Markets attractive for medium to long-term investors despite near-term volatility: Sachin Bajaj
Tired of too many ads?
Remove Ads
Tired of too many ads?
Remove Ads
Tired of too many ads?
Remove Ads
In an exclusive interaction with ETMarkets Smart Talk, Sachin Bajaj , Executive Vice President and Chief Investment Officer at Axis Max Life Insurance, said that Indian markets , despite facing near-term volatility from global headwinds such as US tariffs, FPI outflows , and geopolitical concerns, remain attractive for medium to long-term investors He believes that India's strong domestic demand, proactive fiscal and monetary measures, and sectoral growth drivers provide a solid foundation for sustainable wealth creation. Edited Excerpts –A) The doubling of US tariff on Indian goods to 50% poses challenges for Indian exporters. The additional 25% tariff will be effective August 27, 2025, thus providing time for further negotiations.The high tariff rate will impact around 60-70% of India's exports to the US and will pose some challenges for Indian exporters, particularly in the Textiles, Gems and Jewellery, Auto components sectors.Overall exports to the US are around 2% of GDP and hence it will have limited impact on the overall GDP growth. India predominantly remains a domestic demand driven economy and its medium to long-term fundamentals remain strong.While the tariff rate is still under negotiations, we expect the Government to provide support to the impacted sectors, supporting them as they navigate through this difficult period.A) A large domestic market and growing middle class reduces India's vulnerability to global slowdowns. While certain export markets may face short-term challenges, other markets will open up as a result of FTA agreements with other countries.Initiatives such as personal tax cuts, interest rate cuts and GST reforms are expected to boost consumption in the coming years and will mitigate negative impact due to lesser exports.A) The June quarter results were marginally ahead of estimates with earnings growth of 8% (as against 5% expectations) for the NIFTY 50 companies. While sectors like IT and BFSI were lower than expectations, other sectors like Capital goods, Cement, and Chemicals have delivered strong numbers.Overall, after a relatively flat earnings growth in the fiscal year 2025, we are hopeful of earnings growth rebounding in the fiscal year 2026, helped by various proactive fiscal and monetary stimulus measures.A) Current valuations are in line with historical averages. NIFTY50 index has remained flat in the last one year despite global uncertainties and risk of growth slowdown.Markets have gone through a healthy time correction of one year and if one is willing to look beyond near-term uncertainty and volatility, markets are attractive for any medium to long-term investors.A) While FPI selloff in July reflects recent events like geo-politics, tariff situation and other global uncertainties, the Indian market remains fundamentally strong with robust domestic demand and policy support.Further, this is not the first time we are witnessing selling by FPIs, we have seen similar times in the past and markets have delivered strong returns over the years.Investors should stay focused on long-term trends and avoid knee-jerk reactions to short-term outflows.A) Effective asset allocation is key for any portfolio. Over the past year, the RBI MPC has cut interest rate by around 100bps and as a result fixed income funds have given higher return than major equity indices, but this doesn't guarantee the same pattern will continue in the coming year.It is important to stay disciplined with asset allocation, as equity tends to outperform fixed income over the medium to long-term.A) The recent quarterly results were broadly in line with expectations and for the full year we expect Nifty50 to deliver low double-digit earnings growth.In terms of sectors, we continue to like domestic-facing sectors and companies. We like sectors such as Consumer Discretionary, Industrials, Healthcare, Cement and BFSI.(Disclaimer: Recommendations, suggestions, views, and opinions given by experts are their own. These do not represent the views of the Economic Times)
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Indian Express
6 minutes ago
- Indian Express
India's vocational training system needs to reinvent itself to boost employability
With a volatile external sector increasing the challenge of demand-driven growth, the Prime Minister unveiled a slew of proposed reforms from the Red Fort's ramparts on August 15. While a recalibration of GST could induce higher domestic consumption and spur domestic investment with employment growth, India must seize this opportunity to also rethink its education system and increase the productivity and employability of its labour force. Our traditional education system — academic and rote-based — is unlikely to deliver a workforce equipped for the future of work. In India and across the world, formal vocational or skill training is associated with higher chances of an individual being employed and obtaining a job in the formal sector. Yet, only 4 per cent of India's workforce is formally trained, even though the institutional coverage of the