Man who stole knife from Doncaster College kitchen jailed
"What you did on that day was extremely frightening for everyone involved," he added.Followed by the teacher and a member of security staff, Heeley-Luty first went into the college canteen, then left and went around the side of the college building.The teacher said he had his hand in his trouser waistband, was "bouncing around" and swearing that one of the other men owed him money, the judge heard.When one of the men threatened to shoot him, Heeley-Luty swiped at him with the kitchen knife, leaving witnesses "astounded" no one was harmed. None of those involved were students at the college.Six people were arrested following the fight and the college on Chappell Drive was evacuated as a precaution and searched by police.Heeley-Luty, of no fixed address, was subject to two year-long community orders at the time, one for possessing a bladed article and theft and another for battery.He called the police on himself at the first incident and officers recovered a potato peeler, which he said he was carrying to defend himself, and stolen Greggs sandwiches.Richard Davies, prosecuting, said Heeley-Luty had stopped using cannabis in January as it had been making him paranoid and aggressive.Ed Moss, defending, told the judge of his "unstable" upbringing, mental health difficulties, and personality and learning disorders."He is someone who has had difficulties literally from the day he was born," he said."His whereabouts as a baby were unknown for eight weeks. His foster parents say this has had an impact upon him."
Constant paranoia
All those involved in assessing Heeley-Luty had found he was vulnerable to exploitation, Mr Moss added, due to his age, inexperience in the prison system and mental health issues."He tried to lead a normal life, and accepts he fails in some ways. He has plans for where he goes next and he is not workshy," he said."His offending is sliding off the scale in the wrong direction at a rapid rate, and he has a desire to correct that."Mr Moss said he "constantly" showed traits of paranoia.He said Heeley-Luty found prison very difficult during remand and was "very much alone, with no associates" inside.The defendant was also convicted of having a bladed article in a public place in 2022, making this his third crime involving a weapon.Mr Davies said: "Several staff members [at the college] described fearing for their safety and one described it as 'very traumatic'."Multiple staff and students were aware of the knife, and it clearly caused concern."Recorder Kelbrick said he would not sentence Heeley-Luty as a dangerous offender, given this was his first and only custodial sentence.Heeley-Luty appeared on a video link from HMP Doncaster wearing a rosary around his neck.He thanked the judge as his sentence was delivered.
Listen to highlights from South Yorkshire on BBC Sounds, catch up with the latest episode of Look North
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Mail
13 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Revealed: Two in every five phones thefts across Europe happen in the UK as government battles to get to grips with rise in county lines snatcher gang chaos
Two in every five phone thefts across Europe happen in the UK, new figures claim, as the government attempts to grapple with county line gangs turning to phone snatching. And harrowing figures show London is at the centre of the snatching chaos, with one in every six phones nabbed across the continent happening in the capital, according to American insurance firm, SquareTrade. After surveying data across its 12 European markets, it found despite Brits only accounting for 10 percent of their customers on the continent, they made up 39 percent of all phone loss claims. Nearly half of phone theft in the UK happened in London, according to the gadget insurance firm, with Birmingham following in second place. Phone snatching incidents also occurred more frequently in summer months and Christmas, aligning with busier travel months, shopping periods as well as festivals. Britain has become 'leading country for missing devices in Europe', the company told The Times, with claims of phone theft has quadrupling since June 2021. Latest statistics from the Crime Survey for England and Wales also indicated 'theft from a person' rose by half in the last year to 483,000 incidents, with the most common object snatched in the category being mobile phones. In 2024, 70,371 phones were stolen in London alone, and in 2020, around 20,000 phone thefts were reported, however, due to a lack of reporting from victims, the figures are likely to be higher. Last September, the Home Office promised to crackdown on phone thefts by increasing patrols in the most at risk areas, while adding Operation Opal, the national police intelligence unit, would also be honing in on crooks. Phone thefts are estimated to cost Londoners and its visitors at least £ 70million, according to the Metropolitan Police. The mayor of London, Sir Sadiq Khan was also accused by City Hall Conservatives of 'virtually ignor[ing the problem, even though he remained adamant