logo
Digha Jagannath temple to open today, CM Mamata Banerjee says: ‘All our guests'

Digha Jagannath temple to open today, CM Mamata Banerjee says: ‘All our guests'

Indian Express29-04-2025
ARRANGEMENTS WERE made for the 'Maha Yajna' on Tuesday evening at the newly built Jagannath temple in the seaside tourist town of Digha in Purba Medinipur, and Chief Minister Mamata Banerjee took part in the rituals a day before its inauguration. Banerjee emphasised that 'everyone is our guest.'
The Jagannath temple, a replica of the 12th-century shrine in Puri, Odisha, will be inaugurated on Wednesday on the auspicious occasion of 'Akshaya Trithiya'. Digha is around 350 km from Puri.
The massive event, drawing parallels to the Ram Temple consecration in Ayodhya last year, has been interpreted by some as a significant effort by Chief Minister Banerjee to solidify her image as a leader who embraces all communities, addressing previous allegations of minority appeasement.
Digha has got a makeover as it turned into the host of a grand religious event. Roads have been closed to vehicular traffic and replaced by meticulously laid blue carpets. Giant screens, posters and creative depictions of Lord Jagannath adorned almost every corner of the town on Tuesday.
The air resonated with chants of 'Jai Jagannath' played on loudspeakers and the streets were illuminated by dazzling lights and embellished with flower decorations. Shelters and drinking water arrangements catered to the large number of people — including VIPs, dignitaries and local residents — who thronged the area.
On Tuesday afternoon, Banerjee participated in a Mahayagna at the temple. She performed the aarti and the Purnahuti ceremony commenced at 4:15 pm. The CM was accompanied by Rajesh Dwaitapati, a Puri Jagannath temple serviceman, and Radharman Das, vice president of ISKCON, Bengal.
Following the Purnahuti, the CM addressed the crowd, emphasizing inclusivity and spiritual connection. 'People of all religions and castes have come here. Everyone is our guest. Religion is never preached verbally. Religion is something that touches the heart…I am praying for everyone,' she said.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

'We are going back to the medieval times,' says Rahul Gandhi on new Bills
'We are going back to the medieval times,' says Rahul Gandhi on new Bills

The Hindu

time2 hours ago

  • The Hindu

'We are going back to the medieval times,' says Rahul Gandhi on new Bills

Referring the constitutional Bills aimed at removing persons from office if they are jailed for any offence for more than 30 days, Congress leader and Leader of the Opposition in the Lok Sabha Rahul Gandhi on Wednesday (August 20, 2025) said these legislation take one back to 'the medieval times when the king could just remove anybody at his will.' Mr. Gandhi was speaking at the felicitation programme for the Opposition's joint candidate for the Vice-Presidential polls, Justice (retired) B. Sudershan Reddy. 'We are going back to the medieval times when the king could just remove anybody at his will,' Mr. Gandhi said. There was no concept of what an elected person was, he said, adding, 'If he doesn't like your face, he tells ED [Enforcement Directorate] to put a case, and then a democratically elected person is wiped out within 30 days… this is new.' Also read | TDP and JD(U) support the Bills but express reservation about several 'grey areas' in the legislations The Opposition parliamentary leaders met on Wednesday (August 20, 2025) to discuss their strategy to oppose the Bills. As per sources, it was suggested by a few leaders at the meeting that the Opposition should not nominate any of its members to the Parliament's Joint Committee which would be constituted to review the legislation. 'Any kind of participation will be equal to legitimising these Bills,' a senior leader opined. However, the Opposition has not taken a final call on this. West Bengal Chief Minister Mamata Banerjee and Tamil Nadu Chief Minister M.K. Stalin too flayed the Bills. Ms. Banerjee, in a long post on X, said these legislation aimed to 'finish the independence of our judiciary.' The Bills are 'nothing short of a Hitlerian assault on the very soul of Indian democracy,' she said. Ms. Banerjee claimed that the Bills were to 'empower' the Union government 'to intrude upon the mandate of the people, handing sweeping powers to unelected authorities like the ED and the CBI to interfere in the functioning of elected State governments'. 'It is a step to empower the Prime Minister and the Union Home Minister in a sinister manner at the expense of the basic principles of our Constitution,' the Trinamool Congress chairperson said. False cases DMK chief Mr. Stalin said this was how 'dictatorships' begin. 'Steal votes, Silence rivals and Crush States,' he wrote on X. Condemning the Bills, he said, 'The plan of these Bills is clear. It allows the BJP to foist false cases against political opponents in power across States and remove them by misusing provisions that treat even a 30-day arrest as a ground for removal of an elected leader, without any conviction or trial. This unconstitutional amendment will certainly be struck down by the courts because guilt is decided only after trial, not by the mere registration of a case.' CPI(M) General Secretary M.A. Baby said the Bills exposed the government's 'neo-fascist characteristics' and was a 'direct assault on our democracy'. Communist Party of India Rajya Sabha member P. Sandosh Kumar said the three Bills would open 'floodgates of vendetta politics'. CPI(ML) Liberation general secretary Dipankar Bhattacharya said the Bills would sound the 'death knell' for federalism. 'Every State government opposed to the BJP's politics and policies will henceforth be rendered permanently destabilised and dysfunctional. Every NDA ally will be on tenterhooks to fall in line with the BJP,' he said in a statement.