Vocational Education and Training (VET) system is extensive — with over 14,000 Industrial Training Institutes (ITIs) and 25 lakh sanctioned seats. Actual enrolment was only around 12 lakh in 2022, implying just 48 per cent seat utilisation. Our VET system struggles with not only low uptake but also modest employment rates for those who undergo training. In 2018, the employment rate among ITI graduates was 63 per cent, whereas countries with robust VET systems such as Germany, Singapore, and Canada reported employment rates ranging between 80 and 90 per cent. These statistics point to a VET system that is both ineffective and unattractive to our youth. Why is the uptake and employment rate low for India's VET system? The first factor is the stage of the education system at which VET is integrated. Countries that introduce VET earlier in the schooling system show a stronger association with better labour market outcomes. In Germany, for example, VET is integrated at the upper secondary level through a dual system, combining school education with paid apprenticeships. In contrast, in India, VET is an afterthought — offered post high-school education, which not only shortens the period available for hands-on training before the youth enter the job market, but also does not allow for orientation towards employable skills. A second aspect is the absence of a defined pathway to higher (or academic) education via vocational skilling. For instance, Singapore offers VET either as technical education at the post-secondary level or via polytechnics at the tertiary level through dual vocational tracks, but has defined pathways from VET to traditional university education. India, in contrast, offers no formal academic progression from VET to mainstream higher education, nor does our education system offer credit transfers between systems. This reduces the uptake of VET by many who wish to keep the option of traditional, academic education viable. Third, and possibly most important, is the perception and quality of VET in India. Singapore has industry-led curriculum design, high instructor quality, regular audits and a mechanism that seeks constant feedback from employers and trainees. Singapore also has a Skill Future Programme, where the government offers subsidies to upskill throughout one's career. In India, in contrast, many courses are outdated and misaligned with industry needs. Over one-third of ITI instructor posts are vacant due to limited training capacity at National Skill Training Institutes. Quality monitoring is weak, with irregular ITI grading and no feedback systems. Relatedly, investing in robust public–private partnerships to deliver VET is critical for successful skilling. In Germany, Singapore, and Canada, governments fund VET institutions, while employers pay for apprenticeships, share training costs, and also help design curricula. In India, the engagement of employers in the private sector is limited, if not absent. ITIs depend heavily on government funding, with minimal private sector investment in infrastructure and training apparatus. Medium and Small Scale Enterprises drive local job creation, but have low engagement with ITIs due to capacity constraints. Sector Skill Councils, which play a key role in integrating training with industry needs, lack state-level presence. What can India learn from international experiences to overhaul its VET programme? First, integrate VET into early schooling. The National Education Policy (NEP), 2020 recommends such integration, but progress has been slow. Second, fast-track reforms to implement the National Credit Framework that defines clear progression pathways and aims to have a board for nationally recognised certifications. Third, to improve training quality, align VET courses with local industry demand through regular market assessments, expand NSTIs and fast-track instructor recruitment to address capacity gaps, and strengthen ITI grading by incorporating trainee feedback. Fourth, scale models like the Private Training Partner approach by leveraging public infrastructure and private expertise. Involve MSMEs, and strategically use CSR funding to boost industry relevance. Fifth, increase public spending on VET and ensure the financial viability of institutions by linking public funding to their performance and granting them autonomy to generate their own revenue. We must invest more in human capital. India allocates around 3 per cent of total education expenditure to VET, compared to 10-13 per cent in countries like Germany, Singapore, and Canada. Public funding can be optimised with improved financial viability of ITIs through lower per-student costs of training and by allowing ITIs autonomy to generate their own revenue. Recent government schemes — such as the Employment Linked Incentive (ELI) scheme, the PM Internship Scheme, and the ITI Upgradation Initiative — reflect an increased focus on employment outcomes. ELI Part A offers up to Rs 15,000 for first-time EPFO-registered workers, while the revised ELI, Part B gives employers Rs 3,000 a month for every new hire. Both ELI schemes push formalisation of jobs but have no skilling components. The Prime Minister Internship Scheme aims to provide one-year placements to youth in top companies, but lacks pathways to permanent jobs. The ITI Upgradation Scheme focuses on modernising 1,000 government ITIs in partnership with industry, but not necessarily the quality of training. Policy initiatives, thus far, have either tinkered on the margins of our existing education system or are afterthoughts. They are unlikely to transform the level of productivity and employability of our workforce unless we overhaul a system that is becoming increasingly outdated. Such an overhaul is crucial for making vocational training a pathway to jobs — an essential step towards a Viksit Bharat. Afridi is professor of Economics, ISI (Delhi) and visiting professor, NCAER. Chandna is associate fellow, NCAER
