Isle of Man TT: Extra staffing to support hospitals
Additional staffing has been drafted in to support hospitals during this year's Isle of Man TT races amid a predicted rise in demand for health care services. The annual two-week event, which started on Monday but was disrupted by rain, attracted more that 45,000 visitors last year. Manx Care, said additional cover would support the emergency department and orthopaedics team at Noble's Hospital, as well as the island's ambulance service.Radiology support at Ramsey and District Cottage Hospital has also been secured to cope with the predicted rise in demand.
Executive director of health care services Oliver Radford said the organisation aimed to provide "the highest quality care" during the period, while trying to maintain "business as usual".Additional blood products had been ordered to allow for any emergency blood transfusions required during the fortnight, he said.
Minor injuries
The ambulance service would also have access to additional emergency response vehicles, such as critical care cars, rapid response cars and the A99 helicopter, which the body said would allow them to reach non-racing incidents in "hard-to-reach locations".The health body has urged those with a minor injury or illness to use the Minor Injuries Unit (MIU) at Ramsey Cottage Hospital to reduce pressure at the Emergency Department at the island's main hospital.The health care provider said where possible services were being maintained across Noble's Hospital, but orthopaedics would be "significantly affected" as a result of the event.Patients who are attending scheduled hospital appointments have been advised to "leave plenty of time for your journey". Manx Care said the Ramsey MIU would be fully staffed across the fortnight, with X-ray provision from 09:00 to 17:00 BST on week days, as well as from 10:00 to 16:00 at weekends.Visitors to the island have been reminded to make sure they have adequate health insurance in place to cover the duration of their trip and to bring prescription medications and any other medical items they may use daily with them to the island.The Isle of Man TT race are set to run until 7 June.
Read more stories from the Isle of Man on the BBC, watch BBC North West Tonight on BBC iPlayer and follow BBC Isle of Man on Facebook and X.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Reuters
an hour ago
- Reuters
US judge rules health insurers, MultiPlan must face price-fixing lawsuits
June 3 (Reuters) - A U.S. judge on Tuesday said healthcare providers can pursue claims that technology provider MultiPlan and a group of insurers conspired to underpay them billions of dollars in reimbursements for out-of-network health services. U.S. District Judge Matthew Kennelly in Chicago ruled, opens new tab that doctors and other providers who filed the proposed class action had plausibly alleged a price-fixing conspiracy that relied on insurers collectively sharing sensitive information with MultiPlan to set reimbursement rates. MultiPlan, which rebranded as Claritev in February, processes payments for out-of-network healthcare services. Major insurers, including defendants UnitedHealth, Aetna and Cigna, have contracts with the company and use its software. In a statement on Tuesday, MultiPlan said it was 'confident in the strength of our legal position' and that the lawsuits have no merit. Aetna parent CVS in a statement said, 'we stand ready to argue the substantive facts of the case and defend ourselves vigorously in this matter.' UnitedHealth and Cigna did not immediately respond to requests for comment. All of the defendants have denied any wrongdoing. Kennelly is presiding over consolidated, opens new tab lawsuits that were first filed in 2023. MultiPlan processes more than 80% of out-of-network claims across the country, or abut 370,000 daily claims, according to the plaintiffs. In a statement, attorneys for the health providers said MultiPlan and the insurance defendants 'orchestrated a cartel through the sharing of competitively sensitive confidential pricing information to illicitly coordinate on out-of-network reimbursements.' MultiPlan and the insurers have argued that health providers are free to reject an insurance company's payment and instead seek full compensation from patients. MultiPlan told the court its services provide industry more flexibility, lowering costs to insurers and patients. Kennelly in his ruling said "whether or not MultiPlan's calculated rates are labeled as 'recommendations,' the plaintiffs plausibly allege that they are more akin to mandates." The U.S. Justice Department submitted a court filing in March backing claims in the health providers' case. The case is In re MultiPlan Health Insurance Provider Litigation, U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois, No. 1:24-cv-06795. Read more: US Justice Department backs medical providers' lawsuit over data analytics software Hospital sues data analytics company MultiPlan in US court antitrust case
Reuters
2 hours ago
- Reuters
Trump administration scraps Biden-era policy on emergency abortions