Constitution (130th Amendment) Bill aims to end country's democratic era, says Mamata
Constitution (130th Amendment) Bill aims to end country's democratic era, says Mamata

The Hindu

time3 hours ago

  • The Hindu

Constitution (130th Amendment) Bill aims to end country's democratic era, says Mamata

West Bengal Chief Minister Mamata Banerjee on Wednesday (August 20, 2025) condemned the introduction of the Constitution (130th Amendment) Bill, 2025 in Parliament, calling it 'something that is more than a super-Emergency, a step to end the democratic era of India forever'. In a social media post, Ms. Banerjee said the Bill trampled upon the basic structure of the Constitution and sought to empower the 'Union to intrude upon the mandate of the people, handing sweeping powers to unelected authorities (ED, CBI — whom the Supreme Court has described as 'caged parrots') to interfere in the functioning of elected State governments'. She added that the Bill was a step to empower the Prime Minister and the Union Home Minister 'in a sinister manner at the expense of the basic principles of our Constitution'. Union Home Minister Amit Shah on Wednesday (August 20, 2025) introduced three Bills in the Lok Sabha, including the Constitution (130th Amendment) Bill, which has provisions for the removal of the Prime Minister, Chief Ministers and Ministers if jailed or detained for 30 days for crimes punishable by five years or more. The Bills were sent to the joint committee of the Lok Sabha for examination. Pointing out that the intent of the Bill was to consolidate a system of 'one man, one party, one government', the Trinamool Congress chairperson said the Bill must be resisted at any cost and democracy must be saved at this moment. 'The Bill strikes at the basic structure of the Constitution — federalism, separation of powers, and judicial review — principles that even Parliament cannot override. If allowed to pass, it will be a death warrant for constitutional governance in India. We must resist this dangerous overreach. Our Constitution is not the property of those in temporary seats of power. It belongs to the people of India,' Ms. Banerjee said. She said the Bill was not aimed at any reform but a regression towards a system where the law no longer rests with independent courts but was placed in the hands of vested interests and an attempt to establish a rule where judicial scrutiny was silenced, constitutional safeguards were dismantled and the people's rights were trampled. 'This is how authoritarian regimes, even fascist ones in history, consolidated power. It reeks of the very mindset that the world once condemned in the darkest chapters of the 20th century,' she added. Later in the day, Trinamool Congress general secretary Abhishek Banerjee said the Constitution (130th Amendment) Bill, 2025 would never pass as it required the support of two-third MPs of the House. Mr. Banerjee, who is the leader of the party in the Lok Sabha, told journalists that the Bill was aimed to divert the attention of the people from SIR (Special Intensive Revision) in Bihar. The Trinamool leader said if the BJP leadership could introduce such a Bill with 240 seats then the apprehensions that they want to change the Constitution was correct. 'Having failed in its attempt to misuse the EC to implement special intensive revision (SIR), the government has now activated another 'E' — ED — to bring in laws that target opposition leaders, crush democracy and manipulate the people's mandate by toppling State governments,' the Diamond Harbour MP said on social media. Speaking to media persons, Ms. Banerjee said 'we will strongly take up the matter of women MPs of Trinamool Congress being assaulted during the proceedings of the Parliament with the Speaker of Lok Sabha.'

