Public frustrated by asylum seeker housing, says minister Jonathan Reynolds
The Conservative's new shadow housing secretary Sir James Cleverly said the remarks had "amplified" the frustrations of people who were trying to get on the housing ladder.The past week has seen ongoing demonstrations outside a hotel in Epping being used to house asylum seekers.
The prime minister made the remark when appearing at the Liaison Committee, a group of senior MPs. Labour MP Dame Meg Hillier, who chairs the Treasury Committee, asked the prime minister where the government was going to house homeless people, given that the price of temporary accommodation had been driven up by the need to house asylum seekers.He replied: "Oh, there is lots of housing and many local authorities that can be used, and we're identifying where it can be used."Pressed for specific examples, Sir Keir said he would write to the committee.Asked about the comments on the Today programme, Reynolds said the prime minister "was talking about, in lengthy way, we need to put more in place to solve the housing crisis. "We're doing that and there are several options that can be considered for British families in temporary accommodation." Speaking to the same programme, chair of the Housing Committee Florence Eshalomi said councils were "at breaking point when it comes to housing supply".She said her committee had been told that between 2023- 2024, local councils had spent a total of £2.3bn on temporary accommodation and that the numbers in temporary accommodation had risen by 11% in the past year. Asked about the Sir Keir's comments, she said she would "welcome seeing the detail the prime minister was alluding to". She said it "cannot be right" that the Home Office and local authorities were having to compete for the same accommodation and that there needed to be better "co-operation" between government departments. She also said more social housing - housing that can be rented at affordable levels - needed to be built in order to ease the pressures.
Figures released earlier this year found that a record 123,000 families were living in temporary housing in England.Temporary accommodation refers to accommodation which is organised by the local authority but is not a permanent home. It can include hotels, hostels or caravans. It is provided to those who are homeless, while they wait for longer term housing. Priority is given to those at risk of abuse from a partner or relative, pregnant women, people with dependent children or those who are homeless because of a fire or flood. Separately, the government is required by law to provide accommodation to destitute asylum seekers, while their application is being processed. In general asylum seekers are not allowed to work and earn money until their claim has been completed, although there are some exceptions. Since 2020, there has been an increased in using hotels to provide this accommodation. As of March 2025, there were 32,345 people in asylum hotels, up from 29,585 at the end of June 2024, but lower than the total in December. The Home Office's annual accounts show a third less was spent on hotels to house asylum seekers between April 2024 and March 2025, falling from £3bn to £2.1bn. A senior Home Office source told the BBC one of the main factors behind the saving was moving some asylum seekers from hotels into other types of cheaper accommodation.They said the department had prioritised moving families and children into regular housing so they were not living in hotels for long periods of time.The government has said it wants to end the use of hotels to house asylum seekers altogether and Reynold told the BBC the number of hotels being used had fallen from a peak of 400 to 200. However, he added: "The solution is not about putting people into different forms of accommodation"It's about having a system where if people shouldn't be in the UK they have to leave the UK."That is government policy... it is about having a system that processes the claims at the pace they should be processed and doesn't leave people in limbo."