&w=3840&q=100)
First Post
9 minutes ago
- First Post
'Road to peace in Ukraine runs through India': New US logic to defend tariffs and sanctions
US President Donald Trump's trade representative, Peter Navarro, said that the Trump administration is unlikely to extend the August 27 deadline to impose penalty tariffs on India, insisting that 'the road to peace in the Ukraine war goes through India' India has labelled tariffs levied by the US on goods from the country "unjustified" and "unreasonable". File image/Reuters US President Donald Trump's White House doubled down on its decision to impose nearly 50 per cent tariffs on India, insisting that the 'road to peace (in the ongoing Russia-Ukraine war) runs through India'. Last month, the US imposed heavy duties on Indian goods, accusing it of fueling the ongoing war by purchasing oil from Russia. While speaking to the reporters on Thursday, US President's trade counsellor Peter Navarro, said he doesn't expect Trump to extend the timeline on doubling tariffs on India, which will hit the market on August 27, The Times of India reported. Navarro went on to accuse New Delhi of profiteering from transactions with Moscow. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD 'I love India. Look, [President Narendra] Modi is a great leader. But please, please India, like, look at what your role here is in the global economy and good here. It's like, what you're doing right now is not creating peace, it's perpetuating the war,' Navarro said in the presser. 'They don't need oil — it's a refining profiteering scheme,' he added. Navarro claimed that India is 'using the money that they get from us when they sell us stuff' to buy Russian oil, which is then processed by refiners, and 'they make a bunch of money there.' He maintained that Russians eventually use the money to build more arms and kill Ukrainians, and in light of this, the American taxpayers have been providing more military aid to the Ukrainians to sustain themselves in the war. 'So that's insane, and President Trump sees that chessboard beautifully. And you guys need to write about that,' he told the media in Washington, DC. However, many American political commentators have repeatedly called out the fallacy of the White House not acting on China's larger purchase of Russian oil and the past American encouragement of India buying Russian oil to keep down global oil prices. Navarro himself once implicitly conceded to the line of thinking, arguing that Washington cannot do the same with China because Beijing has leverage on Washington, DC.
Hans India
9 minutes ago
- Hans India
Bhatti demands safeguards to south states in GST rejig
Hyderabad: Deputy Chief Minister Mallu Bhatti Vikramarka on Thursday demanded the Union government to safeguard the interests of the southern states in the proposed GST rate rationalization. Participating in the Group of Ministers (GoM) meeting on GST rate rationalization in New Delhi, the Deputy CM welcomed the proposal of rate rationalization and reduction in tax burden. He, however, said that at the same time, it must be balanced by ensuring that the revenues of the states are protected. Otherwise, the welfare schemes meant for poor people and middle class and infrastructure projects will suffer, he added. Bhatti further said that southern states like Telangana, Karnataka, Tamil Nadu were getting a far lower share in the form of devolution than their contribution to the national revenues. The minister pointed out that when GST was introduced, tax revenues of states were growing at the rate of 14 per cent and therefore the Centre assured an annual growth of 14 per cent in the states. To compensate losses if any, GST compensation was introduced for a period of five years to stabilise the tax revenue growth rate. However, the tax revenue growth had not stabilized at 14 per cent. At present, the states are clocking an upswing of eight to nine per cent only, he added. To protect the interests of the states, he proposed that the present compensation cess may be continued, and the amount collected may be given fully to the respective states. Alternatively, while dispensing with compensation cess, the GST rates on luxury goods may be increased to their present levels and the additional amount collected may be given to the respective states, he said. 'This will reduce the tax burden on ordinary taxpayers while enabling the states to continue with the welfare of poorer sections and middle class as well as development and infrastructure projects', he said.
