EU and Indonesia announce ‘political agreement' on trade deal
'We're living in turbulent times and when economic uncertainty meets geopolitical volatility, partners like us must come closer together. So today we're taking a big step forward in this partnership,' von der Leyen told journalists in Brussels.
'I am very pleased to report that we have just reached a political agreement on an ambitious Free Trade Agreement.'
The 27-nation European bloc and Southeast Asia's largest economy have been negotiating since 2016 to agree a deal that is expected to increase trade and investment.
A European Commission statement called Sunday's agreement a 'decisive milestone' toward striking the deal — which is to be concluded in September by EU trade chief Maros Sefcovic and Indonesia's chief economic minister Airlangga Hartarto.
'There's a lot of untapped potential in our trade relationship. And therefore this agreement comes at the right time, because the new agreement will open new markets,' von der Leyen said.
'It will create more opportunities in key industries, in business activity and agriculture, in automotive and in services.'
Brussels has stepped up efforts to improve ties with key potential partners around the world as Trump threatens a trade war with sweeping tariffs.
'This big and important political agreement on the free trade agreement with Indonesia is today a huge milestone forward, and shows that we're looking for new markets, open markets,' von der Leyen said.
Prabowo called the announcement in Brussels a 'breakthrough.'
'After 10 years of negotiations, we have concluded the agreement to have a Comprehensive Economic Partnership Agreement, which basically is a free trade agreement,' he said.
The president said 'we consider Europe still a very important factor, and we would like to see a very strong Europe.'
But he insisted that 'the United States will be always a very important leader in the world.'
The European Union is Indonesia's fifth-largest trading partner with bilateral trade between them reaching $30.1 billion last year.
Ties had been frayed by a proposed EU import ban on products linked to deforestation that has angered Indonesia because it is a major palm oil exporter.
That legislation has been delayed to the end of this year.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Asharq Al-Awsat
6 hours ago
- Asharq Al-Awsat
Deir al-Balah Ordered to Evacuate: Is Israel Carving a New Military Corridor?
Israeli forces have issued evacuation orders for parts of Deir al-Balah, a central Gaza area previously designated as a 'safe humanitarian zone.' Residents, many of whom had fled there under Israeli direction earlier in the war, were told to vacate the southwestern parts of the city amid claims of militant activity in the area. This marks the first Israeli military operation in Deir al-Balah since the war began, with officials citing efforts to 'intensify operations to dismantle enemy capabilities and terrorist infrastructure.' The Israeli army's directive included the evacuation of displaced persons living in makeshift tents. Leaflets were dropped and electronic notices distributed, requesting residents to head south toward Al-Mawasi, an already overcrowded strip. The region under evacuation lies between central Deir al-Balah and southern Khan Younis. It houses nearly 100,000 people, many displaced multiple times, and includes Gaza's largest EU-funded desalination plant, which has been out of service for months due to Israeli power cuts. If Israel advances on the ground here, it could mean the loss of another stretch of critical farmland, deepening the already catastrophic famine in the Strip. A New Military Corridor in the Making? Sources told Asharq Al-Awsat that Israel may be seeking to carve out a new military corridor, effectively separating Khan Younis from Gaza's central region. Similar divisions were previously enacted when Rafah was isolated from Khan Younis. Observers now anticipate the same pattern could unfold between Khan Younis and Deir al-Balah. Reports suggest Israeli troops might approach from northern Khan Younis to storm the southwestern flank of Deir al-Balah, thereby severing the area from the rest of the city. A comparable strategy was previously employed in the east-west split of Khan Younis through the so-called 'Magin Oz Axis.' Sources further warned that, blocking a ceasefire agreement, Israeli forces may attempt full control of the Netzarim Corridor, effectively dividing northern Gaza from the center. Currently, Israel controls the corridor's eastern flank but has left the western side, Al-Rashid Street, accessible since the last ceasefire ended on March 18. Such fragmentation of the Gaza Strip into isolated zones would grant Israel near-total operational control while pushing civilians into ever-smaller, overcrowded pockets, primarily along the coastline. From Israel's perspective, these military pressures are aimed at squeezing Hamas into more concessions in the ongoing indirect negotiations hosted by Qatar. Sunday saw one of the deadliest days in recent weeks. Over 70 Palestinians were killed in northern Gaza as they gathered near the Zikim military zone, hoping to receive flour from a rare delivery of eight trucks, allowed in for the first time in over a week. Witnesses say Israeli drone fire and artillery struck the crowd, leaving more than 150 injured, many of them children, teenagers, and women. The Gaza Health Ministry confirmed 73 deaths, 67 of them in the north, and warned that many injuries were critical. The tragedy came just a day after 30 others were killed in southern Gaza on Saturday. The incident brings the total number of civilians killed at or near aid distribution points - many of them backed by US humanitarian programs - to more than 1,000 since the end of May. Hamas described the attacks as 'escalation in the genocidal war,' accusing Israel of using food and aid as bait to target vulnerable civilians. 'What's happening in Gaza is a deliberate strategy of ethnic cleansing through hunger, thirst, and violence,' the group stated, urging immediate international intervention. The humanitarian crisis in Gaza continues to spiral. In recent days, at least seven children have died from malnutrition. The Health Ministry reported 18 famine-related deaths within just the past 24 hours.
