Suicides in educational institutions: SC issues pan-India guidelines
A bench of Justices Vikram Nath and Sandeep Mehta said there remained a "legislative and regulatory vacuum" in the country with respect to a unified, enforceable framework for suicide prevention of students in educational institutions, coaching centres, and student-centric environments.
While issuing 15 guidelines, the bench said the measures should remain in force and binding, until such time as appropriate legislation or regulatory frameworks were enacted by the competent authority.
All educational institutions were directed to adopt and implement a uniform mental health policy, drawing cues from the "Ummeed" draft guidelines, the "Manodarpan" initiative, and the National Suicide Prevention Strategy.
"This policy shall be reviewed and updated annually and made publicly accessible on institutional websites and notice boards of the institutes," the bench said.
The top court highlighted Centre's preventive steps to mitigate the situation, with "Ummeed" draft guidelines meant to prevent school student suicides released by the Ministry of Education in 2023.
For a broader reach, the court said, the Ministry of Education launched "Manodarpan", mental health and well-being of students during the COVID-19 pandemic and beyond.
The verdict came on an appeal against an order of the Andhra Pradesh High Court, rejecting the plea to transfer the investigation over the unnatural death of a 17-year-old National Eligibility-cum-Entrance Test aspirant, preparing in Vishakhapatnam, to the CBI.
Passing a slew of guidelines, the bench said all educational institutions with 100 or more enrolled students should either appoint or engage at least one qualified counsellor, psychologist, or social worker with demonstrable training in child and adolescent mental health.
"Institutions with fewer students shall establish formal referral linkages with external mental health professionals," the verdict said.
The bench continued, "All residential-based institutions shall install tamper-proof ceiling fans or equivalent safety devices, and shall restrict access to rooftops, balconies, and other high-risk areas, in order to deter impulsive acts of self-harm."
All educational institutions, particularly coaching institutes or centres, were asked to refrain from segregating students' batches on the basis of academic performance, public shaming, or assignment of academic targets disproportionate to their capacities.
"All educational institutions shall establish robust, confidential, and accessible mechanisms for the reporting, redressal, and prevention of incidents involving sexual assault, harassment, ragging, and bullying on the basis of caste, class, gender, sexual orientation, disability, religion, or ethnicity," the order said.
The bench stressed on the need for zero tolerance when it came to retaliatory actions against complainants or whistle-blowers.
In all such cases, immediate referral to trained mental health professionals must be ensured, and the student's safety, physical and psychological, should be prioritised, it said.
"Failure to take timely or adequate action in such cases, especially where such neglect contributes to a student's self-harm or suicide, shall be treated as institutional culpability, making the administration liable to regulatory and legal consequences," the bench added.
All coaching hubs, including Jaipur, Kota, Chennai, Hyderabad, Delhi and Mumbai, were directed to implement heightened mental health protection and preventive measures.
The guidelines would apply to all educational institutions, including public and private schools, colleges, universities, training centres, coaching institutes, residential academies and hostels, irrespective of their affiliation.
The top court in a separate case took cognisance of suicides in educational institutions and directed the constitution of a National Task Force on mental health concerns of students and prevention of suicides in higher educational institutions.
"We may clarify that these guidelines are not in supersession but in parallel to the ongoing work of the National Task Force on mental health concerns of students and are being issued to provide an interim protective architecture in the interregnum," the bench clarified.
All states and union territories, as far as practicable, were directed to notify rules within two months mandating registration, student protection norms, and grievance redressal mechanisms for all private coaching centres.
The bench directed the Centre to file a compliance affidavit before it within 90 days detailing the steps taken to implement these guidelines and the monitoring systems put in place.
It posted the matter for October 27 for receiving the compliance report.
Dealing with the unnatural death case, the bench directed that the investigation shall be transferred to the CBI.
The CBI director was ordered to ensure immediate registration of case and the investigation being assigned to a team under the supervision of jurisdictional CBI superintendent.
This article was generated from an automated news agency feed without modifications to text.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Hindustan Times
2 hours ago
- Hindustan Times
Consumer panel orders Wockhardt Hospitals to pay ₹18 lakh for patient's death due to ICU delay
Mumbai, The Maharashtra consumer commission has held Wockhardt Hospitals, Nashik, guilty of deficiency in service for delay in shifting a young patient to the ICU, which led to his death. Consumer panel orders Wockhardt Hospitals to pay ₹ 18 lakh for patient's death due to ICU delay Patients have a "right to receive competent care and that too, in time as required", the State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission stated in its order passed earlier this month. The hospital has been directed to pay a compensation of ₹18 lakh to the victim's family for mental agony and harassment. As per the complaint filed by the victim's father, his son was admitted to Wockhardt Hospitals in Nashik on April 15, 2010, after suffering a nosebleed. The complainant claimed that his son's condition deteriorated significantly in the wee hours of April 16, when he complained of chest pain and uneasiness after collapsing while going to the bathroom. Despite his worsening condition, the patient was not admitted to the ICU until 7 am on April 16, he said. He alleged that the hospital unnecessarily continued treatment until afternoon to create evidence, even though he believed his son died around 8.30 am. The patient was officially declared dead at 12.50 pm, he said. The complainant accused the hospital and its doctors of gross medical negligence and deficiency in service. The patient required immediate ICU monitoring, but the hospital failed to admit him promptly despite his deteriorating condition. The patient eventually suffered a cardiac arrest and died. The complainant approached the state commission after the district forum had dismissed his plea. Wockhardt Hospitals and the respondent doctors denied any negligence, asserting that all protocols were followed. They contended that the patient's death was due to his long-standing medical conditions and non-compliance, specifically his unilateral decision to stop prescribed anti-hypertensive medication, which led to accelerated hypertension and a fatal heart attack. The hospital claimed that the patient's father had refused ICU admission. The commission, however, noted that no documentary proof was provided by the hospital to substantiate this claim. While it noted that the treating doctors exercised their utmost qualification, skill and showed no negligence, it held that the hospital's failure to shift the patient to the ICU in time, "amounts to the deficiency of services towards the patient as well as the complainant, which ultimately led to loss of a life". The commission emphasised that consent for ICU admission is not a legal requirement in life-threatening emergencies, citing the Supreme Court rulings which mandate immediate treatment in emergencies, even without consent, if delay can be fatal. The right to emergency medical care is a part of the right to life under Article 21 of the Constitution, the commission stated. Considering the mental agony and harassment suffered by the deceased's family, the commission directed the hospital to pay them compensation of ₹18 lakh with 6 per cent interest per annum from October 26, 2010, until the realisation of the amount. This article was generated from an automated news agency feed without modifications to text.