Mamata Banerjee fears skeletons may tumble out with The Bengal Files: Vivek Agnihotri
Mamata Banerjee fears skeletons may tumble out with The Bengal Files: Vivek Agnihotri

India Today

time4 hours ago

  • India Today

Mamata Banerjee fears skeletons may tumble out with The Bengal Files: Vivek Agnihotri

Director Vivek Agnihotri claimed his film 'The Bengal Files' has hurt West Bengal Chief Minister Mamata Banerjee because she fears it may expose skeletons from the past. In an exclusive interview with the filmmaker expressed his dissent over the way the trailer launch of the film was halted and eventually cancelled in Kolkata last said he is presenting the "untold story" of Bengal's history, which may have upset the Banerjee-led Trinamool Congress. When asked why the Trinamool was vehemently opposed to 'The Bengal Files', the director said, "She (Mamata Banerjee) doesn't want history to come out because when history comes out, lots of other skeletons will also pop out of the box - and some skeletons maybe of their family. Bad skeletons, not good skeletons."advertisementBanerjee, however, is widely seen as having built an independent political career. She was born into a non-political family. Her father, Promileswar Banerjee, was an independence activist but not a politician with dynastic influence. She rose through student politics, joined the Congress party in the 1970s, and later founded the Trinamool Congress (TMC) in 1998. For Agnihotri, the CM weaponised the state power against him during the trailer launch event. He said, "When they cancelled the trailer launch, the state misused its power. They weaponised police to stop the trailer. But you know what? It's just a trailer -picture abhi baaki hai. Let's see what happens when the film releases on September 5. I pray to God that they are given some good sense."The National Award-winning filmmaker called the criticism of his film a denial of the rights of the people of West Bengal. "They understand that by attacking the film, they are denying the rights of millions of Bengalis, whose prestige, glory, heritage and great history are represented in the film. I think the biggest crime in this world is to suppress the expression of a person who has been hurt. The state government is doing that crime," he highlighted that the authorities in West Bengal seem particularly hurt by the film's claim of telling an "untold story".He shared, "I fail to understand what has hurt them, really. Are the Hindus not citizens of Bengal? I've been told by reliable sources that when the trailer launch was cancelled and the police came - those people who were actually stopping it told me in confidence later that their major problem is that it (the film) tells the 'untold story' of Hindu genocide. As if it didn't happen - the Direct Action Day."Agnihotri claimed that 'The Bengal Files' features the persecution of Hindus in Bengal in 1946. He further said Kolkata is running on 'gundaraj (rule of goons)', not film, which has been cleared by the censor board, presents the events of the Great Calcutta Killings-Direct Action Day and the Noakhali riots, which eventually led to the partition of Bengal into West Bengal and Bangladesh.'The Bengal Files' also stars Anupam Kher, Mithun Chakraborty, Pallavi Joshi, Namashi Chakraborty, Simrat Kaur and Darshan Kumar, among others. The film is slated to hit the screens on September 5.- EndsMust Watch IN THIS STORY#Mamata Banerjee#West Bengal

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store