
3.2 million people get boosted Social Security: Who qualifies for retroactive payments?
(NEXSTAR) – A law signed by former President Joe Biden in January is starting to show its impact, as millions of people begin to receive bigger Social Security payments plus back pay.
The change comes after the bipartisan Social Security Fairness Act was passed and signed into law in the final weeks of Biden's term as president. The law rescinds measures that limited Social Security benefits for recipients if they got retirement payments from other sources, including public retirement programs from a state or local government.
What does it take to be middle class in 2025? New study explains
As a result, about 3.2 million people who worked as police officers, firefighters, teachers and in other public service roles will now get larger Social Security payments. Because the change is effective dating back to January 2024, eligible recipients also get retroactively paid for the extra money they were missing out on for about the past year. The back-paid amount is expected to come in one lump-sum payout.
Who qualifies for the bigger payments?
The people impacted include some teachers, officers, firefighters, federal workers who were covered by the Civil Service Retirement System, and people who were covered by another country's social security system, the Social Security Administration says.
That doesn't mean every former teacher or cop will suddenly get more money, however.
'Most state and local public employees – about 72 percent – work in Social Security-covered employment where they pay Social Security taxes and are not affected by WEP or GPO,' the Administration explains, referring to the Windfall Elimination Provision and Government Pension Offset (the two measures recently repealed). 'Those individuals will not receive a benefit increase due to the new law.'
Anyone who qualifies under the change will receive a notice in the mail explaining the new benefits, but some may receive the extra money before they receive a letter.
'Most people will receive their retroactive payment two to three weeks before they receive their notice in the mail, because the President understands how important it is to pay people what they are due right away,' the Administration says.
When do the increased payouts begin? When will the retroactive payment go out?
The one time retroactive payments started going out on Feb. 24, and will hit most people's bank accounts by the end of March, the Administration says. The process is largely automated, but some more complex cases will need individual review, and those payments could come later.
The new, increased monthly payments will start in April.
How much bigger are the new payments?
It depends on the person, but there's a pretty big range of possible outcomes. The Social Security Administration says some may see their monthly benefits increase 'very little' while others could get $1,000 more.
The Congressional Budget Office estimated in September that eliminating the Windfall Elimination Provision would boost monthly payments to the affected beneficiaries by an average of $360 by December 2025.
Ending the Government Pension Offset would increase monthly benefits in December 2025 by an average of $700 for 380,000 recipients getting benefits based on living spouses, according to the CBO. The increase would be an average of $1,190 for 390,000 or surviving spouses getting a widow or widower benefit.
What should you do if you believe you qualify for increased payments, but don't see any change?
The Social Security Administration asks people wait until after they receive their April monthly benefit before asking questions about the retroactive payment or the increased benefit amount. Frequently asked questions may be answered on the Social Security Fairness Act site.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Newsweek
an hour ago
- Newsweek
Donald Trump's No Tax On Tips Crusade Could Backfire
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Ending federal income taxes on tips, one of President Donald Trump's signature campaign pledges in the 2024 election, could potentially backfire as Americans grow weary of tipping, experts have told Newsweek. No tax on tips was something the president said he would enact "first thing" if he won the November election. The idea, launched in the service industry behemoth that is Las Vegas, quickly took hold with the electorate, so much so that his Democratic opponent Kamala Harris was quick to pledge the same relief for tipped workers should she win the White House race. Fast forward 5 months into the second Trump administration, the pledge hasn't yet been enacted, but the idea is certainly beginning to take shape. As part of the One Big Beautiful Bill Act, Republicans have proposed a new tax deduction on tipped income up to $160,000 while keeping payroll taxes that are used to pay for Social Security and Medicare. Other legislative efforts have also been made. Texas Senator Ted Cruz, along with a bipartisan group of co-sponsors, introduced the No Tax on Tips Act to Congress in January, which would establish a new tax deduction of up to $25,000 for tips, subject to certain restrictions. "Whether it passes free-standing or as part of the bigger bill, one way or another, 'No Tax on Tips' is going to become law and give real relief to hardworking Americans," Cruz said on the Senate floor. The bill passed the chamber in May with support from both parties. Lawmakers are clearly keen on the idea, and the proposal is certainly popular with the American public, too. Polling conducted exclusively for Newsweek by Redfield & Wilton Strategies back in July 2024 showed that 67 percent of Americans do not believe tips given to service workers should be taxed. But the proposal, if enacted, could have some unintended consequences, business experts have told Newsweek. Tipping Culture Fatigue Javier Palomarez, founder and CEO of the United States Hispanic Business Council, told