China, Japan close to resuming seafood imports after Fukushima ban
[BEIJING] China and Japan said on Friday they were moving closer to ending a years-long dispute over Tokyo's handling of nuclear wastewater that prompted Beijing to ban imports of Japanese seafood.
In 2023, Japan began gradually releasing treated wastewater from the stricken Fukushima nuclear plant into the Pacific Ocean.
The move was backed by the International Atomic Energy Agency, but drew sharp criticism from Beijing, which banned Japanese seafood imports as a result.
China indicated on Friday that it was edging closer to lifting the ban, saying talks with Japanese officials in Beijing this week had 'achieved substantial progress'.
'So far this year, the two sides have carried out several rounds of technical exchanges,' Beijing's customs administration said in a statement, without giving further details.
Japan's Chief Cabinet Secretary Yoshimasa Hayashi said Beijing and Tokyo had 'reached an agreement on the technical requirements necessary to resume exports of fishery products to China'.
BT in your inbox
Start and end each day with the latest news stories and analyses delivered straight to your inbox.
Sign Up
Sign Up
'Exports to China will resume as soon as the re-registration process for export-related facilities is completed,' Hayashi said on Friday.
'We regard this as a major milestone,' he told a press conference.
China previously said it had found no abnormalities in seawater and marine life samples it independently collected near the Fukushima plant in February, but indicated more tests were needed before revoking the ban.
In 2011, a huge earthquake triggered a deadly tsunami that swamped the Fukushima nuclear facility and pushed three of its six reactors into meltdown.
China, whose ties with Japan have long been strained by Tokyo's imperial legacy, vociferously opposed the release of the treated wastewater, casting it as environmentally irresponsible. AFP
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Straits Times
2 hours ago
- Straits Times
China says US ‘should not play with fire' on Taiwan, slams Hegseth speech
US Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth speaking at this year's Shangri-la Dialogue on May 31. ST PHOTO: KEVIN LIM China says US 'should not play with fire' on Taiwan, slams Hegseth speech BEIJING - China on June 1 warned the United States it 'should not play with fire' over Taiwan and said it had lodged 'representations' with Washington over comments made by Pentagon chief Pete Hegseth at a summit in Singapore. The US Secretary of Defence used his speech at an annual security forum on May 31 to warn that China was 'credibly preparing' to use military force to upend the balance of power in Asia. He added that the Chinese military was building the capabilities to invade Taiwan and 'rehearsing for the real deal'. In a statement released just after midnight, China's foreign ministry said it had 'lodged solemn representations with the US side' over Mr Hegseth's comments, adding that it 'strongly deplores' his remarks. 'The US should not try to use the Taiwan issue as a bargaining chip to contain China and should not play with fire,' it said. Beijing, which did not send its defence minister, Admiral Dong Jun, to the Singapore summit, called the 'Taiwan issue' China's 'internal affair' and said foreign countries had no right to interfere. China considers the self-ruled democratic island as its territory and has not ruled out using force to take control of it. Mr Hegseth also accused Beijing of 'illegally seizing and militarising lands' in the disputed South China Sea. Beijing claims almost the entire waterway, despite an international ruling that its assertion has no merit. The foreign ministry on June 1 claimed there had 'never been any issue' with navigation in the waterway. China 'is committed to safeguarding its territorial sovereignty and maritime rights and interests in accordance with the law', a ministry spokesperson said. Beijing also accused the US of turning the Indo-Pacific region into a 'powder keg' by deploying weapons in the South China Sea. AFP Join ST's Telegram channel and get the latest breaking news delivered to you.
Straits Times
3 hours ago
- Straits Times
Shangri-La Dialogue 2025: Did China really take a back seat by not sending its defence minister?
