logo
The Best Phones You Can't Buy in the US

The Best Phones You Can't Buy in the US

WIRED27-03-2025

These phones are worth considering if you have yet to see something you like.
Photograph: Simon Hill
Oppo Find N5 for £1,106: It's a real shame that the Find N5 won't even land in the UK or Europe because the world's slimmest book-style foldable (3.6 mm open) is a lovely phone. The 6.62-inch cover display and 8.12-inch inner display are excellent, and the Find N5 has top specs all the way (Snapdragon 8 Elite, 16 GB RAM, 512 GB storage, 5,600 mAh battery, 80W wired and 50W wireless charging). The triple-lens camera (50-MP main, 50-MP telephoto, 8-MP ultrawide) is the most obvious compromise, a necessity for this form factor. The slightly buggy software and bloatware are the only other detractors, but the potential pain of importing will be enough to put most folks off.
Xiaomi Poco F7 Ultra for £649 and F7 Pro for £499: While Poco has traditionally been a budget brand, the aptly named F7 Ultra takes it into new territory. This phone boasts a few flagship-level features, such as the Snapdragon 8 Elite chipset with the VisionBoost D7 for graphics, a powerful triple-lens camera, and a lovely, high-resolution 6.67-inch display with a 120-Hz refresh rate. It also scores an IP68 rating and offers up to 50-watt wireless charging. The catch is a price hike over previous Poco F series releases, but at the early bird price, the F7 Ultra is a compelling bargain. The F7 Pro is more in line with what we expect from the brand, with an older processor, limited camera, and no wireless charging. Both run Xiaomi's HyperOS 2 and have too much bloatware, but Xiaomi now promises four Android version upgrades and six years of security patches.
Realme 14 Pro+ for 530 Euros: The color-changing finish may be gimmicky, but it's fun, and this phone looks and feels far more expensive than it is. There are more highs than lows on the spec sheet. You get a triple-lens camera, an IP68/69 rating, a 6,000 mAh battery, and a 6.83-inch OLED display with a 120-Hz refresh rate, but the Snapdragon 7s Gen 3 chipset is limited, there's no wireless charging support, and no charger in the box. It is still quite a bargain and should be landing in the UK soon.
Xiaomi 15 for £899: Folks seeking a more compact phone than the Xiaomi 15 Ultra could do a lot worse than its smaller sibling. The Xiaomi 15 feels lovely, with a 6.36-inch screen, a decent triple-lens camera, and top-notch internals. But it's a conservative design, kind of pricey, and it has the same software and bloatware issues as the Ultra.
Honor Magic 7 RSR for £1,550: Designed with Porsche, this souped-up version of the 7 Pro above has a fancier design with a hexagonal camera module, a slightly improved telephoto lens, 24 GB of RAM (likely largely pointless), 1 TB of storage, and a bigger battery (5,850 mAh). It's lovely but doesn't do enough to justify the additional outlay.
Oppo Find X8 Pro for £1,099: The last two Oppo flagships didn't officially make it to the UK and Europe, so the X8 Pro marks a welcome return. This is a polished phone with a quad-lens camera (all 50 MP), but it feels like a downgrade from the Find X7 Ultra I used last year because of the smaller sensor. It is fast, with excellent battery life, speedy wired and wireless charging, IP68/69 protection, and no obvious omissions. But it's pricey, flagships should not have bloatware, and I'd prefer to wait for the X8 Ultra.
Honor 200 Pro for £499: I don't love the design of the Honor 200 Pro (7/10, WIRED Review), but it has a versatile triple-lens camera with a capable portrait mode. There are also some useful AI features, and the battery life is good, with fast wired and wireless charging. It cost £200 more at launch, but at this new lower price, it is a far more attractive option.
Xiaomi Mix Flip for £749: Xiaomi's first flip phone is surprisingly good, with two relatively bright and roomy screens, solid stamina, fast charging, and snappy performance. It's a shame Xiaomi didn't craft more flip screen-specific features. It doesn't help that the Mix Flip was too expensive at launch (£1,099), but at this reduced price, it's a decent shout for folks craving a folding flip phone.
