
Drimonis: Youth crime is serious. Blaming immigration is laughable
'Immigrant criminal groups are bringing new and especially aggressive methods to Quebec,' he stated.
'(Gangs have) names like Arab Power, so there's no doubt about their ethnocultural affiliation. Recruitment is done on an ethnocultural basis.'
The PQ leader's main concern, he said, lies with street gangs' recruitment efforts primarily targeting minors, in light of a recent report showing a third of homicides in Quebec this year have involved young people age 21 and under.
His concerns aren't entirely unfounded. Gangs are indeed luring younger and younger victims into their fold. Montreal's Maghrebi community already raised the alarm about criminals recruiting their youth.
There's nothing wrong with a political leader reacting to an uptick in violence, seeking solutions. Choosing to frame it as an issue linked to immigration, though, is problematic. And selective.
It's not like homegrown gangs with violent track records haven't been operating in Quebec for decades, or like we don't have our own share of locally produced groups messing with the public's sense of security.
Just weeks ago, four men were arrested in an alleged terrorist plot. As suggested by their names alone — Marc-Aurèle Chabot, Simon Angers-Audet, Raphaël Lagacé and Matthew Forbes — they're from the far-away, exotic land of Quebec. Canada has a creeping far-right extremism problem, and Quebec is not exempt.
Yet, to my recollection, I've never heard the PQ leader express concerns about groups like the Fédération des Québécois de souche, Pégida Québec, La Meute or Storm Alliance. Perhaps their names elicit less terror than Arab Power, which St-Pierre Plamondon took pains to mention in his interview. Why the specific focus on the above group, while the Hells Angels have reportedly been associated with gangs recruiting minors for decades?
And why is the fact that gang recruitment is made on an ethnocultural basis suddenly concerning to the PQ leader? This phenomenon is neither new nor introduced by recent Arab immigration.
The West End Gang, Rock Machine, the Montreal Mafia and the Hells Angels have often recruited on an ethnonationalist basis and have long wreaked violence in this province.
Yves (Apache) Trudeau, Georges (Bo-Boy) Beaulieu, Maurice (Mom) Boucher and St-Henri's infamous Dubois Brothers all sound very, how shall we say, homegrown.
Criminal gangs often do have an ethnonationalist element. But the common denominators in most cases of gang violence are societal alienation, poverty and lack of opportunity. Not immigration.
Taking very real problems — the recruitment of young people into gangs and the rise of criminality among minors — and using them to imply that demographic changes are the culprit is not an evidence-based finding. It didn't take long for right-wing pundits to call St-Pierre Plamondon 'brave' for 'daring to state the obvious: mass immigration has contributed to insecurity.'
Politically opportunistic rhetoric flings the door wide open to those desperately wanting to link multiculturalism or a rise in immigration to a rise in criminality. Something that's blatantly untrue. Numerous studies, including a 2023 McGill-led study, show that immigrants are neither predisposed to more crime nor tied to an increase in crime rates.
Mentioning immigration only when you want to link it to a slew of ills Quebec is suffering from is problematic. A lack of affordable housing? Immigration. Quebec's low birth rate? Immigration. An increase in gang violence? Immigration.
This dog-whistling can be perniciously subtle, allowing people's inherent confirmation bias to fill in gaps and interpret a link that supports their pre-existing beliefs. It's helpful to no one, except perhaps politicians wishing to capitalize on fear.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

Montreal Gazette
20 hours ago
- Montreal Gazette
Libman: Is another gut-wrenching Quebec sovereignty referendum on tap?
