logo
Tesla Sales Plunge Again as Anti-Musk Boycott Shows Staying Power and Rivals Pounce on the Weakness

Tesla Sales Plunge Again as Anti-Musk Boycott Shows Staying Power and Rivals Pounce on the Weakness

Yomiuri Shimbun8 hours ago
NEW YORK (AP) — Sales of Tesla electric cars fell sharply in the last three months as boycotts over Elon Musk's political views continue to keep buyers away.
The 13% plunge in global sales over a year earlier suggests the damage to Tesla's brand from Musk's embrace of U.S. President Donald Trump and far-right European politicians is much deeper, widespread and lasting than some investors had expected. The figures reported by Tesla on Wednesday also signal that its quarterly earnings report due later this month could disappoint as rival electric-vehicle makers pounce on its weakness and steal market share. v
Sales fell to 384,122 in April through June, down from 443,956 in the same three months last year.
During the latest period, Musk formally left the Trump administration as a cost-cutting czar, and hopes rose that sales would recover. The Tesla CEO himself recently said the company was in the midst of a 'major rebound' in sales, a statement contradicted by the latest figures.
Still, some parts of the report were encouraging. Sales of the Models 3 and Y totaled 373,728, above the estimate of 356,000 from Wall Street analysts. Tesla shares rose 5% on the news.
'The numbers weren't as bad as thought with all the analyst forecast cuts we saw over the past week,' said Morningstar's Seth Goldstein, though he added the report overall showed the company faces big challenges. 'The current product lineup is at market saturation and Tesla will need the new affordable vehicle to grow deliveries.'
Musk has promised a cheaper EV model would be coming this year that would boost sales.
It's not clear yet if Musk's latest feud with Trump will help lure back buyers who have been angry at the billionaire's political positions. After Musk once again took to social media to criticize Trump's budget bill, the president threatened Tuesday to use the power of his office to hurt his companies, including Tesla, pushing its stock down more than 5%.
A June AP-NORC poll showed about half of U.S. adults have an unfavorable opinion of Tesla, including 30% of Republicans.
The new figures come as Tesla is focusing less on new models and more on robots, self-driving technology and robotaxis ferrying passengers around without anyone behind the wheel.
Tesla is in the midst of a test run of robotaxis in Austin, Texas, that seems to have gone smoothly for the most part. But it also has drawn the scrutiny of federal car safety regulators because of a few mishaps, including one case in which a Tesla cab was shown on a video heading down an opposing lane.
The competition from rival EV makers is especially fierce in Europe where China's BYD has taken a bite out of its market share. Tesla sales fell 28% in May in 30 European countries even as the overall market for electric vehicles expanded sharply, according to the European Automobile Manufacturers' Association.
Musk has acknowledged that his work as head of the Department of Government Efficiency and his embrace of European far-right candidates have hurt the company. But he said earlier this year that much of the sales plunge is due to customers holding off while they waited for an ugrade to Tesla's best selling Model Y. That new version has been out for months now.
Tesla reports second quarter financial results on July 23. In the first quarter, net income fell 71%.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Concerns Loom Over Japan-U.S. Tariff Talks After Trump Comment; Ishiba Unable to Make Certain Concessions Ahead of Upper House Election
Concerns Loom Over Japan-U.S. Tariff Talks After Trump Comment; Ishiba Unable to Make Certain Concessions Ahead of Upper House Election

Yomiuri Shimbun

timean hour ago

  • Yomiuri Shimbun

Concerns Loom Over Japan-U.S. Tariff Talks After Trump Comment; Ishiba Unable to Make Certain Concessions Ahead of Upper House Election

