logo
Why the EU is ‘absent' in Gaza

Why the EU is ‘absent' in Gaza

Euractiv12 hours ago
Welcome to the Capitals by Eddy Wax. Get in touch.
Were you forwarded this newsletter by a friend? Sign up here.
In today's edition: Inside Europe's Gaza paralysis
EU crumbles further on trade threats
Spy trial could spill AfD secrets
Global plastic treaty talks in Geneva
'Fake' rice threatens Valencian tradition In the Capital
Nicolas Schmit, who sat in the European Commission in the aftermath of the 7 October attacks by Hamas, says the bloc's muddled stance on the Gaza war stems from something deeper than disagreement: institutional inertia and presidential control.
In an exclusive interview with The Capitals, the Luxembourg socialist said the Commission did not hold proper debate about Europe's relationship with Israel during the 13 months that he was in office after the war was triggered.
'We never had a real strategic discussion on the Middle East issue from the different points of view,' he said. 'We should have debated the relationship with Israel [but] we did not."
That omission, Schmit argued, was partly because President Ursula von der Leyen was aligned with Berlin and Washington, leaving little space for divergent views among the other commissioners.
'If you cannot identify and formulate collectively as a Commission,' Schmit said, 'you're just muddling through, and just crying big tears on what happens to the poor people of Gaza.'
Schmit's term as commissioner for jobs and social rights ended late last year. His remarks come after his 'very good friend' and former colleague Josep Borrell, the bloc's former top diplomat, accused EU leadership of being 'complicit' in war crimes by Israel in an eyebrow-raising op-ed, published across British, French, Italian, Spanish and Belgian media.
Reached for a response by Euractiv, the Commission declined to comment, saying it does not comment on comments.
That Borrell, a Spaniard, would take such a position is perhaps unsurprising – Spain has emerged as one of the bloc's most vocal critics of Israel in recent months. Just last week, in a rare public rebuke of her colleagues, Teresa Ribera, one of the Commission's top-ranking vice presidents, said on Spanish national radio that she's been pushing von der Leyen to respond more forcefully.
Schmit previously served as labour minister in Luxembourg – another European nation that has been loud in its criticisms of Israel.
Still, he distanced himself from Borrell's words – 'it's not complicity, it's just weakness,' adding, 'there are divisions in the European Union, obviously, and Borrell must know them better than I do."
Last week, member states debated the Commission's proposal to partially suspend Israel from the EU's flagship research programme, Horizon Europe, in what could become the bloc's first formal sanctions against Israel since 7 October. But no qualified majority emerged.
Around 10 countries, including France, Spain, Ireland, the Netherlands and Belgium, supported the move, but Hungary, Austria, and the Czech Republic firmly opposed it. Germany and Italy, two of the largest nations which could tip the scales, said they needed more time for analysis.
As the humanitarian crisis in Gaza worsens, Schmit believes the destruction is nearing a threshold the EU cannot ignore. 'What is done now to the Gaza people is just unacceptable. I do not want to enter into this legal debate if it's a genocide or not, but if it's not it's very close to [it],' he said.
In Schmit's view, measures such as suspending Israel from Horizon Europe will likely have little impact on PM Benjamin Netanyahu. Instead, he suggested suspending the EU-Israel Association Agreement, describing the move as Europe's 'only weapon.'
His critique that von der Leyen has mismanaged the Commission by not allowing more space for political debates on contentious subjects is not new; he also criticised his former boss on the campaign trail when he ran against her in an ill-fated bid to become Commission president last year.
It is not unusual for politicians to discover their convictions once the burdens of office are behind them. Schmit and Borrell, like many before them, now seem intent on aligning themselves with what they hope will be the right side of history.
But the war has also evolved drastically since they left the Commission, which could also explain why it took until July 2025 for the executive body to propose formal sanctions against Israel.
