logo
Why Trump's Fed nominee may get the cold shoulder at the central bank

Why Trump's Fed nominee may get the cold shoulder at the central bank

CNN21 hours ago
In MAGA world, Stephen Miran, the White House economist President Donald Trump nominated last week to the Federal Reserve's top ranks, is a force to be reckoned with.
Miran has been a key voice in support of Trump's sweeping economic agenda, with the president praising him as 'distinguished' and 'unmatched.'
But what it takes to get nominated to the Fed is different from what it takes to succeed at the central bank.
Miran was nominated in place of Adriana Kugler, who resigned from the Fed with six months left in her term. That means Miran would serve on the Fed's Board of Governors only until January 31, should he be confirmed by the Senate. His unconventional views of the economy will be on full display during his confirmation hearing before the Senate Banking Committee — the same views that would put him out of step with the rest of the board.
Unlike most mainstream economists, including those at the Fed, Miran believes that Trump's widespread tariffs on US trading partners won't stoke inflation — a view that suggests the Fed should have already cut interest rates this year, as Trump has loudly demanded for months.
He's doubled down on that position as recently as Tuesday.
'There's just still continues to be no evidence whatsoever of any tariff-induced inflation,' Miran told CNBC. 'I think lots of folks who are expecting that, who are predicting doom and gloom, it just hasn't panned out, and it continues to not pan out for them.'
Miran also co-authored a paper last year that argued against the Fed's independence, though he's struck a different tone in recent comments. It's unclear if he'll be as unequivocal about honoring the Fed's independence as Chair Jerome Powell and other Fed members typically are.
'The Fed is a consensus-driven body, so someone has to be persuasive in making sure everyone is on the same page,' said Ed Mills, Washington policy analyst at investment firm Raymond James. 'But Miran is aligned with the president's views, not Jerome Powell's.'
Miran aligns closely with Trump's unorthodox vision for the US economy, centered on an overhaul in trade policy. He's one of its architects, after all.
In a November 2024 paper, Miran argued that a steep decline in the US dollar's value and a tariff-centric approach could reshape the global economy in favor of the United States.
Since the beginning of the year, the Trump administration has haphazardly rewritten US trade policy, with sweeping levies as high as 50% that went into effect just last week. Fed officials have warned those import levies could push up inflation, but Miran continues to say the doubters are all wrong.
Consumer prices in July rose 2.7% from a year earlier, according to the latest Consumer Price Index data, released on Tuesday — a continuation of relatively tame inflation readings so far this year. Economists polled by data firm FactSet expected to see an annual gain of 2.8% in July.
With signs that the labor market is sputtering, the Fed could be on track to cut interest rates as soon as next month anyway. But if central bankers have to stop cutting because inflation rises, Miran's long-held view that any impact of tariffs on inflation is fleeting would be out of line with the board again. And he could find himself getting the cold shoulder.
'The latest data have revealed some more weakness in the economy, but there are still quite a few Fed governors who are worried about inflation,' said Daniel Altman, an economist and writer of the High Yield Economics newsletter.
And in his Manhattan Institute paper last year, Miran called the Fed's independence an outdated idea and argued Fed officials should be subject to at-will dismissal from the president — more in line with Trump's views that presidents should get a say on interest rates than with Powell's view of a politics-free Fed. But he softened that stance on Tuesday.
'I've always been clear that independence of the Fed is of paramount importance,' he said in his CNBC interview.
No current Fed official holds tariffs with the same high regard as Miran.
They have all said Trump's tariffs could push up inflation to some extent. Even the two Trump appointees who dissented with the Fed's decision last month to hold rates steady — Fed Governor Christopher Waller and Fed Vice Chair for Supervision Michelle Bowman — have argued that tariffs could have at least a limited effect on prices.
'Tariffs are one-off increases in the price level and do not cause inflation beyond a temporary increase,' Waller said in a statement explaining why he dissented at the July policy meeting.
Miran, however, goes much further.
In an interview with CNBC last month, Miran said it is 'rare' for tariffs to boost inflation, comparing such instances to 'pandemics or meteors or whatever.'
If Miran becomes a Fed governor, he'll have the chance to lay out his economic views, including on tariffs, and recommend to his colleagues what the Fed should decide on interest rates.
The Fed's rate-setting committee consists of 12 voting members, each of whom have only one vote. That means being able to build a consensus — usually the responsibility of the chair — is crucial if Miran wants to bend the Fed to Trump's will.
Still, Miran in some ways remains a conventional Fed candidate.
'We don't know exactly how Miran is going to vote, but he's still a traditional nomination. He's the head of the Council of Economic Advisers after all,' Mills said.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Gold Holds Gain After Bessent Urges Fed to Slash Interest Rates
Gold Holds Gain After Bessent Urges Fed to Slash Interest Rates

Yahoo

time6 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Gold Holds Gain After Bessent Urges Fed to Slash Interest Rates