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Independent
an hour ago
- The Independent
Lowering voting age could deepen class divide in schools due to lack of political literacy among teenagers
The decision to lower the voting age to 16 could widen the inequality divide among teenagers in the UK due to the lack of political education in school. Academics have warned that the move to extend the vote to 16 and 17-year-olds risks only benefitting those from wealthier backgrounds, unless all students are given equal access to citizenship education. Recent research from the University of Roehampton found specific classes on politics and democracy have been provided unevenly across the country, with more affluent schools likely to receive dedicated lessons. It also found that pupils with university-educated parents are more likely to discuss politics at home, and feel more confident engaging in political debates. This results in teenagers from low income households often being at a disadvantage in terms of understanding parties and voting systems, which the research concluded 'compounded class-based disparities'. 'Votes at 16 is an important milestone, but without proper political education in every school, we risk widening the democratic gap between privileged and disadvantaged teenagers', said Dr Bryony Hoskins, Professor of Political Comparative Social Science at the University of Roehampton. 'The students most likely to benefit are those already surrounded by political knowledge and encouragement, leaving disadvantaged young people behind again. 'The result is a political system that feels unrepresentative and irrelevant to many young people. If we ignore this, votes at 16 could actually entrench inequality.' Labour's manifesto committed the party to lowering the voting age to 16 in line with Scottish and Welsh elections. Sir Keir Starmer said it was 'important' to lower the voting age, as 16-year-olds were old enough to work and 'pay in' through tax, so should 'have the opportunity' to say how they wanted their money spent. But a poll of 500 16 and 17-year-olds conducted for ITV News by Merlin Strategy found only half said they thought they should be allowed to vote, and only 18 per cent would definitely vote. Labour stood to gain the most, with 33 per cent saying they would back the party, while 20 per cent said they would choose Reform UK and 18 per cent the Greens. A EU and UK Research and Innovation project was trialled on 900 pupils earlier this ear, and found that a five-lesson political literacy programme improved students' belief in their own ability to engage with politics. 'We now have clear evidence that short, structured lessons that use inclusive education methods can make a real difference,' said Professor Hoskins. 'This should be part of every young person's education and not a postcode lottery.' Ahead of the next general election, researchers are calling on the Department of Education to ensure political literacy becomes a compulsory part of the national curriculum.
Telegraph
an hour ago
- Telegraph
Arab world tells Hamas to lay down arms and end rule of Gaza
The Arab world has called on Hamas to lay down arms and surrender its rule of Gaza. In an unprecedented move, Arab countries including Qatar, Saudi Arabia and Egypt joined calls for the Palestinian terror group to disband in a bid to end the war that has devastated the territory. Seventeen countries including the European Union and Arab League threw their weight behind a seven-page text agreed at a United Nations conference on reviving the two-state solution for Israel and the Palestinians. 'In the context of ending the war in Gaza, Hamas must end its rule in Gaza and hand over its weapons to the Palestinian Authority, with international engagement and support, in line with the objective of a sovereign and independent Palestinian State,' said the declaration. It followed a call on Monday by the Palestinian delegation at the UN for both Israel and Hamas to leave Gaza, allowing the Palestinian Authority to administer the coastal territory. The text also condemned the deadly Hamas attacks against Israel of October 7, 2023, which launched the war. France, which co-chaired the conference with Saudi Arabia, called the declaration 'both historic and unprecedented'. 'For the first time, Arab countries and those in the Middle East condemn Hamas, condemn October 7, call for the disarmament of Hamas, call for its exclusion from Palestinian governance, and clearly express their intention to normalise relations with Israel in the future,' said Jean-Noel Barrot, France's foreign minister. The text, co-signed by France, Britain and Canada among other western nations, also called for the possible deployment of foreign forces to stabilise Gaza after the end of hostilities. 'We supported the deployment of a temporary international stabilization mission upon invitation by the Palestinian Authority and under the aegis of the United Nations and in line with UN principles, building on existing UN capacities, to be mandated by the UN Security Council, with appropriate regional and international support,' said the declaration. Israel and the United States did not take part in the meeting. Earlier this month, Hamas sources told Saudi media that the group would consider laying down its arms as part of a ceasefire deal with Israel. It comes as Sir Keir Starmer said on Tuesday that Britain would recognise Palestine as a state unless Israel met a series of conditions, including ending the 'appalling' situation in Gaza. The move follows Emmanuel Macron, who announced last week that France would recognise Palestinian statehood. For decades, most UN members have supported a two-state solution with Israel and a Palestinian state existing side by side. But after more than 21 months of war in Gaza, the ongoing expansion of Israeli settlements in the West Bank, and Israeli officials declaring designs to annex occupied territory, it is feared a Palestinian state could become geographically impossible. The current war in Gaza began following the Hamas attacks on Israel, which responded with a large-scale military response that has claimed tens of thousands of Palestinian lives and destroyed most infrastructure in the enclave.
