
Meghan Markle accused of 'treating everyone like idiots' after sharing her latest foodie hack - as people say it's been around 'for years'
Meghan Markle has left people baffled after sharing her latest kitchen 'hack' in a previously unseen clip from her Netflix show, With Love, Meghan.
The Duchess of Sussex, 43, took to her Instagram account on Friday to share footage of herself cutting a pineapple, which 'didn't make it in' to the eight official episodes which aired back in March.
In the video, filmed in a rented $8million mansion near her and Prince Harry 's Montecito home, Meghan was joined by wellness therapist Randi Karin as she explained how to properly cut a pineapple.
Meghan said: 'A trick that people do with pineapple instead of just cutting it. To make the perfect little bite, you follow the wedge.
'Nature has given you all the cues on how to have a perfect taste of something.'
She then cut around the pattern on the outside of the pineapple, and used the skin to pull out a chunk of the fruit before taking a bite.
Karin then followed her lead, managing to perfect the hack, and said: 'Oh, how fun is that!'
However, royal watchers were less convinced and thought Meghan was just stating the obvious - while others noted the 'trick' has been around for years and regularly circulates on social media platforms such as Facebook and Pinterest.
One person joked: 'In the next episode Meghan shows us how to peel a banana.'
Another noted: 'I swear to God, she thinks everybody is stupid and she knows all these amazing tricks, I'm going to be 50, and I've known that since I was a little kid.'
Others noted they had indeed seen the chopping hack previously, writing: 'Saw that on Facebook years ago' and 'This girl is a Pinterest hack!!'
'Literally, as this hack is as old as dirt. It might be new to Megs but not the rest of the world,' another commented.
'Who is going to tell her that we already know all the tricks of the kitchen and garden and they do not need any elevation.'
'Not rocket science is it.'
One more wrote: 'Oh my, thank goodness, I have always had a pile of pineapples going rotten because I didn't know how to cut them to get that 'perfect bite'.
'Now what do I do with the rest of the pineapple???'
'With Love, Meghan' was released in March and picked up for a second series - which has finished filming and looks set to release this summer - shortly afterwards
Alongside the video, Meghan said: 'There was so much goodness on Season 1 of "With Love, Meghan" that didn't make it in, there just wasn't enough time!'
She also revealed that season two of the show has finished filming and looks set to release this summer.
Meghan took the opportunity to tease 'all the fun to come' with her brand As Ever - which sold out earlier this year, and has yet to restock.
She said: 'Great weekend to rewatch or catch up on the show as we gear up for Season 2 this summer and all the fun to come with As Ever.'
News of 'With Love, Meghan' being renewed for a second season came in March, shortly after the first eight episodes of series one released on Netflix.
Despite the show being largely panned by media outlets on both sides of the Atlantic, the controversy that continues to surround Meghan is said to be the reason TV bosses were convinced to renew.
'This may raise a few eyebrows but one thing which Netflix love is controversy - and this show certainly created a lot of debate,' one TV insider told the Sun.
They added: 'Many were so scathing about the eight-part series that they thought there was no way it would get another season.
'But it seems the streamer is delighted with the chatter its created on both sides of the Atlantic this week.'
The episodes feature Meghan inviting famous friends to a California estate where she shares cooking, gardening and hosting tips.
However, the series was slammed by reviewers as 'gormless lifestyle filler' with a 'tangible desperation' following its release.
Others said it shows the Duchess is 'attempting to cling to fame by any means possible', while another described how she was 'joylessly filling kids' party bags with seeds'.
Guardian TV writer Stuart Heritage said the series was 'so pointless it might be the Sussexes' last TV show' and 'might also be the final thing she makes for Netflix'.
The Telegraph gave the show just two stars. In a review, they said the series was an 'exercise in narcissism, filled with extravagant brunches, celebrity pals and business plugs'.
The Duchess shared a sweet gift from her husband and children. Meghan shared a photo of a large bouquet of flowers with a special card from her family. 'Congratulations mumma!' it read. 'We love your show, and we love you.'The note was signed 'Lili, Archie and Papa'.
Last week, Meghan shared a picture of her 'garden haul' of vegetables, but royal fans soon spotted something very unusual about it.
The Duchess posted a sweet image of the Sussexes' beagle Mia sniffing a basket of fresh produce seemingly grown in the garden of her Montecito mansion in California.