As the death toll rises, von der Leyen has belatedly sharpened her rhetoric in recent months, calling for Israel to allow humanitarian aid into Gaza and denouncing the images circulating online of civilian casualties as 'unbearable.'
Schmit's criticism of the Commission's chief extends beyond the war. He warned that under her leadership, commissioners 'very rarely' debated in meetings of the College.
'If you have this vertical organisation of power,' he said, 'commissioners are but the secretaries of the president. They are high civil servants.'
Keep your eyes peeled for the full Q&A out later today.
EU crumbles further on trade threats
Amid rumours that the Commission is poised to unveil a joint statement to formalise its trade deal with the US, EU countries are expected today to delay their never used retaliation package by a whopping six months, my colleague Thomas Møller-Nielsen reports.
The EU is essentially canning its €93 billion countermeasure package even though its flagship win from the much-criticised deal has yet to materialise: EU car exporters are still facing a 27.5% tariff even though the deal – such as it is – would lower the tariff to 15%. That reduced tariff is set to take effect on Friday.
The timing couldn't be better – not. The EU Parliament's top trade lawmaker, Bernd Lange, told Thomas there's a risk the EU's digital rulebook could be scrapped to appease Washington, citing the 'big difference' between US and EU interpretations of the deal published last week. Read the full interview.
Counterpoint : Humiliation is part of the strategy, argues SWP's Nicolai von Ondarza in this op-ed – though that's the problem.
Spy trial could expose AfD secrets
A Chinese espionage trial opening today reportedly threatens to spill internal secrets about the far-right Alternative for Germany.
Prosecutors allege that Jian G – a former aide to Maximilian Krah, an ex-AfD MEP now sitting in the Bundestag – spied for China. G, who was arrested shortly before the 2024 European elections, allegedly compiled memos detailing attempted party coups, questionable business deals, and private details about co-leader Alice Weidel. According to German magazine Der Spiegel , these memos are part of the evidence in the case. Read more. The Capitals
PARIS – LONDON | A Franco-British migration deal to limit Channel crossings comes into force today. The scheme, agreed in June, aims to send up to 2,600 rejected asylum seekers a year from Britain to France – which at current rates covers around three weeks' worth of small boats crossing the Channel. The European Commission will be part of a monitoring group to ensure the pilot project complies with EU law, and expects it will only last until the EU's new migration pact comes into force in June 2026.
ROME | Italy is expanding its special economic zone to include the central regions of Umbria and Marche, extending benefits such as tax breaks and reduced red tape previously reserved for the south. PM Giorgia Meloni announced the move during a state visit to Marche, calling it a boost for entrepreneurship and investment. But with regional elections looming, critics suggest the timing appears politically motivated. Read more.
BERLIN | The city of Bonn has joined several others, including Düsseldorf and Hanover, in offering to take in children from Gaza and Israel, following similar moves by France and Spain. While national support is key for entry and medical coordination, Berlin remains cautious, saying the priority is broader local aid. Chancellery Minister Thorsten Frei said Monday that transfers would help only 'individual cases.'
MADRID | Spain's conservative Popular Party has demanded answers over multimillion-euro contracts awarded to Huawai for storing judicial wiretaps, calling top ministers to testify before Congress after the summer break. Party heavyweight Juan Bravo accused the government of ignoring EU and US warnings about security risks tied to the Chinese tech giant.
THE HAGUE | The Netherlands will be the first NATO ally to send a €500 million package of US-made weapons, including Patriot missile systems, to Ukraine under a new European-funded deal praised by NATO Secretary-General Mark Rutte. The move is part of a broader NATO-backed push in which European countries provide US weapons from their stockpiles. Read more.
WARSAW | In an official visit to Warsaw, Ukrainian Foreign Minister Andriy Sybiha announced that Kyiv has requested a €120 million loan from Poland to buy Polish-made military equipment, including Piorun missile launchers and Krab self-propelled howitzers. Also on Euractiv
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