he was continuing to support the force with 'record funding' to tackle the epidemic. The most stolen devices were iPhones, SquareTrade reported, with claims on average totalling to £1,200. The iPhone 15 Pro Max was the most commonly stolen device, with the iPhone 16 Pro Max coming in second place, followed by the Galaxy S24 Ultra. Kevin Gillan, the managing director, of Square TradeEurope, told The Times: 'July creates a perfect storm — festivals, holidays, and crowded spaces increase the risk of theft. London is especially vulnerable, and the UK now leads Europe in phone theft claims.' It comes as county lines gangs have turned to snatching phones instead of dealing drugs to feed a growing £70m a year epidemic. Gang members are grooming vulnerable young people to steal mobiles on Britain's streets due to unprecedented overseas demand and softer sentences for those who are caught. Stolen phones are being shipped abroad in bulk and sold around the world, a police chief warned, with some 80 per cent of the 80,000 phones stolen every year in London ending up overseas. A Mail investigation tracked down a phone stolen from an estate agent on the capital's famous Baker Street across the globe to a high-rise block in Hong Kong, where it sat alongside hundreds of thousands of other handsets. And a police chief in charge suggested the likes of Apple and Google had the gift to stop the trade by making a phone worthless after being taken. At least 230 phones were stolen every day on average in the UK last year - twice as many as five years ago and rising all the time. London is the epicentre, making up roughly 75 per cent of phone thefts, but it is clear the problem is nationwide, with every major force recording thousands of stolen phones every year.
Sky News
13 minutes ago
- Sky News
Hackers prove age verification systems on pornography sites can be bypassed in seconds
Ethical hackers have shown Sky News how new age verification systems can be bypassed on pornographic websites in a matter of seconds. On Friday, toughened rules came into force that mean companies hosting adult content online must block under-18s using "highly effective age verification". That could include AI tools that use pictures to estimate someone's age, bank or ID checks, or more technical solutions using browser cookies. But hours later, two ethical hackers demonstrated just how simple it is to get around the measures designed to protect young people on the internet. Using widely available technology, Chris Kubecka and Paula Popovici quickly accessed numerous pornography sites without ever verifying their ages. Their devices were running standard software, and the tricks they used were simple. This, Ms Kubecka said, showed the systems will not be effective at stopping under-18s from accessing explicit content online. The simplicity of their method was confirmed by multiple viewers, who contacted Sky News to say they had also managed to bypass the systems. One viewer said it had taken him "less than 30 seconds". 3:53 Although Sky News has verified the methods used by Ms Kubecka and Ms Popovici, we won't give details or name any software used. Some of the explicit websites they checked had not turned on any age verification, despite declaring in June that they would. In response to our findings, Ofcom said these checks "will help stop young children from stumbling across porn". The regulator added: "While the new rules have only been in place for a matter of hours, we will be actively assessing compliance to make sure platforms have age checks in place and that they are highly effective. "Companies that fall short can expect to face enforcement action." 1:36 A spokesperson for the Department for Science, Innovation and Technology told Sky News: "We expect these laws to be robustly implemented by tech companies. If they fail to do so, the regulator is ready to take severe enforcement action, including tough fines." There is also a risk that age verification could push users towards more dangerous corners of the internet in search of pornography. By 10am on Friday, data suggested an extra 66,000 internet users in the UK had begun using the dark web. Ms Kubecka fears this number may only increase. "That is one of the concerns that I have because I don't want illegal or extreme content being normalised in our teens," she said. 1:22 Google Trends data shows searches for online tools to help people bypass age verification have surged, too. Ofcom told Sky News it had been clear that sites "must not encourage or direct users to get around age checks". "People should be aware that children and adults who use [certain software] to bypass age checks will not benefit from the wider protections offered by our online safety rules." Despite those warnings, in the days running up to the rules being enforced, advertising data shows companies were targeting UK users and promoting tools that could bypass the verification. "Platforms have clear legal obligations and must actively prevent children from circumventing safety measures, including blocking content that promotes ... workarounds targeting young users."
