A Vinnies that never sleeps and an online thrift store to rival Asos: op shops log on to meet new demand
'Only here,' Randle says, before moving down the next aisle, where TV monitors sit on shelves next to fluffy rugs, which sit next to outdoor TV projectors, which sit next to rows and rows of new shoes, all still in their boxes.
The warehouse in Melbourne's industrial south-east is filled to the brim with goods Vinnies Victoria is going to sell in its new online store. Workers meticulously sort through items before they're photographed, uploaded to the cloud and put on the website for sale.
They've called it the 'shop that never sleeps'.
'Our customers have been asking for this for a while,' Randle says. 'So we thought, right, let's go, let's get serious about this.'
Over the past 10 years, op shops around Australia have changed. No longer are they small stores where bargain hunters find $1 bins; now they're often stylish, with a high level of visual merchandising. And increasingly, they're moving online.
Salvos has had an online store for five years, while Vinnies Victoria launched theirs late last November and Vinnies NSW are about to establish an online fashion store, one to rival Asos.
Randle says while they've only had an online store open for a few weeks, the idea started 10 years ago – with 700 Star Wars figurines.
'Back then we got a donation from the general public, from a collector of Star Wars,' she says. 'His whole house was covered with them.'
They split the collection into affordable groups and put them up on eBay. Buyers – including one from South America – snapped them up.
'That opened our eyes,' she says. 'We were like, 'This has got amazing reach.''
From clothing to electricals, the online store sells an eccentric array of items – Randle says one benefit is being able to find a market for items they couldn't put in stores.
'The other day, and I'm not even joking, [someone] donated a caravan,' she says. 'We sold that in 48 hours.'
A hospital bed worth $7,000, an Olympic-level training bike for paraplegics – they've gone up online and out the warehouse door at a discounted price.Most of it is not niche or unique – it's good quality garments and bric-a-brac that will appeal to a wide customer base, she says.
'You won't be finding a $2 T-shirt,' she says.
Randle says this won't replace the brick-and-mortar stores. Vinnies has 121 stores around the country and has opened 11 in the last six months. Last year they sold 4m items – up from 1m the year before.
'Driving that is a huge shift in the market around sustainability, and 'buy nothing new' trends, with the younger generation really bringing that to the fore,' she says.
'But we're seeing an increase in working poor over the past five years. You've got families out there where mum and dad are both working [and] it's still a struggle.'
Sophie Noonan is the founder of Oppspot – a website where op shops around the country can put their goods online. They take a 2% commission, which is low compared with sites like Depop which take 8%, and offer a 'sell it for you' package, where they collect, photograph and ship the stock for Melbourne's stores.
She says op shops moving online is important – not just for the major players so they can fund their social programs, but for smaller stores so they can continue to compete.
'Many op shops, they're largely volunteer run,' she says. 'If someone calls in sick or goes on a holiday, sometimes that op shop doesn't open and they don't raise funds that day.
'We're really about making sure that they have a shopfront that is always open 24 hours a day. Rain, hail or shine.'
By early May, Vinnies NSW will launch its new online store – with a twist. Marketing and communications director Tom Morgan flicks his mouse through the beta version of the site, moving between brands.
'We're very excited about this,' he says. 'What we're launching is a fashion site, aimed at gen Y, gen Z, millennials.'
It looks fresh, like a thrifty version of Asos with a socially conscious catch. Customers can filter between price points of under $10 and under $100. None of it will be fast fashion.
'There's going to be no Uniqlo, there's no Target, there's no Kmart,' he says. 'Because we know that it doesn't last, and it stretches, and there's drama with it.'
There won't be bric-a-brac or electronics. Instead, shoppers will flick between Adidas, New Balance, and high-end brands.
'As we go live, we'll have around 1,000 different brands on the website,' he says.
'They'll be 30,000 products on day one.'
While there is a rush of charities wanting to get online, some have long been in the game. The Brotherhood of St Laurence has been selling books online since 2009.
The books are donated through their op shops before being checked for defects and personal messages so that information can be included in the selection.
'Since launching, we've sold hundreds of thousands of books, with 77,000 books finding new homes last year alone,' BSL's head of social enterprises, Alison Fletcher, says.
'Demand fluctuates throughout the year, peaking during key sales periods like EOFY and Black Friday. Rare and collectible books, literary classics and fiction remain particularly popular.'