US trade deal doesn't touch EU tech laws, Brussels vows (again)
US trade deal doesn't touch EU tech laws, Brussels vows (again)

Euractiv

timean hour ago

  • Euractiv

US trade deal doesn't touch EU tech laws, Brussels vows (again)

The European Commission said today that the bloc's landmark tech laws, the Digital Services Act (DSA) and Digital Markets Act (DMA), remain untouched in an upcoming statement on the EU-US trade deal. On Tuesday, the Commission reiterated that the bloc's flagship digital laws, specifically the DSA and the DMA, will not even be mentioned in an upcoming joint statement on the EU-US trade deal, expected to be published imminently. "What we're not doing is changing our rules," said a senior EU official during a briefing for journalists on the upcoming trade agreement. "None of the things are touched," the official also emphasised, referencing the DSA and DMA. The sister regulations were only formally adopted by the EU back in 2022 and it's fair to say that enforcement (especially of the DSA) remains a work in progress. In an interview with Euractiv earlier this week, the European Parliament's top trade lawmaker, Bernd Lange, warned that "there is a risk" that EU digital laws could be scrapped to appease the US administration. President Donald Trump's administration has repeatedly attacked foreign laws which take aim at US tech giants as unfair digital taxes. But speaking to Euractiv on Tuesday, German EPP lawmaker Andreas Schwab, who was the rapporteur of the DMA, said he's not worried – predicting, on the contrary, that "confirmations" the Commission has given parliamentarians "will be upheld". "Digital to legislation is part of European Regulatory Competition Policy. It's in the interest of everyone, also of American companies," he went on, before further emphasising "there is no change in the application of rules just because of trade policy issues." Despite the repeated assurances of the Commission's commitment to the digital rulebook, US counterparts have continued to put out polar opposite claims. In interview on CNBC last week, US Commerce Secretary, Howard Lutnick, said that the EU's digital services taxes and 'attack' on US tech firms was still 'on the table.' The DSA, which regulates harmful content online, has also been repeatedly attacked by Republican lawmakers. Most recently, a US delegation led by MAGA politician Jim Jordan, visited Brussels after releasing a report branding the law a "censorship" tool. Likewise, Meta's Joel Kaplan (an ex-Republican politician) has slammed the DMA, the bloc's Big Tech regulation, as an attempt to "handicap successful American businesses." (nl)

Banned Russian media sites ‘still accessible' across EU, report finds
Banned Russian media sites ‘still accessible' across EU, report finds

Euractiv

time2 hours ago

  • Euractiv

Banned Russian media sites ‘still accessible' across EU, report finds

Websites of banned Russian media outlets can still be easily accessed across the EU in the "overwhelming majority" of cases, experts said Tuesday, denouncing the bloc's "failure" to publish full lists of the websites involved. After Russia invaded Ukraine in February 2022, EU authorities banned Kremlin-controlled media from broadcasting in the bloc, including online, to counter "disinformation".But more than three years on, "sanctioned outlets are largely still active and accessible" across member states, said a report released by the Institute for Strategic Dialogue (ISD), a London-based think tank."Russian state media continues to maintain a strong online presence, posing a persistent challenge to Western democracies," the report said, with blocks by internet service providers "largely ineffective". EU sanctions banned RT, previously known as Russia Today, and Sputnik media organisations as well as other state-controlled media accused of "information warfare". The ISD report covered Germany, France, Italy, Poland, the Czech Republic and Slovakia, testing the top three internet service providers in each. It identified 26 media under sanctions and tried to view 58 associated domains. In 76% of tests, providers failed to block access. EU member states are responsible for ensuring blocks are applied by internet service providers. But the ISD report criticised the European Commission for its "failure" to maintain a "definitive list of different domain iterations" – or website addresses – associated with each media outlet. It said this left countries and internet service providers "without the guidance needed for effective and targeted implementation". "The issue is when they sanction Russian state media, they mention the outlet that they are sanctioning – so Russia Today, Sputnik, etc – but what they don't list is what domain falls under this entity," said the report's author, Pablo Maristany de las Casas. "If the European Commission were to list the different domains that are known to be linked to these entities, that would make it much easier for member states and the internet service providers in those member states to enforce these blocks," he said. The report urged the EC to post a "continuously updated and publicly accessible list" and include it in sanctions packages and on its online sanctions dashboard. A Commission spokesperson told AFP: "It is up to the relevant providers to block access to websites of outlets covered by the sanctions, including subdomains or newly created domains." Grey zone and mirrors Enforcement needs to be more agile because Russia has sought to circumvent sanctions, the report's author said. "Some outlets, for example, RT, use so-called mirror domains" where they "simply copy the contents of the blocked site into a new URL – a new link – to circumvent those sanctions," he said. The report found that Slovakia, whose Prime Minister Robert Fico is known for his pro-Russia positions, performed the worst on enforcement, with no blocks at all. Slovakia's legal mandates to block pro-Russian websites expired in 2022 after lawmakers failed to extend them. Poland was the second worst, while France and Germany were most effective overall. Most sanctioned domains had little traction in the bloc, with under 1,000 monthly views, but Germany, with its large Russian diaspora, was the exception: three domains including RT had over 100,000 monthly visitors from there. The report's author spotted another "loophole": numerous accounts on X posting links to banned media, mainly aimed at French and German speakers. In May, such accounts posted almost 50 thousand links, almost all to RT-affiliated sites, the report found. X largely blocks official media accounts, the author said, but "with these anonymous accounts that only repost this kind of content, there seems to be a grey zone and it seems not be withheld in the EU."