On top of everything else that's going on in this world right now, will we soon have to start bracing for another gut-wrenching Quebec sovereignty referendum? The next provincial election is still over a year away, but this week's convincing byelection win by the Parti Québécois in Arthabaska is another indication that the separatist party is cementing itself as the prevailing choice of Quebecers and heavy favourite to form the next government. By contrast, the Coalition Avenir Québec, which had owned this riding in every election since the party's creation in 2011, was badly humbled, finishing a distant fourth. It will be difficult for the bruised and battered governing party to reverse its fortunes before the next election, with no heir apparent to its leader and founder, François Legault, who will inevitably be stepping down. The Liberals have made their bed with Pablo Rodriguez, with whom they improved their vote in the almost exclusively francophone riding but still garnered only single-digit support. With Rodriguez, their chances of winning the general election, which is highly contingent on the regions, is a long shot at this point. A year in politics is a long time, but with the challenges facing its two main rivals, the PQ looks like a pretty sure bet right now. (Sigh!) So, then what? Paul St-Pierre Plamondon has steadfastly maintained a hardline position since assuming the PQ leadership, promising a sovereignty referendum in his first mandate. He needed to consolidate the party's base after devastating losses in the last two elections and hasn't wavered since. Now that the scent of power is getting stronger, some suspect he may try to downplay that commitment, which many previous PQ leaders have done before elections, to avoid scaring off less-nationalist voters. I don't expect PSPP to back down. He knows that his opponents will attack his referendum pledge and are waiting to cynically pounce, as is the media, if he shows the slightest hint of backtracking. His winning mantra during the campaign will be that a referendum allows Quebecers themselves to democratically decide their future, not him. Once in power, then, is a third sovereignty referendum before the end of the decade winnable? For the longest time, support for sovereignty had been stagnating in the low 30 per cent range, particularly weakened by U.S. President Donald Trump's threats of tariffs and annexation. But a couple of recent polls showed a noticeable bump, increasingly among young people, with the overall support in the population hovering around 40 per cent — still comparable to the 1980 referendum result. Referendum campaigns, however, can be volatile, presenting an opportunity to stoke Quebec nationalist pride. It will also be relatively easy for an articulate leader like PSPP — especially when times are tough — to resonate, with magical promises about the cure-all of an independent Quebec, primarily among young people. Also, who would lead the No side this time? For the 1995 referendum, the result was shockingly close, with the federalist leadership — like it is now — fragmented and unprepared. Will Legault's successor be from the federalist flank of the party — or the more nationalist wing, thus putting up only a half-hearted defence of Canada? Will the party split entirely along Yes/No lines? Does Rodriguez have the chops of a young and fiery (circa 1995) Jean Charest, for example, who electrified the pro-Canada rally, waving his Canadian passport? Will Prime Minister Mark Carney play more of an effective role than Jean Chrétien did in 1995, when he seemed to be begging on his knees at the last minute? And what about Trump? Will he meddle, offering to recognize and negotiate with an independent Quebec, seeing separation as a means to severely weaken Canada, thus benefiting his 51st-state narrative — stalking the remnants of a fractured country? Many things can change, but current indicators are reason for concern. We need to be much better prepared this time in girding for the unpleasant battle ahead. Robert Libman is an architect and planning consultant who has served as Equality Party leader and MNA, mayor of Côte-St-Luc and a member of the Montreal executive committee. He was a Conservative candidate in the 2015 federal election.

Montreal Gazette
2 days ago
- Montreal Gazette
Drimonis: Youth crime is serious. Blaming immigration is laughable
In a recent television interview, Parti Québécois Leader Paul St-Pierre Plamondon attempted to establish a direct link between immigration and the involvement of minors in crimes. 