
Locals allege police inaction despite raising suspicions in fake call centre scam case
Visakhapatnam: A five-storey building in Bhogapuram's Atchutapuram area had been raising suspicions among locals for two years. The building's perpetually closed gates and lack of essential services had sparked curiosity, with residents noticing occupants with Chinese features.
However, it wasn't until the police stormed the building at midnight that the true nature of the operation was revealed.
The police apprehended several youths who attempted to escape by scaling walls, and it was discovered that the building was being used as a fake call centre. Local residents had previously reported suspicious activities to the police, but it seemed that no action was taken.
The building, which consisted of 40 flats, had been leased by the builder on behalf of the owners.
Numerous occupants appeared to be of Chinese origin, and the building stood isolated, with only two three-storey houses situated 30 metres away.
Residents shared their observations, stating that young people, including women, were seen smoking inside the building. The cellar, which was initially accessible, was later converted into rooms and sealed. A recent construction of a 40-seat canteen in the cellar had also been noticed.
by Taboola
by Taboola
Sponsored Links
Sponsored Links
Promoted Links
Promoted Links
You May Like
[Click Here] - 2025 Top Trending Search - Local network access
Esseps
Learn More
Undo
Locals alleged that the organisers had likely bribed officials, allowing the operation to go unchecked for two years. "Over 200 youth worked there without police investigation, despite local reports," alleged Bhogapuram residents.
The families of the detained youths are now seeking answers. Sudha, the mother of 23-year-old Arihant alias Aryan from Rajasthan's Churu area, rushed to Bhogapuram after witnessing a uniformed officer during her son's video call.
She claimed that her son was involved in what locals identified as a fraudulent operation.
Monica from Gujarat's Gandhinagar told TOI about her husband Vishal's ordeal, stating that he was detained despite having no connection to the centre. "We were here on holiday when my husband's friend offered accommodation in the employees' residential complex. Police detained him and seized my phone. I'm stranded here, unable to communicate in the local language."
The police are now investigating the matter, and the true extent of the operation is being uncovered.
Investigation reveals structured hierarchy
The police investigation revealed a structured hierarchy within the fraudulent call centre operation. The organisation comprised various roles including dialers, bankers, closures, managers, and administrative staff, with monthly salaries ranging from Rs 20,000 to Rs 70,000.
The operation began with dialers, predominantly from northeastern states, making VOIP calls to American citizens. Using their American-style English accent, they posed as e-commerce fraud alert staff, warning victims about suspicious parcels in their name that could lead to legal complications. Following a prepared script, they would then transfer concerned victims to bankers.
These bankers, pretending to be US bank or FTC officials, collected sensitive personal and financial details from victims.
After evaluating the victim's state of mind, the banker would forward the call to closures.
The closures, armed with gathered information, would persuade victims about their predicament and convince them to purchase gift cards and share the redemption codes. These closure agents handled multiple victims daily, generating monthly fraudulent earnings in crores.
The managers handled the final stage, converting gift cards into money through online platforms, cryptocurrency, and dark web exchanges. The operation's HR team recruited staff primarily from Assam, Nagaland, Meghalaya, and Gujarat, providing two weeks of training in call scripts and impersonation methods.
The monthly salary structure allocated Rs 20,000 for dialers, Rs 35,000 to Rs 40,000 for bankers, Rs 50,000 for closures, and Rs 75,000 for managers.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Hans India
28 minutes ago
- Hans India
11 Dead, 20 Injured in Bengaluru Stadium Stampede During RCB Victory Celebrations
Bengaluru: A tragic stampede outside Bengaluru's M. Chinnaswamy Stadium claimed the lives of at least 11 people and left over 20 injured on Wednesday as thousands of Royal Challengers Bengaluru (RCB) fans gathered to celebrate the team's maiden IPL title. According to initial reports, chaos erupted when the stadium crew kept the outer gates shut despite mounting crowds outside. The gates were reportedly opened at the last moment, triggering a surge as over 600 fans rushed into the outer precincts. The resulting panic led to a stampede in which six men and four women lost their lives. The crowd had begun assembling since early morning, hoping to catch a glimpse of the winning team arriving with the IPL trophy. Roads around the stadium and key areas in the Central Business District were blocked as fans converged from across the city, many arriving by metro and on foot. The RCB team was earlier felicitated by Chief Minister Siddaramaiah and Deputy CM D.K. Shivakumar at Vidhana Soudha. The team was scheduled to make an appearance at the stadium later in the day. According to state BJP president B Y Vijayendra, this was a failure of the government, 'we had told the government not to hold such a large event without proper planning. But the government was adamant on holding it on Wednesday just a day after the RCB team won the championship." According to a report, there were only 100 policemen in an area where over 50,000 people had gathered, and police force was outnumbered drastically. The road from Raj Bhavan, Ambedkar Veedhi, Queens Road, MG Road, GPO, Cubbon Park KR circle, The approach to Anil Kumble circle from Kasturba road, Kamraj road, St Marks road, cubbon road were completely blocked with RCB fans. According to an estimation, over 2 lakh- 3 lakh people had tried to reach the Chinnaswamy injured in the stampede were rushed to Bowring Hospital, including several minors and elderly fans. Authorities are probing the incident, and questions are being raised about crowd management and security preparedness. Addressing a press conference Chief minister S Siddramiah has announced a compensation of Rs. 10 each to all the persons who have died and free treatment to people who have injured at Bowring hospital as well as the private faciliteis. He said thankfully nobody among the injured are critical. 'We are shocked that this incident has happened at a time when the city must be celebrating, but the crowd participation was too much in number while the Chinnaswamy stadium had space limited to 35,000 people. I have also ordered an inquiry headed by a magistrate level official into the incident. We will bring those people responsible for this tragedy to the book. The CM explaining the conditions that prevailed at the Chinnaswamy stadium said 'The gates were smaller and old and the facility could not handle 2-3 lakh people surging at it was totally unexpected. I have ordered the Bengaluru Urban Deputy commissioner to give a report to him followed by the magisterial enquiry in next fifteen days' The CM squarely blamed the Karnataka State Cricket Association for wrongly assessing the gravity of the situation. 'The KSCA functionaries had requested to hold the event today (Wednesday) for their own reasons, even KSCA might not have foreseen such a crowd surge' The CM said. 'This was not a government event but we obliged the KSCA's request. We had acted only as a facilitator with security and other law support' he added.