The Guardian
an hour ago
- The Guardian
Australian actor Rebel Wilson sued by production company behind her own film
The legal drama surrounding The Deb, Rebel Wilson's directorial debut, has made landfall in Australia, with one of the production companies behind the venture filing a lawsuit against Wilson in the New South Wales supreme court this week. UK-based AI Film, represented by Australian legal firm Giles George and high-profile barrister Sue Chrysanthou SC, accused the Pitch Perfect Australian actor of deliberately sabotaging the film's release, alleging threats and defamatory claims had caused the production company financial and reputational damage. The suit also claims the motive behind Wilson's actions was to devalue the production's worth and pressure AI Film and Australian company Dunburn Debutantes Commissioning Company (DDCC – the entity managing the film's rights and named as the second plaintiff in the lawsuit) into selling their stake to Wilson's company Camp Sugar. Originally conceived as a quirky musical comedy celebrating Australian culture, The Deb was co-produced by AI Film and Camp Sugar, with Wilson directing and starring. But the partnership fractured in mid-2024 when Wilson took to Instagram to accuse fellow producers Amanda Ghost, Gregor Cameron and Vince Holden of alleged embezzlement, sexual misconduct and obstructing the film's release. The allegations, broadcast to Wilson's 11 million followers, were swiftly denied by the producers who began defamation proceedings against Wilson in the Los Angeles superior court last July. In November, the film's lead actor, Charlotte MacInnes, who Wilson claimed was the victim of the alleged sexual misconduct, filed a declaration in the US court stating that Wilson fabricated the claims, describing them as 'completely false and absurd'. The court subsequently threw out Wilson's bid to strike out the defamation suit, not accepting her lawyer's argument that under California's anti-Slapp laws, the accusations she had made against the producers of her The Deb constituted 'protected activity' and were a matter of public interest. That defamation case remains ongoing. After filing its lawsuit in the supreme court's equities division on Thursday, AI Film issued the following statement: 'These proceedings are regrettable but essential to ensure The Deb's timely release. It's a joyous, fun film, and we are sure that audiences are going to love it.' And MacInnes issued a second statement, saying: 'I love this film and I can't wait for it to be released … it would be wonderful if these proceedings can help make that happen.' Wilson's Californian legal team, Freedman Taitelman + Cooley, which is handling the defamation case, did not respond to the Guardian's request for comment. In its lawsuit filed this week, Giles George claims that on 5 January, Wilson's lawyer Bryan Freedman responded to correspondence by AI Film's legal team, saying that 'Wilson is currently in active discussions to outright purchase The Deb (the 'Film') and all associated rights and title'. The Freedman letter also threatened to 'pursue all claims and damages should Al Film or any agents acting on its behalf interfere with that business opportunity'. AI Film is alleging that Wilson's motivation behind her alleged undermining of distribution efforts, including making threats to seek an injunction against the film's release, was personal financial gain. AI Film's lawyers claim that on 6 June 2025, Wilson had a discussion with film distributor Kismet, who was bidding to secure the rights for the theatrical release of The Deb in Australia, during which she said words to the effect that she was supportive of Kismet as the Australian distributor of the film but while there was a legal case involving the film in the US she could not support the film's distribution and would seek an injunction if any attempts to distribute the film were made. Giles George alleges Wilson knew the legal proceedings in the US were not impeding the film's release, and knew the threat of injunction was against her and her company, Camp Sugar's, contractual obligations. But as evidence in Byran Freedman's correspondent to them in January, Wilson was delaying the film's release so that she could pursue the 'business opportunity' of buying all rights to the film outright. AI Film is seeking damages, a formal apology, corrective advertising and a permanent restraint on Wilson and her company making any further disparaging and incorrect claims relating to other companies and individuals involved in the making of The Deb, which have come to been know in legal circles as 'The Wilson Statements'. The best public interest journalism relies on first-hand accounts from people in the know. If you have something to share on this subject you can contact us confidentially using the following methods. Secure Messaging in the Guardian app The Guardian app has a tool to send tips about stories. Messages are end to end encrypted and concealed within the routine activity that every Guardian mobile app performs. This prevents an observer from knowing that you are communicating with us at all, let alone what is being said. If you don't already have the Guardian app, download it (iOS/Android) and go to the menu. Select 'Secure Messaging'. SecureDrop, instant messengers, email, telephone and post See our guide at for alternative methods and the pros and cons of each.