'Immigrant criminal groups are bringing new and especially aggressive methods to Quebec,' he stated. '(Gangs have) names like Arab Power, so there's no doubt about their ethnocultural affiliation. Recruitment is done on an ethnocultural basis.' The PQ leader's main concern, he said, lies with street gangs' recruitment efforts primarily targeting minors, in light of a recent report showing a third of homicides in Quebec this year have involved young people age 21 and under. His concerns aren't entirely unfounded. Gangs are indeed luring younger and younger victims into their fold. Montreal's Maghrebi community already raised the alarm about criminals recruiting their youth. There's nothing wrong with a political leader reacting to an uptick in violence, seeking solutions. Choosing to frame it as an issue linked to immigration, though, is problematic. And selective. It's not like homegrown gangs with violent track records haven't been operating in Quebec for decades, or like we don't have our own share of locally produced groups messing with the public's sense of security. Just weeks ago, four men were arrested in an alleged terrorist plot. As suggested by their names alone — Marc-Aurèle Chabot, Simon Angers-Audet, Raphaël Lagacé and Matthew Forbes — they're from the far-away, exotic land of Quebec. Canada has a creeping far-right extremism problem, and Quebec is not exempt. Yet, to my recollection, I've never heard the PQ leader express concerns about groups like the Fédération des Québécois de souche, Pégida Québec, La Meute or Storm Alliance. Perhaps their names elicit less terror than Arab Power, which St-Pierre Plamondon took pains to mention in his interview. Why the specific focus on the above group, while the Hells Angels have reportedly been associated with gangs recruiting minors for decades? And why is the fact that gang recruitment is made on an ethnocultural basis suddenly concerning to the PQ leader? This phenomenon is neither new nor introduced by recent Arab immigration. The West End Gang, Rock Machine, the Montreal Mafia and the Hells Angels have often recruited on an ethnonationalist basis and have long wreaked violence in this province. Yves (Apache) Trudeau, Georges (Bo-Boy) Beaulieu, Maurice (Mom) Boucher and St-Henri's infamous Dubois Brothers all sound very, how shall we say, homegrown. Criminal gangs often do have an ethnonationalist element. But the common denominators in most cases of gang violence are societal alienation, poverty and lack of opportunity. Not immigration. Taking very real problems — the recruitment of young people into gangs and the rise of criminality among minors — and using them to imply that demographic changes are the culprit is not an evidence-based finding. It didn't take long for right-wing pundits to call St-Pierre Plamondon 'brave' for 'daring to state the obvious: mass immigration has contributed to insecurity.' Politically opportunistic rhetoric flings the door wide open to those desperately wanting to link multiculturalism or a rise in immigration to a rise in criminality. Something that's blatantly untrue. Numerous studies, including a 2023 McGill-led study, show that immigrants are neither predisposed to more crime nor tied to an increase in crime rates. Mentioning immigration only when you want to link it to a slew of ills Quebec is suffering from is problematic. A lack of affordable housing? Immigration. Quebec's low birth rate? Immigration. An increase in gang violence? Immigration. This dog-whistling can be perniciously subtle, allowing people's inherent confirmation bias to fill in gaps and interpret a link that supports their pre-existing beliefs. It's helpful to no one, except perhaps politicians wishing to capitalize on fear.


Winnipeg Free Press
3 days ago
- Winnipeg Free Press
Israel announces West Bank settlement that rights groups say could imperil Palestinian state
MAALE ADUMIM, West Bank (AP) — Israel's far-right finance minister announced a contentious new settlement construction in the Israeli-occupied West Bank on Thursday which Palestinians and rights groups worry will scuttle plans for a future Palestinian state by effectively cutting the West Bank into two separate parts. The announcement comes as many countries said they would recognize a Palestinian state in September. 'This reality finally buries the idea of a Palestinian state, because there is nothing to recognize and no one to recognize,' said Finance Minister Bezalel Smotrich. 'Anyone in the world who tries today to recognize a Palestinian state – will receive an answer from us on the ground,' he said. Development in E1, an open tract of land east of Jerusalem, has been under consideration for more than two decades, but was frozen due to U.S. pressure during previous administrations. On Thursday, Smotrich praised President Donald Trump and U.S. ambassador to Israel Mike Huckabee as 'true friends of Israel as we have never had before.' The E1 plan has not yet received its final approval, which is expected next week. The plan includes around 3,500 apartments to expand the settlement of Maale Adumim, Smotrich said. While some bureaucratic steps remain, if the process moves quickly, infrastructure work could begin in the next few months and construction of homes could start in around a year. Sundays Kevin Rollason's Sunday newsletter honouring and remembering lives well-lived in Manitoba. Rights groups swiftly condemned the plan. Peace Now called it 'deadly for the future of Israel and for any chance of achieving a peaceful two-state solution' which is 'guaranteeing many more years of bloodshed.' The announcement comes as the Palestinian Authority and Arab countries condemned Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu's statement in an interview on Tuesday that he was 'very' attached to the vision of a Greater Israel. He did not elaborate, but supporters of the idea believe that Israel should control not only the occupied West Bank but parts of Arab countries.