The Brief – Will the dream of free hand luggage get off the ground? Don't bet on it
The Brief – Will the dream of free hand luggage get off the ground? Don't bet on it

Euractiv

time2 hours ago

  • Euractiv

The Brief – Will the dream of free hand luggage get off the ground? Don't bet on it

If you've stressed over buying your cabin bag for your flight home, don't get your hopes up for EU lawmakers settling the issue any time soon. Earlier this year, passengers across the continent welcomed the announcement that the European Parliament transport committee would push to make a second piece of free hand luggage a legal right for flights across Europe. Until now, we have depended on the goodwill of airlines to carry on board anything more than a pathetically small personal items bag. But despite the committee's best intentions, MEPs have undermined the outcome before even starting the confrontation with the Council of the EU, where governments want to restrict, rather than increase, air passenger rights. Rather than setting their sights on securing a meaningful luggage allowance, MEPs have instead proposed a risible minimum allowance – one that, if enforced by airlines, would permit only the smallest of bags. According to their motion, the minimum sum of length, width, and height would be capped at 100cm – barely more than two shoe boxes. It's small to the point of being impractical, and would do little to alleviate the frustration of passengers. Some might argue it's an improvement on the existing situation, but the reality is that airlines would likely be even more stringent in checking the size of hand luggage – and hammering passengers who exceed the limit. At the same time, airlines are already playing the victim and have framed the right to a second free luggage item as unfair for those who want to fly 'light' (with just a small backpack) without paying extra. The truth is that allowances have been reduced year after year, forcing passengers to pay extra. And whilst there is a chance that airlines would try to recoup lost revenue – for instance, by inflating ticket prices – doing so risks losing passengers. Given that the limit would be applied across the board, it would more likely just be something airlines would have to swallow. Which of course explains their loud protest. Consumers shouldn't hold their breath for a substantial improvement to baggage allowances. The parliament's lead negotiator on the file, the Italian democrat Matteo Ricci, has bigger things on his mind. Namely, the chance of being elected as governor of la Marche region at the end of September; and defending himself in a corruption investigation over funds he awarded as mayor of Pesaro city. He's hardly the hand luggage hero EU travellers long for. And though a second item of hand luggage might technically be a win for consumer rights, the gain could have been much greater if EU lawmakers had the courage to really challenge private airlines' interests. Roundup Life after plastic – Plastic pollution is highly detrimental to human and animal health, and is expected to triple by 2060 if no action is taken to reverse the trend. But a global treaty to limit pollution is facing pushback from petrostates. Age checks in the virtual world – European countries are tightening age verification rules to protect children online, especially in the realm of porn platforms. But building a robust system is complicated by the fast-evolving online space, and age checks raise their own privacy concerns. How bad was the deal? – The EU-US tariff deal has come under intense scrutiny, with many concluding that the EU has completely caved to Trump's bullying. But is all lost? Maybe not, Nicolai von Ondarza argues. And the Commission is also clinging to the line that the deal "could ensure stability and protect our shared interests." Across Europe Döner dispute – Germany's appetite for döner kebabs stems from the influx of Turkish Gastarbeiter (guest workers) who arrived between the 1950s and 1970s to help rebuild post-war Germany. But a strike at one of the country's largest skewer suppliers has pushed up prices of the cheap eat. What happened to proper paella? – Non-Spanish rice is increasingly being marketed as paella rice, much to the frustration of chefs who have noted that their time-tested recipes don't taste so good. 'When you cook it, you realise: the cooking points are different.' More munitions to Ukraine – Sweden will send around €238 million worth of equipment to Ukraine, including Patriot missiles and anti-tank ammunition. The pledge is part of a broader €433 million package jointly coordinated with Denmark and Norway and is largely sourced from existing European stockpiles.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store