Delhi HC defers Shahdara Bar elections to May 24 over EVM and cost concerns
The Court was acting on a report submitted by Justice Talwant Singh (Retd.), who chairs the Shahdara Bar Association Election Committee.Justice Singh, in his report to the Registrar General, raised serious concerns over the availability of Electronic Voting Machines (EVMs) and the estimated expenditure for conducting the elections.
He informed the Court that the EVMs initially planned for use were being allocated to the Saket Bar Association on May 9. However, Delhi University, the provider of these machines, had expressed willingness to supply them on May 24 instead. Justice Singh emphasised that holding elections using paper ballots would be both complicated and financially burdensome.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
&w=3840&q=100)
Business Standard
37 minutes ago
- Business Standard
SC orders rare EVM recount, flips Haryana sarpanch poll result after row
The Supreme Court summoned Electronic Voting Machines (EVMs) and other poll records to recount votes in a sarpanch (village head) election in Haryana. The case involved the Gram Panchayat of Buana Lakhu village in Panipat district. A Bench of Justices Surya Kant, Dipankar Datta, and N Kotiswar Singh ordered the recount after a dispute arose over the election results. The recounting was done inside the Supreme Court, overseen by its registrar, and was fully videographed in the presence of both parties, Live Law reported. Election dispute reaches SC The Sarpanch election was held on November 2, 2022, and Kuldeep Singh was declared the winner. Mohit Kumar, the rival candidate, challenged the result through an election petition. On April 22, 2025, the Additional Civil Judge (Senior Division)-cum-Election Tribunal in Panipat ordered a recount of votes from booth no. 69. The Deputy Commissioner was directed to carry it out on May 7. However, the Punjab and Haryana High Court later set aside this order. SC orders recount of all booths When the matter came up on July 31, the top court ordered the production of all EVMs and poll records — not just those from one booth, the news report said. "Taking into consideration the peculiar facts and circumstances of this case, the Deputy Commissioner and the District Election Officer, Panipat, Haryana is directed to produce all the EVMs before the Registrar of this Court, to be nominated by the Secretary General, at 10 a.m. on August 6, 2025. The nominated Registrar shall recount the votes, not only of the disputed booth but of all the booths. The recounting shall be duly videographed. The petitioner as well as the respondent no.1 or their authorised agents shall remain present at the time of recounting," the court said in its order. The recount took place on August 6 with party representatives and lawyers present. Votes from booths 65 to 70 were tallied again. The revised count showed Mohit Kumar securing 1,051 votes, ahead of Kuldeep Singh, who got 1,000. The registrar submitted a report of the recount to the court. On August 11, the Bench observed there was 'prima facie no reason' to doubt the report, as it had been videographed and signed by both parties' representatives, the news report said. High court order overturned The Supreme Court set aside the Punjab and Haryana High Court's order and declared Mohit Kumar the duly elected Sarpanch. "The Deputy Commissioner-cum-Election Officer, Panipat is, accordingly, directed to issue a Notification in this regard within two days declaring the appellant as the elected Sarpanch of the above-mentioned Gram Panchayat. The appellant shall be entitled to assume the said office forthwith and perform his duties," the court ordered. It also clarified that any remaining disputes could be raised before the election tribunal, but the tribunal must accept the registrar's report as the final recount result. The resealed report and EVMs will now be sent to the Tribunal to become part of the official record.
New Indian Express
2 hours ago
- New Indian Express
Pakistani Hindu refugees in Delhi's Majnu ka Tila face fresh eviction threat
NEW DELHI: IN the narrow lanes near Majnu ka Tila, around 300 Hindu refugee families from Pakistan have built their lives from scratch, living in one-room homes fashioned from tin sheets and tarpaulin. For over a decade, they have stayed here with a constant fear of losing it all — again. Some families arrived in Delhi as early as 2011, and for years, the residents have faced the prospect of demolition. The settlement lies on the Yamuna floodplains, where construction is prohibited. Last year, the Delhi Development Authority (DDA) issued eviction notices in March and July but did not act on them. In May this year, the Delhi HC dismissed a plea seeking protection for the camp, stating that environmental restrictions on the floodplains must be enforced. In July, the DDA again pasted notices, signalling that bulldozers could arrive at any time. For Sona Das, one of the community leaders, the anxiety is relentless. 'Some 200 families got citizenship last year, but many are still waiting. Despite entering the country legally and gaining citizenship, we still live in fear. Other slum dwellers have a support system here; they can go back to their villages. We have nowhere to go. If they demolish our homes, we will have to live on the streets,' he said. He added that, unlike in other eviction drives, officials have not promised alternate housing. Most families survive by selling mobile covers and other accessories on roadside stalls, with stable income still out of reach. Dharamveer Bagri, another resident, remembers the fields they once tilled back in Sindh, voicing their longing for stability, dignity, and a return to self-reliance. 'We were farmers there. Here, we live in cramped dwellings, in overcrowded settlements. If the government could give our community even a small piece of land, we would be grateful forever,' he said. HC junks plea seeking protection of camp Last year, the Delhi Development Authority (DDA) had issued eviction notices in March and July but did not proceed with them. In May this year, the Delhi High Court dismissed a plea seeking protection for the camp, stating that environmental restrictions on the floodplains must be enforced. In July, however, the DDA again pasted notices, signalling that bulldozers could arrive at any time.
&w=3840&q=100)
Business Standard
2 hours ago
- Business Standard
Only Aadhaar, PAN, Voter ID not sufficient proof of citizenship: Bombay HC
Rejecting the bail application of a man alleged to be a Bangladeshi national, the Bombay High Court noted that Aadhaar, PAN, and Voter ID, without verification, cannot be treated as sufficient proof of citizenship. The judgement by single-judge bench of Justice Amit Borkar said on Tuesday, "Merely relying on the existence of certain identity documents such as Aadhaar, PAN, or Voter ID, without verification of the process through which these were obtained, cannot be treated as sufficient proof of lawful citizenship at this stage, particularly when the very authenticity of such documents is under investigation." Justice Borkar mentioned that the claim of citizenship can only be examined under the rules of the Citizenship Act, 1955. "The claim of citizenship must be examined strictly under the rules of the Citizenship Act, 1955, including whether the person meets the conditions under Sections 3 to 6, or any special provisions applicable to their case," the judgement read. The prosecution alleged that the applicant is a Bangladeshi national and has forged the identity cards. During the investigation, the police found his birth certificate belonging to Bangladesh. However, the court at this stage has not decided whether the documents presented by the accused are forged or not. "During the investigation, the applicant's mobile phone was taken by the police as per law and sent for forensic examination. From the data recovered from the phone, copies of two birth certificates were found, one said to be of the applicant himself and the other of a woman claimed to be his mother. Both these documents show the place of birth as being in Bangladesh... The Court is not deciding at this stage whether the documents are true or false, that will be decided at the trial. But the fact that such documents have been found on the applicant's own phone is important and cannot be ignored," Justice Borkar said in his judgment. Rejecting the bail plea, Justice Borkar said that the accused can apply for bail if the trial is not concluded within a year. "However, it shall be open for the applicant to revive his request for bail if the trial is not concluded within a period of one year from today," the judgment read.