Referring to Mia, who the Sussexes rescued in 2022, Meghan captioned her post: 'The unofficial quality inspector of this morning's garden haul.'
Mia buried her face in the 'haul', comprising broccoli, carrots, corn, red peppers and squash as well as spring onions and an assortment of fresh herbs.
But eagle-eyed social media users immediately claimed there was something suspicious about her fruit and veg, including a lack of any mud on them and the time of year they were picked.
One follower wrote: 'Huh. She's so good at gardening she can grow all things from all seasons at once'.
Taking note of the squeaky-clean vegetables, another critic noted there wasn't even a 'speck of dirt' on any of the food, despite appearing to be freshly picked.
'I've never seen vegetables so clean after harvesting', another said.
The Duchess of Sussex, 43, shared a sweet snap of her pooch, Mia, sniffing the contents of her woven bag that was filled with fresh vegetables grown in her garden on Instagram
Others noted that, in California, May could be too early in the year to harvest several crops. Some even speculated that Meghan could have gone to a local supermarket or Farmer's Market instead.
'And everything is perfectly clean. She is also the only person outside of the US Cornbelt to harvest corn in MAY?', one wrote.
Another said: 'The only place I see all that in season is the grocery store produce section'
A third critic said: 'It's way too early in the season for most of those vegetables to be grown in her garden and ready to pick'.
'Who is harvesting corn in May? It's pretty early for squash and peppers too', a fourth said.
Another critic asked: 'No dirt?'
According to the California Farmland Trust, sweetcorn is typically harvested from June to September - meaning it may be slightly too early for Meghan to have grown her own at her Montecito home, in the Santa Barbara county.
The latest post on As Ever's social media page came after Meghan revealed she plans to 'step back to assess' what the lifestyle brand had achieved in its first year - and what it could become in the future.
Meghan, who unveiled the company at the start of the year, recently revealed she may never restock her famous jam - one of the many homely products she sold under the As Ever brand - in an interview with The Fast Company.
The Duchess was speaking about her business and balancing work with motherhood as the first series of her podcast, Confessions of a Female Founder, drew to a close yesterday.
Asked about As Ever, Meghan said she would 'step back, gather data from the launch, and figure out exactly what' the company's future holds - as she confirmed new products won't go live until the first quarter of 2026.
Meghan also revealed the surprising turn As Ever could take - hinting at a future step into the fashion industry that she deemed an 'interesting space for me'.
The inaugural run of As Ever products, such as honey, jams and teas, sold out within 45 minutes of the launch.
Her previous store also sold out in 45 minutes and contained homely items as well as her long-awaited pots of jam.
Last week, Meghan also released the eighth episode of her podcast, Confessions of a Female Founder, featuring Spanx entrepreneur Sara Blakely.
Promoting the podcast and As Ever, Meghan told The Fast Company that she wouldn't know 'what to call herself' if she had to write a resume.
The latest post on As Ever's social media page came after Meghan revealed she plans to 'step back to assess' what the lifestyle brand had achieved in its first year - and what it could become in the future
'I think it speaks to this chapter many of us find ourselves in, where none of us are one note. But I believe all the notes I am playing are part of the same song.'
Meghan added that the 'mom moments' push her to success in the business world, with plans in the future ranging from home goods to fashion.
Revealing her son Archie has begun to lose his teeth, she described becoming the tooth fairy and leaving coins and a little dinosaur underneath his pillow.