Nubia Z70 Ultra for £749: Much like last year's Z60 Ultra (6/10, WIRED Review), the Z70 Ultra is a value-packed brick with an excellent 6.8-inch display, Snapdragon 8 Elite chipset, versatile triple-lens camera, and 6,150 mAh battery. Unfortunately, the camera is inconsistent and poor at recording video, and the software is shoddy (with only three Android version updates promised).
Oppo Reno 12 Pro for £395: There are a couple of reasons to consider the Reno 12 Pro: the camera and the battery life. A main camera and a telephoto lens, both rated at 50 megapixels, are rare at this price (there's also an 8MP ultrawide and a 50MP selfie camera). But I don't like the plastic design, there's bloatware galore, and the performance is just OK.
Xiaomi 14T Pro for £470: As the mid-year follow-up to Xiaomi's flagship 14, the 14T Pro (7/10, WIRED Review) is a bit of a bargain and has dropped in price since I reviewed it. The basics are nailed, with a big screen, good performance, plenty of stamina, and a solid camera. But there is bloatware, Xiaomi's software, and the lack of wireless charging to contend with.
OnePlus Nord 4 for £369: With a metal unibody, the Nord 4 stands out and also boasts an excellent screen, enough processing power for most folks, impressive battery life, and fast charging. The main camera is fine, and there's a nifty AquaTouch feature that lets you use the phone with wet hands. But there's no wireless charging, the ultrawide camera is disappointing, and there's some bloatware.
Avoid These Phones
These aren't bad phones necessarily, but we think you'd be better served by something above.
Xiaomi Mix Fold 4 for £1,085: Only officially released in China, the Xiaomi Mix Fold 4 is a stylish folding phone with a 6.56-inch outer screen that folds open to reveal a 7.98-inch inner screen. It also offers solid performance and battery life, but despite having a large quad-lens camera module, the camera is underwhelming. The crease is also pronounced, and using a Chinese model is a bit of a pain as various things are not translated, and there's work in getting the apps you want.
Realme GT7 Pro for £774: This potential flagship killer has a 6.78-inch OLED screen, a Snapdragon 8 Elite chip, and an enormous 6,500 mAh battery. You also get a triple-lens camera, but the 50-megapixel main and telephoto lenses are let down by the 8-megapixel ultrawide. It also lacks wireless charging, and you'll have to import it to the UK as it only seems to be on sale in Germany.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro+ for £369: An attractive, durable design (IP68), a 200-megapixel Samsung camera sensor, and decent battery life with super fast charging (120W) must be balanced against middling performance, poor ultrawide (8 MP) and macro (2 MP) lenses, and a ton of bloatware. Ultimately, there's little improvement over last year's Redmi Note 13 Pro+ (6/10, WIRED Review), and it's not just that there are better phones for the same money; there are better Xiaomi phones.
Xiaomi Poco F6 for £268 or F6 Pro for £339: A real bargain when first released, the Poco F6 series (7/10, WIRED Recommends) is still tempting with a big screen, decent performance, and a pretty capable camera, but there's bloatware, shoddy software, and limited long-term support. The F6 is a better value than the Pro.
Motorola Edge 50 Pro for £399: It may be falling in price, but the Motorola Edge 50 Pro (7/10, WIRED Review) only has a couple of Android upgrades to go. While the design is compact and there's a lovely display, I found it lacked processing power, with sometimes sluggish camera performance, and there are better options above.
Nubia Flip 5G for £419: We had some fun with the Nubia Flip 5G (6/10, WIRED Review), and it was the cheapest flip foldable available for a while. The circular cover screen is cute, but it can't do much. The performance was average a year ago, and the annoying software and update policy are major strikes against it.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Galaxy S25 Edge deals — where to get Samsung's super thin new phone for free
Galaxy S25 Edge deals — where to get Samsung's super thin new phone for free