Arab News
8 hours ago
- Arab News
Libya commander Haftar seeks to force international engagement
TUNIS: Libya's eastern authorities recently expelled a senior European delegation in a move analysts say was meant to send a message: the unrecognized administration backed by military leader Khalifa Haftar cannot be July 8, an EU commissioner and ministers from Greece, Italy and Malta were in Libya to discuss irregular migration from the North African visit was divided in two, as is Libya, which is still grappling with the aftermath of the armed conflict and political chaos that followed the 2011 NATO-backed uprising that toppled longtime dictator Muammar delegation first visited the capital Tripoli, seat of the internationally recognized Libyan government of Prime Minister Abdelhamid then traveled to Benghazi, in the east, where a rival administration backed by Haftar and his clan is based, and with whom the EU has generally avoided direct immediately, a reported disagreement prompted the eastern authorities to accuse the European delegation of a 'flagrant breach of diplomatic norms,' ordering the visiting dignitaries to Brussels, the European Commission admitted a 'protocol issue.'Tarek Megerisi, a senior policy fellow at the European Council on Foreign Relations think tank, said the scene at the airport 'was a calculated move.'Haftar was playing to EU fears of irregular migration in order 'to generate de facto European recognition,' and thus 'broaden relations with Europe away from just engagement with him as a local military leader.'Turning the delegation away showed that declining to engage with the eastern civilian administration was no longer an complex situation in Libya has required unusual governments recognize and work with the Tripoli-based government and not the eastern administration, but still hold contact with Haftar's military their visit earlier this month, the European commissioner and ministers were meant to meet with eastern military once at the Benghazi airport, they saw 'there were people there that we had not agreed to meet,' a European official in Brussels told journalists on condition of anonymity.'We had to fly back,' the official said, adding that 'of course' it was linked to recognition of the eastern Gazzini, a Libya expert at the International Crisis Group, said she did not believe 'it was a premeditated incident.'But 'the question does present itself as to why' ministers from the eastern government were at the airport in the first place, and why Haftar would let it play out the way it did, she said.'We can't completely rule out that there was some particular issue or bilateral disagreement with one of the countries represented in the delegation,' Gazzini expert Jalel Harchaoui suggested Greece may have been the July 6, two days before the axed visit, 'the Greek foreign minister had come to demand concessions on migration and maritime (issues) without offering any tangible incentives,' Harchaoui Haftar's personal involvement, the July 6 visit 'had yielded nothing,' added the on July 8, 'a Greek representative – this time as part of an EU delegation – wanted to negotiate on the same day with the rival Tripoli government, placing the two governments on an equal footing,' he was 'an affront in Benghazi's view,' Harchaoui said, and the administration wanted to 'punish Athens.'To Harchaoui, the diplomatic flap was a sign not to 'underestimate' the Haftars' foreign policy.'The Haftar family is an absolutely essential actor' in tackling the influx of migrants or, for example, advancing energy projects, due to its key role in securing Libya's eastern coast, said message delivered at the Benghazi airport 'is clear: take the eastern faction seriously,' he said that the Haftars, already 'rich in cash and strong' in terms of strategic assets, have recently increased efforts to 'consolidate their legitimacy.'Haftar himself was hosted in February by French President Emmanuel Macron, and in May by Russia's Vladimir Haftar's son, Saddam, recently visited the United States, Turkiye, Italy and Ankara, which has provided support for the Tripoli-based government in repelling attacks from the east, 'is now seeking to further profit off the Haftars through things like construction projects,' said added that Turkiye also has wider geopolitical ambitions, hoping to see the Haftars endorse a maritime border agreement in the eastern Mediterranean, which Tripoli had already signed but Athens regards as illegal.