Concerns about trade talks possibly stalling is spreading within the Japanese government following U.S. President Donald Trump's comment on Tuesday that cast doubt on reaching an agreement on tariffs. With the July 9 deadline for the end of the suspension of the additional portion of 'reciprocal tariffs' approaching, some have begun making moves on the assumption that an agreement will not be reached anytime soon. Prime Minister Shigeru Ishiba spoke to the press at the Prime Minister's Office on Wednesday and stressed his intention to continue negotiations, saying: 'I will not comment on every one of [Trump's] remarks. Japan has been engaged in serious negotiations with our national interest at stake.' Economic revitalization minister Ryosei Akazawa also said on the day, 'The negotiations are not supposed to be straightforward and easy, as the national interests of both countries are at stake.' 'We hope to reach an agreement while firmly defending our national interest,' Akazawa added. The two countries held administrative-level talks on Monday that were followed by a series of talks over the phone and through other means, according to Akazawa. As Japan's chief tariff negotiator, Akazawa has so far held seven ministerial-level talks with the U.S. side. However, disagreements have remained regarding the United States imposing tariffs on Japanese automobiles. Some within the Japanese government said Trump's remark 'severely hurt negotiations.' Others consider it as a 'bluff to get Japan to make more concessions' and think the government should not be swayed by it. With the House of Councillors election set to be held July 20, Ishiba has been unable to find something to negotiate with that is appealing for Trump. Ishiba cannot make concessions to increase rice imports from the United States — something that is strongly opposed by Japanese rice producers — or on automobile tariffs, which is a key industry in Japan. If negotiations do not progress, it is possible that the additional 14% will be imposed after July 9. Furthermore, the additional 25% tariff imposed on automobiles since April will further impact the industry. The government has begun to consider possible measures to deal with the situation. 'I intend to protect industries in Japan through such measures as expanding domestic demand and export destinations,' Ishiba said, regarding possible support measures if fewer automobiles are exported to the United States, at a debate between party leaders on Wednesday. 'No point in getting nervous' 'There is no point in getting nervous every time Trump makes a comment,' said Ken Kobayashi, chairperson of the Japan Chamber of Commerce and Industry, at a press conference on Wednesday. 'I will remain calm.' He also said the impact on the Japanese economy will be big if the tariff rates are raised. 'We might just have to bear with certain things to reach an agreement,' Kobayashi said.

Tibetans in exile wonder: Will the next Dalai Lama be as charismatic as this one?
Tibetans in exile wonder: Will the next Dalai Lama be as charismatic as this one?

The Mainichi

timean hour ago

  • The Mainichi

Tibetans in exile wonder: Will the next Dalai Lama be as charismatic as this one?