Tom's Guide

time5 hours ago

  • Tom's Guide

Galaxy S25 Edge deals — where to get Samsung's super thin new phone for free

Samsung's Galaxy S lineup just got bigger — and thinner. The Galaxy S25 Edge is the newest member of the family, and this device is all about being thin and light. You get a big 6.7-inch display and 200MP camera in a design that measures just 5.8mm thin and weighs 5.8 ounces. There are dozens of Galaxy S25 Edge deals to choose from right now. And trust us when we say you'll want to take advantage of them because this $1,099 phone is not cheap. My favorite deal right now comes from Samsung itself. Samsung is offering up to $750 off the Galaxy S25 Edge with trade-in. Equally impressive, T-Mobile is offering the Galaxy S25 Edge for free with trade-in and Experience Beyond or Go5G Next data plans. Those aren't the only Galaxy S25 Edge deals you can get right now. Below I've rounded up the best deals from carriers and retailers alike. For more ways to save, make sure to check out our guide to the best Samsung promo codes. Galaxy S25 Edge: up to $750 off w/ trade-in @ SamsungThe new Galaxy S25 Edge sports a 5.8mm profile, which is 31% thinner than the Galaxy S25 Ultra. It features a 6.7-inch AMOLED QHD+ 120Hz display, Snapdragon 8 Elite chipset, 12GB of RAM, and 256GB of storage. It also has a 200MP main camera with 10x digital zoom and a 12MP front camera with 85-degree FOV. In our Galaxy S25 Edge review, we called it a svelte phone that offers the same One UI 7 experience and Galaxy AI features found on the S25 Ultra. Just keep in mind you'll need to charge it during the day as its battery life only hit 12 hours and 24 minutes in our testing. Galaxy S25 Edge: free w/ trade-in @ T-MobileT-Mobile is also giving away Samsung's latest phone to anyone who trades in an eligible device in any condition and signs up the carrier's Experience Beyond plan, which costs $100/month. You receive bill credits covering the cost of the Galaxy S25 Edge spread out across 24 months. If you'd prefer a less expensive data plan, you can get $800 off the cost of the Galaxy S25 Edge with a trade-in and a new line on either the Experience More or Go5G Plus. Existing customers on the Experience More, Experience Beyond, Go5G Plus, or Go5G Next plans can also save $800 with a trade-in. Galaxy S25 Edge: free w/ trade-in @ AT&TAT&T is offering the Galaxy S25 Edge for free when you trade-in an eligible phone from any year, in any condition. You'll need to sign up to an eligible 36-month data plan to get this offer. Galaxy S25 Edge: free w/ unlimited @ VerizonWith its 5.8mm profile, the Galaxy S25 Edge is the thinnest phone in Samsung's S25 family. It features a 6.7-inch AMOLED QHD+ 120Hz display, Snapdragon 8 Elite chipset, 12GB of RAM, and 256GB of storage. It also has a 200MP main camera with 10x digital zoom and a 12MP front camera with 85-degree FOV. In our Galaxy S25 Edge review, we called it a svelte phone that's rich in features. Note: The phone is coming in and out of stock at Verizon. Galaxy S25 Edge: up to $830 off w/ trade-in @ Xfinity MobileNew and existing Xfinity Mobile customers can get up to $830 off the Galaxy S25 Edge with an eligible trade-in. Customers with no trade-in can still get $400 off Samsung's new phone when they purchase with Xfinity. Galaxy S25 Edge: up to $750 off w/ trade-in @ Best BuyTrade-in an old phone at Best Buy and you can get up to $750 off the new Galaxy S25 Edge. Additionally, Best Buy Plus and Total members can get a $50 Best Buy gift card with their Galaxy S25 Edge purchase. Galaxy S25 Edge: 512GB for $1,099 @ AmazonAmazon is offering the upgraded 512GB Galaxy S25 Edge for $1,099. That's what you'd normally pay for the base 256GB model. Additionally, you'll get a free $50 Amazon gift card with your purchase.

Tesla rival Xiaomi shows off its new SUV in Beijing
Tesla rival Xiaomi shows off its new SUV in Beijing

Yahoo

time9 hours ago

  • Yahoo

Tesla rival Xiaomi shows off its new SUV in Beijing

Elon Musk's beleaguered Tesla (TSLA) is fending off yet another competitive EV entry in China. Chinese electronics giant Xiaomi launched the YU7 SUV at 13 of its Beijing showrooms this week and, according to CNEVPOST will roll it out in almost 100 Chinese cities throughout June. While customers can marvel at the YU7, they won't be able to start placing orders for it until July. A robust YU7 launch would build on the success of its sleek SU7 sedan, which launched last year and has been outselling Tesla. The YU7 is a five-seat, mid-to-large-size SUV, clocking in at just over 16 feet in length. CNEVPOST reports that the YU7 will be available in standard, pro, and max versions, each with more amenities than the other. Zoriy Birenboym, auto expert and CEO of tells Quartz that Xiaomi's entry into the EV market with the SU7 was more than just a headline — it was a signal. 'With the YU7 now following, Xiaomi is clearly aiming to scale and diversify its lineup,' Birenboym said, adding that if priced competitively and supported by their strong tech ecosystem, the YU7 could challenge incumbents in the mid-size EV space and further blur the lines between consumer tech and mobility. 'This move could have ripple effects across both the auto and tech industries,' he said. HSBC Qianhai (HSBC) published a note, according to Reuters, stating that the new EV SUV will be priced between 230,000 yuan and 330,000 yuan ($31,989 and $45,898) and that Xiaomi could ship 100,000 YU7 units this year, followed by 249,000 units in 2026. In a regulatory filing with the Chinese government and reported on CNEVPOST, the company said the new SUV is equipped with a battery pack that has a capacity of 101.7 kWh and range available in three options: 670 km, 750 km, and 760 km (416 miles at the low end and 472 at the high end). This would rival Tesla's Model S, which can go just over 400 miles before needing a recharge. For the latest news, Facebook, Twitter and Instagram.