(Bloomberg) -- Gold held a small gain after traders increased bets the Federal Reserve will cut interest rates next month, following pressure from US Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent. Bullion rose as much as 0.6% on Thursday before paring gains to trade near $3,365 an ounce. Prices saw a modest increase in the previous session, supported by a fall in Treasury yields after Bessent suggested the Fed's benchmark rate ought to be at least 1.5 percentage points lower than it is now. Lower borrowing costs and declining yields tend to support gold, as it pays no interest. The US-Canadian Road Safety Gap Is Getting Wider Sunseeking Germans Face Swiss Backlash Over Alpine Holiday Congestion To Head Off Severe Storm Surges, Nova Scotia Invests in 'Living Shorelines' Five Years After Black Lives Matter, Brussels' Colonial Statues Remain For Homeless Cyclists, Bikes Bring an Escape From the Streets The increased bets on monetary easing mark a shift from last month, when markets at one point saw less than a 50% chance of a September rate cut. The consensus is now for a quarter-point move next month, with some betting on a larger reduction. Gold has climbed 28% this year, with the bulk of those gains occurring in the first four months. It has been supported by heightened geopolitical and trade tensions that have spurred haven demand, while central bank purchases have also underpinned its strength. Spot gold was up 0.2% to $3,363.35 an ounce at 8:14 a.m. in London, after rising 0.2% in the previous session. The Bloomberg Dollar Spot Index was steady. Silver and platinum were little changed, while palladium edged higher. The market is still seeking official clarification over whether US imports of gold bars would be subject to tariffs, after days of confusion that prompted a spike in the premium for gold futures in New York over the spot price in London. President Donald Trump said on Monday that there would not be a levy — causing the two markets to converge — but he didn't elaborate. Americans Are Getting Priced Out of Homeownership at Record Rates Dubai's Housing Boom Is Stoking Fears of Another Crash Why It's Actually a Good Time to Buy a House, According to a Zillow Economist Bessent on Tariffs, Deficits and Embracing Trump's Economic Plan The Electric Pickup Truck Boom Turned Into a Big Bust ©2025 Bloomberg L.P.

‘Jeffrey Epstein is dead. Ghislaine Maxwell is not': Sex trafficker fights DOJ move to unseal grand jury records
‘Jeffrey Epstein is dead. Ghislaine Maxwell is not': Sex trafficker fights DOJ move to unseal grand jury records

Yahoo

time12 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

‘Jeffrey Epstein is dead. Ghislaine Maxwell is not': Sex trafficker fights DOJ move to unseal grand jury records

Ghislaine Maxwell, the former girlfriend of Jeffrey Epstein who after his death was convicted of sex trafficking girls and young women as his accomplice, is opposing the government's requests to unseal the grand jury transcripts in her criminal case. The Trump administration has been firefighting the fallout from the so-called 'Epstein Files' since the DOJ released a memo last month that contained little new information and concluded no further investigation was warranted into the late sex offender's alleged sex trafficking scheme. Since the uproar, which has included Republican lawmakers and many from his MAGA base, President Donald Trump asked Attorney General Pam Bondi to make public 'any and all pertinent' grand jury transcripts in the Epstein and Maxwell criminal cases. Experts say these documents only account for a small fraction of the files related to the investigations. The grand jury transcripts are sealed, and Maxwell's attorneys say she wants to keep them that way as she continues to make appeals to the Trump administration to toss or lessen her prison sentence. The 63-year-old is serving 20 years after being convicted in 2021 of sex trafficking and other counts for her role in the scheme to sexually exploit and abuse teenage girls and young women with Epstein. Her attorneys have taken an appeal of her conviction to the Supreme Court. 'Jeffrey Epstein is dead. Ghislaine Maxwell is not,' Maxwell's attorneys wrote in a Tuesday filing. The public interest in the Epstein case 'cannot justify a broad intrusion into grand jury secrecy in a case where the defendant is alive, her legal options are viable, and her due process rights remain.' The Supreme Court will consider whether to take up her appeal in September. If the judge allowed the transcripts to be unsealed before then, her lawyers argued, the documents could impact any future litigation. Releasing the raw transcripts would 'inevitably influence any future legal proceeding' and cause 'severe and irrevocable' reputational harm, her attorneys said. Maxwell has never been allowed to review the documents. Her lawyers asked the court to deny the government's motion to unseal the transcripts. The judges overseeing the cases previously asked the government to address legal questions before they can consider releasing them. On Monday, the DOJ gave the judges annotated versions of the transcripts, identifying what information is not publicly available. However in an attached memo, Bondi admitted that 'much' of the information in the transcripts is already in the public domain. 'The enclosed, annotated transcripts show that much of the information provided during the course of the grand jury testimony—with the exception of the identities of certain victims and witnesses—was made publicly available at trial or has otherwise been publicly reported through the public statements of victims and witnesses,' Bondi wrote. The attorney general also noted that the government has provided notice about its requests to unseal transcripts to all but one of the victims referenced in the documents. 'The Government still has been unable to contact that remaining victim,' she wrote. After meeting with the DOJ last week, Maxwell was moved from a federal prison in Tallahassee, Florida to the Federal Prison Camp Bryan in southeast Texas. The Florida prison was classified as a minimum security prison, where she was detained in an 'honor dorm' for the best-behaved inmates, and activities included yoga and pilates. The Texas prison mainly houses those convicted of 'white-collar' crimes and minor offenses and boasts a sports field, gym, arts and crafts activities, and a theater program. Earlier this week, two of Epstein's victims criticized the Trump administration's handling of the case. The victims remained anonymous and filed their letters in the New York case related to the late pedophile. 'The latest attention on the 'Epstein Files', the 'Client List' is OUT OF CONTROL and the ones that are left to suffer are not the high-profile individuals, IT IS THE VICTIMS. Why the lack of concern in handling such sensitive information for the victims sake?' one wrote in a Monday filing. Another wrote: 'Dear United States, I wish you would have handled and would handle the whole 'Epstein Files' with more respect towards and for the victims. I am not some pawn in your political warfare.' Furor has mounted over the administration's handling of the case since the Justice Department released its July 6 Epstein memo. In it, the DOJ confirmed that Epstein died by suicide and said there was no evidence to support the existence of a 'client list' of high-profile individuals involved in his alleged sex trafficking. The memo put to an end months-long anticipation for new Epstein information. In February, Bondi had released 'Phase 1' of the files, a tranche of documents that included mostly publicly available information. She also suggested that the 'client list'was sitting on her desk. Parts of Trump's MAGA base and prominent lawmakers on both sides of the aisle have called for heightened transparency around the Epstein files. Those calls grew louder after the Wall Street Journal published a report last month claiming that the president drew a sexually suggestive 50th birthday card for Epstein in 2003. Trump has vehemently denied making the card and sued the Journal in a $10 billion defamation case. The Wall Street Journal also reported that DOJ officials told the president in May that his name, among many others, had appeared in the Epstein Files. Being named in the files does not suggest any wrongdoing. The president's name was reportedly redacted from documents as the administration prepared for their potential public release, Bloomberg reported last week. The Trump administration has declared itself the 'most transparent' in history.