Daily Mail
an hour ago
- Daily Mail
Britain needs a tax break: Labour's lavish spending hurts jobs, work and commerce, says ALEX BRUMMER
Aspiration is terrific, but Labour's bravado about Britain being the fastest growing economy in the G7 was always hooey. Economic output is trivialised if assessed as a sports league table. Any growth at all is welcome in an uncertain world of tariffs, fragmentation and geopolitical turmoil. Raising taxes by £40billion and piling much of the cash into the public sector without productivity targets was a nonsense. Worse, the surcharge on employers' National Insurance (NI) contributions and levies on wealth penalised jobs, work and enterprise. Latest forecasts from the International Monetary Fund (IMF) show that UK growth at 1.2 per cent this year and 1.4 per cent next will lag that of the US and Canada. Despite nostalgia in some quarters for a return to the European Union, the UK's fleet-of-foot services-led economy outpaces Germany and France. The IMF has upgraded forecasts for global output this year and in 2026. In April, the Fund's projections were overshadowed by Liberation Day tariffs. But Britain, Japan, India and the EU have limited damage. The US and China are still working on a deal so, critically, a new era of beggar-thy-neighbour retaliatory actions has been averted. The brakes on globalisation have been applied. Data from Yale University's Budget Lab shows that, after the EU deal, the average tariff for goods entering the US will be 17.3 per cent, the highest since the 1930s. There is no mystery as to Donald Trump's remedy for dealing with stuttering growth. As master instructed pupil Keir Starmer in Scotland this week, the best way forward is lower taxes. Lessons of October 2024 must be learned. Every tax increase outlined, from NI and capital gains to inheritance and stamp duties on lower priced homes, stymied commerce. Simple changes to the tax system could help. Abolishing stamp duty on share trading would boost listings and confidence. Including digital expenditure in full expensing of capital spending could light a fire under AI and biotech. As wonderful as reviving tin production in Cornwall may be, spending money on an AstraZeneca plant just might have averted the pharma giant's American tilt. Captain America AstraZeneca boss Pascal Soriot has good reason to look across the Atlantic. A knighthood is one kind of recognition. But Keir Starmer's government has still to come up with a credible pharma strategy. A fixation on steel, car making and renewables has left medicines, one of Britain's most dynamic industries, in the lurch. Soriot remains tight-lipped on a move of Britain's largest listed company to New York. His current enthusiasm for America shows no bounds. A £37billion US investment strategy and a promise of local manufacturing is his ace card. AstraZeneca has two world class R&D centres and a workforce of close to 20,000 in America. It has good reason to double down on a market which represents 40 per cent of sales. Speaking to CNBC, the Astra boss also praised the US for its science and innovation. There was barely a mention of home territories in the UK and Sweden. AZ's pipeline of oncology drugs is as strong as ever with sales up 15 per cent at £9billion, contributing almost half of total revenues in the first half of the year. Next on the agenda for Soriot is an oral compound designed to take on leaders Novo Nordisk and Eli Lilly on weight loss. He believes that his company can deliver Americans an oral medicine at a cheaper price than rivals. The meltdown in first mover Novo Nordisk's share price suggests investors believe the weight loss tortoise could, eventually, catch the hare. Trading places Barclays is thriving despite a reputational hit from the Jes Staley-Epstein relationship. Goldman Sachs looks to be cooling off on the UK. But Barclays retains its place as Europe's most influential investment bank. It is a big beneficiary of volatility since Liberation Day with profits climbing by 23 per cent on the back of an industry beating 26 per cent gain on fixed interest, currencies, and commodity trading. As chief executive Venkat reiterated, success should not be an excuse for Labour to clobber banks with more tax.