Apple should make an iPhone 17 Ultra and copy these phone cameras
Apple should make an iPhone 17 Ultra and copy these phone cameras

Digital Trends

time9 hours ago

  • Digital Trends

Apple should make an iPhone 17 Ultra and copy these phone cameras

The iPhone has long been recognized as a leader in both mobile photography, but in recent years, companies from across the globe have aimed to dethrone it. Five years ago, Samsung launched its Ultra series, which includes the latest Galaxy S25 Ultra. More recently, Oppo, Vivo, and Xiaomi have all launched Ultra competitors that have broken new barriers in mobile photography and videography. Fast forward to this year, and Apple is expected to launch the iPhone 17 Air, a new thin with a single camera designed to usher in a thinner, lighter era for smartphones. Yet, the iPhone 16 Pro Max remains a camera powerhouse, albeit one that's limited by Apple's imagination and willingness to be the best in mobile photography. Recommended Videos For the past few months, I've used all four main Ultra phones for a variety of photos and tested them against the iPhone 16 Pro, which has the same camera as its bigger brother. The results have left me convinced that Apple should launch an iPhone 17 Ultra and copy these features from its rival Ultra phones. Here's how the iPhone 16 Pro compares and why Apple should finally push the Ultra barrier. How each camera compares Let's take a quick look at the main spec differences between each phone camera and how Apple's best smartphone camera right now stacks up. iPhone 16 Pro Galaxy S25 Ultra Vivo X200 Ultra Oppo Find X8 Ultra Primary Camera 48MP, f/1.8 24mm, OIS Size: 1/1.28' 200MP, f/1.7 24mm, OIS Size: 1/1.3' 50MP, f/1.7 35mm, OIS Size: 1/1.28' 50MP, f/1.8 23mm, OIS Size: 1-inch Ultra-wide camera 48MP, f/2.2 13mm, PDAF 50MP, f/1.9 PDAF 50MP, f/2.0 14mm, OIS 50MP, f/2.0 15mm, PDAF Telephoto Camera 1 12MP, f/2.8 120mm, OIS 5x optical zoom 10MP, f/2.4 67mm, OIS 3x optical 200MP, f/2.3 85mm, OIS 3.7x optical Macro: 3.4:1 50MP, f/2.1 70mm, OIS 3x optical Macro: 10cm Telephoto Camera 2 – 50MP, f/3.4 111mm, OIS 5x optical – 50MP, f/3.1 135mm, OIS 6x optical Macro: 35cm Max zoom 25x 100x 120x 120x Other 3D LiDAR scanner (depth) Laser autofocus Zeiss Optics Add-on zoom lens: 200mm, 2.35x Hasselblad Colors, Laser, Color Spectrum sensor Selfie Camera 12MP, f/1.9 23mm, OIS 12MP, f/2.2 26mm 50MP, f/2.5 AF 32MP, f/2.4 PDAF Examining the specs sheet reveals the key issues with Apple's current approach compared to the best smartphone cameras. First, there's the distinct lack of a secondary telephoto camera, or failing that, one capable of AI-powered zoom at larger magnifications. Then, there's the poor quality selfie camera. Finally, there's the smaller sensor sizes. Each of the Ultra competitors solves one or more of these issues, and as we'll see, that makes a significant difference to the overall pictures captured. Let's take a look. few common differences between the iPhone 16 Pro and its Ultra competitors. First, most competitors feature dual telephoto lenses, and all but Samsung offer a minimum capture distance of just 10cm. The net result is far better zoom capabilities than those available on an iPhone today. The iPhone 16 Pro is also limited to just 25x zoom, and there is significant degradation past 10x. Meanwhile, Samsung is strong at up to 30x, and Oppo, Xiaomi, and Vivo all prove capable at up to 100x zoom. To take it a step further, Vivo and Xiaomi also offer add-on lenses that can significantly extend the zoom. Let's take a closer look at how each camera compares to the iPhone 16 Pro and what lessons Apple can learn from its chief rivals. Comparing to the Galaxy S25 Ultra in Dubai Huawei was the first to make periscope telephoto lenses popular on smartphones, but Samsung was the first to define the term Ultra in smartphones. The Galaxy S20 Ultra delivered exceptional zoom, and one key selling point was the performance at higher magnifications. The iPhone 16 Pro is limited to a maximum magnification of 25x, while the Galaxy S25 Ultra can go up to 100x. You likely won't use that on the latter, but it does mean great performance at the 30x magnification, as we'll see. Galaxy S25 Ultra (left), iPhone 16 Pro (right) At 1x, both phones are fairly evenly matched under the Dubai sunshine, although the Galaxy S25 Ultra has much better color reproduction thanks to the higher saturation. While the iPhone 16 Pro is technically more accurate, Samsung's color science has always skewed towards saturated, and it works wonders for landscapes and scenes like this. 5x zoom photo captured with 5x telephoto lens: Galaxy S25 Ultra (left), iPhone 16 Pro (right) Both phones feature a periscope lens offering 5x optical zoom, so how do they compare? This is probably the best indication of the difference in the overall results with that lens, and looking closely at these results shows that Apple's lower resolution 12MP telephoto struggles to match the detail captured by the 50MP telephoto on the Galaxy S25 Ultra. Apple's color science once again skews natural, but this is less of a concern in this scene. 