 a year in academic expenses. However, the lopsided decision left the NCAA vulnerable to additional legal challenges regarding rules that limited compensation, and it was delivered on June 21, 2021, nine days before numerous state laws allowing NIL payments were set to go into effect. The NCAA quickly scrapped most of its intended restrictions on NIL. In the years since, many athletes have entered into deals with local companies and struck lucrative endorsement deals with national brands like Gatorade and New Balance, as intended. But a far more common practice involves boosters using purported NIL deals to lure recruits or players from the transfer portal to their favorite school. The NCAA's enforcement division initially sought to punish schools that used NIL as a form of 'pay for play' or recruiting inducement, but when the University of Tennessee came under fire in early 2024, the state's attorney general sued, and a judge issued an injunction prohibiting the NCAA from enforcing those rules. Advertisement The amount of money being spent in the NIL arena has skyrocketed since 2021. Last year, Ohio State athletic director Ross Bjork said the Buckeyes football team — which later won the national championship — was earning $20 million in NIL. CBS Sports recently reported that a number of men's basketball rosters have already topped $10 million for next season. To this point, collectives supporting specific schools have ruled the market, but administrators are hoping the House settlement will curtail that influence. In addition to schools being allowed to make NIL deals themselves, the new model also requires all outside NIL deals of more than $600 to go through a clearinghouse that will determine whether the payments are for a valid business purpose and reflect fair market value. Meanwhile, the settlement establishes an enforcement arm that will penalize schools that go over the $20.5 million cap. All of this will be overseen by the newly established regulatory body, called the College Sports Commission, which is in the process of shifting considerable oversight and control of college sports away from the NCAA and to the power conferences. The NCAA's Division I Board of Directors recently approved a series of proposals, pending settlement approval, that will strike 153 rules from the association's handbook and clear the way for the settlement terms to be implemented. The settlement represents a significant shift in college sports, but it will not mark the end of the NCAA's legal challenges. Among numerous ongoing cases, Johnson v. NCAA was filed in 2019 in Pennsylvania and seeks to have athletes classified as employees who are entitled to minimum wage compensation. The NCAA's efforts to dismiss the case have thus far been denied. Revenue sharing and third-party NIL constraints could also invite additional lawsuits on the basis of Title IX, antitrust violations and conflicts with state laws. NCAA and power conference stakeholders continue to pursue antitrust exemptions in the form of Congressional intervention, in hopes of codifying the settlement and its effectiveness moving forward. President Donald Trump has explored a new commission focused on the issues facing college sports, led by former Alabama head coach Nick Saban and billionaire Texas Tech board chair Cody Campbell, though it is paused as members of Congress pursue legislation.