She said: 'I had a lot of business meetings the next morning, but I still chose to cuddle with him the rest of the night. Those mom moments energise me to be a better founder, a better employer, a better boss.'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Daily Mail
8 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
EXCLUSIVE Hilaria Baldwin breaks silence on rumors that she 'controls' husband Alec
Hilaria Baldwin has clapped back at haters who claim the she is controlling husband Alec Baldwin - jokingly saying she 'wishes' she could. The 41-year-old shocked fans in March when she snapped at her husband on the red carpet, sparking a fierce debate online about their relationship dynamic. However, the mother-of-seven has now cleared up the internet rumors, exclusively telling that as a woman, no matter what she does it is always going to be 'wrong.' 'Couldn't they have picked a different couple with a husband that's easier to control?' Hilaria told in a street interview. She claimed that for years, much of the focus has been on her husband's alleged temper, whereas now she feels critics have switched to branding her as controlling. 'The headlines over the years, and all of this stuff where people have poked on him, and then all of a sudden, I have this power,' she said. 'It kind of makes me feel like... am I winning? Is this a compliment?' she asked. She added that she feels as through the narrative 'flipped' because the rumor mill needed 'something new.' Hilaria continued: 'I also think, going in to what it is like being a woman, they pick at us. [No] matter what we're gonna do it wrong.' She also suggested people are confusing her being a supportive wife as her being controlling. 'If we're supportive, we're controlling. If we're not, we're cold,' she ranted. 'You can't win.' The reality star quickly brushed it off, saying she just 'has to ignore it.' 'I wish I could control things more,' Hilaria admitted. The couple were talking to Extra at the grand re-opening of Planet Hollywood in NYC last week alongside her actor husband, 66, when conversation turned to a potential second series of their reality TV show. As Hilaria went to respond, Alec jumped in with: 'The Hilaria Show.' She then added: 'No, I think we are going to see, you know, we're going to see how it feels to be out there.' The 30 Rock star then cut in to say: 'It's gonna be great. You're a winner.' They later mocked the response to the interview in an Instagram post in which Hilaria accused her husband of 'manterrupting' as he apologized for his behavior before puckering up for a kiss Seemingly furious at his interjection, she snapped: 'Oh my God. When I'm talking, you're not talking.' 'I'm sorry,' Alec said as Hilaria threw her hands up and repeated: 'When I'm talking, you're not talking.' She turned back to face the interviewer and joked: 'This is why we'll just have to cut him out of the show.' The cringeworthy confrontation sparked a fierce debate online, with some branding it a 'very uncomfortable dynamic.' Hilaria appeared on Today after the incident, where she seemingly doubled down on her remarks, expressing her frustration at not being able to voice her thoughts. Discussing why the Baldwins opened up their home for a new reality series, she explained: 'Since I met Alec a lot of people have spoken for me, have taken my narrative. I don't want that anymore. 'This is an example for my children to hold your head up high and take control of your own narrative and we did it during a very vulnerable time.' While many people online declared it the beginning of a relationship fail, 'fireworks' are the norm, according to sources close to the fiery couple who dismissed the humiliating interaction as nothing more than 'banter.' 'That was a true reflection of their relationship,' an insider told Daily Mail. 'They test each other. It may have looked concerning to some, but it was all playful banter. 'There is no harm. They both have strong personalities and that's why they're attracted to one another. 'Alec finds Hilaria captivating and he loves that she can take his humor because Alec is never reserved in anything he does and vice versa.' They later mocked the response to the interview in an Instagram post in which Hilaria accused her husband of 'manterrupting' as he apologized for his behavior. Alec admitted in the clip that he suffers from 'correctile dysfunction.' The video saw them engaging in a patronizing back-and-forth, with the yoga teacher–turned–reality star cuing up her husband's responses. 'And that is called — what's the word of the day?' Hilaria began after the audio had ended, setting Alec up to wearily reply: 'Manterrupting.' 'So, the whole point is that we interrupt each other all the time,' Hilaria finished as they concluded the video with a kiss.