United News of India
30 minutes ago
- United News of India
Maha: Three arrested in fake gold scam
West Mumbai, June 4 (UNI) Three people were arrested by BKC police station on Wednesday for their alleged involvement in a fake gold scam, where a man was duped of Rs two lakh. The accused allegedly created a bogus Instagram account offering imported gold at discounted rates and lured unsuspecting buyers with the promise of profitable deals, officials said here. The accused were arrested near CST Road in Kalina, Santacruz East, after police laid a trap based on specific inputs. A case was registered at BKC police station under Sections 318(4) and 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS). During the investigation, police used technical surveillance and local sources to track the suspects. Further investigation revealed that the suspects have cases of cheating registered against them in Maharashtra and Gujarat. UNI AAA SS


Time of India
32 minutes ago
- Time of India
HC junks Rahul's plea, says free speech doesn't extend to remarks against Army
Lucknow: Observing that freedom of speech and expression is subject to reasonable restrictions and it does not include freedom to make statements which are defamatory to any person or to the Indian Army, the Lucknow bench of the Allahabad high court on May 29 dismissed Congress MP Rahul Gandhi's plea challenging a lower court summon in a defamation case over alleged derogatory remarks about the Indian Army during his . Tired of too many ads? go ad free now The single-judge bench of Justice Subhash Vidyarthi observed that the material on record made a prima facie case against Gandhi for making defamatory statement against Indian Army and hence the summoning order of lower court could not be set aside, and he would have to stand on trial. The case stems from a complaint filed by Udai Shanker Srivastava, retired director of the Border Roads Organization (a position equivalent to a Colonel in the Indian Army), in which he alleged that on Dec 16, 2022, during his 'Bharat Jodo Yatra' in Lucknow, Gandhi made disparaging comments about a face-off between the Indian and Chinese armies in Arunachal Pradesh on Dec 9, 2022. According to the complaint, Gandhi had said, "People will ask about Bharat Jodo Yatra, here and there, Ashok Gahlot and Sachin Pilot and whatnot. But they will not ask a single question about China capturing 2000 sq kms of Indian territory, killing 20 Indian soldiers and thrashing our soldiers in Arunachal Pradesh. But the Indian press doesn't ask a question to them about this. Isn't it true? The nation is watching all this. Don't pretend that people don't know." Srivastava contended that Gandhi's statement was "false and baseless" and made with "evil intention of demoralizing the Indian Army and to damage the faith of the Indian population in the Indian Army". He highlighted that the official statement from the Indian Army on Dec 12, 2022, confirmed that "PLA troops contacted the LAC in Tawang Sector which was contested by our troops in a firm and resolute manner. Tired of too many ads? go ad free now This faceoff led to minor injuries to a few personnel from both sides." The complainant said that Gandhi's "baseless and derogatory statement" deeply hurt him and other nationalists. The additional chief judicial magistrate, court no. 27, Lucknow, had on Feb 11, 2025, summoned Gandhi to face trial for the offence under Section 500 (defamation) of the Indian Penal Code. The lower court observed that prima facie, Gandhi's statement appeared to demoralize the Indian Army and its personnel and was not made in the performance of his official duties. Gandhi's counsel, Pranshu Agarwal, argued that the complaint was politically motivated and lacked merit. He contended that the complainant was not an "aggrieved person" under Section 199 of the Criminal Procedure Code, as the alleged defamation was against the Indian Army as an institution, not Srivastava directly. However, Justice Subhash Vidyarthi, rejected these arguments in his ruling and observed: "No doubt, Article 19(1)(a) of the Constitution of India guarantees freedom of speech and expression, this freedom is subject to reasonable restrictions, and it does not include the freedom to make statements which are defamatory to any person or defamatory to the Indian Army." The court clarified that the complainant as an "aggrieved person" could file the complaint under Section 199 of CrPC. While dismissing Gandhi's plea challenging the lower court summons, Justice Vidyarthi also noted that the trial court's decision to summon Gandhi was based on a "judicious application of mind" after considering the complaint and witness statements, and was not mechanical.