Anthropic wins key ruling on AI in authors' copyright lawsuit
June 24 (Reuters) - A federal judge in San Francisco ruled late Monday that Anthropic's use of books without permission to train its artificial intelligence system was legal under U.S. copyright law.
Siding with tech companies on a pivotal question for the AI industry, U.S. District Judge William Alsup said Anthropic made "fair use" of books by writers Andrea Bartz, Charles Graeber and Kirk Wallace Johnson to train its Claude large language model.
Alsup also said, however, that Anthropic's storage of the authors' books in a "central library" violated their copyrights and was not fair use.
Spokespeople for Anthropic and attorneys for the authors did not immediately respond to requests for comment on the ruling on Tuesday.
The writers sued Anthropic last year, arguing that the company, which is backed by Amazon (AMZN.O), opens new tab and Alphabet (GOOGL.O), opens new tab, used pirated versions of their books without permission or compensation to teach Claude to respond to human prompts.
The class action lawsuit is one of several brought by authors, news outlets and other copyright owners against companies including OpenAI, Microsoft (MSFT.O), opens new tab and Meta Platforms (META.O), opens new tab over their AI training.
The doctrine of fair use allows the use of copyrighted works without the copyright owner's permission in some circumstances.
Fair use is a key legal defense for the tech companies, and Alsup's decision is the first to address it in the context of generative AI.
AI companies argue their systems make fair use of copyrighted material to create new, transformative content, and that being forced to pay copyright holders for their work could hamstring the burgeoning AI industry.
Anthropic told the court that it made fair use of the books and that U.S. copyright law "not only allows, but encourages" its AI training because it promotes human creativity. The company said its system copied the books to "study Plaintiffs' writing, extract uncopyrightable information from it, and use what it learned to create revolutionary technology."
Copyright owners say that AI companies are unlawfully copying their work to generate competing content that threatens their livelihoods.
Alsup agreed with Anthropic on Monday that its training was "exceedingly transformative."
"Like any reader aspiring to be a writer, Anthropic's LLMs trained upon works not to race ahead and replicate or supplant them — but to turn a hard corner and create something different," Alsup said.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Reuters
29 minutes ago
- Reuters
Brighthouse bidders narrow to TPG, Aquarian in hunt to buy US insurer, sources say
NEW YORK, June 24 (Reuters) - Brighthouse Financial (BHF.O), opens new tab has narrowed down a field of suitors to money manager TPG and Abu Dhabi-backed financial investor Aquarian Holdings, as the U.S. life insurance and annuity provider continues to explore a potential sale, according to people familiar with the matter. The pair have progressed to the final bidding round in recent days, the people said. Final bids are currently scheduled for submission in early July, although this timeline could shift, some of them added. While there was interest from other parties, including a bid from the insurance arm of investment firm Sixth Street, as well as an offer from fellow insurer Jackson Financial (JXN.N), opens new tab to buy part of Brighthouse's operations, the two remaining parties are best positioned to buy the entire company in one piece, they said. Apollo Global Management (APO.N), opens new tab, which has a substantial insurance business, was expected to be a strong contender in the Brighthouse process but ultimately did not submit a bid by the mid-June deadline for offers, according to two other sources. All of the sources, who spoke on condition of anonymity because the process is confidential, cautioned that a deal was not guaranteed and Brighthouse, which has a market value of roughly $3.4 billion, could ultimately remain an independent company. Brighthouse, Apollo and TPG declined to comment. Sixth Street, Aquarian and Jackson did not immediately respond to requests for comment. The Financial Times reported earlier on Tuesday that TPG and Aquarian had emerged as leading bidders. Charlotte, North Carolina-based Brighthouse, which was spun out of MetLife (MET.N), opens new tab in 2017, has been exploring the possibility of a sale for most of this year. It was reported in January that the company was working with bankers on a possible deal. Even as the number of contenders has narrowed in recent days, it is likely to take weeks, or even months, before a potential agreement is struck with a winner, given the time needed to complete steps including the complex due diligence process and any raising of outside finance to support their offer, the people said. U.S. life insurance and annuity providers in recent years have been attracting takeover interest from private equity firms and other asset managers that can take the underlying assets and deploy them into their various strategies. As well as earning higher returns on the insurance assets, the method helps turbo-charge firms' other products. For TPG, one of the last major alternative asset managers without a substantial insurance arm, acquiring Brighthouse would give it a platform from which to build out a broader insurance business. While Aquarian already owns some insurance assets, and formed subsidiary Aquarian Insurance Holdings in March to combine its insurance operations, buying Brighthouse is also regarded as a platform play, the sources said. Aquarian is a holding company focused on insurance and asset management businesses that is backed by investors including RedBird Capital Partners and Abu Dhabi state fund Mubadala. Brighthouse shares have gained roughly 12% so far in 2025, significantly outperforming the approximately 5% rise in the S&P insurance index (.SPXIN), opens new tab.