As stores move online, though, they have one challenge to contend with: how to keep prices low while including postage.
Salvos has more than 400 stores around the country. One way around it is by giving customers the option to pick it up from a store if the product is close to them, says general manager of customer and strategy Sarah Knox.
They launched their online store in 2020 when Covid forced their brick-and-mortar stores to close. Knox says it was so popular the site crashed within 10 minutes. Now capable of handling a lot more traffic, she says they keep seeing an increase in customers.
Related: Let's face it, Australia could pick people from the crowd and still beat England | Geoff Lemon
'There is an increased demand for secondhand clothing,' she says.
'Some people are keen to shop secondhand because they know that it has a positive impact on the environment, and they can contribute to a circular economy.
'We also know that we're in a cost-of-living crisis, and some people, they know that shopping secondhand is a more affordable way of clothing their families.'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


USA Today
8 hours ago
- USA Today
'Weapons' and 'Freakier Friday' show Hollywood can have it both ways
Trying to figure out what audiences want is one of the most overcomplicated issues facing Hollywood. The best answer has always been the most inconvenient one to safety. It requires taking risks, a dedication to quality and a willingness to strike out every now and again in an effort to go for the home run. That can mean a new idea; that can mean going back to an idea you haven't created with in a while. It just means you've got to try. Audiences want their money's worth. They want something fresh and new, but they also want something comfortable and fun. They want to be challenged, yes, but they also want to turn their brains off for just a bit after a stressful work week and just enjoy familiar confines. They like the same thing, to be caught up with the trends, but they don't want too much of it. They're fickle, sure, but they're also consistent. They're willing to be surprised, willing to take a gamble one night on a movie with good word of mouth. However, they're also creatures of habit and often prefer to stick with what they know. However, no matter what it is, they want it to be worth the price of admission. That's the universal unifier; that's the tie that binds. Generations of studio executives will rise and fall trying to solve the very question that any average moviegoer could answer while hanging out in the lobby, slurping on Diet Coke while waiting for the show to start. They just want to watch a good movie. It could be Star Wars, it could be the rise of an exciting auteur with vision for years. One of those movies might make a lot more than the other, but franchise empires fall all the time over crumbling foundations. Audiences eventually wise up and stop showing up in droves when you keep shoveling them garbage. The most ardent fans may not care; the ones content with "more" over "worth." However, the causals will. It's why the Weapons/Freakier Friday one-two punch at the domestic box office this past weekend matters a ton. It's why the awesome Naked Gun reboot legging out matters and the latest Fantastic Four movie slipping does, too. It's why Sinners emerging as a word-of-mouth smash in the spring looms over the year, as does a Minecraft movie creating chaos (and lots of dollars) with Chicken Jockeys and a Smurfs movie bombing after getting terrible reviews. It matters that Weapons is a sensational surge of broadly accessible horror-comedy from a director (Zach Cregger) whose audacious debut Barbarian blew past its economical budget and gathered moss over the years on streaming as people told all their friends to check out that wild movie with the creepy basement. It matters that the film's startling $70-plus million global opening haul came on the back of excellent reviews and, very likely, folks who saw the guy from Barbarian made this new movie that looks like nothing they'd quite seen before. It also matters that an affable Freaky Friday update brought folks in, ones who saw the 2003 film with their parents when they were younger now possibly bringing their kids out to see the latest Disney body-swap comedy. It matters that Lindsay Lohan still holds cultural currency that extends past Netflix rom-coms, that legacy sequels don't have to be masterpieces to justify spending time in their worlds again. It matters that Freakier Friday was good enough to work, even if it wasn't great enough to usurp the beloved original. In a broken Hollywood where the Marvel machine no longer churns out consistent hits like in the past, where studios attempt to mimic specific successes instead of forging their own paths and focusing on quality, the answer may really not be all that hard. Weapons is really well done; a bit polarizing like the best water cooler movies often are. Freakier Friday is a good hang; not a movie you think too hard about but one you enjoy with the whole family. The new Naked Gun is a hoot, a clever way to dust off intellectual property to reignite the fledgling comedic genre. The Fantastic Four: First Steps was a piece of baked chicken, technically cooked to serve but lacking any distinct flavor or spice to keep the leftovers. It's too safe to stick with folks outside of the passionate Marvel fan base. People aren't telling their friends to see it. The film's dismal fall at the box office will still assuredly put its overall gross ahead of Weapons, Freakier Friday and The Naked Gun, but those films cost far less and will have a much easier time making a profit and sticking in the zeitgeist. The Fantastic Four has already withered on the cultural vine. As much as we fret about the health of the theatrical experience when the superheroes falter, hitting doubles all over the film calendar, even in the oft-sleepy month of August, is far, far