Arab News
16 hours ago
- Arab News
Europe's moral authority in tatters after failing to sanction Israel
The EU last week faced a defining test of its commitment to human rights and international law — and it failed. Presented with irrefutable evidence of Israeli war crimes in Gaza, the bloc's foreign ministers gathered in Brussels to consider 10 possible actions: from suspending the EU-Israel Association Agreement to imposing sanctions on Israeli officials and banning trade with illegal settlements. Yet, in the end, they took the politically easy path, securing a handful of humanitarian concessions from Israel in return for shelving all meaningful accountability. Let me be clear: aid access is essential. Gaza's suffering is beyond comprehension. And Palestinians dying from bullets and hunger will no doubt appreciate any relief. But allowing Israel to dictate the terms of food and medical relief — as if these are diplomatic chips and not legal obligations — strips humanitarianism of its moral force. EU officials may consider what they accomplished a 'diplomatic success.' They will state that they used diplomatic leverage to push for aid delivery. But what the EU hails as progress is, in truth, a lowering of the bar so far that the basic survival of a besieged population becomes the summit of European diplomacy. This is not only disappointing. It is dangerous. The EU-Israel Association Agreement explicitly states that respect for human rights is a cornerstone of bilateral relations. Yet, even after clear violations — documented by Amnesty International, the UN and dozens of credible nongovernmental organizations — the EU opted to maintain business as usual. Israel continues to enjoy access to European markets, research programs and diplomatic forums while violating the very principles the agreement is meant to uphold. According to Amnesty International, Israel has killed women and children with no evidence of any military target nearby. Journalists, medical personnel, ambulance drivers and kitchen supply teams have been killed without accountability. Schools, hospitals, bakeries and houses have been shelled. The UN's Independent International Commission of Inquiry further concluded that Israel's total blockade on Gaza — cutting off food, water, electricity and fuel — amounts to collective punishment and may constitute a crime against humanity or genocide. Despite this, the EU, which has implemented harsh sanctions against the Russian occupiers of Ukraine, chose not to sanction complicit officials and not to halt trade with illegal settlements. This inaction occurred even after its own diplomats, along with church leaders, saw with their own eyes the destruction caused to Palestinians and churches in the West Bank town of Al-Taybeh. If Europe still believes in its founding principles — human dignity, the rule of law and justice — then it must act like it. Daoud Kuttab In 2024, when independently documented Israeli war crimes were widely reported, the total two-way trade in goods between Israel and EU member states was €42.6 billion ($49.5 billion). The EU accounted for about 32 percent of Israel's total goods trade, contributing roughly 34.2 percent of its imports and 28.8 percent of its exports, making it Tel Aviv's biggest trading partner. Instead of agreeing on any one of the 10 sanctions options, EU officials — who needed a consensus of all 27 member countries — negotiated for food trucks, fuel for hospitals and other humanitarian aid that is already an obligation to be provided by an occupier according to international humanitarian law. This moral abdication is more than a policy failure — it is a betrayal of the EU's legal commitments. Europe's inaction sends a dangerous message: that Israel can commit atrocities with impunity. No political price. No trade penalty. No sanctions. The Geneva Conventions are not suggestions — they are binding obligations. And if countries that tout the rule of law allow them to be violated without consequence, their credibility collapses. Europe's silence does not just embolden Israel, it weakens the global order that holds war criminals accountable. The impact of this decision will not be confined to Gaza. If Israel, a state benefiting from billions in EU trade and cooperation, can bomb hospitals, starve civilians and raze homes with no repercussions, then what incentive remains for any state to respect humanitarian law? Europe's moral authority now lies in tatters. Some of the countries that prevented the EU from doing the right thing included Germany, Hungary, Italy and the Czech Republic. The fear of diplomatic fallout and the need to preserve internal cohesion at all costs outweighed the courage to uphold justice. Still, there is a path forward. If the EU as a whole will not act, its member states must. National governments should suspend arms transfers, ban trade with illegal settlements and sever cooperation with institutions complicit in occupation and apartheid. These are not radical steps, they are legal necessities. The stakes are too high for empty statements. Every day without accountability is a day of impunity, a day when another child dies under rubble, another family starves behind a blockade and another future is extinguished. If Europe still believes in its founding principles — human dignity, the rule of law and justice — then it must act like it. Because history is watching. And so are the people of Gaza.