The Independent
an hour ago
- The Independent
Gen X is the least financially secure generation — and most Americans say they need six figures to live comfortably
More than a quarter of Americans say they would need to be making at least $150,000 to feel financially secure, and more than three-quarters of Americans say they currently don't feel financially secure — especially those who belong to Generation X. More than three-quarters of U.S. adults say they aren't completely financially secure, which is up from 72 percent in 2023 and 75 percent in 2024, according to Bankrate's Financial Freedom Survey. While just over a quarter of Americans told Bankrate they would feel secure if they could make $150,000, a large percentage of respondents — 45 percent — said they need to make at least six figures before they could begin to feel secure. Feeling financially secure, as defined by Bankrate's survey, is the ability to 'cover your bills and everyday essentials but also have money left over for eating out and vacations.' That growing sense of financial instability is fueled by several factors. 'One major issue is that wages have been stagnant for a large majority of the population over that time, and prices continue to rise,' Carolyn McClanahan, a certified financial planner and founder of Life Planning Partners in Jacksonville, Florida, told Bankrate. 'Add that to the backdrop of political instability everyone is feeling, and I think that is a perfect formula for people not feeling financially secure,' she said, The cost of goods are not the only major expense on the rise. There's also child care, auto loans, home insurance, outstanding student loan balances, and of course, rent. While all U.S. adults are subject to these forces, Generation X may be one of the hardest hit. Gen Xers — people who are currently between the ages of 45 and 60 — have now been working for decades. But the oldest of that cohort is still at least seven years away from the retirement age. Bankrate's survey found that 84 percent of Gen Xers felt they weren't being paid enough to feel financially secure. The survey found that 80 percent of Generation Z respondents felt the same way, as did 79 percent of Millennials and 69 percent of Baby Boomers. According to a 2024 Experian survey, Gen X has experienced the most 'financial trauma' — defined by Trauma of Money author Chanel Chapman as emotional distress directly linked to monetary concerns and its impact on their relationships, families, and perspectives on wealth. In that survey, 74 percent of Gen X respondents said they were experiencing financial trauma, followed by 71 percent of Millennials, 64 percent of Gen Z, and 63 percent of Baby Boomers. Gen Xers are in the unenviable position of nearing the end of their careers while also having to care for children and aging loved ones and navigating the challenging modern financial landscape. Gen X was also in the prime earning years during the Great Recession, and were the first generation born after the broad elimination of pensions in the United States. In the Bankrate survey, 35 percent of Gen Xers said they would need to rake in at least$150,000 annually to feel financially comfortable, while 24 percent of Baby Boomers, 26 percent of Millennials, and 20 percent of Gen Zers said the same. While Gen X may be struggling the most, all the surveys show that more than half of all U.S. adults are feeling the pressure to make ends meet. According to Bankrate, rapid inflation over the last three years has undermined households' purchasing power, which makes it harder for Americans to afford their lifestyles on their current salaries. A salary of $100,000 in January 2020 has the same buying power as $124,353, according to Bankrate. That means that if the worker making $100,000 hasn't received a raise between 2020 and 2025, they've effectively lost $24,000 of their salary. But for the nearly 900,000 Americans who make minimum wage, reaching that six-figure benchmark for financial security may seem impossible, especially when pushes to raise the federal minimum wage fail to materialize. Today, 34 states and territories have minimum wages around the federal hourly minimum of $7.25 per hour. That rate has not increased since 2009. Five states — Alabama, Louisiana, Mississippi, South Carolina, and Tennessee — use the federal minimum wage, and three states have a lower minimum wage than the federal minimum. While the push for a $15 minimum wage was championed primarily by progressive voices like Sen. Bernie Sanders, the idea has gained broader momentum in Congress, even among some Republicans like Sen. Josh Hawley. Sanders attempted to add a provision raising the federal minimum wage to $15 in 2021 as part of Joe Biden's COVID-19 stimulus bill, but the effort was killed in the Senate. That same year, the National Low Income Housing Coalition's annual ' Out of Reach ' report found that minimum wage workers in 93 percent of U.S. counties would not be able to afford a modest one-bedroom apartment. But even moderate raises aren't going to go far enough to reduce the financial pressures facing modern American adults. The current typical national salary for a full-time, year-round worker was $81,515 in 2023, according to the latest figures from the Bureau of Labor Statistics. Typically, the more direct path toward making more money is switching jobs, but even that avenue has become more difficult for many workers. Many companies have slowed or stopped hiring, making it that much harder for Americans to increase their salaries. The financial realities of the modern world are a far cry from the idyllic American Dream — that an American who works a full-time job can afford a home, transportation, raise their children, and have enough left over to enjoy their lives — and that reality doesn't seem to be changing anytime soon. 'Though many Americans hold onto the idea of returning to a 1950s-era 'Golden' America age, the days when a single, non-college educated breadwinner could sustain an entire family seem like they may be confined forever to the past,' Bankrate economy reporter Sarah Foster said.
Reuters
an hour ago
- Reuters
Grant Hill joining NBC coverage of 2025-26 NBA season
June 24 - The return of NBA coverage on NBC will have a familiar face for the 2025-26 season as Hall of Famer Grant Hill will join the desk as a game analyst. Hill, 52, will continue to serve in his role as a college basketball analyst with TNT Sports for the NCAA Tournament as well as for the network's coverage of Big East and Big 12 basketball. "The NBA has been such a meaningful part of my life, and I'm grateful for the opportunity to continue sharing the game I love with fans across the country," Hill said in a statement. "To be part of NBC's return to the NBA -- a network with such a rich basketball legacy -- and its debut on Peacock is truly an honor. I can't wait to get started this fall." Sam Flood, executive producer for NBC Sports, described Hill's pedigree as "unparalleled," emphasizing that Hill "will be a tremendous asset to our coverage." "He's an accomplished broadcaster," Flood added, "whose basketball IQ, insight and intellect will continue to resonate with NBA fans across the country." The 1995 Co-Rookie of the Year and a seven-time All-Star, Hill played 18 seasons in the NBA with the Detroit Pistons, Orlando Magic, Phoenix Suns and Los Angeles Clippers. He also won a gold medal with Team USA at the 1996 Olympics and was inducted into the Naismith Memorial Basketball Hall of Fame in 2018. Hill joined the broadcasting side of the game after retiring in 2013 and also assumed the role of USA Basketball's managing director, with Hill building a roster that won gold at the 2024 Olympics. The NBA last summer agreed to an 11-year media rights deal with NBC/Peacock, ABC/ESPN and Amazon Prime Video that begins with the 2025-26 season. --Field Level Media