more advantageous than just risking it all on the same player hitting the same grand slam over and over again. Eventually, even the best sluggers age out. As far as the viability of studio filmmaking goes, Weapons is the dream. It's Cregger tapping fully into his Sam Raimi creepy-funny horror maestro potential. It's violent, unsettling, impossible to predict and downright jubilant in its desire to please. It's not fussily cerebral as much as it is shrewd with how it plots and disseminates information, paced like a hair-raising page-turner from Hell and explicit in a way that somehow doesn't alienate the most casual filmgoers. It's really hard to get movies like Weapons right without trying to consider how they'll play to a wider audience, but Cregger has the magic touch. He knows how to appeal without sacrificing his vision. He's cooking up an artisan dish that doesn't push picky eaters out of the restaurant. He's meeting widespread needs with originality. Filmmakers like Christopher Nolan, Jordan Peele, Greta Gerwig and Ryan Coogler paved the recent path for a filmmaker like Cregger to come out, do his thing and thrive. They all took different paths to modern auteurism, with Nolan having been around for decades now and Gerwig just confirming her mainstream appeal with 2023's Barbie. It's the path Superman's James Gunn took to make signature superhero films that have survived the recent wave of fatigue. They're not studio machines; they're filmmakers working at the heights of their powers who made movies that were new enough to build goodwill with audiences. People wanted to see more of what they had to offer. We mourn that directors aren't household names like they used to be, but Weapons will give Cregger a newfound credibility. Coogler living up to his enormous potential with an original vampire movie this past spring in Sinners also gave him the year's most important financial success. Cregger blowing past expectations with Weapons builds on that momentum. Jason Blum confirmed the benefits of horror on a budget, but Peele, Coogler and Creggrer (and Ari Aster, to an extent) showed us why well-made event horror gets people out of the house in into the theaters. This is the blueprint to keep original studio movies alive. Find directors with vision who still know how to make movies for everybody. It's not as hard as it looks; this entire generation was raised on Steven Spielberg, for goodness sake. Market the movies and directors. Watch people come out and tell all of their friends. We don't need Sinners or Weapons sequels; we need more movies like Sinners and Weapons. Hopefully, Hollywood finally reinvests in big, fresh ideas from auteurs. However, Hollywood also needs to better select its shots far better when it comes to nostalgia. People get tired of watching the same-old thing over and over again, but nostalgia is always going to be part of the media ecosystem. As much as you cringe a bit at how nothing can ever stay dead in this day and age, you also accept the need for people to get the seconds they crave. Freakier Friday is a happy medium. Sure, it's not going to knock your socks off, but it's been a while since we've been in this mode to the point where more isn't necessarily a bad thing. The concept is a bit shaky (more body-swapping, this time, with four people?!), but director Nisha Ganatra and writer Jordan Weiss make it work. You get Lohan and Jamie Lee Curtis back to acting beyond their age, but you also get a sturdy story that is within the parameters of the original but just different enough to stand out. It's funny. It's got a good heart. It's just reverential enough without beating you over the head with callbacks to the original. It's about as well as this creative exercise could have gone, and it's probably going to have legs and be profitable. These movies are not high art, but they occupy an important space at the multiplex. We live in the never-ending cycle of nostalgic pull; that's why they keep making Jurassic movies and Robert Downey Jr. is coming back to the Marvel Cinematic Universe to play a different character. Inherently, moviegoing audiences can't help themselves to return to the well if the water still tastes like it used to. Eventually, they'll tire out of one flavor... but another will do. Hollywood needs to keep finding Freakier Fridays, too. No, they won't make any critic's top 10 list, but they scratch the shameless itch without insulting the audience's intelligence. If you can balance the old with the new in a way that doesn't disengage with quality, you can keep finding "Weapons and Freakier Friday" weekends. As badly as Hollywood wants another "Barbenheimer," these dual successes keep the lights on and keep the spirit of the form alive in ways that satisfy artistry and commerce. Isn't that the best-case scenario? No longer do studios have to hold their breaths, banking on the same-old superhero movies to make a billion dollars. You need those types of movies, but you need the mid-range successes, too. They keep movies alive. It's both good and scary for Hollywood for the Marvel machine to lose its regular mojo, where Spider-Man and Deadpool put butts in seats but the Thunderbolts and the Human Torch aren't working with the same fire. Eventually, the movie world was going to have to learn that investing in originality and vision can lead to positive results, and that these grossly expensive IP movies with little attention to detail just won't thrive on name alone. Yes, you can do the whole "pander to nostalgia" thing, but mix it up a little and don't forget to make a decent movie in the process. It's really not that hard. New franchises like Minecraft will form in the mountains, just as old franchises will gather dust for their inevitable nostalgic glow-ups down the road. The wheel in the sky keeps on turning. However, papering over shoddy storytelling with half-baked visual effects won't cut it in the long run. You have to spice things up.