DHARAMSHALA, India (AP) -- The Dalai Lama has announced that he intends to reincarnate, paving the way for a successor to take on a mantle stretching back 500 years after his death. But as he approaches his 90th birthday, that news hasn't eased the worries of Tibetan Buddhists who wonder: What will happen when this Dalai Lama is gone? For decades, the 14th Dalai Lama has been more than a spiritual leader. He has sustained a nation in exile and managed to build a community that's kept the Tibetan culture and identity alive. He is the China -reviled spokesperson for a Tibetan homeland that many, like him, can see only from afar. He has received a Nobel Peace Prize and been courted by royalty, politicians and Hollywood stars, helping him draw global attention and support for Tibet. When his death comes, it will pitch the global Tibetan community into uncertainty, perhaps for years. His successor will have to be found through the traditional process of reincarnation. China, whose troops took control of Tibet in 1950, says it will reject anyone chosen without Beijing's consent. Tibetans in India's Himalayan town of Dharamshala, the Dalai Lama's home in exile, and scattered around the world fear a new onslaught on their cultural and religious identity. "The absence of His Holiness would be a huge setback for the Tibetans," said Penpa Tsering, the head of the democratically elected Tibetan government-in-exile. "The responsibility lies on us as to how we carry forward the legacy of His Holiness." A long gap The Dalai Lama has become one of the world's most recognizable figures while leading a Tibetan diaspora through their struggle for autonomy and opposition of China's control of Tibet. He has not named a successor, but he says they will be born in the "free world" -- outside China. Previous Dalai Lamas have been identified by senior monastic disciples, under strict religious rituals meant to identify their predecessor's reincarnation. Monks interpret signs, consult oracles and send search committees to Tibetan households looking for a child who exhibits the qualities of the Dalai Lama. All of this takes years of effort, leaving a leadership vacuum. Years of religious education and training are needed before the identified successor grows up and takes up full responsibilities as spiritual leader. China has already sought to elevate other spiritual figures, particularly Tibetan Buddhism's No. 2 figure, the Panchen Lama, whose legitimacy is highly contested by many Tibetans at home and in exile. Gyaltsen Norbu was installed by Beijing as the 11th Panchen Lama in 1995 after followers of the Dalai Lama recognized a different boy as the Panchen's incarnation. That boy disappeared soon after. Joy and stubbornness And there's no guarantee the successor will have the current Dalai Lama's charisma, or his ability to balance a sense of joy with the stubbornness needed to counter China. "He is a fulcrum, he's the epitome of the Tibetan movement," said writer and activist Tenzin Tsundue, who was born in India. Tsundue for years has advocated for Tibet's autonomy. To him, the current Dalai Lama's absence will be hugely felt. Like many other Tibetans, however, his hopes are pinned on the government in exile. "How is home not anything but a genuine human demand?" he added. Such concerns are most prevalent in Dharamshala, where a Tibetan community of over 20,000 administers its own schools, hospitals and monasteries and elects its own lawmakers and president. The Dalai Lama handed over his political powers to a democratically elected government in 2011. Beijing is likely to appoint its own candidate China doesn't recognize the Tibetan government-in-exile and brands the Dalai Lama a dangerous separatist. It has shunned direct contact with his representatives for more than a decade. It has insisted that the Dalai Lama's successor will be from inside China and must be approved by its government. Tibetans in exile have long been wary of the officially atheist Chinese government's attempts to meddle with the Tibetan Buddhism reincarnation system. They see it as part of Beijing's plan to tighten its control over Tibet. "If they do it, they are actually making a mockery of themselves among the free countries," said Geshe Lhakdor, a Tibetan Buddhist scholar, calling Beijing's stance "hypocrisy." Tibetans say they were effectively independent for centuries and accuse China of trying to wipe out Tibet's Buddhist culture and language. Many of the more than 7 million Tibetans living under Chinese rule accuse Beijing of stifling religious freedoms, changing its ethnic makeup by moving millions of Han Chinese into the region and torturing political prisoners. The Chinese government denies these allegations. Waning global attention For years, governments across the world have feted the Dalai Lama for advocating for Tibetan rights and spreading a message of nonviolence. They have also helped him raise tens of millions of dollars to build Tibetan cultural and religious institutions. But Tsundue said that global powers have become more unreliable in their support of the Tibetan cause as China's influence grows. "Everybody has benefited at our cost because they have been trading with China," Tsundue said. "We are, in a way, a victim of geopolitics." Some countries, including the United States, view Beijing's attempts to control the reincarnation of the Dalai Lama as a violation of religious freedom and Tibetan cultural tradition. Others, like the European Union and India, have maintained a cautious stance to avoid friction with China. Tsering, the president of the government-in-exile, acknowledged this, calling Tibetans' efforts to keep the issue of Tibet alive "a miracle." He also cautioned that the future depends on the Tibetan people at large. Under the Dalai Lama's "Middle Way" policy, the movement for Tibet's autonomy has largely been nonviolent. It espouses autonomy under Chinese sovereignty. The newly announced succession plan, however, can prompt a reckoning of that policy, and it is unclear how the Dalai Lama's successor might approach dialogue with Beijing. Tsering cautioned that much could change in the coming years. His biggest worry is that the Dalai Lama's death in exile could trigger a violent response inside Tibet, where in recent years hundreds of monks and others reportedly set themselves on fire in protest against Chinese rule. "I hope the Tibetans won't get radicalized," he said.