Newsweek the policy could "reinforce tipping in the short term but erode it over time," pointing to a growing phenomenon of tipping fatigue—a weariness among consumers increasingly asked to tip in situations where it wasn't previously expected. A BankRate survey conducted between April and May this year found that 41 percent of Americans believe tipping is "out of control" and that businesses should better compensate their employees instead of relying on gratuities to provide a wage. Thirty-eight percent reported being annoyed with pre-entered tip screens, which are usually used in automated checkouts, particularly in cafes or fast food restaurants. Still, the generosity of many Americans could pull through, at least for a short while. "By framing tips as a tax-free bonus, the policy may temporarily boost the perceived generosity and importance of tipping, encouraging consumers to view it as a more impactful way to support service workers," Palomarez said. Composite image created by Newsweek. Composite image created by Newsweek. Photo-illustration by Newsweek/Getty/Canva But it's unlikely to be straightforward. "Cultural norms around tipping are sticky," he said. "By signaling that tipped workers deserve special tax treatment, the policy may further divide and complicate service industry compensation norms—bolstering tips in some sectors like restaurants while emphasizing reform calls in others like delivery services or app-based platforms. Over time, this could lead to service charges or higher base pay as consumers question tipping." Speaking to Newsweek, Mark Luscombe, principal analyst for Wolters Kluwer's Tax and Accounting Division North America, warned that "the perception that tipped employees have a tax advantage may discourage tipping or at least the same amount of tipping by customers who are fully taxed on their incomes." Pay Boost for Workers While tipping fatigue is certainly on the rise, the pay boost for workers in the service industry is tangible. The Urban-Brookings Tax Policy Center has estimated that middle-income households could pocket an extra $1,800 per year under the plan. Joseph Camberato, CEO at emphasized that the policy is not necessarily designed to address tipping culture—for all its pros and cons—at large. "We've all seen those 'tip' prompts at self-checkout machines for things you grabbed off a shelf yourself," Camberato told Newsweek. "This policy doesn't fix that, and honestly, it's not meant to. It's for the 1.8 million restaurant servers who rely on tips to pay their bills. For them, not getting taxed on that income is a big deal. This policy targets the right group and gives them a meaningful raise, basically overnight." He added, "If anything, it's going to help the people who deserve tips the most like servers, bartenders, hospitality workers, walk away with more money. Remember, they usually get taxed 15 to 20 percent on tips. Take that off the table, and it's like giving them a 15 to 20 percent raise. "If you're already a tipper, you're not suddenly going to stop because of this bill. But the person on the other side of the transaction is going to be walking away with more money, and that's the point."
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
This Little-Known Social Security Rule Could Boost Your Monthly Check Up to 26.7%, Even if You're Already Collecting Benefits
Many seniors feel the buying power of Social Security has declined over the years. If you want the maximum possible benefit you're eligible to receive, you need to delay claiming until age 70. Many who claimed earlier can still boost their benefits by taking advantage of this little-known rule. The $23,760 Social Security bonus most retirees completely overlook › The average retiree collecting Social Security receives about $2,000 per month from the government program. And while that number has gone up significantly over the last few years as a result of the annual cost-of-living adjustment, or COLA, many seniors feel their Social Security checks still don't go as far as they used to. The Senior Citizens League estimates someone who received Social Security back in 2010 now has 20% less buying power from their monthly benefits compared to 15 years ago. As such, it's natural for seniors to look for ways to get more out of Social Security. While there are several ways you could receive a bump in benefits, only a few of them are in your control. One of the easiest ways to increase your benefit takes advantage of a little-known rule that could boost your monthly check up to 26.7%. Here's what Social Security recipients need to know. Before we dive into how to increase your Social Security check, it's important to understand how the government calculates it. There are only three factors that go into determining the size of your benefit: How much you earned during your career When you were born When you claim benefits When you apply for Social Security, the government takes a look at your past earnings from every year of your career. It adjusts each years' earnings for inflation, indexed to the year you turned 60. Any earnings after age 60 don't get an inflation adjustment. It then selects the 35 highest years of adjusted earnings from your career and calculates the monthly average earnings from that sample. The resulting number gets plugged into the Social Security benefits formula to determine your primary insurance amount. Your primary insurance amount, or PIA, is the amount of Social Security you're eligible to receive if you apply for benefits the exact month you reach full retirement age. That age is determined by when you were born. If you were born between 1943 and 1954, you reached full retirement age at 66. The age increases by 2 months for each year you were born after 1954 until maxing out at age 67 for anyone born in 1960 or later. The last factor that determines your monthly benefit is when you decide to claim. If you claim Social Security before you reach full retirement age, you'll