10x comparison: Galaxy S25 Ultra (top), iPhone 16 Pro (bottom) The power of two telephoto lenses starts to kick in once we go into hybrid or digital zoom. Comparing the same 10x photo captured on both phones, the degradation in the iPhone 16 Pro zoom photo has become obvious. The degradation is fairly subtle so the finaly image is still completely usable, but it's definitely visible. 30x Galaxy S25 Ultra (left) vs iPhone 16 Pro 25x (right) Rounding off this comparison at 30x, the iPhone 16 Pro photo has actually improved over the quality in the previous photo. This isn't always the case, and there are plenty of other examples of higher degradation at these magnifications, but here the differences are more nuanced. The iPhone 16 Pro picture has better colors but lesser detail, while the Galaxy S25 Ultra has better detail but a less visually appealing photo. Throughout the past four months, I've yielded similar results to these. Like the Google Pixel 9 Pro, the iPhone 16 Pro is limited in its zoom capabilities, but considering the Pro Max version is priced at $200 below the Galaxy S25 Ultra, these phones are all designed to compete against each other. For Apple, Samsung doesn't pose the largest threat. Rather, it's the innovation by other companies to push the boundaries of smartphone photography. Vivo and Oppo both have incredible phones that pose a threat to Apple's camera appeal in the biggest smartphone markets in the world (outside of the US, where they're not available). Comparing to the Oppo Find X8 Ultra and Vivo X200 Ultra in Paris Vivo has been pushing the boundaries with smartphone cameras for years, and the Vivo X200 Ultra is no different. It's an incredible all-around smartphone that shows you don't need a secondary telephoto to capture incredible photos. The triple camera setup on the X200 Ultra prioritizes parity between lenses so that you can shoot with any lens and get similar results with minimal loss of quality. The one key downside to the Vivo X200 Ultra is the starting 35mm focal length; while it's designed to replicate what your eye can see, it makes comparisons really hard and feels jarring when you come from the wider cameras on most phones. Oppo has taken a somewhat different approach with the Find X8 Ultra. It's designed to have parity between the different lenses, ensuring that you don't suddenly lose quality in a photo or video when you switch between the different lenses. It includes two periscope telephoto lenses and while there are differences between the color science across the four lenses, maintaining parity in the resolution is a worthwhile endeavor. During a recent trip to Paris, I managed to test these three cameras out. Let's first start at the Eiffel Tower. For these lower magnifications, the Vivo has the brightest image but the Oppo captures the most detail. The iPhone 16 Pro mostly keeps up with its rivals, but the trend continues with images lacking color and vibrancy. As we go above 5x, the iPhone starts to struggle as it has done consistently throughout my testing. This is the biggest issue with Apple's approach to the camera: it doesn't heavily use AI to enhance captured photos, and it lacks the hardware to offer strong zoom at above 5x magnification. It's a problem that would be solved with a secondary, longer telephoto lens. Alongside daytime, both the Oppo Find X8 Ultra and Vivo X200 Ultra have proven extremely capable at night as we'll see below. Although the iPhone 16 Pro does struggle with zoom, it's still incredibly capable in lowlight. Here it has my favorite overall photo, as it has less flare from the lights and the photo visually appears to be clearer. There's little difference between Oppo and Vivo, but Apple is the winner here. This was an interesting test as there's a lot of detail, there's street lights providing background glow and it would challenge many phones. The Vivo X200 Ultra fails to capture the correct light balance here, but it captures the most detail. The lighting is slightly warm on the