The Guardian
11 minutes ago
- The Guardian
23andMe back on the auction block after former CEO makes 11th-hour bid
DNA testing company 23andMe is back up for sale, throwing a purchase agreement reached last month into chaos, court filings show. The board of directors of 23andMe, which filed for bankruptcy in March, had agreed to sell the company and its assets to pharmaceutical firm Regeneron for $256m after conducting an auction in April. However, the founder and former CEO of the genetics company, Anne Wojcicki, put in a $305m bid through a newly formed non-profit, TTAM Research Institute, after the auction ended and pushed the bankruptcy court to re-open the sale process. She tried to buy the company multiple times during its long decline and bankruptcy but was rejected by the board. TTAM's offer of $305m will serve as a starting price for the secondary sale process, and Regeneron will be permitted to submit a competing bid that is at least $10m more. Both companies will be able to then submit a final offer. Whoever loses will qualify for a $10m breakup fee, according to the Wall Street Journal, which first reported the news. Sign up to TechScape A weekly dive in to how technology is shaping our lives after newsletter promotion The reopening of the auction puts the valuable trove of DNA data that 23andMe has accrued back on the market. Consumer concerns over who will control their data after a sale and what they would do with it prompted hundreds of 23andMe customers to delete their DNA info from the site. As part of its acquisition, Regeneron said it would comply with 23andMe's privacy policies and applicable laws with respect to the use of customer data. In the weeks since the acquisition was agreed upon, Regeneron said that it had already started to work with a consumer privacy ombudsman and was 'preparing to work with regulators, among others, to assure all interested stakeholders that 23andMe will be in safe hands and will not face the data breach issues that plagued it in the past', according to court filings. Regeneron agreed to the terms of the secondary sale but in court filings lamented that TTAM was permitted to submit the bid after the auction closed in spite of rules that prohibited such late bids. The company accused both TTAM and 23andMe of violating the court-ordered bidding procedures, including the deadline for bids and overbids. 'Since the auction ended, Regeneron has been subject to remarkably unfair treatment,' court filings read. 'Despite auction rules that unambiguously prohibit bids after the auction, and that likewise prohibit bidders from seeking to reopen the auction, TTAM—a vehicle controlled by the Debtors' former CEO, which participated at every stage of the auction—has submitted a flurry of new bids and has pressed non-stop to reopen the auction.' Regeneron further pointed to an eighth circuit ruling that warned against allowing buyers to 'bide[] its time during the auction, taking an opportunity to survey the landscape of the sale, only later to submit an upset bid at the lowest possible price'. The company also cited Wojcicki's previous failed attempts to purchase the company or take it private. 'In short, and given that history, no bidder would ever voluntarily participate in an auction in which the Wojcicki Parties, who led the company into this proceeding, could use the auction process as a vehicle for price discovery, with a one-way option to reopen the process—and to bid again—after the auction concludes,' Regeneron's attorneys wrote in court filings. 23andMe, Regeneron and TTAM did not respond to requests for comment.


Telegraph
15 minutes ago
- Telegraph
How Meghan's pregnant twerking fuelled a bonkers conspiracy theory
If it was meant to silence the trolls then, well, it has had the opposite effect. The extraordinary 80-second video of the Duchess of Sussex, posted on Instagram to mark Princess Lilibet's fourth birthday, shows a heavily pregnant Meghan twerking. She is lip-syncing and gyrating to the Baby Mama Dance – a song that became a TikTok trend in which pregnant women showcased their dance moves – with a couple of clumsy cameos from Prince Harry. The video, shot in a hospital room, has been seen by some as a response to the absurd conspiracy theory that has swirled online since the birth of Archie in 2019: namely, that both Meghan's pregnancies were fake. 'Four years ago today,' reads the caption beneath the video. Meghan writes: 'Both of our children were a week past their due dates... so when spicy food, all that walking, and acupuncture didn't work – there was only one thing left to do!' Some commentators – including The Telegraph 's own Camilla Tominey – have weighed in to say that, in labour, dropping it 'down down low' probably isn't the only thing left to do. For most women, in fact, the 40th week of a pregnancy is the point in their lives at which they'd be least likely to countenance such a move. The video, meanwhile, has only fuelled cruel rumours circulating on X, YouTube and Reddit: that Meghan was never really pregnant. According to these claims, she wore a 'Moonbump' – a brand of prosthetic baby bump – for photo opportunities, and hired a surrogate to carry her two children, now aged six and four, who are sixth and seventh in line to the throne respectively. It should go without saying that these theories are both baseless and bonkers. Social media sleuths, however, claim to have analysed the video of Meghan and Harry dancing and taken it as further evidence that she was never pregnant at all. For instance, they cite the lumpen shape under her black dress as proof of a prosthetic belly. This is easily debunked when I ask a midwife: 'This is likely to be cardiotocography [CTG] equipment, which continuously monitors the baby's heart rate and the mother's contractions,' she says. 