Trump wants to mobilize troops in DC – it went horribly for him in Los Angeles
Trump wants to mobilize troops in DC – it went horribly for him in Los Angeles

Yahoo

time13 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Trump wants to mobilize troops in DC – it went horribly for him in Los Angeles

Trump made a much-teased announcement on Monday that he would invoke a never-before-used presidential authority to seize control of Washington, D.C.'s police department from local control to his Attorney General Pam Bondi. The president also announced he would deploy the National Guard on the streets of the nation's capital as a plan to 'rescue' the city from rampant crime, despite the fact that crime dropped in Washington by 35 percent last year after it spiked during the Covid-19 pandemic. Trump had teased a federal takeover of Washington and has decried homelessness and graffiti in the city. Republicans have encroached on Washington, D.C's home rule for decades. The fact it is a majority Black city with a Black political establishment has also made it easy to attack the same way Trump has attacked Baltimore and other cities run by Black mayors. Of course, this is not the first time that Trump has taken control of a major American city. Earlier this year, after protests against raids by Immigration and Customs Enforcement, Trump deployed the National Guard and Marines to Los Angeles without the consent of the governor of California or the city's mayor. Trump may be hoping his actions will boost his approval ratings, which have been sagging in recent months. But a simple look at the numbers shows that it might backfire precipitously. First, let's get to the kernel of truth in Trump's idea. Voters in Democratic cities did vote against their leaders partially because of crime. New York City elected Eric Adams, a former police officer, as mayor in 2021. Voters in San Francisco kicked out mayor London Breed and voters in Los Angeles and Alameda beat back progressive prosecutors for lax policies toward crime. While almost no Democratic presidential candidate has supported defunding the police it became a tagline for Republicans use to hit at Democrats. That being said, it's fairly clear that Trump's approval ratings took a hit after he dispatched troops and the National Guard to Los Angeles. When Trump first came into office this year, and even after he began his tariff regime, Americans continued to support him on immigration. In February, according to an Economist/YouGov poll, he still cracked 50 percent approval on immigration. That number began to dip in April, after Trump sent Kilmar Abrego Garcia, the immigrant based in Maryland, to El Salvador. In April, Trump's approval number on immigration went to 45 percent. But by May, the same poll showed his approval on immigration started to rebound to 48 percent. That would go 'poof' in June once Trump began to send troops to Los Angeles. By the middle of June, a plurality of Americans thought that his response to the anti-ICE protests was too aggressive and 52 percent disapproved of his policies on immigration. By the end of June, 50 percent of Americans opposed Trump's policies on immigration. and his number has stubbornly stayed there. Not only that, as The Independent reported last month, polling from CBS News and CNN bore that out as well. The CNN poll also found that 59 percent of Americans opposed the deployment of National Guard troops without the consent of the governor and 55 percent of respondents said protesters were justified. While much of the attention when it comes to Trump's approval tends to focus on Jeffrey Epstein, it's clear that his approval began to collapse long before that scandal, when he began to deploy troops into the second-largest city in the United States. Trump may be trying to bait protesters by having troops roving throughout Washington in hopes that it will create the type of unrest that happened in 2020 and in Los Angeles. But the numbers show he might come to regret that. Voters may not like disorder and crime but they dislike overzealous responses from the government even more. Solve the daily Crossword

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store