Federal Judge Bars Trump Administration from Expelling Asylum Seekers
Federal Judge Bars Trump Administration from Expelling Asylum Seekers

Yomiuri Shimbun

time2 hours ago

  • Yomiuri Shimbun

Federal Judge Bars Trump Administration from Expelling Asylum Seekers

A federal judge in the District of Columbia on Wednesday barred the Trump administration from expelling asylum seekers from the United States, dealing a blow to the administration's efforts to curtail crossings at the U.S. southern border. In a 128-page decision, U.S. District Judge Randolph D. Moss invalidated a proclamation that President Donald Trump signed on his first day in office that declared an 'invasion' on the border and invoked emergency presidential powers to deport migrants without allowing them to apply for asylum. Migrants and advocacy groups sued in February, saying federal law allows people to apply for the humanitarian protection no matter how they entered the United States. Moss stayed his ruling for 14 days pending a likely appeal from the Trump administration. But he wrote that the executive branch cannot create an 'alternative immigration system' that tramples on existing federal law. 'The Court recognizes that the Executive Branch faces enormous challenges in preventing and deterring unlawful entry into the United States and in adjudicating the overwhelming backlog of asylum claims of those who have entered the country,' Moss wrote. But he added that the Immigration and Nationality Act 'provides the sole and exclusive means for removing people already present in the country.' Depending on the appeal, the ruling could reopen asylum processing on the southern border and enable migrants to cross into the United States in hopes of seeking refuge. The decision is the latest in a long line of litigation over federal asylum law, and the case ultimately could reach the Supreme Court. The White House warned that the decision could lead to another surge on the southern border with Mexico. 'A local district court judge has no authority to stop President Trump and the United States from securing our border from the flood of aliens trying to enter illegally,' said White House spokeswoman Abigail Jackson. 'This is an attack on our Constitution, the laws Congress enacted, and our national sovereignty. We expect to be vindicated on appeal.' The Supreme Court, ruling last week on Trump's attempts to end birthright citizenship, curtailed judges' authority to issue the type of sweeping nationwide injunctions that have paused several administration policies while they were under legal review. But Moss, as part of his ruling Wednesday, certified all asylum seekers 'currently present in the United States' as a legal class, making his ruling applicable to most people who would be affected by Trump's policy. Class-action lawsuits were one avenue the Supreme Court justices suggested in their birthright citizenship ruling that lower courts could still provide broad relief to many people in the same situation. Attorneys in the asylum case had sought class certification from the judge well before Friday's birthright citizenship ruling. Still, Trump administration officials quickly attacked Moss as 'a rogue district court judge' and his ruling as an attempt 'to circumvent the Supreme Court.' 'The American people see through this,' Attorney General Pam Bondi wrote on social media. 'Our attorneys … will fight this unconstitutional power grab.' The ruling is a legal roadblock for the Trump administration as it pursues an aggressive plan to deport 1 million undocumented immigrants this year. Federal courts have limited some of Trump's policies – a judge on Wednesday blocked him from terminating temporary protected status for Haitians, for instance – but immigration arrests are up sharply, border crossings are down dramatically and Congress is working through the final stages of a sprawling tax bill that would turbocharge funding for immigration enforcement. Illegal crossings at the U.S.-Mexico border have been reduced to a trickle, with fewer than 9,000 apprehensions in May, the most recent month available, compared with fewer than 118,000 in May 2024. Trump officials have celebrated the sharp decline and noted that it is in stark contrast to the average of 2 million apprehensions annually in the first years of the Biden administration as migrants fled pandemic-ravaged economies and authoritarian regimes in nations such as Venezuela. But advocates for immigrants argued that the Trump administration achieved the lower numbers by overstepping presidential authority and ignoring laws passed by Congress. Federal law stipulates that immigrants on U.S. soil may apply for asylum, even if they crossed the border illegally. In the lawsuit, lawyers for 13 immigrants from countries including Afghanistan, Cuba and Turkey argued that their clients fled persecution and deserved a chance to apply for protection. Some plaintiffs had already been deported back to their native countries or to an alternative country, including Panama. Moss has not yet ruled on whether the government must bring back the deportees. Advocacy groups had also argued that migrants were being deprived of protection. 