iPhone, but it takes the most balanced photo overall again. Without doubt, the Oppo Find X8 Ultra has the best all-around set of pictures in this scene. In particular, the 3x photo is fantastic as the phone adjusts for lens flare from the bulbs underneath the canopy, which makes the scene sharper. I dislike the Vivo's odd focal lengths again, as they feel strange but that's a personal preference. Vivo's photos are perfectly fine here, although it struggles with some of the lighting. The iPhone does well overall, but it overexposes most scenes resulting in less vibrant images. Testing the portrait mode I saved the best for last: the Oppo Find X8 Ultra is my current smartphone camera of choice, for everything from capturing memories to capturing content on new gadgets. Most of the content I use on social media, in articles, and even in video has been captured on the Find X8 Ultra, which proves to be the most versatile smartphone camera I've ever used. I've found that parity amongst the lenses works wonders during regular use, and the use of a 1-inch sensor in the main camera means you can get incredible light. It has f/1.6 aperture, which also allows it to capture stunning bokeh. It's fast become my favorite portrait mode hardware, although I still prefer Samsung's color point mode. Here's some comparison of the portrait mode across all three devices. The larger sensor of the Oppo Find X8 Ultra helps capture far more light, and the color spectrum sensor works wonders in ensuring that white balance remains accurate throughout the image. At both focal lengths, the Oppo takes the best photo, but Apple isn't far behind so better hardware and finer tuning could yield these results from an iPhone. The final test yields a clear victory for Apple. Despite the different focal lengths (these were all captured at the maximum permitted in the camera's viewfinder), there's fantastic color reproduction and dynamic range in the picture captured on the iPhone. The Oppo Find X8 Ultra is close behind, but the Vivo X200 Ultra is too aggressive in smoothening skin tones and textures. Why Apple should embrace the Ultra culture There are several reasons why Apple should adopt the trend of launching an Ultra smartphone with the very best mobile photography capabilities. The main one is obvious: Apple has positioned the iPhone as a creator's dream, but while it's the best for video, an Ultra phone would also allow it to be one of the best for photos. Beyond this, however, there are four main reasons. First, Samsung has proven that Ultra cameras make sense. The higher sale price, likely higher margin, and ability to attract people who are price-insensitive all make sense in Apple's current business model. Second, Samsung's cameras will eventually match the iPhone for video, meaning Apple will need to compete in photography as well. Third, Apple would inspire an ecosystem of additional products. Companies like Moment have built entire additional ecosystems around photography and videography on the iPhone, but providing them with better hardware would inspire the next generation of mobile photography apps and services. Fourth and finally, product differentiation. The rumored thin iPhone 17 Air and reported low sales of current-generation phones, such as the iPhone 16 Plus, suggest that Apple's lineup may have stagnated. An iPhone 17 Ultra (or future generation) would offer a product that can stand alone from its siblings. Considering the iPhone 17 Air is expected to be the more expensive phone in the lineup, an Ultra model could help Apple push even higher pricing. For now, this is the Ultra phone to use Unsurprisingly, the Oppo Find X8 Ultra remains my smartphone camera of choice, at least for photography. The iPhone will stay in my pocket for video (and as my primary phone for sensitive apps), but the Oppo Find X8 Ultra will continue to be my phone of choice for all my photos. Although the Vivo X200 Ultra takes better photos than its rivals at many focal lengths, I've found that Oppo is slightly better at others, and I prefer Oppo's color science. Furthermore, ColorOS is far smoother, with a more intuitive interface that allows for quick changes to settings and features. Then there's the Galaxy S25 Ultra, the only Ultra phone you can buy in the US. I hope that Samsung adopts a 1-inch sensor in a future Ultra phone, as well as better telephoto cameras, which would likely bring it to parity with the competition. For now, at least it still has the best portrait mode of any smartphone.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store