'We use it in higher risk labours [ Meghan has spoken about how she has preeclampsia ].' Two sensors are placed on the mother's abdomen and secured round her bump with a strap. The theories only grow more outlandish. One claims that if Meghan had truly been pregnant, she wouldn't have been wearing a cannula in what they call 'a very weird place.' In reality, the Duchess's cannula, placed halfway up her arm, is standard practice. Another false claim insists that the Baby Mama Dance didn't become a trend until 2023 or 2024, despite online examples dating back to 2018. 'Unless Harry & Meghan can predict the future, how were they doing a dance in 2021 when it didn't exist as a trend?' one social media user wrote. Conspiracy theorists have also taken issue with her weight in the clip, suggesting that although her bump is large, the rest of her seems too slim to be pregnant. Meghan recently revealed on her podcast, Confessions of a Female Founder, that she 'gained 65lb' (around four stone) in both her pregnancies. It doesn't look like it from the video, say the trolls. But Meghan wouldn't be the first pregnant woman whose weight gain appeared confined to her bump. There is an even more obvious rebuttal to some of the questions raised about the video, too: that extended labour can send you slightly doolally. It may not occur to most heavily pregnant women to film themselves twerking but, then, who can say they made it through an overdue pregnancy without behaviour that was at least a little out of character? 'I did this exact same thing to the same song,' one X user, Drea Humphrey, posted in Meghan's defence on Thursday. 'When you're that pregnant you don't care about looking bizarre.' Perhaps it seems odder still to have filmed this private moment – but Meghan was apparently partaking in an online trend in which thousands of other women posted similar videos. Nevertheless, posts peddling these conspiracy theories have racked up tens of thousands of views – in some cases, millions. By posting a video with more 'proof,' Meghan has inadvertently added fuel to the fire. 'Generally, the more you try and refute a conspiracy theory, the more you fuel the idea that there's something to it,' explains Sander van der Linden, prof of social psychology at the University of Cambridge. 'It legitimises it – why would you respond unless it's something credible? There are some exceptions, where people can successfully dismiss conspiracy theories with humour and sarcasm, which is maybe what [Meghan] was attempting to do here.' Unfortunately, though, all it has done is provide conspiracy theorists with more material to work with. 'In an age where all videos are suspect in terms of being AI-manipulated, it creates an extra cloud of confusion,' van der Linden says. 'It provides lots of material for people to cling onto, saying, 'Look, she's wearing a prosthetic bump,' or suggesting videos are deepfakes.' For a woman who has spoken candidly about the devastating impact online trolling has had, these rumours must be particularly hard for Meghan to take. Perhaps that's why this isn't the first time she appears to have attempted to debunk them: last month, in an Instagram mood board posted to celebrate her seventh wedding anniversary to Harry, she included an ultrasound photo and a picture of her bare bump. View this post on Instagram A post shared by Meghan, Duchess of Sussex (@meghan) These, too, were extensively analysed, with anonymous users claiming her stomach was too 'shiny' and looked like a prosthetic, and that the ultrasound picture, which did not have a date or name on it, was faked. These wild theories first emerged online in 2019 in the period before Prince Archie's birth. Photos of Meghan cradling her bump, which were regularly mocked by the tabloid media, sparked the outlandish hypothesis that she was wearing an inflatable belly. Trolls pored over videos of Meghan on official royal duties for any slips, folds or odd movements as proof. The conspiracy theory initially appeared 'on some obscure social media platform where people were congregating who hated Meghan and then made its way into the mainstream,' says van der Linden. 'There's an element of unfamiliarity here with pregnancies of women of colour in particular – there is less representation in the media and on TV shows and there's no clear benchmark. You see the same with Beyoncé, for example [who was subject to similar trolling]. If there's some uncertainty in terms of what people expect to see, there's more potential for rumour and exploitation.' The couple continued to break with royal tradition, as Archie was born at the Portland Hospital on Great Portland Street, rather than the Lindo Wing at St Mary's Hospital in Paddington, where Prince Harry, the Prince of Wales, and Prince George, Princess Charlotte and Prince Louis were all born. Meghan and Harry initially kept Archie's birth a secret – even from Buckingham Palace officials – and also did away with the time-honoured royal ritual of a photoshoot on the steps of the hospital, prompting the scurrilous online rumour that Meghan hadn't actually given birth at all. When they did have a photoshoot at Windsor two days after Archie's birth, some went so far as to claim the newborn shots were faked using a hyper-realistic doll, and that Kensington Palace posted a hastily deleted tweet announcing he was born via surrogate. Meghan later revealed that this pregnancy was marked by mental health struggles, making the cruel rumours an especially bitter pill to swallow. When it comes to wild theories about their family life, the couple's quest for privacy has become a double-edged sword. Carefully curated personal revelations, along with family photos and videos they share, are subjected to intense and feverish scrutiny. When they uploaded Meghan's twerking video, even if it wasn't meant as a response to the bizarre rumours, the couple must have known social media vigilantes would comb through it for clues.