'The importance of restoring asylum in the United States cannot be overstated, not only for the people whose lives are in danger but for our standing in the world,' said Lee Gelernt, a lawyer with the American Civil Liberties Union who argued the case. 'The decision also sends a message that the President cannot simply ignore laws Congress has passed.' To qualify for asylum protection, migrants must demonstrate a fear of persecution based on their race, religion, nationality, political opinion or another reason that makes them a target in their native country. Trump's first term, from 2017 to 2021, also was marked by immigration surges, and he implemented multiple asylum restrictions that were overturned by federal courts. Illegal border crossings declined during the pandemic, but they began to rise again before Trump left office. After returning to the White House in January, Trump renewed his efforts to curb asylum. He signed a proclamation on his first day called 'Guaranteeing the States Protection Against Invasion' and began to reject asylum seekers from the border. Trump has argued that he maintains the legal authority to bar entry to migrants under Section 212(f) of the Immigration and Nationality Act, which authorizes the president to suspend the entry of foreigners deemed detrimental to the United States. The Supreme Court ruled in 2018 that Trump could use that legal authority to implement the third version of his travel ban targeting people mainly from Muslim-majority nations. But Moss drew a bright line between people outside the United States and those who are already here, saying the authority to bar entry 'does not mean that the President has the authority to alter the rules that apply to those who have already entered.' Trump and his surrogates have long argued that smugglers abuse U.S. asylum laws to help migrants gain entry into the country and remain for years as their cases wind through the backlogged immigration system. Biden officials restricted asylum access last year after record numbers of border apprehensions damaged his political standing. Biden officials curtailed asylum for those who crossed the border illegally, but they also created legal pathways into the country so that people could apply for legal protection, such as parole programs for Venezuelans, Cubans, Haitians and Nicaraguans. That administration also allowed migrants waiting in Mexico to schedule appointments to cross the border legally through a Customs and Border Protection app called CBP One. Trump, in contrast, essentially foreclosed access to asylum after taking office in January, advocates for immigrants argued, by flatly rejecting migrants at the southern border. Trump officials also ended the parole program and discontinued the app appointments. In the Mexican border city of Matamoros, across from Brownsville, Texas, there were between 700 and 800 migrants who had applied for or obtained appointments through CBP One when Trump took office. His administration canceled them all. Many lost hope and gave up, said the Rev. Abraham Barberi, leader of One Mission Ministries, which helps feed migrants in the Mexican government shelter. But about 200 – mostly families with children – have remained in the shelter for two reasons, he said. 'One, because they still have hope something will change,' Barberi said. 'And two, because they have nowhere else to go.' Immigrant rights lawyers said Moss's ruling on the asylum issue could lead to increased border crossings if the Trump administration is forced to restore access to asylum. 'People remain fearful of what is happening in this country. I don't know how people will react,' said Keren Zwick, the director of litigation at the National Immigrant Justice Center and co-counsel with the ACLU on the case. 'But sometimes the news, and how our legal system works, does not really matter to someone fleeing for their lives.' Migrants are aware of the Trump administration hard-line enforcement tactics – including a new detention facility that opened this week in alligator-infested swampland in Florida – and many remain afraid to cross into the country, some advocates said. 'They've seen the deportations and all that's happening in the U.S., and they are not sure it's a place for them anymore,' said the Rev. Juan Fierro of El Buen Samaritano migrant shelter in Juarez, across the border from El Paso.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store