Major General Hu Gangfeng (C), Vice President of National Defense University of Chinese People's Liberation Army attends the Shangri-La Dialogue Summit in Singapore on May 31, 2025. (Photo by MOHD RASFAN / AFP) AFP Shangri-La Dialogue 2025 Did China take a back seat by not having its defence minister attend top security meet? SINGAPORE - Almost everyone was talking about China at the Shangri-La Dialogue this weekend. The main question: Why did Beijing opt not to send its defence minister? For the large part of the three-day security forum held at the Shangri-La Hotel in Singapore, China was not around to push back against the criticisms levied against it. But it appears that this was a calculated loss that Beijing is prepared to accept. US Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth mentioned China about 20 times in his speech on May 31, as he urged other countries in the Indo-Pacific to increase their defence expenditure, buy more American arms and buffer themselves against the 'threat' posed by China. French President Emmanuel Macron on May 30 invited the security policymakers and military chiefs attending the forum to think of Russia's aggression in Ukraine as what China might do to Taiwan or the Philippines. The role of the Chinese defence minister is to conduct defence diplomacy and explain China's security positions to other countries. Had he been at this weekend's top security gathering in Singapore, Beijing would have had the podium for over an hour to respond to Washington and address the concerns raised by other delegates. Not this year. For the first time since 2019, China's defence minister did not attend. This meant the platform set aside for China had to be downsized accordingly. Its delegation chief – a military scholar with the rank of a one-star general – spoke in a smaller room to a smaller audience for a shorter time than the minister would have had. He was one of five panellists at one of the three concurrent sessions at the end of the day on May 31. As the vice-president of the People's Liberation Army National Defence University, Rear-Admiral Hu Gangfeng is not involved in combat operations or policymaking. He gave a brief response to Mr Hegseth's speech, dismissing his criticisms as 'unfounded accusations' and going against the spirit of the forum, to reduce and not magnify differences. The Chinese embassy in Singapore, which belongs to the ministry of foreign affairs and usually remains backstage at the defence ministry-driven Shangri-La Dialogue, made the unusual move of posting a response to Mr Hegseth's speech on its Facebook page, describing it as 'steeped in provocations and instigation' and a relentless hyping of the China threat. But China's overall response to its critics at the forum this year was markedly low-key compared with the year before. In 2024, the Chinese defence ministry officials briefed reporters hours after then US Defence Secretary Lloyd Austin gave his speech; Minister Dong Jun held court at a plenary session the next day; and just before the forum ended, four or five military experts stood in different corners of a hotel room to answer journalists' questions almost in a speed-dating format. Did China shoot itself in the foot by ceding the space at the annual forum for the US to run with its narrative of rallying allies and partners in the region against Beijing? Not necessarily. A Chinese security expert explained that while the delivery style may differ, whoever represents China at the forum is expected to deliver the same talking points that have been pre-cleared by the senior leadership, at the apex of which is President Xi Jinping, the de facto commander-in-chief. He declined to be named as he was not cleared to speak to the media. Rear-Adm Hu alluded to this on May 31 when pressed to explain the absence of the defence minister: 'Objectively speaking, I'm the appointed person today to convey our thinking and exchange views with you all. I suppose you would've heard clearly our true thinking.' He argued that China's representation at the forum changes over the years, and this variance should be seen as a 'perfectly normal work arrangement that does not impact the actual efficacy of our sharing of defence policy thinking'. But this does not mean that China has given up on the Shangri-La Dialogue and will never send its defence minister again. Rear-Adm Hu reaffirmed that China still values and sees the forum as a 'very good platform to engage and discuss with all parties about regional cooperation in Asia-Pacific'. This raises the question – if so, why didn't Beijing send its top defence diplomat here? Observers have proffered a number of theories for Admiral Dong's no-show. A likely explanation is that since the leaders of China and the US have not talked and decided at the highest level on how to manage the bilateral relations, which are fractious across trade, politics and security, there is not much that their defence ministers can meet and talk about, in practical terms. Having bilateral meetings on the sidelines of the forum in the third-party ground of Singapore is the other main purpose of being here, besides to speak at the forum. For example, when Adm Dong attended the forum in 2024 for the first time as defence minister, his bilateral meetings with the then Defence Secretary was crucial for a reset of China-US military ties, which had stalled after then US House Speaker Nancy Pelosi angered China by visiting Taiwan in 2022. Given the uncertainty and unpredictability of bilateral ties, China may have opted for a conservative, wait-and-see approach this year by sending a lower-level representation. Another supplementary consideration is: While Adm Dong appeared to have been in the clear after reportedly being questioned for corruption last year, rumours of other generals being investigated for corruption continue to surface . The absence of high-level military officials would forestall awkward questions, even in casual conversation . As with many things related to the Communist Party of China, the full picture may never emerge. Two scholars in the official Chinese delegation confessed to The Straits Times that they simply did not know the reason Adm Dong did not attend this year's forum. For this year, Mr Hegseth gets the spotlight all to himself. Yew Lun Tian is a senior foreign correspondent who covers China for The Straits Times. Join ST's WhatsApp Channel and get the latest news and must-reads.
Straits Times
3 hours ago
- Straits Times
Germany's Merz heads to US for talks on Ukraine, trade, Middle East
German Chancellor Friedrich Merz will meet US President Donald Trump at the White House on June 5. PHOTO: REUTERS Germany's Merz heads to US for talks on Ukraine, trade, Middle East BERLIN - Germany's Chancellor Friedrich Merz will on June 5 meet US President Donald Trump for talks at the White House with the Ukraine and Middle East conflicts, as well as rocky trade relations, on the agenda. The talks will focus on relations between the two countries, German government spokesman Stefan Kornelius said on May 31, as well as 'the Russian war of aggression against Ukraine, the situation in the Middle East and trade policy'. The talks will be the first time the two leaders have met and mark Mr Merz's first official visit as Germany's new Chancellor. Mr Trump has rattled Europe with shifts in security and trade policy since returning to the White House, including an array of tariffs on European partners. Speaking at the WDR Europaforum conference on May 26, Mr Merz said the European Union could retaliate with measures against US technology companies or other tariffs if the transatlantic trade conflict escalates. 'We shouldn't react heedlessly and hectically,' Mr Merz said. 'But if we can't do anything else, we would need to use this tool.' At the same time, Mr Merz's government, which last week said it would help Kyiv develop long-range missiles, wants to make sure that Washington will not walk away from Ukraine whilst it is at war with Russia. Mr Merz and Mr Trump have already had several telephone conversations, with the two earlier in May agreeing to visit each other, without giving dates. AFP Join ST's Telegram channel and get the latest breaking news delivered to you.