Buzz Feed
9 hours ago
- Buzz Feed
Manny Jacinto Reads Thirst Tweets (Part Two)
Manny Jacinto, aka everyone's favorite dream man, is back to read another round of thirst tweets, and this time it's thirstier (and raunchier) than before. Watch Manny find out how much we all love him now. #MannyJacinto #FreakierFriday #StarWars

Miami Herald
12 hours ago
- Miami Herald
Apollo 13 commander's death highlights a sad reality: America is short on heroes
'Houston, we've had a problem.' Those words, from astronaut James Lovell to NASA, gripped the world for four days in 1970 as astronauts on Apollo 13 worked furiously to get back to earth after an oxygen tank exploded. Apollo 13 was the most well-known of Lovell's space flights but he flew three other missions and held the world record for time in space with 715 hours, 4 minutes and 57 seconds — a record later broken in 1973 by the Skylab 2 mission. Last week, when Lovell passed away at the age of 97, we lost an American hero. But his death also felt like something more: the sunsetting of an era when we celebrated people for what they achieved, not how famous they could become. A shift has taken place in our society away from Olympic athletes and astronauts and toward reality television stars and social media influencers. The idea of shared heroes, the kinds whose posters hung on bedroom walls of kids across America, encouraging them to aim higher and dream bigger, seems to be slipping away. Posters of Chicago Bulls players, Scottie Pippen and Michael Jordan hung on my wall when I was a kid and played basketball. I never dreamed of playing professionally, but they showed me what could be possible if you work hard: You can be successful and achieve your goals. Lovell, too, showed America what can happen when talent, discipline and opportunity meet. Fame — for Pippen, Jordan and Lovell — was a byproduct, not the point. But somewhere along the way, that has flipped. Today, anyone can be famous without having to do anything remarkable. The Kardashians are a much-discussed example. They're famous — not because of gold medals or moon landings, nor are they particularly talented — but because they allowed cameras to follow their daily lives. Now the Kardashians run a business empire that was born from their celebrity status rather than actual achievement. Compare that to Lovell, who managed to command a space mission that seemed destined to fail. The contrast reveals how we've redefined heroism. The belief that greatness comes through dedication, sacrifice and the pursuit of excellence has been upended. Recognition — a certain kind, anyway — now comes from viral videos on social media, not by adding meaningfully to society or changing the course of history. Social media has made fame easier to achieve but harder to sustain. We've lost shared heroes, the type who inspired kids across the country to lay in bed at night and wonder how they might achieve greatness themselves. This isn't to diminish social media influencers or their entrepreneurial success. Nor is it to suggest that all viral content lacks value. Rather, it's to observe that we've created a system where the path to recognition has become disconnected from the types of achievements that historically defined American heroes. We are the poorer for it. When Lovell and his Apollo 13 crew returned to earth after four harrowing days, America celebrated because their story of survival felt like a shared experience. That kind of shared pride seems rare these days. Fewer moments bind our culture together in collective awe. While heroes still exist — in classrooms, research labs and in our local communities — their stories are harder to spot, swamped by trending videos and celebrity gossip. Lovell didn't become famous because he wanted the spotlight. He became famous because, when everything went wrong, he stayed calm, used his training and brought Apollo 13 home safely. He was extraordinarily brave. That kind of heroism stands the test of time. If we allow fame to replace accomplishment, we risk losing more than American heroes. We lose a shared culture of American heroism that has long united us. Mary Anna Mancuso is a member of the Miami Herald Editorial Board. Her email: mmancuso@