June 3 (Reuters) - U.S. President Donald Trump's administration on Tuesday rescinded guidance issued during his Democratic predecessor Joe Biden's tenure requiring hospitals to provide abortions to women in medical emergencies regardless of various state bans on the procedure. The U.S. Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services said the 2022 guidance, which interpreted a federal law that ensures patients can receive emergency "stabilizing care" as preempting state abortion bans, did not reflect the policy of the Trump administration. The agency, which is part of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, said it "will work to rectify any perceived legal confusion and instability created by the former administration's actions." The Biden administration issued the guidance in July 2022 weeks after the 6-3 conservative majority U.S. Supreme Court overturned its 1973 Roe v. Wade ruling that had recognized a nationwide right of women to obtain abortions. The 2022 guidance reminded healthcare providers across the country of their obligations under a 1986 federal law called the Emergency Medical Treatment and Labor Act (EMTALA) to ensure Medicare-participating hospitals offer emergency care stabilizing patients regardless of their ability to pay. Medicare is the government healthcare program for the elderly. Hospitals that violate EMTALA risk losing Medicare funding. The 2022 guidance aimed to make clear that under EMTALA, physicians must provide a woman an abortion if needed to resolve a medical emergency and stabilize the patient even in states where the procedure is banned and that the federal law preempted any state laws that offer no exceptions for medical emergencies. After issuing the guidance, the U.S. Department of Justice sued the state of Idaho in a bid to stop it from enforcing its near-total abortion ban in medical emergencies. A federal judge at the Justice Department's urging blocked the Idaho from enforcing the ban during medical emergencies, but the Trump administration in March dropped that lawsuit, resulting in that injunction being lifted. The ban still remains blocked in emergencies due to a similar lawsuit brought by a hospital system.
The Guardian
3 hours ago
- The Guardian
Trump rescinds Emtala guidance protecting women in need of emergency abortions
The Trump administration on Tuesday rescinded Biden-era guidance clarifying that hospitals in states with abortion bans cannot turn away pregnant patients who are in the midst of medical emergencies – a move that comes amid multiple red-state court battles over the guidance. The guidance deals with the federal Emergency Medical Treatment and Labor Act (Emtala), which requires hospitals to stabilize patients facing medical emergencies. States such as Idaho and Texas have argued that the Biden administration's guidance, which it issued in the wake of the 2022 overturning of Roe v Wade, interpreted Emtala incorrectly. In its letter rescinding the guidance, the Trump administration said that the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) 'will continue to enforce Emtala, which protects all individuals who present to a hospital emergency department seeking examination or treatment, including for identified emergency medical conditions that place the health of a pregnant woman or her unborn child in serious jeopardy. CMS will work to rectify any perceived legal confusion and instability created by the former administration's actions'. Abortion rights supporters said Tuesday that rescinding the Biden administration's guidance will muddy hospitals' ability to interpret Emtala and endanger pregnant patients' lives. Since Roe's collapse, dozens of women have come forward to say that they were denied medical treatment due to abortion bans. A reported five pregnant women have died after having their care denied or delayed, or being unable to access legal abortions. 'This action sends a clear message: the lives and health of pregnant people are not worth protecting,' Dr Jamila Perritt, an OBGYN and the president of Physicians for Reproductive Health, said in a statement. 'Complying with this law can mean the difference between life and death for pregnant people, forcing providers like me to choose between caring for someone in their time of need and turning my back on them to comply with cruel and dangerous laws.' Last year, the US supreme court heard arguments in a case involving Idaho's abortion ban, which at the time only allowed abortions in cases where a woman's life was at risk. In contrast, most state abortion bans permit abortions when a patient's 'health' is in danger – a lower standard that could make it easier for doctors to intervene. Idaho's standard, the Biden administration said, blocked doctors from providing abortions in some emergencies and thus violated Emtala's requirement that hospitals must stabilize patients. Ultimately, the supreme court punted on the issue by ruling 6-3 on procedural grounds that the case had been 'improvidently granted', indicating they should have never taken it up in the first place. 'This court had a chance to bring clarity and certainty to this tragic situation and we have squandered it,' wrote Ketanji Brown Jackson, a supreme court justice, at the time. 'And for as long as we refuse to declare what the law requires, pregnant patients in Idaho, Texas and elsewhere will be paying the price.' Sign up to This Week in Trumpland A deep dive into the policies, controversies and oddities surrounding the Trump administration after newsletter promotion The Trump administration's Tuesday move is not unexpected. In March, the administration moved to drop out of the case over the Idaho abortion ban. A local Idaho hospital later filed its own lawsuit over the ban.