News18
2 hours ago
- News18
Maharashtra reports six fresh COVID-19 cases
Last Updated: Mumbai, July 29 (PTI) Maharashtra recorded six COVID-19 cases on Tuesday, taking the tally to 2,726 since January, the state public health department said. It stated that 43 patients, including 42 with comorbidities and one with another disease, have succumbed to the infection so far this year. Of the six infections, two are reported in Mumbai and one each in municipal areas of Thane, Kalyan, Navi Mumbai, and Chhatrapati Sambhajinagar. Mumbai's tally of cases stands at 1,091, including 551 infections reported in June and 99 in July. The health department conducted 41,872 COVID-19 tests across Maharashtra so far this year. The number of recoveries is 2,650. PTI SM NSK First Published: Disclaimer: Comments reflect users' views, not News18's. Please keep discussions respectful and constructive. Abusive, defamatory, or illegal comments will be removed. News18 may disable any comment at its discretion. By posting, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy.
India Today
3 hours ago
- India Today
How to put an end to Hepatitis B
(NOTE: This article was originally published in the India Today issue dated August 4, 2025)Every 30 seconds, globally, someone dies from hepatitis-related liver infections—amounting to 1.3 million deaths annually as per WHO 2024 estimates. The Hepatitis B Virus (HBV) alone contributes to nearly 900,000 of these deaths, mostly due to cirrhosis and liver cancer. That's more than malaria, and approaching tuberculosis levels. The virus is carried by an estimated 29 million Indians—the second-highest number globally. And yet, despite having a protective vaccine and effective antivirals for over three decades, we have failed to eliminate it. Why?advertisementThe painful truth: doctors have failed to engage society. We treated HBV as a medical issue, not a societal one like COVID-19, HIV or tuberculosis. For most people, the infection lasts less than six months. For others, it can get chronic and seriously damage the liver. Shockingly, less than 10 per cent of infected individuals are diagnosed; stigma around sexual transmission of the virus has led to under 5 per cent receiving treatment. This ignorance is far from bliss. The HBV can spread through blood, semen, saliva and other bodily fluids, as well as maternally. But the infected are not at the real case of 67-year-old Dr D. Basu (name changed) from Hubli. A CT scan for mild abdominal discomfort revealed a 5 cm liver cancer. He had tested HBV-positive 35 years ago, but never followed up or took treatment. He even hid the diagnosis from his family. When we treated his cancer, his brother and 37-year-old daughter Kalyani also tested positive, likely due to maternal transmission and later sexual or vertical transmission. This tragic case underlines some key precautions to follow. Periodic monitoring in the HBV-infected is a must—one in 10 of those infected develop cirrhosis or cancer. Patients undergo repeated testing but get no treatment as current guidelines are restrictive, excluding nearly 60 per cent from treatment. Patients live with anxiety, fear and stigma. We must move from treating a select few to treating all HBV-positives. One pill, like tenofovir, taken daily can suppress the virus lifelong, halt transmission and prevent Dr Basu's daughter, could have been protected with a birth dose. She was not given HBV vaccination at birth. India's birth-dose coverage is just 63 per cent. Despite being one of the cheapest vaccines and India being a major vaccine producer, the HBV vaccine is scarcely available in private markets here and public awareness is dismal. Only 4.4 per cent of Delhi's adults are fully vaccinated. Are you? Sadly, nearly one-third of health professionals aren't either. Every Indian child and adult should know: the HBV vaccine is safe, effective and for taught us the power of self-testing. All close contacts of the HBV-infected must be screened. Enact anti-discrimination laws in education, workplaces and healthcare. We need HBV kits to enable one-stop testing and treatment. At least 80 per cent of diagnosed patients must be linked to free, accessible treatment. Integrating HBV services with programmes for prenatal care, non-communicable diseases, HIV and tuberculosis is essential. We must integrate hepatitis testing into routine healthcare check-ups and general population-based screening. Pregnant women should be screened for both HBV and Hepatitis C Virus (HCV)—the latter spreads only through blood contact and affects 5.5 million launched the National Viral Hepatitis Control Program (NVHCP) on July 28, 2018—one of the world's largest campaigns aiming to eliminate viral hepatitis by 2030. It offers free diagnosis and treatment for HBV and HCV. While impressive work on screening has been done, the treatment uptake remains low. We need a massive awareness drive and a movement for public around 3,500 global hepatitis deaths daily—11 per cent from India—the crisis demands urgency. Every avoidable death is a call to act. Each preventable infection highlights our collective failure, and an opportunity to act. We need a society-wide approach, powered by political will, scientific leadership and strong community engagement. Let us break it down. No shame. No blame. Just a cure.—The author is Professor of Eminence, Chancellor, ILBS UniversitySubscribe to India Today Magazine- EndsTrending Reel