receive less than your PIA. If you wait, you'll see an increase in your monthly benefit up until age 70. To be precise, each month you delay Social Security beyond your full retirement age increases your monthly benefit by 2/3 of a percentage point of your PIA. So, someone born in 1958 with a full retirement age of 66 and 8 months could delay for 40 months for a 26.7% boost to their benefit. If you claimed your benefits early, there's good news. You can still get that boost of up to 26.7% on top of your current benefit. You just have to take advantage of this one rule. If you've already claimed Social Security, you can opt to suspend your benefits upon reaching full retirement age. If you've already reached the threshold age but remain younger than 70, you can suspend benefits starting next month. Doing so will allow you to start accruing credits that will increase your monthly benefit amount once you resume collecting it. Benefits will automatically resume starting at age 70 if you haven't restarted them already. Someone born in late 1958 still has time to apply to suspend benefits the month they reach full retirement age and increase their monthly check by the maximum 26.7%. Note, you'll still see the annual COLA adjustment while benefits are suspended, so the actual increase will be even greater. Of course, there are some significant drawbacks to this strategy. First and foremost, it means going without your monthly Social Security check for several years. If you aren't in a position where you can forego benefits today in exchange for a bigger benefit later, then it's probably not worth the financial maneuvering required to take advantage of the option. However, if you can do without, the guaranteed return from suspending benefits is very appealing. Second, if someone else is collecting benefits based on your earnings record, they'll no longer be eligible for those benefits. If your spouse is taking spousal benefits or your child is eligible through you, they'll see their benefits disappear or revert to any other smaller benefit they're eligible for. That could negatively impact your household income for the time being, but in many cases it's worth it in the long run. Lastly, if you're enrolled in Medicare Part B, the Social Security Administration automatically deducts your premiums from your monthly benefit. Be sure you can afford to pay those premiums out of pocket before you suspend Social Security. If you can manage those challenges, though, opting to suspend benefits could be worth it. You can request a suspension by phone, in writing, or in person at your local Social Security office. The suspension begins the month after your request is accepted. So, if you're fast approaching full retirement age, it's time to get things in order if you think suspending benefits and boosting your monthly payment is right for you. If you're like most Americans, you're a few years (or more) behind on your retirement savings. But a handful of little-known could help ensure a boost in your retirement income. One easy trick could pay you as much as $23,760 more... each year! Once you learn how to maximize your Social Security benefits, we think you could retire confidently with the peace of mind we're all after. Join Stock Advisor to learn more about these Motley Fool has a disclosure policy. This Little-Known Social Security Rule Could Boost Your Monthly Check Up to 26.7%, Even if You're Already Collecting Benefits was originally published by The Motley Fool
Yahoo
3 hours ago
- Yahoo
Former White House doctor: Biden physician should have tested for cognitive decline
A former doctor for the White House under the Obama administration said former President Biden should have been tested for cognitive decline in his final year in office, given his age. Jeffrey Kuhlman said performing such a test on Biden would have shed light on the former president's mental state and ability to serve another four years. 'Sometimes those closest to the tree miss the forest,' Kuhlman told The Washington Post. Biden's long-term doctor, Kevin O'Connor, didn't perform a cognitive test on the leader during his fourth year in office, as White House officials said formal results weren't needed to prove the former president's mental soundness. 'The president's doctor has said, if you look at what this president, who is also the commander-in-chief — he passes a cognitive test every day — every day, as he moves from one topic to another topic, understanding the granular level of these topics,' former White House press secretary Karine Jean-Pierre said during a February briefing last year. 'You saw him talk about fighting crime today. Tomorrow, he's going to go to the border. Next week, he's going to give a State of the Union Address,' she added. O'Connor was recently subpoenaed by the House Oversight Committee Chair James Comer (R-Ky.) to address why a cognitive test wasn't given. Biden traveled often while serving, including taking two international trips prior to his first presidential debate with President Trump. 'This is a very rigorous job. And the president has been able to do — do this job every day for the past three years,' Jean-Pierre previously told reporters from the podium. However, Kuhlman said the public deserved to have evidence that Biden was mentally sharp, arguing that health reports should include a total overview of a president's well-being. 'It shouldn't be just health, it should be fitness,' Kuhlman said. 'Fitness is: Do you have that robust mind, body, spirit that you can do this physically, mentally, emotionally demanding job?' Months after leaving office, Biden was diagnosed with prostate cancer amid reports alleging he suffered from mental decay while serving as commander-in-chief. 'Cancer touches us all. Like so many of you, Jill and I have learned that we are strongest in the broken places,' he wrote in a post on X. 'Thank you for lifting us up with love and support.' Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.